Kinematic synergies show good consistency when extracted with a low-cost markerless device and a marker-based motion tracking system.

Recently, markerless tracking systems, such as RGB-Depth cameras, have spread to overcome some of the limitations of the gold standard marker-based tracking systems. Although these systems are valuable substitutes for human motion analysis, as they guarantee higher flexibility, faster setup time and lower costs, their tracking accuracy is lower with respect to marker-based systems. Many studies quantified the error made by markerless systems in terms of body segment length estimation, articular angles, and biomechanics, concluding that they are appropriate for many clinical applications related to motion analysis. We propose an innovative approach to compare a markerless tracking system (Kinect V2) with a gold standard marker-based system (Vicon), based on motor control assessment. We quantified kinematic synergies from the tracking data of fifteen participants performing multi-directional upper limb movements. Kinematic synergy analysis decomposes the kinematic data into a reduced set of motor primitives that describe how the central nervous system coordinates motion at spatial and temporal level. Synergies were extracted with the recently released mixed-matrix factorization algorithm. Four synergies were extracted from both marker-based and markerless datasets and synergies were grouped in 6 clusters for each dataset. Cosine similarity in each cluster was ⩾0.60 in both systems, showing good consistency of synergies. Good matching was found between synergies extracted from markerless and from marker-based data, with a cosine similarity between matched synergies ⩾0.60 in 5 out 6 synergies. These results showed that the markerless sensor can be feasible for kinematic synergy analysis for gross movements, as it correctly estimates the number of synergies and in most cases also their spatial and temporal organization.

Transferring Sensor-Based Assessments to Clinical Practice: The Case of Muscle Synergies.

Sensor-based assessments in medical practice and rehabilitation include the measurement of physiological signals such as EEG, EMG, ECG, heart rate, and NIRS, and the recording of movement kinematics and interaction forces. Such measurements are commonly employed in clinics with the aim of assessing patients' pathologies, but so far some of them have found full exploitation mainly for research purposes. In fact, even though the data they allow to gather may shed light on physiopathology and mechanisms underlying motor recovery in rehabilitation, their practical use in the clinical environment is mainly devoted to research studies, with a very reduced impact on clinical practice. This is especially the case for muscle synergies, a well-known method for the evaluation of motor control in neuroscience based on multichannel EMG recordings. In this paper, considering neuromotor rehabilitation as one of the most important scenarios for exploiting novel methods to assess motor control, the main challenges and future perspectives for the standard clinical adoption of muscle synergy analysis are reported and critically discussed.

SynergyAnalyzer: A Matlab toolbox implementing mixed-matrix factorization to identify kinematic-muscular synergies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A new direction in the study of motor control was opened about two decades ago with the introduction of a model for the generation of motor commands as combination of muscle synergies. Muscle synergies provide a simple yet quantitative framework for analyzing the hierarchical and modular architecture of the human motor system. However, to gain insights on the functional role of muscle synergies, they should be related to the task space. The recently introduced mixed-matrix factorization (MMF) algorithm extends the standard approach for synergy extraction based on non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) allowing to factorize data constituted by a mixture of non-negative variables (e.g. EMGs) and unconstrained variables (e.g. kinematics, naturally including both positive and negative values). The kinematic-muscular synergies identified by MMF provide a direct link between muscle synergies and the task space. In this contribution, we support the adoption of MMF through a Matlab toolbox for the extraction of kinematic-muscular synergies and a set of practical guidelines to allow biomedical researchers and clinicians to exploit the potential of this novel approach. METHODS: MMF is implemented in the SynergyAnalyzer toolbox using an object-oriented approach. In addition to the MMF algorithm, the toolbox includes standard methods for synergy extraction (NMF and PCA), as well as methods for pre-processing EMG and kinematic data, and for plotting data and synergies. RESULTS: As an example of MMF application, kinematic-muscular synergies were extracted from EMG and kinematic data collected during reaching movements towards 8 targets on the sagittal plane. Instructions and command lines to achieve such results are illustrated in detail. The toolbox has been released as an open-source software on GitHub under the GNU General Public License. CONCLUSIONS: Thanks to its ease of use and adaptability to a variety of datasets, SynergyAnalyzer will facilitate the adoption of MMF to extract kinematic-muscular synergies from mixed EMG and kinematic data, a useful approach in biomedical research to better understand and characterize the functional role of muscle synergies.

Biomechanical Analysis of Human Gait When Changing Velocity and Carried Loads: Simulation Study with OpenSim.

Walking is one of the main activities of daily life and gait analysis can provide crucial data for the computation of biomechanics in many fields. In multiple applications, having reference data that include a variety of gait conditions could be useful for assessing walking performance. However, limited extensive reference data are available as many conditions cannot be easily tested experimentally. For this reason, a musculoskeletal model in OpenSim coupled with gait data (at seven different velocities) was used to simulate seven carried loads and all the combinations between the two parameters. The effects on lower limb biomechanics were measured with torque, power, and mechanical work. The results demonstrated that biomechanics was influenced by both speed and load. Our results expand the previous literature: in the majority of previous work, only a subset of the presented conditions was investigated. Moreover, our simulation approach provides comprehensive data that could be useful for applications in many areas, such as rehabilitation, orthopedics, medical care, and sports.

Influence of Backpack Carriage and Walking Speed on Muscle Synergies in Healthy Children.

Four to five muscle synergies account for children's locomotion and appear to be consistent across alterations in speed and slopes. Backpack carriage induces alterations in gait kinematics in healthy children, raising questions regarding the clinical consequences related to orthopedic and neurological diseases and ergonomics. However, to support clinical decisions and characterize backpack carriage, muscle synergies can help with understanding the alterations induced in this condition at the motor control level. In this study, we investigated how children adjust the recruitment of motor patterns during locomotion, when greater muscular demands are required (backpack carriage). Twenty healthy male children underwent an instrumental gait analysis and muscle synergies extraction during three walking conditions: self-selected, fast and load conditions. In the fast condition, a reduction in the number of synergies (three to four) was needed for reconstructing the EMG signal with the same accuracy as in the other conditions (three to five). Synergies were grouped in only four clusters in the fast condition, while five clusters were needed for the self-selected condition. The right number of clusters was not clearly identified in the load condition. Speed and backpack carriage altered nearly every spatial-temporal parameter of gait, whereas kinematic alterations reflected mainly hip and pelvis adaptations. Although the synergistic patterns were consistent across conditions, indicating a similar motor pattern in different conditions, the fast condition required fewer synergies for reconstructing the EMG signal with the same level of accuracy.

Azure Kinect performance evaluation for human motion and upper limb biomechanical analysis.

Human motion tracking is a valuable task for many medical applications. Marker-based optoelectronic systems are considered the gold standard in human motion tracking. However, their use is not always feasible in clinics and industrial environments. On the other hand, marker-less sensors became valuable tools, as they are inexpensive, noninvasive and easy to use. However, their accuracy can depend on many factors including sensor positioning, light conditions and body occlusions. In this study, following previous works on the feasibility of marker-less systems for human motion monitoring, we investigate the performance of the Microsoft Azure Kinect sensor in computing kinematic and dynamic measurements of static postures and dynamic movements. According to our knowledge, it is the first time that this sensor is compared with a Vicon marker-based system to assess the best camera positioning while observing the upper body part movements of people performing several tasks. Twenty-five healthy volunteers were monitored to evaluate the effects of the several testing conditions, including the Azure Kinect positions, the light conditions, and lower limbs occlusions, on the tracking accuracy of kinematic, dynamic, and motor control parameters. From the statistical analysis of the performed measurements, the camera in the frontal position was the most reliable, the lighting conditions had almost no effects on the tracking accuracy, while the lower limbs occlusion worsened the accuracy of the upper limbs. The assessment of human static postures and dynamic movements based on experimental data proves the feasibility of applying the Azure Kinect to the biomechanical monitoring of human motion in several fields.

Phasic and tonic muscle synergies are different in number, structure and sparseness.

In the last two decades, muscle synergies analysis has been commonly used to assess the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying human motor control. Several synergy models and algorithms have been employed for processing the electromyographic (EMG) signal, and it has been shown that the coordination of motor control is characterized by the presence of phasic (movement-related) and tonic (anti-gravity and related to co-contraction) EMG components. Neural substrates indicate that phasic and tonic components have non-homogeneous origin; however, it is still unclear if these components are generated by the same set of synergies or by distinct synergies. This study aims at testing whether phasic and tonic components are generated by distinct phasic and tonic synergies or by the same set of synergies with phasic and tonic activation coefficients. The study also aims at characterizing the differences between the phasic and the tonic synergies. Using a comprehensive mapping of upper-limb point-to-point movements, synergies were extracted from phasic and tonic EMG signal separately, estimating the tonic components with a linear ramp model. The goodness of reconstruction (R2) as a function of the number of synergies was compared, and sets of synergies extracted from each dataset at three R2 threshold levels (0.80, 0.85, 0.90) were retained for further analysis. Then, shared, phasic-specific, and tonic-specific synergies were extracted from the two datasets concatenated. The dimensionality of the synergies shared between the phasic and the tonic datasets was estimated with a bootstrap procedure based on the evaluation of the distribution of principal angles between the subspaces spanned by phasic and tonic synergies due to noise. We found only few shared synergies, indicating that phasic and tonic synergies have in general different structures. To compare consistent differences in synergy composition, shared, phasic-specific, and tonic-specific synergies were clustered separately. Phasic-specific clusters were more numerous than tonic-specific ones, suggesting that they were more differentiated among subjects. The structure of phasic clusters and the higher sparseness indicated that phasic synergies capture specific muscle activation patterns related to the movement while tonic synergies show co-contraction of multiple muscles for joint stabilization and holding postures. These results suggest that in many scenarios phasic and tonic synergies should be extracted separately, especially when performing muscle synergy analysis in patients with abnormal tonic activity and for tuning devices with gravity support.

Evidence of synergy coordination patterns of upper-limb motor control in stroke patients with mild and moderate impairment.

Objectives: Previous studies showed that the central nervous system (CNS) controls movements by recruiting a low-dimensional set of modules, usually referred to as muscle synergies. Stroke alters the structure and recruitment patterns of muscle synergies, leading to abnormal motor performances. Some studies have shown that muscle synergies can be used as biomarkers for assessing motor function. However, coordination patterns of muscle synergies in post-stroke patients need more investigation to characterize how they are modified in functional movements. Methods: Thirteen mild-to-moderate stroke patients and twenty age-matched healthy subjects were recruited to perform two upper-limb movements, hand-to-mouth movement and reaching movement. Muscle synergies were extracted with nonnegative matrix factorization. We identified a set of reference synergies (i.e., averaged across healthy subjects) and typical synergies (i.e., averaged across stroke subjects) from the healthy group and stroke group respectively, and extracted affected synergies from each patient. Synergy similarity between groups was computed and analyzed. Synergy reconstruction analysis was performed to verify synergy coordination patterns in post-stroke patients. Results: On average, three synergies were extracted from both the healthy and stroke groups, while the mild impairment group had a significantly higher number of synergies than the healthy group. The similarity analysis showed that synergy structure was more consistent in the healthy group, and stroke instead altered synergy structure and induced more variability. Synergy reconstruction analysis at group and individual levels showed that muscle synergies of patients often showed a combination of healthy reference synergies in the analyzed movements. Finally, this study associated four synergy coordination patterns with patients: merging (equilibrium and disequilibrium), sharing (equilibrium and disequilibrium), losing, and preservation. The preservation was mainly represented in the mild impairment group, and the moderate impairment group showed more merging and sharing. Conclusion: This study concludes that stroke shows more synergy variability compared to the healthy group and the alterations of muscle synergies can be described as a combination of reference synergies by four synergy coordination patterns. These findings deepen the understanding of the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms and possible motor control strategies adopted by the CNS in post-stroke patients.

Biomedical Sensors for Functional Mapping: Techniques, Methods, Experimental and Medical Applications.

The rapid advancement of biomedical sensor technology has revolutionized the field of functional mapping in medicine, offering novel and powerful tools for diagnosis, clinical assessment, and rehabilitation [...].

A Narrative Review on Multi-Domain Instrumental Approaches to Evaluate Neuromotor Function in Rehabilitation.

In clinical scenarios, the use of biomedical sensors, devices and multi-parameter assessments is fundamental to provide a comprehensive portrait of patients' state, in order to adapt and personalize rehabilitation interventions and support clinical decision-making. However, there is a huge gap between the potential of the multidomain techniques available and the limited practical use that is made in the clinical scenario. This paper reviews the current state-of-the-art and provides insights into future directions of multi-domain instrumental approaches in the clinical assessment of patients involved in neuromotor rehabilitation. We also summarize the main achievements and challenges of using multi-domain approaches in the assessment of rehabilitation for various neurological disorders affecting motor functions. Our results showed that multi-domain approaches combine information and measurements from different tools and biological signals, such as kinematics, electromyography (EMG), electroencephalography (EEG), near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and clinical scales, to provide a comprehensive and objective evaluation of patients' state and recovery. This multi-domain approach permits the progress of research in clinical and rehabilitative practice and the understanding of the pathophysiological changes occurring during and after rehabilitation. We discuss the potential benefits and limitations of multi-domain approaches for clinical decision-making, personalized therapy, and prognosis. We conclude by highlighting the need for more standardized methods, validation studies, and the integration of multi-domain approaches in clinical practice and research.

Recent developments in muscle synergy analysis in young people with neurodevelopmental diseases: A Systematic Review.

The central nervous system simplifies motor control by sending motor commands activating groups of muscles, known as synergies. Physiological locomotion can be described as a coordinated recruitment of four to five muscle synergies. The first studies on muscle synergies in patients affected by neurological diseases were on stroke survivors. They showed that synergies can be used as biomarkers for motor impairment as they vary in patients with respect to healthy people. Likewise, muscle synergy analysis has been applied to developmental diseases (DD). The need for a comprehensive view of the present findings is crucial for comparing results achieved so far and promote future directions in the field. In the present review, we screened three scientific databases and selected thirty-six papers investigating muscle synergies extracted from locomotion in children affected by DD. Thirty-one articles investigate how cerebral palsy (CP) influences motor control, the currently exploited method in studying motor control in CP and finally the effects of treatments in these patients in terms of synergies and biomechanics; two articles investigate how muscle synergies vary in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), and three other articles assess other developmental pathologies, such as chronic and acute neuropathic pain. For CP, most of the studies demonstrate that the number of synergies is lower and that the synergy composition varies in the affected children with respect to normal controls. Still, the predictability of treatment's effects and the etiology of muscle synergy variation are open questions, as it has been reported that treatments minimally modify synergies, even if they improve biomechanics. The application of different algorithms in extracting synergies might bring about more subtle differences. Considering DMD, no correlation was found between non-neural muscle weakness and muscle modules' variation, while in chronic pain a decreased number of synergies was observed as a possible consequence of plastic adaptations. Even if the potential of the synergistic approach for clinical and rehabilitation practices is recognized, there is not full consensus on protocols nor widely accepted guidelines for the systematic clinical adoption of the method in DD. We critically commented on the current findings, on the methodological issues and the relative open points, and on the clinical impact of muscle synergies in neurodevelopmental diseases to fill the gap for applying the method in clinical practice.

Muscle synergies for evaluating upper limb in clinical applications: A systematic review.

Introduction: Muscle synergies have been proposed as a strategy employed by the central nervous system to control movements. Muscle synergy analysis is a well-established framework to examine the pathophysiological basis of neurological diseases and has been applied for analysis and assessment in clinical applications in the last decades, even if it has not yet been widely used in clinical diagnosis, rehabilitative treatment and interventions. Even if inconsistencies in the outputs among studies and lack of a normative pipeline including signal processing and synergy analysis limit the progress, common findings and results are identifiable as a basis for future research. Therefore, a literature review that summarizes methods and main findings of previous works on upper limb muscle synergies in clinical environment is needed to i) summarize the main findings so far, ii) highlight the barriers limiting their use in clinical applications, and iii) suggest future research directions needed for facilitating translation of experimental research to clinical scenarios. Methods: Articles in which muscle synergies were used to analyze and assess upper limb function in neurological impairments were reviewed. The literature research was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. Experimental protocols (e.g., the aim of the study, number and type of participants, number and type of muscles, and tasks), methods (e.g., muscle synergy models and synergy extraction methods, signal processing methods), and the main findings of eligible studies were reported and discussed. Results: 383 articles were screened and 51 were selected, which involved a total of 13 diseases and 748 patients and 1155 participants. Each study investigated on average 15 ± 10 patients. Four to forty-one muscles were included in the muscle synergy analysis. Point-to-point reaching was the most used task. The preprocessing of EMG signals and algorithms for synergy extraction varied among studies, and non-negative matrix factorization was the most used method. Five EMG normalization methods and five methods for identifying the optimal number of synergies were used in the selected papers. Most of the studies report that analyses on synergy number, structure, and activations provide novel insights on the physiopathology of motor control that cannot be gained with standard clinical assessments, and suggest that muscle synergies may be useful to personalize therapies and to develop new therapeutic strategies. However, in the selected studies synergies were used only for assessment; different testing procedures were used and, in general, study-specific modifications of muscle synergies were observed; single session or longitudinal studies mainly aimed at assessing stroke (71% of the studies), even though other pathologies were also investigated. Synergy modifications were either study-specific or were not observed, with few analyses available for temporal coefficients. Thus, several barriers prevent wider adoption of muscle synergy analysis including a lack of standardized experimental protocols, signal processing procedures, and synergy extraction methods. A compromise in the design of the studies must be found to combine the systematicity of motor control studies and the feasibility of clinical studies. There are however several potential developments that might promote the use of muscle synergy analysis in clinical practice, including refined assessments based on synergistic approaches not allowed by other methods and the availability of novel models. Finally, neural substrates of muscle synergies are discussed, and possible future research directions are proposed. Conclusions: This review provides new perspectives about the challenges and open issues that need to be addressed in future work to achieve a better understanding of motor impairments and rehabilitative therapy using muscle synergies. These include the application of the methods on wider scales, standardization of procedures, inclusion of synergies in the clinical decisional process, assessment of temporal coefficients and temporal-based models, extensive work on the algorithms and understanding of the physio-pathological mechanisms of pathology, as well as the application and adaptation of synergy-based approaches to various rehabilitative scenarios for increasing the available evidence.

Biomechanical Assessments of the Upper Limb for Determining Fatigue, Strain and Effort from the Laboratory to the Industrial Working Place: A Systematic Review.

Recent human-centered developments in the industrial field (Industry 5.0) lead companies and stakeholders to ensure the wellbeing of their workers with assessments of upper limb performance in the workplace, with the aim of reducing work-related diseases and improving awareness of the physical status of workers, by assessing motor performance, fatigue, strain and effort. Such approaches are usually developed in laboratories and only at times they are translated to on-field applications; few studies summarized common practices for the assessments. Therefore, our aim is to review the current state-of-the-art approaches used for the assessment of fatigue, strain and effort in working scenarios and to analyze in detail the differences between studies that take place in the laboratory and in the workplace, in order to give insights on future trends and directions. A systematic review of the studies aimed at evaluating the motor performance, fatigue, strain and effort of the upper limb targeting working scenarios is presented. A total of 1375 articles were found in scientific databases and 288 were analyzed. About half of the scientific articles are focused on laboratory pilot studies investigating effort and fatigue in laboratories, while the other half are set in working places. Our results showed that assessing upper limb biomechanics is quite common in the field, but it is mostly performed with instrumental assessments in laboratory studies, while questionnaires and scales are preferred in working places. Future directions may be oriented towards multi-domain approaches able to exploit the potential of combined analyses, exploitation of instrumental approaches in workplace, targeting a wider range of people and implementing more structured trials to translate pilot studies to real practice.

Spatial and Temporal Muscle Synergies Provide a Dual Characterization of Low-dimensional and Intermittent Control of Upper-limb Movements.

Muscle synergy analysis investigates the neurophysiological mechanisms that the central nervous system employs to coordinate muscles. Several models have been developed to decompose electromyographic (EMG) signals into spatial and temporal synergies. However, using multiple approaches can complicate the interpretation of results. Spatial synergies represent invariant muscle weights modulated with variant temporal coefficients; temporal synergies are invariant temporal profiles that coordinate variant muscle weights. While non-negative matrix factorization allows to extract both spatial and temporal synergies, the comparison between the two approaches was rarely investigated targeting a large set of multi-joint upper-limb movements. Spatial and temporal synergies were extracted from two datasets with proximal (16 subjects, 10M, 6F) and distal upper-limb movements (30 subjects, 21M, 9F), focusing on their differences in reconstruction accuracy and inter-individual variability. We showed the existence of both spatial and temporal structure in the EMG data, comparing synergies with those from a surrogate dataset in which the phases were shuffled preserving the frequency content of the original data. The two models provide a compact characterization of motor coordination at the spatial or temporal level, respectively. However, a lower number of temporal synergies are needed to achieve the same reconstruction R2: spatial and temporal synergies may capture different hierarchical levels of motor control and are dual approaches to the characterization of low-dimensional coordination of the upper-limb. Last, a detailed characterization of the structure of the temporal synergies suggested that they can be related to intermittent control of the movement, allowing high flexibility and dexterity. These results improve neurophysiology understanding in several fields such as motor control, rehabilitation, and prosthetics.

The Number and Structure of Muscle Synergies Depend on the Number of Recorded Muscles: A Pilot Simulation Study with OpenSim.

The muscle synergy approach is used to evaluate motor control and to quantitatively determine the number and structure of the modules underlying movement. In experimental studies regarding the upper limb, typically 8 to 16 EMG probes are used depending on the application, although the number of muscles involved in motor generation is higher. Therefore, the number of motor modules may be underestimated and the structure altered with the standard spatial synergy model based on the non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). In this study, we compared the number and structure of muscle synergies when considering 12 muscles (an "average" condition that represents previous studies) and 32 muscles of the upper limb, also including multiple muscle heads and deep muscles. First, we estimated the muscle activations with an upper-limb model in OpenSim using data from multi-directional reaching movements acquired in experimental sessions; then, spatial synergies were extracted from EMG activations from 12 muscles and from 32 muscles and their structures were compared. Finally, we compared muscle synergies obtained from OpenSim and from real experimental EMG signals to assess the reliability of the results. Interestingly, we found that on average, an additional synergy is needed to reconstruct the same R2 level with 32 muscles with respect to 12 muscles; synergies have a very similar structure, although muscles with comparable physiological functions were added to the synergies extracted with 12 muscles. The additional synergies, instead, captured patterns that could not be identified with only 12 muscles. We concluded that current studies may slightly underestimate the number of controlled synergies, even though the main structure of synergies is not modified when adding more muscles. We also show that EMG activations estimated with OpenSim are in partial (but not complete) agreement with experimental recordings. These findings may have significative implications for motor control and clinical studies.

Number of trials and data structure affect the number and components of muscle synergies in upper-limb reaching movements.

Objective.Due to the variability of human movements, muscle activations vary among trials and subjects. However, few studies investigated how data organization methods for addressing variability impact the extracted muscle synergies.Approach.Fifteen healthy subjects performed a large set of upper limb multi-directional point-to-point reaching movements. Then, the study extracted muscle synergies under different data settings and investigated how data structure prior to synergy extraction, namely concatenation, averaging, and single trial, the number of considered trials, and the number of reaching directions affected the number and components of muscle synergies.Main results.The results showed that the number and components of synergies were significantly affected by the data structure. The concatenation method identified the highest number of synergies, and the averaging method usually found a smaller number of synergies. When the concatenated trials or reaching directions was lower than a minimum value, the number of synergies increased with the increase of the number of trials or reaching directions; however, when the number of trials or reaching directions reached a threshold, the number of synergies was usually constant or with less variation even when novel directions and trials were added. Similarity analysis also showed a slight increase when the number of trials or reaching directions was lower than a threshold. This study recommends that at least five trials and four reaching directions and the concatenation method are considered in muscle synergies analysis during upper limb tasks.Significance.This study makes the researchers focus on the variability analysis induced by the diseases rather than the techniques applied for synergies analysis and promotes applications of muscle synergies in clinical scenarios.

Biomechanical assessment of the ipsilesional upper limb in post-stroke patients during multi-joint reaching tasks: A quantitative study.

In hemiplegic patients with stroke, investigating the ipsilesional limb may shed light on the upper limb motor control, impairments and mechanisms of functional recovery. Usually investigation of motor impairment and rehabilitative interventions in patients are performed only based on the contralesional limb. Previous studies found that also the ipsilesional limb presents motor deficits, mostly evaluated with clinical scales which could lack of sensibility. To quantitatively evaluate the performance of the ipsilesional limb in patient with stroke, we conducted an observational study in which 49 hemiplegic patients were enrolled, divided in subgroups based on the severity of impairment of the contralesional limb, and assessed with a kinematic, dynamic and motor control evaluation protocol on their ipsilesional upper limb during reaching movements. Measurements were repeated in the acute and subacute phases and compared to healthy controls. Our results showed that the ipsilesional limb presented lower kinematic and dynamic performances with respect to the healthy controls. Patients performed the movements slower and with a reduced range of motion, indicating a difficulty in controlling the motion of the arm. The energy and the power outputs were lower in both shoulder and elbow joint with a high significance level, confirming the limitation found in kinematics. Moreover, we showed that motor deficits were higher in the acute phase with respect to the subacute one and we found higher significant differences in the group with a more severe contralesional limb impairment. Ipsilesional upper limb biomechanics adds significant and more sensible measures for assessments based on multi-joints dynamics, providing a better insight on the upper limb motor control after stroke. These results could have clinical implications while evaluating and treating ipsilesional and contralesional upper limb impairments and dysfunctions in patients with stroke.

The effects of robotic assistance on upper limb spatial muscle synergies in healthy people during planar upper-limb training.

BACKGROUND: Robotic rehabilitation is a commonly adopted technique used to restore motor functionality of neurological patients. However, despite promising results were achieved, the effects of human-robot interaction on human motor control and the recovery mechanisms induced with robot assistance can be further investigated even on healthy subjects before translating to clinical practice. In this study, we adopt a standard paradigm for upper-limb rehabilitation (a planar device with assistive control) with linear and challenging curvilinear trajectories to investigate the effect of the assistance in human-robot interaction in healthy people. METHODS: Ten healthy subjects were instructed to perform a large set of radial and curvilinear movements in two interaction modes: 1) free movement (subjects hold the robot handle with no assistance) and 2) assisted movement (with a force tunnel assistance paradigm). Kinematics and EMGs from representative upper-limb muscles were recorded to extract phasic muscle synergies. The free and assisted interaction modes were compared assessing the level of assistance, error, and muscle synergy comparison between the two interaction modes. RESULTS: It was found that in free movement error magnitude is higher than with assistance, proving that task complexity required assistance also on healthy controls. Moreover, curvilinear tasks require more assistance than standard radial paths and error is higher. Interestingly, while assistance improved task performance, we found only a slight modification of phasic synergies when comparing assisted and free movement. CONCLUSIONS: We found that on healthy people, the effect of assistance was significant on task performance, but limited on muscle synergies. The findings of this study can find applications for assessing human-robot interaction and to design training to maximize motor recovery.

Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Spatial Muscle Synergies.

Muscle synergies have been largely used in many application fields, including motor control studies, prosthesis control, movement classification, rehabilitation, and clinical studies. Due to the complexity of the motor control system, the full repertoire of the underlying synergies has been identified only for some classes of movements and scenarios. Several extraction methods have been used to extract muscle synergies. However, some of these methods may not effectively capture the nonlinear relationship between muscles and impose constraints on input signals or extracted synergies. Moreover, other approaches such as autoencoders (AEs), an unsupervised neural network, were recently introduced to study bioinspired control and movement classification. In this study, we evaluated the performance of five methods for the extraction of spatial muscle synergy, namely, principal component analysis (PCA), independent component analysis (ICA), factor analysis (FA), nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF), and AEs using simulated data and a publicly available database. To analyze the performance of the considered extraction methods with respect to several factors, we generated a comprehensive set of simulated data (ground truth), including spatial synergies and temporal coefficients. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the number of channels (NoC) varied when generating simulated data to evaluate their effects on ground truth reconstruction. This study also tested the efficacy of each synergy extraction method when coupled with standard classification methods, including K-nearest neighbors (KNN), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machines (SVM), and Random Forest (RF). The results showed that both SNR and NoC affected the outputs of the muscle synergy analysis. Although AEs showed better performance than FA in variance accounted for and PCA in synergy vector similarity and activation coefficient similarity, NMF and ICA outperformed the other three methods. Classification tasks showed that classification algorithms were sensitive to synergy extraction methods, while KNN and RF outperformed the other two methods for all extraction methods; in general, the classification accuracy of NMF and PCA was higher. Overall, the results suggest selecting suitable methods when performing muscle synergy-related analysis.

Optimal Biomechanical Performance in Upper-Limb Gestures Depends on Velocity and Carried Load.

In the last few years, there has been increased interest in the preservation of physical and mental health of workers that cooperate with robots in industrial contexts, such as in the framework of the European H2020 Mindbot Project. Since biomechanical analysis contributes to the characterization of the subject interacting with a robotic setup and platform, we tested different speed and loading conditions in a simulated environment to determine upper-limb optimal performance. The simulations were performed starting from laboratory data of people executing upper-limb frontal reaching movements, by scaling the motion law and imposing various carried loads at the hand. The simulated velocity ranged from 20% to 200% of the original natural speed, with step increments of 10%, while the hand loads were 0, 0.5, 1, and 2 kg, simulating carried objects. A 3D inverse kinematic and dynamic model was used to compute upper-limb kinematics and dynamics, including shoulder flexion, shoulder abduction, and elbow flexion. An optimal range of velocities was found in which the expended energy was lower. Interestingly, the optimal speed corresponding to lower exerted torque and energy decreased when the load applied increased. Lastly, we introduced a preliminary movement inefficiency index to evaluate the deviation of the power and expended energy for the shoulder flexion degree of freedom when not coinciding with the minimum energy condition. These results can be useful in human-robot collaboration to design minimum-fatigue collaborative tasks, tune setup parameters and robot behavior, and support physical and mental health for workers.