Controversial Aspects of Diagnostics and Therapy of Idiopathic Condylar Resorption: An Analysis of Evidence- and Consensus-Based Recommendations Based on an Interdisciplinary Guideline Project.

Idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR), though a rare event, is associated with severe detrimental sequelae for the patient. To date, the etiology remains unknown, and treatment strategies are highly controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study is to present an analysis of the consensus- and evidence-based approach to ICR by a German interdisciplinary guideline project of the AWMF (Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany). Following a systematic literature search, including 56 (out of an initial 97) publications, with a predominantly low level of evidence (LoE), two independent working groups (oral and maxillofacial surgery and interdisciplinary, respectively) voted on a draft comprising 25 recommendations in a standardized anonymized and blinded Delphi procedure. While the results of the votes were relatively homogeneous, the interdisciplinary phase required a significantly higher number of rounds (p < 0.001). Most of the controversial recommendations were related to initial imaging (with consensus on CT/CBCT as the current diagnostic standard for imaging), pharmacotherapy (no recommendation due to lack of evidence), discopexy (no recommendation possible due to low LoE) and timing of orthognathic surgery (with consensus on two-staged procedures after invasive TMJ surgery, except for single-stage procedures if combined with total joint reconstruction). Overall, the Delphi procedure resulted in an interdisciplinary guideline offering the best possible evidence- and consensus-based expertise to date in the diagnosis and treatment of ICR.

Controversial Aspects of Diagnostics and Therapy of Arthritis of the Temporomandibular Joint in Rheumatoid and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-An Analysis of Evidence- and Consensus-Based Recommendations Based on an Interdisciplinary Guideline Project.

Introduction: Due to potentially severe sequelae (impaired growth, condylar resorption, and ankylosis) early diagnosis of chronic rheumatic arthritis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and timely onset of therapy are essential. Aim: Owing to very limited evidence the aim of the study was to identify and discuss controversial topics in the guideline development to promote further focused research. Methods: Through a systematic literature search, 394 out of 3771 publications were included in a German interdisciplinary guideline draft. Two workgroups (1: oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2: interdisciplinary) voted on 77 recommendations/statements, in 2 independent anonymized and blinded consensus phases (Delphi process). Results: The voting results were relatively homogenous, except for a greater proportion of abstentions amongst the interdisciplinary group (p < 0.001). Eighty-four percent of recommendations/statements were approved in the first round, 89% with strong consensus. Fourteen recommendations/statements (18.2%) required a prolonged consensus phase and further discussion. Discussion: Contrast-enhanced MRI was confirmed as the method of choice for the diagnosis of TMJ arthritis. Intraarticular corticosteroid injection is to be limited to therapy-refractory cases and single injection only. In adults, alloplastic joint replacement is preferable to autologous replacement. In children/adolescents, autologous reconstruction may be performed lacking viable alternatives. Alloplastic options are currently still considered experimental.

Does Maximum Voluntary Clenching Force Pose a Risk to Overloading Alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint Replacement?-A Prospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: The amount of maximum voluntary clenching (MVC) force may influence functional loading at the polyethylene/metal bearing surfaces in alloplastic total temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR). The aim of this study was to measure ipsilateral MVC and estimate the risk for revision due to overloading of the TMJR. METHODS: A prospective cohort study design was used to study patients who underwent alloplastic TMJR. The primary predictor was time after TMJR, the secondary predictors were age at TMJR placement, coronoidectomy, prior ipsilateral TMJ surgeries, TMJR design (custom, stock), and bite location. The primary outcome variable was MVC, the secondary outcome was need for TMJR revision. Data were collected preoperatively (T0), and 1 year (T1), 2 to 3 years (T2) and ≥4 years postoperatively (T3). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Tukey-HSD and regression analysis was used for statistical analysis. P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (58 TMJR) with unilateral (n = 16) and bilateral (n = 21) TMJR were enrolled; 8 males (12 TMJR) and 29 females (46 TMJR). Average age was 46.4 ± 14.9 years. MVC increased significantly over the observation period (P = .000). At all observation time points, age at TMJR placement and bite location significantly influenced MVC (P = .000). Coronoidectomy and prior ipsilateral TMJ surgeries did not demonstrate a significant influence on MVC. TMJR design influenced MVC significantly at T3 (P = .006). Regression analysis identified age as a significant factor for higher MVC. No TMJR required revision or replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, ipsilateral MVC increases significantly after TMJR. However, since MVC is significantly lower than in healthy test-patients, a considerably lower functional loading at the polyethylene/metal bearing surfaces can be assumed. Lower loading at the TMJR bearing surfaces and at the cortical screw fixation sites suggest a potential longer lifespan compared to other artificial joints like hip and knee prostheses.

Unilateral, Alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction, Biomechanically What Happens to the Contralateral Temporomandibular Joint?-A Prospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Unilateral alloplastic total temporomandibular joint reconstruction (TMJR) might influence the contralateral side joint function. This study's purpose was to estimate the risk for contralateral TMJR and the jaw function of the contralateral untreated temporomandibular joint (TMJ). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study design was used for patients who underwent unilateral alloplastic TMJR. The primary predictor was time after TMJR, and the secondary predictors were pre-TMJR mandibular angle resection, prior ipsilateral TMJ surgeries, and TMJR design (custom, stock). The primary outcome variable was the need for contralateral TMJR. The secondary outcome variables were the results of jaw function-jaw tracking, maximum voluntary clenching, surface electromyography, and pressure pain thresholds (PPT) and patient's quality-of-life (oral health-related quality-of-life [OHrQoL]). Data were collected preoperatively (T0), and 1 year (T1), 2-3 years (T2), and ≥ 4 years postoperatively (T4). Analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey -HSD test and multiple linear regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled, 15 males and 24 females, with an average age of 48.9 ± 16.2 years. Two patients (5.1%) required a contralateral TMJR. Contralateral condylar motion, incisal laterotrusion, and protrusion slightly decreased, while incisal opening (P = .003), rotation angle (P = .013), opening deflection, surface electromyography activity, maximum voluntary clenching (P = .01), PPTs, and OHrQoL all increased. Pre-TMJR mandibular angle resection had an impact on PPTs and subjective outcomes and prior ipsilateral TMJ surgeries on the opening rotation angle. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, bilateral TMJR does not appear necessary when the contralateral TMJ is healthy. Unilateral alloplastic TMJR is associated with improved contralateral jaw function and OHrQoL.

How Does a Unilateral Temporomandibular Joint Replacement Affect Bilateral Masseter and Temporalis Muscle Activity?-A Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: Total alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) requires the detachment of the masseter muscle (MM) at its insertion to the lateral ramus and often the resection of the coronoid process (insertion of the temporalis muscle). There is little literature on how a detachment affects the muscles. The present study evaluates the long-term masticatory muscle activities and maximum voluntary bite force (MVC) in patients with unilateral TMJR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Surface electromyography of the MM and anterior temporalis muscle during bite force testing and MVC were evaluated bilateral preoperatively (T0), 1 (T3), 2 (T4), 3 (T5), and 4 years (T6) postoperatively. The percentage overlapping coefficient (index of the symmetric distribution of muscular activity) was calculated. Differences between stock or custom devices were evaluated. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were enrolled, 4 males and 10 females, age 47.3 ± 14.3 years at TMJR placement. In 11 patients, the coronoid process was resected, 5 patients received stock, and 9 custom prostheses. After surgery, a trend in the improvement of bilateral surface electromyography activities and MVC was found without statistical significance for the side comparison or the time of the investigation. The percentage overlapping coefficient values showed postoperatively relative (>72%) symmetry in both muscles. Up to T5 on the TMJR side, MM showed higher activity when custom prostheses were used. There was no significant difference between stock and custom prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: The vertical (anterior) fibers of the temporalis muscle are preserved despite the resection of the coronoid process. The anterior temporalis muscle, as a synergist of the MM on the TMJR side, postoperatively partially assumes its abduction function. The detached MM appears to reattach. Generally, the bilateral increase in muscle activity and MVC of both muscles suggests regeneration of the investigated muscles. Custom prostheses seem to have an initial advantage for the reattachment of the MM compared with stock prostheses.