Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Minerva Med ; 100(5): 341-8, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19910887

ABSTRACT

AIM: As it is a non-invasive method, magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRCP) has almost completely replaced endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreato-biliary diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRCP in diagnosis of choledocholithiasis using ERCP/endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) as gold standard. METHODS: For this study 140 individuals, suspected for lithiasis of the common bile duct (CBD), were enrolled. After a clinical and biochemical evaluation, patients underwent upper abdominal ultrasonography, then MRCP and diagnostic and/or operative ERCP. RESULTS: Only 120 out of 140 patients completed the study. MRCP diagnosed lithiasis of CBD in 84. ERCP confirmed the lithiasis in 73/84 patients who were submitted to ES. Eleven were negative after ES. ERCP documented stones in 10 patients among the 36 negative at MRCP; stones were detected only in four patients after ES. In 26 out of 36 patients negative at MRCP, ERCP confirmed this response: only 12 out of 26 patients underwent ES. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, PPV and NPV of MRCP were: 88%, 72%, 83%, 87%, 72%. CONCLUSIONS: As the MRCP diagnostic yield is still limited with small stones, the question of which patient is the best candidate to ERCP/ES is still unsolved.


Subject(s)
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance , Gallstones/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Gallstones/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Endoscopy ; 41(10): 829-35, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19750448

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This study examines efficacy, outcome, and complications of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large (> or = 20 mm) and giant (> or = 40 mm) sessile and flat colorectal polyps. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All EMRs carried out at our institution over a 9-year period, for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps with an intensive and regular follow-up were evaluated. The rate of en bloc and piecemeal resection, complications, and recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 148 polyps were resected in 148 patients. There were 113 large polyps (76.3 %) with a mean size of 25 +/- 4.7 mm (range 20 - 39 mm) and 35 giant polyps (23.7 %) with a mean size of 48.8 +/- 12.5 mm (range 40 - 100 mm). The most frequent location was the rectum, occurring in 43.2 %. All lesions were removed in a single session. En bloc resection was performed in 65 cases (43.9 %) and piecemeal in 83 (56.1 %). Procedural bleeding occurred in 13 EMRs (8.8 %), and one case of early and one case of delayed bleeding also occurred. There were two cases of postpolypectomy syndrome and one case of perforation. Malignancy (intramucosal and invasive cancer) was mostly present in polyps with sessile shape ( P = 0.0013). Follow-up colonoscopy was performed in 142 patients for a mean of 29.8 months. Recurrence was observed in 6/142 (4.2 %) patients and was found more in patients with giant polyps ( P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience EMR is a simple and safe procedure for removing large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps, and is associated with a very low risk of complication and local recurrence.


Subject(s)
Intestinal Mucosa/surgery , Intestinal Polyps/surgery , Polyps/surgery , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intestinal Polyps/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Polyps/pathology , Rectal Diseases/pathology , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome
3.
Minerva Med ; 100(1): 115-21, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19078888

ABSTRACT

Gastric varices (GV) are less common than esophageal varices, but their management represents a particular challenge. When bleeding occurs is usually severe, requiring immediate supportive intensive care and has a high mortality rate. The best management of GV is supposed to be with a multidisciplinary approach and close cooperation between gastroenterologists, interventional radiologists and the surgical team. Many studies in literature reported high success rates with intravariceal injection of cyanoacrylate in acute GV bleeding. This agent obliterates the variceal lumen by solidification within the vein and more than 80% primary obliteration rates are achieved. In comparison with other endoscopic techniques as variceal band ligation or sclerotherapy with ethanolamine oleate, alcohol and sodium tetradecyl sulphate, cyanoacrylate has shown to be more effective, with a decrease in complications and mortality rates. The cyanoacrylate has shown effective also in the secondary prophylaxis with an incidence of re-bleeding that ranges between 15% and 30%. Actually, there is no scientific evidence supporting the application of cyanoacrylate in primary prophylaxis of bleeding from GV. Significant procedural, septic and embolic complications have been reported with cyanoacrylate glue injection. In conclusion, the endoscopic treatment with cyanoacrylate of actively bleeding GV, as well as the prophylaxis of the re-bleeding, is a safe and effective procedure and should be considered as a first-line therapy, whenever available.


Subject(s)
Cyanoacrylates/therapeutic use , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/therapy , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Sclerotherapy/methods , Tissue Adhesives/therapeutic use , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/complications , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastroscopy , Humans , Injections, Intravenous/adverse effects , Injections, Intravenous/methods , Secondary Prevention
4.
Dig Liver Dis ; 35(12): 907-10, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14703889

ABSTRACT

The case described here is of a 73-year-old male patient who developed a colocutaneous fistula following necrotizing pancreatitis, diagnosed by imaging and treated endoscopically by the application of an endoclip. Pancreatic and gastrointestinal fistulas, common complications of surgery for necrotizing pancreatitis, frequently require surgical treatment. Colonic perforations are the most difficult to treat surgically on account of the risk of peritonitis. A technique, namely, endoscopic clips application, has recently been developed to close anastomotic leakages and perforations of the oesophagus, stomach and colon. In the patient described here, endoscopic repair was technically easy and the good result was confirmed within a few days. In order to repair colonic fistulas following pancreatitis, application of endoclips could, in our opinion, provide a useful therapeutic option, feasible in selected patients.


Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases/etiology , Colonic Diseases/surgery , Cutaneous Fistula/etiology , Cutaneous Fistula/surgery , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Intestinal Fistula/etiology , Intestinal Fistula/surgery , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/surgery , Surgical Instruments , Aged , Humans , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Male , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Reoperation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...