Influence of blood transfusions during radical retropubic prostatectomy on disease outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Blood transfusion in patients with malignant neoplasms may alter the disease outcome because of a theoretical immunomodulatory effect. This effect may reduce prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-free and disease-specific survival in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. However, the results in published studies have been contradictory, and this effect has not yet been determined. METHODS: We evaluated 1412 patients after radical prostatectomy from 1984 to 2003 in a retrospective analysis, with a special focus on the rate and type of blood transfusions, specifically heterologous versus autologous blood. Univariate analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate the impact of blood transfusions on disease outcome. RESULTS: The overall transfusion rate was 56.7%. The rate dropped from 88.9% in 1988 to 9.1% in 2002. PSA recurrence (greater than 0.5 ng/mL) was noted in 11.0% in patients without and in 26.0% with blood transfusions, which was not statistically significant on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Again, no difference was noted when patients were stratified according to the type (autologous versus heterologous) or the amount (2 U or less versus more than 2 U) of blood transfusion. Evaluating overall survival, again no differences were found. The established Cox regression model also proved that blood transfusions had no impact on disease outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective analysis did not detect any effect of blood transfusions in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. If a negative adverse effect occurs, this effect must be minimal. However, the infectious risk and the costs of blood transfusions should be reason enough to reduce blood loss and the transfusion rate further in patients with prostate cancer.

Optimization of prostatic biopsy: a prospective randomized trial comparing the sextant biopsy with a 10-core biopsy. Impact of prostatic region of sampling.

OBJECTIVE: New prostatic biopsy protocols suggest to increase the core numbers to enhance detection. Additional cores are usually sampled from the lateral part of the p-zone. We direct the sextant biopsy to the most lateral part of the p-zone, therefore we investigated if there is a gain by adding 4 median biopsy cores. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The prospective randomized trial (n = 200) compared our modified sextant biopsy to a 10-core strategy with 2 additional median cores on both sides. Directed biopsies to suspicious areas were allowed in both groups. Morbidity was assessed by a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: PC detection was 32% for 6 cores and 40% for 10 cores. Four patients were detected only by median biopsies. Using the binomial distribution table the gain of 4% is statistically significant. There was no statistical difference in morbidity, but a trend towards a higher rate of side effects in the 10-core group. CONCLUSIONS: The gain in prostate cancer detection rate by additional median biopsies is low, but statistically significant. There is no difference in morbidity and patient acceptance is high, therefore we favor the 10-core biopsy in our patients.

Morbidity of prostatic biopsy for different biopsy strategies: is there a relation to core number and sampling region?

OBJECTIVES: The standard sextant prostatic biopsy is a safe procedure associated with low morbidity. Newer biopsy protocols suggest an increase in core numbers or sampling in distinct areas. In this respect we investigated the morbidity of different biopsy regimens. METHODS: Morbidity was assessed using self-administered questionnaires 1 week and 1 month after biopsy in a prospective randomized trial of 405 men with three different biopsy protocols. We compared a sextant biopsy regimen to a 10-core biopsy strategy, as well as patients with a re-biopsy including t-zone sampling. We investigated pain during and after biopsy, gross hematuria, rectal bleeding, hematospermia, fever and chills. RESULTS: There is a trend towards a more painful biopsy and higher rate of side effects if the number of core samples is increased, this difference did not reach statistical significance. There was no increase in severity of side effects. Regarding the rate and severity of side effects of biopsy strategies to different areas of the prostate we could not find a difference. About 95% of patients would accept a repeat biopsy based on their experience on first biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity of transrectal prostatic biopsy is low and increasing the number of cores correlates with a minor and statistically not significant increase in the rate of side effects. Transrectal sextant prostatic biopsy and extensive biopsy protocols are generally well tolerated and widely accepted from patients.