Retrospective comparison of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies stratified by spontaneous or artificial conception.

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes of monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies by in vitro fertilization (IVF) vs. spontaneously conceived counterparts. METHODS: Retrospective comparison. Data about MCDA twin pregnancies, conceived spontaneously or by IVF, attending the Twin Pregnancy Care Unit of Sant'Anna Hospital in Turin (Italy) between January 1st 2010 and March 31st 2022, were collected retrospectively. Obstetric, fetal, and neonatal outcomes of MCDA twin pregnancies by IVF were compared to those of spontaneously conceived counterparts. Data were described by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 541 MCDA twin pregnancies were included in the study, among which 45 conceived by IVF and 496 spontaneously conceived. Women with IVF twins were older than those who conceived spontaneously (36.7 ± 5.7 vs. 32.1 ± 5.2 years; p<0.001). No significant difference in the prevalence of pregnancy complications between the two groups was found, except for an increased incidence of hypertensive disorders among IVF pregnancies (17.8 vs. 8.5 %; p=0.039), which resulted nonsignificant after adjusting for maternal age and parity (aOR 1.9, 95 % CI 0.8-4.6). Data about 1,046 live born babies (90 conceived by IVF and 956 spontaneously) were also collected: perinatal outcomes did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that MCDA twin pregnancies following IVF are not at increased risk of adverse outcomes compared to spontaneous MCDA twin pregnancies.

Provisional unicentric experience with an electronic incident reporting form in pediatric anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: To present and compare with literature our experience with an electronic anesthesia-related incident reporting form as a quality control measure at Gaslini Children's Hospital over a 19-month period. METHODS: All events that occurred between March 2009 and September 2010 were recorded. We adopted an electronic reporting form included in the online recording process of every anesthetic procedure. Events were divided into near misses and adverse events. Adverse events were further divided into incidents, minor events, and major events. Patients were divided into three age-groups: <1, between 1 and 3, and >3 years. RESULTS: A total of 12,850 anesthetics were performed. Eight (0.06%) near misses and 108 (0.8%) adverse events were reported. Adverse events occurred more frequently in infants. Of 108 events, 35 (32.4%), 61 (56.5%), and 12 (11.1%) were classified as incidents, minor, and major events, respectively. Of all the adverse events, 66 (61%) were respiratory, 27 (25%) organizational, six (5%) drug-related, four (4%) cardiocirculatory, and five (5%) miscellaneous. CONCLUSIONS: Infants were at the highest risk to experience adverse events. Although experimental electronic incident reporting proved to be feasible, there is reason to suspect that there was underreporting of near misses. Overreporting of near miss events may be enhanced by easier and more straightforward reporting forms as well as by better education for anesthetic providers about the importance of recognizing and reporting near misses.