Repeat angiography in patients undergoing conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis for submassive pulmonary embolism: a large single-center experience.

PURPOSE: Few studies have examined conventional catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) for the treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). Moreover, angiographic resolution of thrombus burden following CDT has infrequently been characterized. This study describes a single-center experience treating submassive PE with CDT while utilizing repeat angiography to determine treatment efficacy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 140 consecutive patients who underwent CDT for submassive PE from December 2012 to June 2019 was performed. Angiographic resolution of thrombus burden after CDT was reported as high (>75%), moderate (51-75%), low (26-50%), or insignificant (≤25%). All angiograms were reviewed by two interventional radiologists. Secondary endpoints included reduction in pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and clinical outcomes. Bleeding events were classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) adverse event criteria. RESULTS: CDT was performed in 140 patients with a mean rtPA dose of 25.3 mg and a mean treatment time of 26.0 hours. Angiographic resolution of thrombus burden was high in 70.0%, moderate in 19.3%, low in 5.7%, and insignificant in 3.6%; in 2 patients (1.4%) repeat angiography was not performed. Systolic PAP was reduced (47 vs. 35 mmHg, p < 0.001), mean PAP was reduced (25 vs 21 mmHg, p < 0.001), and 129 patients (92.1%) improved clinically. Patients with high or moderate resolution of thrombus burden had a clinical improvement rate of 95.2%, while patients with low or insignificant thrombus burden resolution had a clinical improvement rate of 76.9% (p=0.011). Ten patients (7.1%) had hemodynamic or respiratory decompensation requiring mechanical ventilation, systemic thrombolysis, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or surgical intervention. Seven patients (5.0%) experienced moderate bleeding events and one patient (0.7%) with metastatic disease developed severe gastrointestinal bleeding that resulted in death. Thirty-day mortality was 1.4%. CONCLUSION: In patients with submassive PE undergoing CDT, angiographic resolution of thrombus burden is a safe and directly observable metric that can be used to determine procedural success. In this study, CDT with repeat angiography was associated with a 5.7% bleeding event rate and thirty-day mortality of 1.4%.

Fast-Track Registration: A Way to Increase Efficiency in the IR Division.

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in patient registration process at an academic 2-suite IR Division to determine if moving registration from the waiting room to the vascular holding area decreased amount of time patients spent in the Radiology Department and improved start times. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A data collection sheet was created by evaluating patient-related processes; event timestamps were recorded on the sheet. The control group consisted of 33 patients who registered using the traditional process. The fast-track group consisted of 29 patients who bypassed the traditional registration procedure and were registered by nurses in the vascular holding area. RESULTS: Total time between control and fast-track groups significantly decreased from an average time of 215 minutes to 178 minutes (P = .020). The average start time improved significantly from an average of 63 minutes after scheduled procedure start time for the control group to 33 minutes after the scheduled procedure start time for the fast-track group (P = .009). Start time (P = .022), time spent in recovery area (P = .006), and total time, after correcting for differences in laboratory test turnaround time, (P = .010) decreased in variability after implementation of fast-track registration. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing fast-track registration for outpatient subcutaneous port placement in the IR Division improved start times and decreased total time patients spent in the hospital, while also reducing variability in the process.

Locoregional and systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains challenging due to late presentation and the presence of accompanying liver dysfunction. As such, most patients are not eligible for curative resection and liver transplant. Management in this scenario depends on a number of factors including hepatic function, tumor burden, patency of hepatic vasculature and patients' functional status. Based on these, patients can be offered catheter based intra-arterial therapy for intermediate stage disease and in more advanced disease, sorafenib. Given recent data, regorafenib is now an option following failure of sorafenib. Catheter directed intra-arterial therapy takes advantage of tumor hypervascularity and the unique dual blood supply of the liver, as hepatic tumors receive arterial perfusion via the hepatic artery while the rest of the liver is supplied by the portal vein. This allows selective embolization and delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the tumor. Compared to best supportive care, intra-arterial therapy offers a survival benefit in intermediate stage HCC and is the recommended approach for treatment. None of the catheter based approaches; including bland embolization, conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE), drug eluting bead trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) or trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) offers a clear advantage over the other, although DEB-TACE may be characterized by less systemic toxicity. All of these approaches are contraindicated in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). On the other hand, intra-arterial, radio embolization, with Yttrium-90 (Y90) can be offered to patients with PVT. The place of this modality in management of HCC is still being investigated. The role of sorafenib in advanced HCC is not in doubt, as until recently, it was the only systemic therapy approved for the management in this setting. This is despite multiple trials evaluating other agents. The addition of sorafenib to catheter-based therapy in intermediate stage disease has also failed to show any benefit. The modest survival benefit with sorafenib and the failure of other targeted agents suggest that it is important to look beyond inhibition of angiogenesis in advanced HCC. Identification of key drivers and mediators of HCC remains paramount for successful drug development. In line with this, it is refreshing that the excitement that has followed developments in cancer immunotherapy is finding its way to HCC with early trials of anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies showing sufficient activity that phase III trials are now ongoing for Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab in advanced HCC. Future drug development efforts will focus on defining the feasibility of combining different treatment approaches targeting multiple important modulators of HCC.