Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 5: CD004128, 2023 05 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37217440

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Good neurological outcome after cardiac arrest is difficult to achieve. Interventions during the resuscitation phase and treatment within the first hours after the event are critical for a favourable prognosis. Experimental evidence suggests that therapeutic hypothermia is beneficial, and several clinical studies on this topic have been published. This review was originally published in 2009; updated versions were published in 2012 and 2016. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest in adults compared to standard treatment. SEARCH METHODS: We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 30 September 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in adults comparing therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest with standard treatment (control). We included studies with adults cooled by any method, applied within six hours of cardiac arrest, to target body temperatures of 32 °C to 34 °C. Good neurological outcome was defined as no or only minor brain damage allowing people to live an independent life. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was 1. neurological recovery. Our secondary outcomes were 2. survival to hospital discharge, 3. quality of life, 4. cost-effectiveness and 5. ADVERSE EVENTS: We used GRADE to assess certainty. MAIN RESULTS: We found 12 studies with 3956 participants reporting the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on neurological outcome or survival. There were some concerns about the quality of all the studies, and two studies had high risk of bias overall. When we compared conventional cooling methods versus any type of standard treatment (including a body temperature of 36 °C), we found that participants in the therapeutic hypothermia group were more likely to reach a favourable neurological outcome (risk ratio (RR) 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12 to 1.76; 11 studies, 3914 participants). The certainty of the evidence was low. When we compared therapeutic hypothermia with fever prevention or no cooling, we found that participants in the therapeutic hypothermia group were more likely to reach a favourable neurological outcome (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.23; 8 studies, 2870 participants). The certainty of the evidence was low. When we compared therapeutic hypothermia methods with temperature management at 36 °C, there was no evidence of a difference between groups (RR 1.78, 95% CI 0.70 to 4.53; 3 studies; 1044 participants). The certainty of the evidence was low. Across all studies, the incidence of pneumonia, hypokalaemia and severe arrhythmia was increased amongst participants receiving therapeutic hypothermia (pneumonia: RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.18; 4 trials, 3634 participants; hypokalaemia: RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.84; 2 trials, 975 participants; severe arrhythmia: RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.64; 3 trials, 2163 participants). The certainty of the evidence was low (pneumonia, severe arrhythmia) to very low (hypokalaemia). There were no differences in other reported adverse events between groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that conventional cooling methods to induce therapeutic hypothermia may improve neurological outcomes after cardiac arrest. We obtained available evidence from studies in which the target temperature was 32 °C to 34 °C.


Subject(s)
Heart Arrest , Hypokalemia , Hypothermia, Induced , Pneumonia , Adult , Humans , Neuroprotection , Hypokalemia/complications , Hypokalemia/therapy , Heart Arrest/therapy , Pneumonia/therapy , Hypothermia, Induced/adverse effects , Hypothermia, Induced/methods
2.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 830580, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35833107

ABSTRACT

Aims: To evaluate the performance of the ABC (Age, Biomarkers, Clinical history) and CHA2DS2-VASc stroke scores under real-world conditions in an emergency setting. Methods and Results: The performance of the biomarker-based ABC-stroke score and the clinical variable-based CHA2DS2-VASc score for stroke risk assessment were prospectively evaluated in a consecutive series of 2,108 patients with acute symptomatic atrial fibrillation at a tertiary care emergency department. Performance was assessed according to methods for the development and validation of clinical prediction models by Steyerberg et al. and the Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis. During a cumulative observation period of 3,686 person-years, the stroke incidence rate was 1.66 per 100 person-years. Overall, the ABC-stroke and CHA2DS2-VASc scores revealed respective c-indices of 0.64 and 0.55 for stroke prediction. Risk-class hazard ratios comparing moderate to low and high to low were 3.51 and 2.56 for the ABC-stroke score and 1.10 and 1.62 for the CHA2DS2-VASc score. The ABC-stroke score also provided improved risk stratification in patients with moderate stroke risk according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score, who lack clear recommendations regarding anticoagulation therapy (HR: 4.35, P = 0.001). Decision curve analysis indicated a superior net clinical benefit of using the ABC-stroke score. Conclusion: In a large, real-world cohort of patients with acute atrial fibrillation in the emergency department, the ABC-stroke score was superior to the guideline-recommended CHA2DS2-VASc score at predicting stroke risk and refined risk stratification of patients labeled moderate risk by the CHA2DS2-VASc score, potentially easing treatment decision-making.

3.
J Pers Med ; 12(4)2022 Mar 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35455660

ABSTRACT

Background: Modern personalised medicine requires patient-tailored decisions. This is particularly important when considering pharmacological cardioversion for the acute treatment of haemodynamically stable atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in a shared decision-making process. We aimed to develop and validate a predictive model to estimate the individual probability of successful pharmacological cardioversion using different intravenous antiarrhythmic agents. Methods: We analysed data from a prospective atrial fibrillation registry comprising 3053 cases of first-detected or recurrent haemodynamically stable, non-permanent, symptomatic atrial fibrillation presenting to an Austrian academic emergency department between January 2012 and December 2017. Using multivariable analysis, a prediction score was developed and externally validated. The clinical utility of the score was assessed using decision curve analysis. Results: A total of 1528 cases were included in the development cohort (median age 69 years, IQR 58−76; 43.9% female), and 1525 cases were included in the validation cohort (median age 68 years, IQR (58−75); 39.5% female). Finally, 421 cases were available for score development and 330 cases for score validation The weighted score included atrial flutter (8 points), duration of symptoms associated with AF (<24 h; 8 points), absence of previous electrical cardioversion (10 points), and the specific intravenous antiarrhythmic drug (amiodarone 10 points, vernakalant 11 points, ibutilide 13 points). The final score, the "Successful Intravenous Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation (SIC-AF) score," showed good calibration (R2 = 0.955 and R2 = 0.954) and discrimination in both sets (c-indices: 0.68 and 0.66) and net clinical benefit. Conclusions: A predictive model was developed to estimate the success of intravenous pharmacological cardioversion using different antiarrhythmic agents in a cohort of patients with haemodynamically stable, non-permanent, symptomatic atrial fibrillation. External temporal validation confirmed good calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. The SIC-AF score may help patients and physicians jointly decide on the appropriate treatment strategy for acute symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Registration: NCT03272620.

4.
Eur J Intern Med ; 83: 45-53, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32951957

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of patients presenting to the Emergency Department with hemodynamically stable symptomatic atrial fibrillation remains unclear. We aimed to develop and validate an easy-to-use score to predict the individual probability of spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm in these patients METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 2426 cases of first-detected or recurrent hemodynamically stable non-permanent symptomatic atrial fibrillation documented between January 2011 and January 2019 in an Austrian academic Emergency Department atrial fibrillation registry. Multivariable analysis was used to develop and validate a prediction score for spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm during Emergency Department visit. Clinical usefulness of the score was assessed using decision curve analysis RESULTS: 1420 cases were included in the derivation cohort (68years, 57-76; 43% female), 1006 cases were included in the validation cohort (69years, 58-76; 47% female). Six variables independently predicted spontaneous conversion. These included: duration of atrial fibrillation symptoms (<24hours), lack of prior cardioversion history, heart rate at admission (>125bpm), potassium replacement at K+ level ≤3.9mmol/l, NT-proBNP (<1300pg/ml) and lactate dehydrogenase level (<200U/l). A risk score weight was assigned to each variable allowing classification into low (0-2), medium (3-5) and moderate (6-8) probability of spontaneous conversion. The final score showed good calibration (p=0.44 and 0.40) and discrimination in both cohorts (c-indices: 0.74 and 0.67) and clinical net benefit CONCLUSION: The ReSinus score, which predicts spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm, was developed and validated in a large cohort of patients with hemodynamically stable non-permanent symptomatic atrial fibrillation and showed good calibration, discrimination and usefulness REGISTRATION: NCT03272620.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Austria , Electric Countershock , Female , Heart Rate , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
5.
Open Access Emerg Med ; 11: 305-312, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31920407

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Blood gas analysis plays an important role in both diagnosis and subsequent treatment of critically ill patients in the emergency department and the ICU. Historically, arterial blood is predominantly used for blood gas analysis. The puncture is painful and complications may occur. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the agreement between arterial and venous blood gas analysis and whether the sole use of venous blood gas analysis would have changed therapy. METHODS: Adult patients who were intubated in the field and received an arterial and venous blood gas analysis within 15 mins after admission to the ED were eligible for inclusion. The values for pH, pCO2, HCO3-, base excess and lactate levels were collected retrospectively. Mean differences were calculated by subtracting venous from arterial values. The agreement between venous and arterial measurements was assessed using the method of Bland and Altman. Blood gases were assessed by two independent physicians using a standardized questionnaire to determine whether the use of venous blood gases would have led to a different interpretation of the situation (other diagnostic path) or a change of therapy (eg. respirator adjustment). Acceptable limits were defined before the collection of data started. RESULTS: Fifty patients (62% male, median age 63years) who were treated at the Emergency Department between June 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014 were included in the study. Following average differences and limits of agreement (LOA) were documented: pH 0.02312 with LOA from -0.048 to 0.094; pCO2 -3.612 mmHg with LOA from -15 to 8.1 mmHg; BE -0.154 mmol/l with LOA from -3.7 to 3.4 mmol/l; HCO3-0.338 mmol/l with LOA from -2.27 to 2.9 mmol/l; Lactate -0.124 mg/dl with LOA from -2.28 to 2.03 mg/dl. Using venous blood gas results 100% of the patients with metabolic alkalosis were correctly diagnosed. Metabolic acidosis was detected with a high sensitivity (80.64%), specificity (89.47%) and positive predictive value (92.59%). The answers to lactate and acidosis due to AKI showed a specificity and positive predictive value of 100%. The respiratory adjustment showed a high sensitivity (91.89%) but a low specificity (38.46%). CONCLUSION: For pH, bicarbonate, BE and lactate venous blood gases can be used as surrogates for arterial measurements. Venous pCO2 can be used for screening of hypercapnia and trending. Respirator adjustments may be done too often if the venous blood gas is used.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...