Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 5(8): 490-500, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18569516

ABSTRACT

Solid phase microextraction (SPME) has been widely used for many years in various applications, such as environmental and water samples, food and fragrance analysis, or biological fluids. The aim of this study was to suggest the SPME method as an alternative to conventional techniques used in the evaluation of worker exposure to benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX). Polymethylsiloxane-carboxen (PDMS/CAR) showed as the most effective stationary phase material for sorbing BTEX among other materials (polyacrylate, PDMS, PDMS/divinylbenzene, Carbowax/divinylbenzene). Various experimental conditions were studied to apply SPME to BTEX quantitation in field situations. The uptake rate of the selected fiber (75 microm PDMS/CAR) was determined for each analyte at various concentrations, relative humidities, and airflow velocities from static (calm air) to dynamic (> 200 cm/s) conditions. The SPME method also was compared with the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health method 1501. Unlike the latter, the SPME approach fulfills the new requirement for the threshold limit value-short term exposure limit (TLV-STEL) of 2.5 ppm for benzene (8 mg/m(3)).


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , Benzene Derivatives/analysis , Benzene/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Solid Phase Microextraction/methods , Air Movements , Benzene/standards , Benzene Derivatives/standards , Charcoal , Chromatography, Gas , Environmental Monitoring/standards , Humans , Humidity , Linear Models , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. , Occupational Exposure/standards , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...