Noninvasive pulse wave analysis for the determination of central artery stiffness.

Central artery stiffness predicts cardiovascular structural damage and clinical outcome. It is controversial whether central artery stiffness can be determined by noninvasive measurements. We compared noninvasive determination of central artery stiffness obtained from applanation tonometry of the peripheral radial artery waveform with invasive measurements of the ratio of pulse-pressure-to-stroke-volume. A total of 112 invasive measurements of the ratio of pulse-pressure-to-stroke-volume and noninvasive determinations of central artery stiffness were performed in 49 patients on the intensive care unit. In 13 out of 112 attempts of noninvasive measurements (12%) radial pulse could not be obtained using applanation tonometry because of cardiac arrhythmia or radial pulse could not be detected. These 13 failing noninvasive measurements were attempted in 7 patients. In the remaining cases we found a significant correlation between noninvasively obtained central artery stiffness and invasive measurements of the ratio of pulse-pressure-to-stroke-volume (Spearman r=0.40; p<0.0001). The association between invasive and noninvasive measurements was confirmed using Bland-Altman plots. Furthermore, a norepinephrine-induced increase of arterial stiffness was detected both invasively and noninvasively. Noninvasive determination of central artery stiffness obtained from peripheral radial artery waveform should be useful in clinical practice although it cannot be performed in every patient.

Noninvasive cardiac output determination using applanation tonometry-derived radial artery pulse contour analysis in critically ill patients.

Conventional thermodilution cardiac output (CO) monitoring is limited mainly to intensive care units and operating rooms because it requires the use of invasive techniques. To reduce the potential for complications and to broaden the applicability of hemodynamic monitoring, noninvasive methods for CO determination are being sought. Applanation tonometry allows noninvasive CO estimation through pulse contour analysis, but the method has not been evaluated in critically ill patients. We therefore performed noninvasive radial artery applanation tonometry in 49 critically ill medical intensive care unit patients and compared CO estimates to invasive CO measurements obtained using a pulmonary artery catheter or the PiCCO transpulmonary thermodilution system. One-hundred-sixteen measurements were performed, and patients were receiving vasopressor support during 78 measurements. When the data were analyzed with bias and precision statistics, a large bias of 2.03 L x min(-1) x m(-2) and a high percentage error of 85% were found between the invasive measurements and applanation tonometry-derived CO estimates, with the noninvasive CO results being significantly lower than the invasive ones (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in bias between the patients who were receiving vasopressor support and those who were not (P = 0.874) or between patients with good and poor applanation tonometry pressure waveform signal quality (P = 0.071). Whereas a significant increase in the invasively determined CO was observed when a fluid bolus was administered (n = 7, P = 0.016), these changes were not reflected by the noninvasive method. We conclude that radial artery applanation tonometry is not suitable to determine CO in critically ill hemodynamically unstable patients.

Volumetric hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid removal on hemodialysis in the intensive care unit.

Estimation of removable excess body fluid is difficult in critically ill patients with renal failure. Volumetric hemodynamic parameters are increasingly being used to guide fluid therapy in the intensive care unit, but their suitability to monitor fluid removal with hemodialysis in critically ill patients is not known. Changes in the extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) and intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) measured with transpulmonary thermodilution immediately before and after hemodialysis were analyzed from 39 hemodialysis sessions of 9 patients consecutively treated in the medical intensive care unit of a German University Hospital. Additional hemodynamic, ventilation, and oxygenation-related parameters were recorded at the same time. Online relative blood volume (RBV) monitoring was performed in 29 sessions. Comparisons of pre and postdialysis values showed a significant reduction of the EVLWI with fluid removal (p=0.009), with only a slight nonsignificant decrease in the ITBVI. The cardiac index (CI) also decreased significantly (p=0.010), whereas blood pressure remained stable. Oxygenation improved significantly (p=0.005), and the hematocrit increased significantly with dialysis (p=0.039). There was no correlation between hematocrit changes and RBV measurements. Significant correlations existed between ITBVI and CI changes (p<0.001), but not to EVLWI reduction. The removal of excess body fluid on hemodialysis is reflected by the EVLWI reduction, whereas the preservation of cardiac preload is shown by ITBVI stability. Volumetric hemodynamic parameters could be useful to guide fluid removal with hemodialysis in the intensive care unit.

Effect of the venous catheter site on transpulmonary thermodilution measurement variables.

OBJECTIVE: Transpulmonary thermodilution is increasingly used for hemodynamic monitoring of critically ill patients. Injection of a cold saline bolus in the central venous circulation is a prerequisite for transpulmonary thermodilution measurements. Superior vena cava access is typically used for injection. This access, however, is not feasible or available in all intensive care patients (e.g., in burn victims or due to contraindications for Trendelenburg position). The present study investigates whether femoral vein access can be used to obtain clinically acceptable values. DESIGN: Open prospective trial performed between September 2005 and April 2006. SETTINGS: Medical intensive care unit at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Eleven critically ill patients monitored by transpulmonary thermodilution. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 44 measurements in 11 intensive care patients were performed with the Pulsion PICCO Plus device to compare cardiac output, extravascular lung water index, and global end-diastolic volume index after central venous injection of the cold saline bolus via femoral and jugular venous access. Bland-Altman analysis revealed that catheter insertion site does not relevantly influence cardiac output and extravascular lung water index. The bias between femoral and jugular injection was +0.16 L/min for cardiac output and +0.23 mL/kg for extravascular lung water index. Global end-diastolic volume index values, however, show a constant overestimation of +140.73 mL/m2 after femoral injection, as obtained by Bland-Altman analysis. This overestimation can be explained by a longer mean transit time due to a longer distance of catheter tip and right atrium for a femoral catheter. CONCLUSIONS: Transpulmonary thermodilution measurements with a cold saline bolus via a femoral catheter provide clinically reliable cardiac output and extravascular lung water index values. Concerning global end-diastolic volume index, there is a good correlation as well, but in the interpretation of the results, an overestimation has to be taken into account.