ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to assess a possible correlation between obesity and lower urinary tract symptoms in a selected population of women. All the subjects referred for lower urinary tract complaints over a 2-year period received a questionnaire and a frequency/volume chart. The patient population was divided into normal or low weight (BMI < or = 29) and high weight and obese (BMI > or = 30). The main outcome measures were lower urinary tract symptoms (infections, frequency, urgency, voiding difficulty, dysuria, nocturia and incontinence). The statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, chi2 test and odds ratios; 694 women received the questionnaire and 553 were evaluated (79.7% response). Overall, 229 (42.4%) were of low or normal BMI; 311 (57.5%) had a high or obese BMI. After adjusting for prior bladder surgery, any surgery, history of medical problems and physical inactivity, only the association between BMI and incontinence remained statistically significant (adjusted OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.18-3.19).
Subject(s)
Obesity/complications , Urination Disorders/complications , Adult , Body Mass Index , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Female , Humans , Middle AgedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of and risk factors associated with regular water supplementation of neonates. DESIGN: Evaluation of data from the Food and Drug Administration's Infant Feeding Practices Study, a panel study of US women of fairly high socioeconomic status who were followed up from late pregnancy through their infants' first year of life. The sample was drawn from a nationally distributed consumer mail panel. Each mother was asked whether she gave her neonate water at least 3 times per week. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1677 mothers of infants who were neonates in April through November 1993. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentages of mothers who gave their neonates water at least 3 times a week, considering infant feeding status, mother's education, and family income. RESULTS: About one fourth (24.7%) of the mothers reported giving their neonates water at least 3 times per week. Stratification by feeding practices and socioeconomic factors revealed that 41.6% of mothers who formula-fed their neonates, 47.4% of mothers with less than a high school education, and 35.4% of mothers with an annual family income less than $22,500 gave their neonates water at least 3 times per week. CONCLUSIONS: Water supplementation of neonates was a prevalent practice in this cohort of women. Feeding practices, maternal education, and family income were all significant risk factors associated with this behavior.
Subject(s)
Bottle Feeding , Feeding Behavior , Infant Food , Water/administration & dosage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Income , Infant, Newborn , Mothers/education , Nutrition Surveys , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Water/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Studies on the health benefits of breastfeeding in developed countries have shown conflicting results. These studies often fail to account for confounding, reverse causality, and dose-response effects. We addressed these issues in analyzing longitudinal data to determine if breastfeeding protects US infants from developing diarrhea and ear infections. METHODS: Mothers participating in a mail panel provided information on their infants at ages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 months. Infants were classified as exclusively breastfed; high, middle, or low mixed breast- and formula-fed; or exclusively formula-fed. Diarrhea and ear infection diagnoses were based on mothers' reports. Infant age and gender; other liquid and solid intake; maternal education, occupation, and smoking; household size; family income; and day care use were adjusted for in the full models. RESULTS: The risk of developing either diarrhea or ear infection increased as the amount of breast milk an infant received decreased. In the full models, the risk for diarrhea remained significant only in infants who received no breast milk compared with those who received only breast milk (odds ratio = 1.8); the risk for ear infection remained significant in the low mixed feeding group (odds ratio = 1.6) and among infants receiving no breast milk compared with those who received only breast milk (odds ratio = 1.7). CONCLUSIONS: Breastfeeding protects US infants against the development of diarrhea and ear infection. Breastfeeding does not have to be exclusive to confer this benefit. In fact, protection is afforded in a dose-response manner. The more breast milk an infant receives in the first 6 months of life, the less likely that he or she
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Otitis/epidemiology , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Diarrhea/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Logistic Models , Longitudinal Studies , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Otitis/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Concern has been raised by infant feeding experts that supplementing breastfed infants with iron-fortified formula rather than low-iron formula may have an undesirable impact on their gastrointestinal flora. Thus far, there have been no clinical studies to address this issue directly. We compared the reported frequency of diarrhea for breastfed infants given iron-fortified formula with those fed low-iron formula. METHODS: Mothers participating in a mail panel provided feeding and diarrhea information on their infants at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 12 months (n = 1743). Infants were grouped into five feeding categories: (1) breast milk only, (2) breast milk and low-iron formula, (3) breast milk and iron-fortified formula, (4) low-iron formula only, and (5) iron-fortified formula only. We calculated the number of diarrheal episodes per week for each feeding category and used rate ratios to estimate the relative impact of low-iron and iron-fortified formulas. RESULTS: Among infants who received both breast milk and formula, the rate ratio for iron-fortified formula versus low-iron formula was 1.06 (confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.34), indicating that the type of formula a breastfed infant receives does not significantly affect the frequency of diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support the hypothesis that breastfed infants given iron-fortified formula are at greater risk of having diarrhea. This, in addition to the fact that iron-fortified formula has played a major role in preventing childhood iron deficiency anemia, supports the current recommendation that any formula given to infants be fortified with iron.