Longitudinal trajectories and associated risk factors of paternal mental illness in the nine years surrounding the transition to fatherhood.

BACKGROUND: The arrival of one's first child is a known risk factor for mental illness, yet investigations on fathers' mental health are limited. We conducted a longitudinal investigation on paternal depression and anxiety in the nine years surrounding the transition to fatherhood. METHODS: Using a national cohort of French men (CONSTANCES, n = 6299), we investigated the prevalence and associated risk factors of mental illness amongst first-time fathers. Responses to the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) and 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) scales were used to identify clinically significant symptom scores. Self-declared mental illness was also reported by participants. Group-based modelling was used to identify latent trajectory groups for both measures. RESULTS: Levels of self-declared anxiety (averaging 4.9 % pre-fatherhood, 7.8 % post) exceeded that of depression (1.9 % pre- fatherhood, 3.3 % post) or other disorders. However, rates of clinically significant symptom scores (17-27 %) were consistently higher. Participants' mental health appeared to worsen from two-years prior to their child's arrival and improve from two-years after. We identified three trajectory groups for fathers' self-declared mental illness: Low stable (90.3 %); Low risk with high temporary increase (5.6 %); and Consistent high risk (4.1 %). Risk factors associated with worsening mental health trajectories were unemployment, not living with one's partner, having had adverse childhood experiences and foregoing healthcare due to financial reasons. LIMITATIONS: All measures of mental illness relied on participant self-reports and are thus subject to bias. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals an important period of heightened psychological vulnerability amongst first-time fathers, emphasising the need for increased and better adapted paternal mental health screening.

Social determinants in prenatal antidepressant use and continuation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Depression is one of the most common co-morbidities during pregnancy; with severe symptoms, antidepressants are sometimes recommended. Social determinants are often linked with antidepressant use in the general population, and it is not known if this is the case for pregnant populations. Our objective was to determine if social determinants are associated with prenatal antidepressant intake via a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search of five databases was conducted to identify publications from inception to October 2022 that reported associations with prenatal antidepressant intake (use/continuation) and one or more social determinants: education, race, immigration status, relationship, income, or employment. Eligible studies were included in random effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: A total of 23 articles describing 22 studies were included. Education was significantly and positively associated with prenatal antidepressant continuation and heterogeneity was moderate. (Odds ratio = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.89; p < 0.00001; I2 = 53%). Meta-analyses of antidepressant use and education, race, and relationship status, and antidepressant continuation and income were not significant with high levels of heterogeneity. DISCUSSION: While most social determinants in this review were not linked with prenatal antidepressant intake, lower maternal education level does seem to be associated with lower rates of prenatal antidepressant continuation. CONCLUSIONS: Education appears to be linked with prenatal antidepressant intake. The low number of included studies precludes conclusive evidence for other social determinants.

The impact of paternal mental illness on child development: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Whilst there is growing evidence highlighting the importance of paternal mental illness (PMI) on child development, this relationship still remains under-studied and often over-looked. Considering the increasingly active role of fathers in their children's upbringing, a comprehensive overview of the impact of PMI on child development is overdue. This study aimed to combine and synthesise currently available evidence on the relationship between PMI and multiple domains of child development. Narrative synthesis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the relationship between PMI and child development (mental health and social, emotional, language, cognitive or adaptive behaviour), published between 1980 to December 2021, was conducted in line with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Review quality was assessed based on AMSTAR-2 criteria and respective study confidence was interpreted in line with GRADE scoring. All relevant meta-analytic effect sizes were converted to odds ratios (OR) and grouped using a random effects model. Grouped meta-analyses saw PMI to have a significant, detrimental effect on all studied domains of child development [OR: 1.54; 95% CI (1.36-1.74)]. Subgroup analyses saw PMI affecting both internalising [OR: 1.62; 95% CI (1.27-2.08)] and externalising [OR: 1.63; 95% CI (1.28-2.08)] child behaviours to a similar extent. However, included reviews were of poor methodological quality, demonstrating either low or critically low confidence. These results show a consistent and influential effect of PMI on child development. The relationship between fathers' mental illness and child development warrants further investigation, as current research is limited in scope, particularly regarding cognitive domains of child development and non-affective PMI diagnoses.

Substance Use Among Residents of Homeless Shelters During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings From France.

Objectives: To record the prevalence and risk factors of substance use amongst homeless persons during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The ECHO study consisted in two independent cross-sectional waves of data collection in the regions of Paris, Lyon, and Strasbourg during the Spring of 2020 (n = 530) and 2021 (n = 319). Factors associated with substance use were explored using generalised logistic regression models. Results: The most prevalent substance used was tobacco (38%-43%), followed by alcohol (26%-34%). The use of both substances positively associated with each other, although risk factors varied depending on the substance. The only factors consistently associated with alcohol and tobacco use were being male, exposure to theft/assault and participants' region of origin. Whilst the rate of tobacco use was relatively stable between Spring 2020 and 2021, alcohol use was more common in 2021. Conclusion: These findings highlight a high prevalence of substance use amongst homeless persons. People experiencing homelessness face specific challenges in the context of the pandemic, alongside greater vulnerability to illness and low healthcare access, therefore the need to improve prevention and support services for substance abuse within this population is vital.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable groups, including homeless persons and migrants, in France: A qualitative study.

Social inequalities tended to increase in the context of the pandemic, particularly in relation to the measures taken to manage and reduce the risk of COVID-19. When lockdown measures required the general population "to stay home", what were homeless people expected to do? The ECHO study is a cross-sectional, descriptive study with a convergent mixed-method design. Data were collected across shelters in France both during and immediately following the lockdown (April - June 2020). This article presents the study's qualitative findings, with a focus on understanding both the experiences and perceptions among these populations of the measures taken to limit the COVID-19 infection. A total of 26 semi-directed individual interviews were conducted across seven shelters in both Lyon (42%) and Paris (58%). Data were analysed using thematic content analysis with partial blinded coding. Four key themes were identified: 1- Reactions to the introduction of lockdown: a sudden implementation reminiscent of prior violent or traumatic circumstances amongst participants, 2- Accommodation during lockdown: participants' conflicting visions of the shelter, 3- Influence of the media and public communication: an abundant flow of information impacting participant's wellbeing and representations on the pandemic, and 4- The individual impact of lockdown: perceived health and limitations to daily life activities. The most vulnerable populations have borne the heaviest burden during the pandemic. It is therefore crucial that we improve both the availability of information, and the health literacy of, all groups within the national population.

Depression during the COVID-19 pandemic amongst residents of homeless shelters in France.

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected global mental health and well-being. However, the impact amongst homeless persons has not been fully evaluated. The ECHO study reports factors associated with depression amongst the homeless population living in shelters in France during the spring of 2020. METHODS: Interview data were collected from 527 participants living in temporary and/or emergency accommodation following France's first lockdown (02/05/20 - 07/06/20), in the metropolitan regions of Paris (74%), Lyon (19%) and Strasbourg (7%). Interviews were conducted in French, English, or with interpreters (33% of participants, ∼20 languages). Presence of depression was ascertained using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). RESULTS: Amongst ECHO study participants, 30% had symptoms of moderate to severe depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). Multivariate analysis revealed depression to be associated with being female (aOR: 2.15; CI: 1.26-3.69), single (aOR: 1.60; CI: 1.01-2.52), chronically ill (aOR: 2.32; CI: 1.43: 3.78), facing food insecurity (aOR: 2.12; CI: 1.40-3.22) and participants' region of origin. Persons born African and Eastern Mediterranean regions showed higher levels of depression (30-33% of participants) than those migrating from other European countries (14%). Reduced rates of depression were observed amongst participants aged 30-49 (aOR: 0.60; CI: 0.38-0.95) and over 50 (aOR: 0.28; CI: 0.13-0.64), compared to 18-29-year-olds. LIMITATIONS: These data are cross-sectional, only providing information on a given moment in time. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate high levels of depression amongst homeless persons during the COVID-19 pandemic. Predicted future instability and economic repercussions could particularly impact the mental health of this vulnerable group.

Preconditioning human pharyngeal motor cortex enhances directional metaplasticity induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

KEY POINTS: Recent studies have proposed therapeutic potential for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in swallowing rehabilitation, yet its outcomes vary across individuals and studies. Such variability may be related to the brain state before stimulation. Metaplasticity is a higher order plasticity which regulates cortical response to plasticity changes. Studies have shown that preconditioning of the hand motor cortex could increase cortical capacity for neuroplastic change and enhance rTMS outcomes. We investigated, for the first time, the directional metaplastic properties in human pharyngeal motor cortex using preconditioned rTMS. We found that preconditioned rTMS with specific time intervals between preconditioning and conditioning rTMS had stronger stimulation effects in both swallowing neurophysiology and behaviour than that without preconditioning. Our results provide evidence for enhanced directional metaplasticity in pharyngeal motor cortex and new insights into its clinical application for dysphagia. ABSTRACT: Despite growing evidence that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can be used as a treatment for dysphagia, its efficacy varies across individuals. Such variability may relate to the pre-stimulation state of neuronal activation. Previous studies found that preconditioning the hand motor cortex before rTMS could enhance stimulation outcomes through metaplasticity. No studies have investigated such mechanisms in human pharyngeal motor cortex. Therefore, we investigated the preconditioning effects of rTMS on swallowing neurophysiology and behaviour. Healthy adults were recruited for swallowing neurophysiological (n = 14) and behavioural (n = 14) experiments. They were first given eight different preconditioned (1 and 5 Hz) rTMS interventions with varying inter-rTMS intervals. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured before and for 60 min post-rTMS. Based on the changes in pharyngeal MEPs, the optimal preconditioned 1 Hz and 5 Hz rTMS protocols were then applied as interventions while assessing swallowing performance using a reaction time task. We found that 5 Hz rTMS preconditioned with 1 Hz rTMS with 30 min inter-rTMS interval induced the greatest increase on pharyngeal cortical excitability (F1,13  = 21.244; P < 0.001). By comparison, 1 Hz rTMS preconditioned with 5 Hz rTMS with 90 min inter-rTMS interval was most optimal for suppressing pharyngeal motor cortex (F1,13  = 13.547; P = 0.003). Behaviourally, swallowing accuracy was improved after preconditioned 5 Hz rTMS (F1,13  = 10.109, P = 0.007) and reduced after preconditioned 1 Hz rTMS (F1,13  = 14.108, P = 0.009) compared to sham. Thus, two optimal protocols for inducing functional metaplasticity in human pharyngeal motor cortex have been identified. These protocols appear superior to conventional rTMS and may be relevant to future clinical application in neurogenic dysphagia.