Disengagement from the Ribeirão Preto early intervention program for psychosis: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment discontinuation within Early Intervention Services (EIS) for psychosis poses a significant challenge to achieving better outcomes in the early stages of psychotic disorders. Prevalence and predictors of early disengagement from EIS located in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain poorly investigated. We aimed to examine the rates and predictors of disengagement from the Ribeirão Preto Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (Ribeirão Preto-EIP) in Brazil. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from patients referred to the Ribeirão Preto-EIP between January 01, 2015, and December 31, 2018. Exclusion criteria were individuals with a single consultation, a diagnosis other than a psychotic disorder, and documented cases of death. RESULTS: Our sample comprised 234 patients, with an overall median follow-up time of 14.2 months. Early treatment disengagement was observed in 26.5 % (n=62), with a median time to disengagement of 5.25 months. Univariable analysis identified non-white skin color (HR=2.10, 95 %CI 1.26-3.49), positive THC screening (HR=2.22, 95 %CI 1.23-4.01), and substance-induced psychosis (HR=2.15, 95 %CI 1.10-4.21) as significant predictors. In multivariable analysis, only non-white skin color remained a significant predictor of early disengagement (HR=1.87, 95 %CI 1.08-3.27). CONCLUSIONS: The observed rates of early disengagement in our sample are similar to those reported in wealthy countries, but higher than previously reported for LMICs. Non-white skin color predicted early disengagement in our sample, probably due to social disadvantages. Our data highlights the need for enhanced research elucidating the specific features of EIS in LMICs.

Early intervention in psychosis in emerging countries: Findings from a first-episode psychosis programme in the Ribeirão Preto catchment area, southeastern Brazil.

AIM: People presenting with first-episode psychosis (FEP) can benefit from early intervention programmes. However, such programmes are scarce in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In Brazil, there are a few programmes, but they are unequally distributed across the country. We aimed to describe the implementation and performance of the Ribeirão Preto Early Intervention in Psychosis Programme (Ribeirão Preto-EIP), an outpatient service for patients presenting with FEP residing in the Ribeirão Preto catchment area in Southeastern Brazil. METHODS: A detailed description of the service, staff and theoretical framework was compiled. Furthermore, a retrospective cohort study of patients attending the programme throughout 4 years (2015-2018) was conducted. Data were obtained by analysing the medical records of all patients, and sociodemographic and diagnostic stability information for this period was recorded. RESULTS: The Ribeirão Preto-EIP had 358 new referrals during the study period. Among them, 237 patients were assessed for an average (median) duration of 14 months. Most patients were male (64.1%) and single (84.8%). The median age was 23.5 years (range, 9-86 years). Schizophrenia was the main diagnosis (43.4%), followed by substance-induced (25.7%) and affective (18.6%) psychosis. Referrals occurred from emergency, inpatient, community-based mental health and primary care services. CONCLUSIONS: Programmes such as the Ribeirão Preto-EIP demonstrate that early intervention in psychosis is feasible in LMICs despite significant challenges for their access and integration in the health system. Strategic scale-up policies could be undertaken to offer better short- and long-term outcomes for individuals presenting with FEP and their families.

Is the Mini-Mental State Examination the best cognitive screening test for less educated people?

OBJECTIVE: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) results are strongly influenced by educational level. The Brief Cognitive Screening Battery (BCSB) is an alternative assessment tool that provides more accurate results in individuals with less education. Our aim was to compare the MMSE and BCSB as screening tests. METHODS: The MMSE and BCSB were assessed in 112 participants by two evaluators blind to the other test's result. Participants were classified according to their level of education. The influence of education level was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: Scores of the MMSE (p < 0.0001) and the clock-drawing test (p < 0.0001) were influenced by education level but the delayed recall test score was not (p = 0.0804). The verbal fluency test (p = 0.00035) was influenced only by higher educational levels. It took three minutes less to apply the MMSE than to apply the BCSB (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the delayed recall test and the verbal fluency test of the BCSB are better than the MMSE and clock-drawing test as tools for evaluating cognition in people with limited education.

Is the Mini-Mental State Examination the best cognitive screening test for less educated people? / O mini-exame de estado mental é o melhor teste de rastreamento cognitivo para indivíduos com menor escolaridade?

ABSTRACT Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) results are strongly influenced by educational level. The Brief Cognitive Screening Battery (BCSB) is an alternative assessment tool that provides more accurate results in individuals with less education. Objective: Our aim was to compare the MMSE and BCSB as screening tests. Methods: The MMSE and BCSB were assessed in 112 participants by two evaluators blind to the other test's result. Participants were classified according to their level of education. The influence of education level was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and multiple comparison tests. Results: Scores of the MMSE (p < 0.0001) and the clock-drawing test (p < 0.0001) were influenced by education level but the delayed recall test score was not (p = 0.0804). The verbal fluency test (p = 0.00035) was influenced only by higher educational levels. It took three minutes less to apply the MMSE than to apply the BCSB (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: These findings suggest that the delayed recall test and the verbal fluency test of the BCSB are better than the MMSE and clock-drawing test as tools for evaluating cognition in people with limited education.

Resumo Os resultados do Mini-Exame de Estado Mental (MEEM) são consideravelmente influenciados pelo nível de escolaridade. A Bateria Breve de Rastreio Cognitivo (BBRC) é uma ferramenta de rastreamento cognitivo alternativa que fornece resultados mais acurados em indivíduos com menor nível de escolaridade. Objetivo: Comparar o MEEM e a BBRC como testes de rastreamento cognitivo. Métodos: 112 participantes foram submetidos ao MEEM e a BBRC por 2 avaliadores cegos para o resultados do outro teste. Os participantes foram classificados de acordo o nível de escolaridade. A influência do nível de escolaridade foi analisada utilizando o teste de Kruskal-Wallis e o teste de comparações múltiplas. Resultados: As pontuações do MEEM (p < 0,0001) e do teste do desenho do relógio (p < 0,0001) foram influenciadas pelo nível de escolaridade, porém o teste de memória tardia não sofreu influência do nível de escolaridade (p = 0,0804). O teste de fluência verbal (p = 0,00035) foi influenciado apenas pelos níveis educacionais mais altos. A aplicação do MEEM levou 3 minutos a menos que a da BBRC (p < 0,0001). Conclusão: Os achados desse estudo sugerem que o teste de memória tardia e o teste de fluência verbal da BBRC são mais adequados que o MEEM e o teste do desenho do relógio como ferramentas para avaliação cognitiva em populações com menor nível educacional.