Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neurosurgery ; 42(2): 414-21; discussion 421-2, 1998 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9482198

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Source modeling by magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) may be useful techniques for noninvasive localization of epileptogenic zones for surgery in patients with partial seizures. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: Simultaneous recordings of MEG and EEG, obtained in two patients, were coregistered on each patient's magnetic resonance image for direct comparison of these two methods with intracranial electrocorticography. TECHNIQUE: The average difference between MEG and EEG for localization of the same interictal spikes was approximately 2 cm in one patient and 3.8 cm in the other patient. One patient experienced a complex partial seizure during testing, which permitted comparison between interictal and ictal source localization by both MEG and EEG. The EEG ictal localization differed from the interictal one, whereas the MEG ictal and interictal localizations were more similar. In this patient, the MEG interictal source seemed to localize close to the ictal source, whereas EEG did not. The patients underwent temporal lobectomy after electrocorticography, and the results were compared with the findings of MEG and EEG. Although the results of both techniques agreed with the findings of electrocorticography, in one patient the MEG localization seemed to be more accurate. Both patients experienced good surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Both MEG and EEG source localization can add useful and complementary information for epilepsy surgery evaluation. MEG seemed to be more accurate than EEG, especially when comparing interictal versus ictal localization. Further study is needed to evaluate the validity of source localization as useful noninvasive techniques to localize the epileptogenic zone.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Electroencephalography , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/diagnosis , Magnetoencephalography , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male
2.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol ; 102(3): 159-66, 1997 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9129570

ABSTRACT

Dipole sources were localized in 3 patients with epilepsy using both the realistically shaped head model and the 3-sphere model. Interictal spikes were recorded from 63 closely spaced scalp electrodes. The scalp, skull, and brain surfaces were digitized from a MRI of each patient's head, and each surface was tessellated by 1600 triangles. Single dipole fits to the EEG were performed using both the realistically shaped head model and the 3-sphere model. The 2 models localized dipoles to positions that differed from one another by 1-3 cm. For dipoles localized to the temporal lobe, the most important difference between models was that the realistically shaped head model localized the dipole lower in the brain than the 3-sphere model. The realistically shaped head model was more in accordance with the ECoG findings than the 3-sphere model.


Subject(s)
Brain/pathology , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/pathology , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/physiopathology , Models, Neurological , Adolescent , Adult , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL