Neurotoxicity of Engineered Nanomaterials: Testing Considerations.

As with toxicology in general, major challenges have emerged in its subfield neurotoxicology regarding the testing of engineered nanomaterials (ENM). This is on the one hand due to their complex physicochemical properties, like size, specific surface area, chemical composition as well as agglomeration and dissolution behavior in biological environments. On the other hand, toxicological risk assessment has faced an increasing demand for the development and implementation of non-animal alternative approaches. Regarding the investigation and interpretation of the potential adverse effects of ENM on the brain, toxicokinetic data are relatively scarce and thus hampers dose selection for in vitro neurotoxicity testing. Moreover, recent in vivo studies indicate that ENM can induce neurotoxic and behavioral effects in an indirect manner, depending on their physicochemical properties and route of exposure. Such indirect effects on the brain may proceed through the activation and spill-over of inflammatory mediators by ENM in the respiratory tract and other peripheral organs as well via ENM induced disturbance of the gut microbiome and intestinal mucus barrier. These ENM specific aspects should be incorporated into the ongoing developments of advanced in vitro neurotoxicity testing methods and strategies.

Dietary nanoparticles alter the composition and function of the gut microbiota in mice at dose levels relevant for human exposure.

BACKGROUND: Nanotechnologies provide new opportunities for improving the safety, quality, shelf life, flavor and appearance of foods. The most common nanoparticles (NPs) in human diet are silver metal, mainly present in food packaging and appliances, and silicon and titanium dioxides used as additives. The rapid development and commercialization of consumer products containing these engineered NPs is, however, not well supported by appropriate toxicological studies and risk assessment. Local and systemic toxicity and/or disruption of the gut microbiota (GM) have already been observed after oral administration of NPs in experimental animals, but results are not consistent and doses used were often much higher than the estimated human intakes. In view of the strong evidence linking alterations of the GM to cardiometabolic (CM) diseases, we hypothesized that dietary NPs might disturb this GM-CM axis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We exposed male C57BL/6JRj mice (n = 13 per dose group) to dietary NPs mixed in food pellets at doses relevant for human exposure: Ag (0, 4, 40 or 400 µg/kg pellet), SiO2 (0, 0.8, 8 and 80 mg/kg pellet) or TiO2 (0, 0.4, 4 or 40 mg/kg pellet). After 24 weeks of exposure, we assessed effects on the GM and CM health (n = 8 per dose group). The reversibility of the effects was examined after 8 additional weeks without NPs exposure (recovery period, n ≤ 5 per dose group). RESULTS: No overt toxicity was recorded. The GM ß-diversity was dose-dependently disrupted by the three NPs, and the bacterial short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were dose-dependently reduced after the administration of SiO2 and TiO2 NPs. These effects disappeared completely or partly after the recovery period, strengthening the association with dietary NPs. We did not observe atheromatous disease or glucose intolerance after NP exposure. Instead, dose-dependent decreases in the expression of IL-6 in the liver, circulating triglycerides (TG) and urea nitrogen (BUN) were recorded after administration of the NPs. CONCLUSION: We found that long-term oral exposure to dietary NPs at doses relevant for estimated human intakes disrupts the GM composition and function. These modifications did not appear associated with atheromatous or deleterious metabolic outcomes.

Amelioration of murine experimental colitis using biocompatible cyclosporine A lipid carriers.

Lipoproteins are biodegradable and biocompatible natural carriers that can be utilized for the transport of hydrophobic drugs, such as cyclosporin A (CycloA), a calcineurin inhibitor utilized for the inflammatory bowel disease, such as ulcerative colitis. A major limitation in the drug treatment of inflammatory bowel disease is the inability to deliver the drug selectively toward the inflamed tissues. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems have led to an amelioration of the therapeutic selectivity, but still the majority of the entrapped drug is eliminated without exercising a therapeutic effect. The present study aimed to prepare three lipoprotein formulations (HDL-, LDL-, and VLDL-based) loaded with cyclosporin A for the treatment of colitis in a murine model. After an intravenous injection of a drug dose of 2 mg/kg, clinical activity (colon weight/length ratio) and therapeutic effects (evaluated by the inflammatory markers MPO and TNF-α) were compared with those of the untreated colitis control group. All CycloA-containing lipoproteins reduced clinical activity, with a significant decrease in the case of LDL-CycloA formulation, which also led to the higher therapeutic effect.

Mind your assays: Misleading cytotoxicity with the WST-1 assay in the presence of manganese.

The WST-1 assay is the most common test to assess the in vitro cytotoxicity of chemicals. Tetrazolium-based assays can, however, be affected by the interference of tested chemicals, including carbon nanotubes or Mg particles. Here, we report a new interference of Mn materials with the WST-1 assay. Endothelial cells exposed to Mn particles (Mn alone or Fe-Mn alloy from 50 to 1600 µg/ml) were severely damaged according to the WST-1 assay, but not the ATP content assay. Subsequent experiments revealed that Mn particles interfere with the reduction of the tetrazolium salt to formazan. Therefore, the WST-1 assay is not suitable to evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicity of Mn-containing materials, and luminescence-based assays such as CellTiter-Glo® appear more appropriate.

Are Fe-Based Stenting Materials Biocompatible? A Critical Review of In Vitro and In Vivo Studies.

Fe-based materials have increasingly been considered for the development of biodegradable cardiovascular stents. A wide range of in vitro and in vivo studies should be done to fully evaluate their biocompatibility. In this review, we summarized and analyzed the findings and the methodologies used to assess the biocompatibility of Fe materials. The majority of investigators drew conclusions about in vitro Fe toxicity based on indirect contact results. The setup applied in these tests seems to overlook the possible effects of Fe corrosion and does not allow for understanding of the complexity of released chemical forms and their possible impact on tissue. It is in particular important to ensure that test setups or interpretations of in vitro results do not hide some important mechanisms, leading to inappropriate subsequent in vivo experiments. On the other hand, the sample size of existing in vivo implantations is often limited, and effects such as local toxicity or endothelial function are not deeply scrutinized. The main advantages and limitations of in vitro design strategies applied in the development of Fe-based alloys and the correlation with in vivo studies are discussed. It is evident from this literature review that we are not yet ready to define an Fe-based material as safe or biocompatible.