Sudden Cardiac Death at Home: Potential Lives Saved With Fully Automated External Defibrillators.

Sudden cardiac death from ventricular arrhythmia kills about 350,000 people annually in the United States. This number has not improved since the widespread public availability of semi-automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and the teaching of nonbreathing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) procedures. When an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurs in a public space, lay witnesses do CPR in 40% of the cases and use AEDs on only 7.4% of the victims before emergency medical services (EMS) arrive. About 70% of sudden cardiac death occurs at home, where an AED is usually unavailable until EMS appears. The time from a 911 call to shock averages approximately 7 minutes in urban areas and is more than 14.5 minutes in rural environments. Because arrest onset is often not observed, arrest onset to shock times maybe even longer. Survival from cardiac arrest decreases by approximately 7 to 10% per minute of ventricular arrhythmia. A prearrest protocol is proposed for the at-home use of fully automated external defibrillators in select cardiac patients, which should reduce the arrest-to-shock interval to under 1 minute and may eliminate the need for CPR in some cases.

A multicenter, retrospective pilot study of resource use and costs associated with severity of disease in glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE: To examine resource consumption and the direct costs of treating glaucoma at different disease severity levels. DESIGN: Observational, retrospective cohort study based on medical record review. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-one records of patients with primary open-angle or normal-tension glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, or ocular hypertension (age > or =18 years) were randomly selected from 12 sites in the United States and stratified according to severity based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Patients had to have been followed up for a minimum of 5 years. Patients with concomitant ocular disease likely to affect glaucoma treatment-related resource consumption were excluded. METHODS: Glaucoma severity was assessed and assigned using a 6-stage glaucoma staging system, modified from the Bascom Palmer (Hodapp-Anderson-Parrish) system. Clinical and resource use data were collected from the medical record review. Resource consumption for low-vision care and vision rehabilitation was estimated for patients with end-stage disease based on specialist surveys. For each stage of disease, publicly available economic data were then applied to assign resource valuation and estimate patient-level direct costs from the payer perspective. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Average annual resource use and estimated total annual direct cost of treatment were calculated at the patient level and stratified by stage of disease. Direct costs by specific resource types, including ophthalmology visits, glaucoma surgeries, medications, visual field examinations, and other glaucoma services, were also assessed. RESULTS: Direct ophthalmology-related resource use, including ophthalmology visits, glaucoma surgeries, and medication use, increased as disease severity worsened. Average direct cost of treatment ranged from $623 per patient per year for glaucoma suspects or patients with early-stage disease to $2511 per patient per year for patients with end-stage disease. Medication costs composed the largest proportion of total direct cost for all stages of disease (range, 24%-61%). CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that resource use and direct cost of glaucoma management increase with worsening disease severity. Based on these findings, a glaucoma treatment that delays the progression of disease could have the potential to significantly reduce the health economic burden of this chronic disease over many years.

A persistency and economic analysis of latanoprost, bimatoprost, or beta-blockers in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in the persistency and treatment costs for latanoprost, bimatoprost, or beta-blockers in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, multicenter, parallel, active-controlled comparison of patients who were prescribed with ocular hypotensive monotherapy between September 1996 and August 2002. RESULTS: 1,182 patients were included. The Kaplan Meier life table analysis showed that latanoprost was continued longest among the groups for the first year of therapy (p=0.02). A significant difference existed between groups in the final intraocular pressure for latanoprost (17.3+/-3.9, N=357), for bimatoprost (18.0+/-3.6, N=146), and for the beta-blockers (17.9+/-3.7, N=335) (p=<0.0001). The average number of visits was statistically higher for beta-blockers (3.3), compared to latanoprost (2.9) and bimatoprost (3.1) (p=0.01). Further, the mean number of medicine changes was greater for bimatoprost (0.45) and beta-blockers (0.47) than for latanoprost (0.27) (p=0.0008). The cost of visits and medications was lowest for beta-blockers ($119.3+/-$78.9) and highest for bimatoprost ($163.8+/-$51.2) (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients were more persistent with latanoprost and demonstrated lower intraocular pressure, fewer visits, and fewer medicine changes when compared to bimatoprost or beta-blocker therapy. In contrast, the beta-blocker group provided lower overall cost.

Timolol 0.5%/dorzolamide 2% fixed combination vs timolol maleate 0.5% and unoprostone 0.15% given twice daily to patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of timolol 0.5%/dorzolamide 2% fixed combination vs timolol maleate 0.5% and unoprostone 0.15% given twice daily. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter, randomized, double-masked, crossover comparison study. METHODS: Primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension patients were randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups for a 6-week treatment period and then crossed over to the opposite treatment. Diurnal curve testing was performed at 8:00 AM, 10:00 AM, 4:00 PM, 6:00 PM, and 8:00 PM at baseline and the end of each treatment period. The run-in medicine was timolol twice daily for 28 days. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients completed this trial. The baseline trough pressure was 24.3 +/- 3.0 mm Hg, and the diurnal curve was 23.4 +/- 3.2 mm Hg. For the fixed combination the treatment trough pressure was 20.8 +/- 4.1 mm Hg and the diurnal curve was 19.6 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, whereas timolol and unoprostone concomitant therapy showed a treatment trough pressure of 20.1 +/- 4.5 mm Hg and a diurnal pressure of 19.8 +/- 4.1 mm Hg. There was no significant difference between treatment groups at any time point, for the diurnal curve, or in the extended reduction from baseline. There was no difference between treatment groups regarding ocular and systemic unsolicited or solicited adverse events. Burning, stinging, and conjunctival hyperemia were the adverse events most noted. There were no serious adverse events during this trial. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that both timolol/dorzolamide 2% fixed combination and concomitant timolol maleate 0.5% and unoprostone 0.15% therapy provide similar efficacy and safety throughout the daytime diurnal curve.