Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses: a retrospective clinical examination.

PURPOSE: To obtain survival data on 32 fiber-reinforced fixed dental prostheses which were inserted in our department and to rate the quality of these restorations on the basis of esthetic, biological, and functional parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with fiber-reinforced fixed dental prostheses were included in the study. The fiber frameworks were made of a polymer-monomer-preimpregnated continuous unidirectional glass fiber material. The survival times, failure events, and clinical parameters were recorded. Restorations in function without previous failure were classified as "Overall Survival". The classification "Functional Survival" was assigned in the event of minor failure and subsequent repair. Loss of the restoration was regarded as "Failure". The quality rating was performed using modified USHPS/Ryge criteria. RESULTS: The follow-up interval ranged from 2 to 64 months with a median follow-up time of 18.2 months. Twenty-four restorations were classified as "Overall Survival", seven were classified as "Functional Survival", and one was classified as "Failure". The overall survival at the median follow-up time was 74.4%. For the majority, the quality rating (USHPS/Ryge criteria) yielded clinically excellent results in all categories. No restoration was rated as insufficient or poor. CONCLUSION: Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses provide sufficient stability and very good esthetic, biological, and functional performance in the case of specific clinical indications.

Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a clinical evaluation of survival and quality parameters.

OBJECTIVES: Irregular tooth shape and position in the anterior maxilla and mandible are major aesthetic problems for patients. In recent years such conditions have increasingly been treated minimally or even non-invasively by recontouring teeth with direct composite resin buildups. Although clinical experience with this treatment option is promising, evidence-based data about longevity are limited. METHODS: The authors evaluated survival and quality of 327 composite buildups that were placed in 101 patients in the Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, between 2002 and 2008. Follow-up intervals and failures were recorded. Quality was assessed by grading restorations (modified USPHS/Ryge critera) still in situ without adverse event during the follow-up period. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up interval of 27.8 months, 284 restorations were in situ and had no event. Forty-two restorations were in situ but had events that were mostly minor fractures of the composite resin. One restoration had been lost. Analysis of the time from insertion to any event or end of follow-up yielded an estimated 5-year survival rate of 79.2% (95% CI, 70.5-87.9). Quality was assessed by grading in situ restorations without event. More than 90% of graded restorations were categorized as "clinically excellent" (1) or "clinically good" (2). A correlation between those rated "clinically sufficient" or worse (≥3) and the follow-up period was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Direct composite buildups are aesthetic, functional, and biologically sound treatment options for recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with clinically promising survival rates. Therefore, tooth shape correction can be recommended in cases in which minimally invasive or non-invasive procedures on healthy teeth are indicated.