The Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Characterizing Adrenal Tumors.

CONTEXT: Imaging plays an important role in the characterization of adrenal tumors, but findings might be inconclusive. The clinical question is whether 18F fluodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is of diagnostic value in this setting. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was aimed at the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating benign from malignant adrenal tumors discovered either as adrenal incidentaloma or during staging or follow-up of oncologic patients. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched to select articles between 2000 and 2021. STUDY SELECTION: We included studies describing the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in adult patients with an adrenal tumor. Exclusion criteria were 10 or fewer participants, insufficient data on histopathology, clinical follow-up, or PET results. After screening of title and abstract by 2 independent reviewers, 79 studies were retrieved, of which 17 studies met the selection criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction using a protocol and quality assessment according to QUADAS-2 was performed independently by at least 2 authors. DATA SYNTHESIS: A bivariate random-effects model was applied using R (version 3.6.2.). Pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying malignant adrenal tumors was 87.3% (95% CI, 82.5%-90.9%) and 84.7% (95% CI, 79.3%-88.9%), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 9.20 (95% CI, 5.27-16.08; P < .01). Major sources of heterogeneity (I2, 57.1% [95% CI, 27.5%-74.6%]) were in population characteristics, reference standard, and interpretation criteria of imaging results. CONCLUSIONS: 18F-FDG PET/CT had good diagnostic accuracy for characterization of adrenal tumors. The literature, however, is limited, in particular regarding adrenal incidentalomas. Large prospective studies in well-defined patient populations with application of validated cutoff values are needed.

Plasma carnitine concentrations in Medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: lessons from an observational cohort study.

Our aim was to study the effect of secondary carnitine deficiency (SCD) and carnitine supplementation on important outcome measures for persons with medium-chain Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCADD). We performed a large retrospective observational study using all recorded visits of persons with MCADD in the University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands, between October 1994 and October 2019. Frequency and duration of acute unscheduled preventive hospital visits, exercise tolerance, fatigue, and muscle pain were considered important clinical outcomes and were studied in relation to (acyl)carnitine profile and carnitine supplementation status. The study encompassed 1228 visits of 93 persons with MCADD. >60% had SCD during follow-up. This included only persons with severe MCADD. Carnitine supplementation and SCD were unrelated to the frequency and duration of the acute unscheduled preventive hospital visits (P > 0.05). The relative risk for fatigue, muscle ache, or exercise intolerance was equal between persons with and without SCD (RR 1.6, 95% CI 0.48-5.10, P = 0.4662). No episodes of metabolic crisis were recorded in non-carnitine-supplemented persons with MCADD and SCD. In some persons with MCADD, SCD resolved without carnitine supplementation. There is absence of real-world evidence in favor of routine carnitine analysis and carnitine supplementation in the follow-up of persons with MCADD.

Impact of Oncotype DX testing on ER+ breast cancer treatment and survival in the first decade of use.

BACKGROUND: The Oncotype DX breast recurrence score has been introduced more than a decade ago to aid physicians in determining the need for systemic adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)+, lymph node-negative breast cancer. METHODS: In this study, we utilized data from The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program to investigate temporal trends in Oncotype DX usage among US breast cancer patients in the first decade after the introduction of the Oncotype DX assay. RESULTS: We found that the use of Oncotype DX has steadily increased in the first decade of use and that this increase is associated with a decreased usage of chemotherapy. Patients who utilized the Oncotype DX test tended to have improved survival compared to patients who did not use the assay even after adjusting for clinical variables associated with prognosis. In addition, chemotherapy usage in patients with high-risk scores is associated with significantly longer overall and breast cancer-specific survival compared to high-risk patients who did not receive chemotherapy. On the contrary, patients with low-risk scores who were treated with chemotherapy tended to have shorter overall survival compared to low-risk patients who forwent chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: We have provided a comprehensive temporal overview of the use of Oncotype DX in breast cancer patients in the first decade after Oncotype DX was introduced. Our results suggest that the use of Oncotype DX is increasing in ER+ breast cancer and that the Oncotype DX test results provide valuable information for patient treatment and prognosis.