Congenital absence of the vas deferens and unilateral renal agenesis: implications for patient and family.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: At routine groin surgery in male paediatric patients occasionally the vas deferens may be absent. This finding usually leads to investigations to establish the status of the contralateral vas deferens and the status of the kidneys. It is not uncommon to find either an ipsilateral renal agenesis or congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. The latter finding prompts a test for cystic fibrosis. We report three patients who upon investigation were found to have the rare combination of congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens and unilateral renal agenesis, and discuss the possible embryological basis, the clinical management and the long-term implications of these findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present three patients who were incidentally found to have absence of the vas deferens whilst undergoing elective groin surgery and following further tests were diagnosed with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens and unilateral renal agenesis. The case notes were reviewed, together with the results of radiological investigations, cystic fibrosis screening and the status of the contralateral vas deferens. RESULTS: All three patients were found to have congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens, unilateral renal agenesis and were not found to have cystic fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens and unilateral renal agenesis, without cystic fibrosis, is rare and not reported previously in the paediatric literature. These findings require appropriate counselling of the parents and child, with regards to the long-term implications of infertility and renal function.

Proximal colonic atresia: is right hemicolectomy inevitable?

PURPOSE: Proximal colonic atresia often results in a marked discrepancy of the atretic ends presenting a technical challenge for restoration of bowel continuity. We review our series of colonic atresia patients with particular reference to the techniques for restoring bowel continuity. METHODS: Case notes of all patients diagnosed with colonic atresia and admitted to our unit between 1997 and 2011 were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 13 patients with a median gestational age of 39 weeks. Location of the atresia was ascending colon (n = 1), hepatic flexure (n = 9), proximal transverse colon (n = 2) and sigmoid colon (n = 1). The primary procedure was: primary anastomosis (n = 1), right hemicolectomy followed by ileo-colic anastomosis (n = 2), right hemicolectomy and stoma formation (n = 3). Six patients underwent stoma formation, of which five subsequently had a right hemicolectomy at a later procedure. In total, 10/12 patients required right hemicolectomy to facilitate restoration of bowel continuity. Median time to full feeds was 11 days (4-46). Median follow up time was 11 months (22 days-5.6 years). CONCLUSION: A temporising stoma does not reduce the discrepancy in the calibre of the atretic ends in proximal colonic atresia. Right hemicolectomy and ileo-colic anastomosis should therefore be considered at the initial surgery.