Subcutaneous immunoglobulin in primary immunodeficiency - impact of training and infusion characteristics on patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) is increasingly utilized in primary immunodeficiency (PI). Understanding factors associated with treatment experience and satisfaction can optimize patient outcomes. We analyzed Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) survey data to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in relation to SCIG training and infusion characteristics. Respondents' PRO scores were rank ordered into 'best', 'intermediate', and 'worst' tertiles. Predicted probabilities of being in the best tertile with any combination of characteristics were generated for each PRO. RESULTS: In 366 SCIG respondents, higher odds of being in the best PRO tertile were driven by favorable training characteristics (particularly, higher confidence post-training and no training barriers) and efficient infusions (infusion preparation ≤20 min and actual infusion < 2 h). Age (≤17 years old) and treatment experience (> 2 years) increased the odds of being in the best tertiles. Compared with the least favorable training/infusion characteristics, those with the most favorable training/infusion characteristics had higher predicted probabilities of being in the best tertiles: TSQM side effects, 59% vs 4%; convenience, 52% vs 4%; effectiveness, 27% vs 13%; global, 26% vs 3%; PROMIS Fatigue, 44% vs 18%. CONCLUSIONS: Increased experience with SCIG consistently improved PROs, but our findings predicted that enhanced training and infusion characteristics improve patient treatment satisfaction beyond that achieved by experience alone.

Fatigue and the wear-off effect in adult patients with common variable immunodeficiency.

Patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) have increased fatigue compared with the general population. Fatigue is associated with lower quality of life (QoL), which is associated with higher mortality in CVID. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of self-reported fatigue for patients with CVID and to identify its possible drivers and burden on QoL. We analysed data from the 2013 Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) treatment survey. Answers were included from 873 CVID patients who responded (respondents). Of the 873 respondents included in the analysis, 671 (76·9%) reported fatigue, of whom 400 (83·7%) were receiving intravenous (i.v.) immunoglobulins (IVIG) and 271 (68·6%) were receiving subcutaneous (s.c.) immunoglobulins. This difference in fatigue between patients receiving IVIG and SCIG was statistically significant (P < 0·001). Dose and frequency of immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgGRT) did not affect fatigue prevalence. Fatigued patients on IVIG reported greater infection rates and required more anti-microbials during the wear-off period. Fatigued patients reported worse health status than non-fatigued patients, and had lower rates of employment, education, household income and school attendance than their non-fatigued counterparts. Fatigue is increased in CVID, especially among patients receiving IVIG, compared to SCIG. Fatigue has a significant impact on QoL and productivity in patients with CVID. Further studies to identify the mechanisms of fatigue are warranted to help advance therapeutic measures to treat this disease and improve patients' QoL and wellbeing.

Comparison of American and European practices in the management of patients with primary immunodeficiencies.

Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) comprise a heterogeneous group of rare disorders. This study was devised in order to compare management of these diseases in the northern hemisphere, given the variability of practice among clinicians in North America. The members of two international societies for clinical immunologists were asked about their management protocols in relation to their PID practice. An anonymous internet questionnaire, used previously for a survey of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI), was offered to all full members of the European Society for Immunodeficiency (ESID). The replies were analysed in three groups, according to the proportion of PID patients in the practice of each respondent; this resulted in two groups from North America and one from Europe. The 123 responses from ESID members (23·7%) were, in the majority, very similar to those of AAAAI respondents, with > 10% of their practice devoted to primary immunodeficiency. There were major differences between the responses of these two groups and those of the general AAAAI respondents whose clinical practice was composed of < 10% of PID patients. These differences included the routine use of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIg) for particular types of PIDs, initial levels of IVIg doses, dosing intervals, routine use of prophylactic antibiotics, perceptions of the usefulness of subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy (SCIg) and of the risk to patients' health of policies adopted by health-care funders. Differences in practice were identified and are discussed in terms of methods of health-care provision, which suggest future studies for ensuring continuation of appropriate levels of immunoglobulin replacement therapies.