Comparison of Molecular Multiplex and Singleplex Analysis of IgE to Grass Pollen Allergens in Untreated German Grass Pollen-Allergic Patients.

BACKGROUND: The ImmunoCAP ISAC 112 platform is the only commercially available molecular allergy IgE multiplex test. Data on the comparison of this rather novel test with the molecular singleplex ImmunoCAP IgE platform are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare the multiplex ISAC 112 platform and the singleplex ImmunoCAP platform in regard to IgE to grass pollen allergens in untreated grass pollen-allergic patients in Germany. METHODS: Serum samples from 101 adults with grass pollen allergy were analyzed for specific IgE (sIgE) to 8 allergenic molecules from timothy grass pollen and to the 112 allergenic molecules included in the ISAC panel. The results for the multiplex and singleplex tests were subsequently analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Comparison of sIgE to grass pollen allergens detected by ISAC 112 and the singleplex ImmunoCAP assay revealed the following correlation coefficients: 0.88 (rPhl p 1), 0.96 (rPhl p 2), 0.70 (nPhl p 4), 0.94 (rPhl p 5b), 0.92 (rPhl p 6), 0.85 (rPhl p 11), and 0.78 (rPhl p 12). CONCLUSION: Molecular testing with ISAC 112 correlates well with the ImmunoCAP platform for respective molecular timothy grass pollen allergens.

Comparison of molecular multiplex and singleplex analysis of IgE to grass pollen allergens in untreated german grass pollen–allergic patients

Antecedentes: El ImmunoCAP ISAC 112, es el único sistema comercial con determinación simultánea de múltiples alérgenos comercializado para el diagnóstico alergológico molecular. No existen estudios comparativos de este sistema con el ImmunoCAP para la determinación de IgE frente a un único alérgeno. Objetivos: Realizar un estudio comparativo para la determinación de IgE específica a alérgenos de polen de gramíneas en pacientes alemanes con alergia a estos pólenes, utilizando los sistemas ISAC IgE y el ImmunoCAP IgE. Métodos: Se estudiaron 101 sueros de adultos con alergia a pólenes de gramíneas, determinando la IgE específica a 8 alérgenos de hierba timotea mediante ImmunoCAP y a 112 alérgenos presentes en la plataforma ISAC. Posteriormente se realizó un análisis estadístico comparativo entre los resultados de ambos sistemas. Resultados: La comparación de los valores de IgE específica frente a los alérgenos de pólenes de gramíneas hallados en los sistemas ISAC e ImmunoCAP mostraron los siguientes coeficientes de correlación: 0.88 (rPhl p 1), 0.96 (rPhl p 2), 0.70 (nPhl p 4), 0.94 (rPhl p 5b), 0.92 (rPhl p 6), 0.85 (rPhl p 11) y 0.78 (rPhl p12). Conclusiones: El diagnóstico molecular con el Sistema ISAC guarda buena correlación con los resultados del ImmunoCAP para los alérgenos de hierba timotea presentes en ambas plataformas (AU)

Background: The ImmunoCAP ISAC 112 platform is the only commercially available molecular allergy IgE multiplex test. Data on the comparison of this rather novel test with the molecular singleplex ImmunoCAP IgE platform are lacking. Objective: To compare the multiplex ISAC 112 platform and the singleplex ImmunoCAP platform in regard to IgE to grass pollen allergens in untreated grass pollen–allergic patients in Germany. Methods: Serum samples from 101 adults with grass pollen allergy were analyzed for specific IgE (sIgE) to 8 allergenic molecules from timothy grass pollen and to the 112 allergenic molecules included in the ISAC panel. The results for the multiplex and singleplex tests were subsequently analyzed statistically. Results: Comparison of sIgE to grass pollen allergens detected by ISAC 112 and the singleplex ImmunoCAP assay revealed the following correlation coefficients: 0.88 (rPhl p 1), 0.96 (rPhl p 2), 0.70 (nPhl p 4), 0.94 (rPhl p 5b), 0.92 (rPhl p 6), 0.85 (rPhl p 11), and 0.78 (rPhl p12). Conclusion: Molecular testing with ISAC 112 correlates well with the ImmunoCAP platform for respective molecular timothy grass pollen allergens (AU)

Intussusception in adults.

Three cases of intussusception in adults were observed within a period of six months in a small general hospital. All the patients were over 65 years old and all were admitted to hospital with intermittent cramping abdominal pains. None appeared to be in acute distress. In all three, body temperature, pulse rate and hemogram were within normal limits. Diagnosis was made preoperatively after barium enema studies. Bowel resection with end-to-end anastomosis was done in all three cases, in two because of gangrenous bowel. The site of intussusception was jejunojejunal in one case, ileocecal in another and colorectal in the third; and the cause in all cases was tumor, benign in two cases, malignant in one. The patients recovered uneventfully except for incisional abscess and diarrhea of seven days' duration in one. In a review of literature it was found that the clinical features in these three cases closely paralleled those of other cases of adult intussusception reported in this country.