Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Addict Biol ; 25(3): e12762, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31013550

ABSTRACT

Understanding genetic factors that contribute to cannabis use disorder (CUD) is important, but to date, findings have been equivocal. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the cannabinoid receptor 1 gene (CNR1; rs1049353 and rs806378) and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) gene (rs324420) have been implicated in CUD. Their relationship to addiction endophenotypes such as cannabis-related state satiety, the salience of appetitive cues, and craving after acute cannabinoid administration has not been investigated. Forty-eight cannabis users participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover experiment where they were administered treatments in a randomized order via vaporization: placebo, Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (8 mg), THC + cannabidiol (THC + CBD) (8 + 16 mg), and CBD (16 mg). Cannabis-related state satiety, appetitive cue salience (cannabis and food), and cannabis craving were assessed each day. Participants were genotyped for rs1049353, rs806378, and rs324420. Results indicated that CNR1 rs1049353 GG carriers showed increased state satiety after THC/THC + CBD administration in comparison with placebo and reduced the salience of appetitive cues after THC in comparison with CBD administration; A carriers did not vary on either of these measures indicative of a vulnerability to CUD. CNR1 rs806378 CC carriers showed greater salience to appetitive cues in comparison with T carriers, but there was no evidence for changes in state satiety. FAAH rs324420 A carriers showed greater bias to appetitive cues after THC, in comparison with CC carriers. FAAH CC carriers showed reduced bias after THC in comparison with CBD. No SNPs modulated craving. These findings identify candidate neurocognitive mechanisms through which endocannabinoid system genetics may influence vulnerability to CUD.


Subject(s)
Amidohydrolases/genetics , Cannabidiol/pharmacology , Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists/pharmacology , Craving/physiology , Dronabinol/pharmacology , Marijuana Abuse/genetics , Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1/genetics , Satiation/physiology , Adolescent , Craving/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Cues , Double-Blind Method , Endophenotypes , Female , Humans , Male , Marijuana Abuse/physiopathology , Satiation/drug effects , Young Adult
2.
Transl Psychiatry ; 8(1): 181, 2018 09 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30185793

ABSTRACT

The main active ingredient in cannabis, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), can acutely induce psychotic symptoms and impair episodic and working memory. Another major constituent, cannabidiol (CBD), may attenuate these effects. This study aimed to determine the effects of THC and CBD, both alone and in combination on psychotic symptoms and memory function. A randomised, double-blind crossover design compared the effects of (i) placebo, (ii) THC 8 mg, (iii) CBD 16 mg and (iv) THC 8 mg + CBD 16 mg administered by inhalation through a vaporiser. Using an experimental medicine approach to predict treatment sensitivity, we selected 48 cannabis users from the community on the basis of (1) schizotypal personality questionnaire scores (low, high) and (2) frequency of cannabis use (light, heavy). The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Psychotomimetic States Inventory (PSI), immediate and delayed prose recall (episodic memory), 1- and 2-back (working memory) were assessed on each day. Results indicated that THC increased overall scores on the PSI, negative symptoms on BPRS, and robustly impaired episodic and working memory. Co-administration of CBD did not attenuate these effects. CBD alone reduced PSI scores in light users only. At a ratio of 2:1, CBD does not attenuate the acute psychotic and memory impairing effects of vaporised THC. Frequent cannabis users may show a blunted anti- psychotic response to CBD, which is of concern due to the high rates of cannabis use disorders in patients with schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Cannabidiol/pharmacology , Dronabinol/pharmacology , Hallucinogens/pharmacology , Memory/drug effects , Psychoses, Substance-Induced , Administration, Inhalation , Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Dronabinol/adverse effects , Drug Combinations , Drug Interactions , Female , Humans , Male , Marijuana Smoking , United Kingdom , Young Adult
3.
Pain ; 157(8): 1618-25, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26934512

ABSTRACT

Estimates of patients' pain, and judgments of their pain expression, are affected by characteristics of the observer and of the patient. In this study, we investigated the impact of high or low trustworthiness, a rapid and automatic decision made about another, and of gender and depression history on judgments made by pain clinicians and by medical students. Judges viewed a video of a patient in pain presented with a brief history and rated his or her pain, and the likelihood that it was being exaggerated, minimized, or hidden. Judges also recommended various medical and treatment options. Contrary to expectations, trustworthiness had no main effect on pain estimates or judgments, but interacted with gender producing pervasive bias. Women, particularly those rated of low trustworthiness, were estimated to have less pain and to be more likely to exaggerate it. Unexpectedly, judgments of exaggeration and pain estimates were independent. Consistent with those judgments, men were more likely to be recommended analgesics, and women to be recommended psychological treatment. Effects of depression history were inconsistent and hard to interpret. Contrary to expectations, clinicians' pain estimates were higher than medical students', and indicated less scepticism. Empathy was unrelated to these judgments. Trustworthiness merits further exploration in healthcare providers' judgments of pain authenticity and how it interacts with other characteristics of patients. Furthermore, systematic disadvantage to women showing pain is of serious concern in healthcare settings.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Judgment , Trust/psychology , Chronic Pain/psychology , Empathy , Female , Health Personnel , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Male , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Students, Medical
4.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 148: 165-71, 2015 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25622777

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To determine the degree to which cigarette smoking predicts levels of cannabis dependence above and beyond cannabis use itself, concurrently and in an exploratory four-year follow-up, and to investigate whether cigarette smoking mediates the relationship between cannabis use and cannabis dependence. METHODS: The study was cross sectional with an exploratory follow-up in the participants' own homes or via telephone interviews in the United Kingdom. Participants were 298 cannabis and tobacco users aged between 16 and 23; follow-up consisted of 65 cannabis and tobacco users. The primary outcome variable was cannabis dependence as measured by the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS). Cannabis and tobacco smoking were assessed through a self-reported drug history. RESULTS: Regression analyses at baseline showed cigarette smoking (frequency of cigarette smoking: B=0.029, 95% CI=0.01, 0.05; years of cigarette smoking: B=0.159, 95% CI=0.05, 0.27) accounted for 29% of the variance in cannabis dependence when controlling for frequency of cannabis use. At follow-up, only baseline cannabis dependence predicted follow-up cannabis dependence (B=0.274, 95% CI=0.05, 0.53). At baseline, cigarette smoking mediated the relationship between frequency of cannabis use and dependence (B=0.0168, 95% CI=0.008, 0.288) even when controlling for possible confounding variables (B=0.0153, 95% CI=0.007, 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette smoking is related to concurrent cannabis dependence independently of cannabis use frequency. Cigarette smoking also mediates the relationship between cannabis use and cannabis dependence suggesting tobacco is a partial driver of cannabis dependence in young people who use cannabis and tobacco.


Subject(s)
Marijuana Abuse/diagnosis , Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Smoking/psychology , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
5.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 25(3): 325-34, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25534187

ABSTRACT

Acute administration of the primary psychoactive constituent of cannabis, Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), impairs human facial affect recognition, implicating the endocannabinoid system in emotional processing. Another main constituent of cannabis, cannabidiol (CBD), has seemingly opposite functional effects on the brain. This study aimed to determine the effects of THC and CBD, both alone and in combination on emotional facial affect recognition. 48 volunteers, selected for high and low frequency of cannabis use and schizotypy, were administered, THC (8mg), CBD (16mg), THC+CBD (8mg+16mg) and placebo, by inhalation, in a 4-way, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design. They completed an emotional facial affect recognition task including fearful, angry, happy, sad, surprise and disgust faces varying in intensity from 20% to 100%. A visual analogue scale (VAS) of feeling 'stoned' was also completed. In comparison to placebo, CBD improved emotional facial affect recognition at 60% emotional intensity; THC was detrimental to the recognition of ambiguous faces of 40% intensity. The combination of THC+CBD produced no impairment. Relative to placebo, both THC alone and combined THC+CBD equally increased feelings of being 'stoned'. CBD did not influence feelings of 'stoned'. No effects of frequency of use or schizotypy were found. In conclusion, CBD improves recognition of emotional facial affect and attenuates the impairment induced by THC. This is the first human study examining the effects of different cannabinoids on emotional processing. It provides preliminary evidence that different pharmacological agents acting upon the endocannabinoid system can both improve and impair recognition of emotional faces.


Subject(s)
Cannabidiol/pharmacology , Dronabinol/pharmacology , Facial Recognition/drug effects , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Schizotypal Personality Disorder/chemically induced , Administration, Inhalation , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Drug Interactions , Emotions/drug effects , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Marijuana Smoking/drug therapy , Photic Stimulation , Psychotropic Drugs/pharmacology , Schizotypal Personality Disorder/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Visual Analog Scale , Young Adult
6.
Addiction ; 109(10): 1686-94, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24894801

ABSTRACT

AIMS: (1) To determine whether measured concentrations of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) in individuals' own cannabis predict their estimates of drug potency and actual titration; and (2) to ascertain if these effects are influenced by frequency of use and cannabis type. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, naturalistic. SETTING: Participants' own homes. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 247 cannabis users in the United Kingdom: 152 'recreational' (1-24 days/month) and 95 'daily' (≥25 days/month). METHODS: Participants rated their own cannabis for its potency (1-10) and type ('resin', 'herbal', 'skunk') before smoking it in front of the researcher. The amount of cannabis (g) used in their joints was recorded and an additional sample was analysed for THC and CBD concentrations (%). FINDINGS: THC concentrations were related negatively to the amount of cannabis used [unstandardized regression coefficient: b = -0.009, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.017, -0.002]. Potency estimates were predicted by increasing THC (b = 0.055, 95% CI = 0.020, 0.090) and decreasing CBD (b = -0.160, 95% CI = -0.284, -0.062), and both of these associations were mediated by cannabis type (THC: b = 0.018, 95% CI = 0.006, 0.037; CBD: b = -0.105, 95% CI = -0.198, -0.028). Potency estimates were more reflective of THC as frequency of use increased (b = 0.004, 95% CI = 0.001, 0.007) and were 7.3 times more so in daily (partial r = 0.381) than recreational users (r = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS: When using their own cannabis in a naturalistic setting, people titrate the amount they roll in joints according to concentrations of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) but not cannabidiol (CBD). Recreational users thus show poor understanding of cannabis potency.


Subject(s)
Cannabidiol/analysis , Cannabis/chemistry , Dronabinol/analysis , Marijuana Smoking , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , United Kingdom , Young Adult
7.
Conscious Cogn ; 21(1): 292-8, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22230356

ABSTRACT

Cannabis acutely increases schizotypy and chronic use is associated with elevated rates of psychosis. Creative individuals have higher levels of schizotypy, however links between cannabis use, schizotypy and creativity have not been investigated. We investigated the effects of cannabis smoked naturalistically on schizotypy and divergent thinking, a measure of creativity. One hundred and sixty cannabis users were tested on 1 day when sober and another day when intoxicated with cannabis. State and trait measures of both schizotypy and creativity were administered. Quartile splits compared those lowest (n=47) and highest (n=43) in trait creativity. Cannabis increased verbal fluency in low creatives to the same level as that of high creatives. Cannabis increased state psychosis-like symptoms in both groups and the high creativity group were significantly higher in trait schizotypy, but this does not appear to be linked to the verbal fluency change. Acute cannabis use increases divergent thinking as indexed by verbal fluency in low creatives.


Subject(s)
Creativity , Marijuana Smoking/adverse effects , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Schizotypal Personality Disorder/chemically induced , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , United Kingdom , Verbal Behavior
8.
Br J Psychiatry ; 197(4): 285-90, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20884951

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The two main constituents of cannabis, cannabidiol and Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), have opposing effects both pharmacologically and behaviourally when administered in the laboratory. Street cannabis is known to contain varying levels of each cannabinoid. AIMS: To study how the varying levels of cannabidiol and THC have an impact on the acute effects of the drug in naturalistic settings. METHOD: Cannabis users (n = 134) were tested 7 days apart on measures of memory and psychotomimetic symptoms, once while they were drug free and once while acutely intoxicated by their own chosen smoked cannabis. Using an unprecedented methodology, a sample of cannabis (as well as saliva) was collected from each user and analysed for levels of cannabinoids. On the basis of highest and lowest cannabidiol content of cannabis, two groups of individuals were directly compared. RESULTS: Groups did not differ in the THC content of the cannabis they smoked. Unlike the marked impairment in prose recall of individuals who smoked cannabis low in cannabidiol, participants smoking cannabis high in cannabidiol showed no memory impairment. Cannabidiol content did not affect psychotomimetic symptoms, which were elevated in both groups when intoxicated. CONCLUSIONS: The antagonistic effects of cannabidiol at the CB(1) receptor are probably responsible for its profile in smoked cannabis, attenuating the memory-impairing effects of THC. In terms of harm reduction, users should be made aware of the higher risk of memory impairment associated with smoking low-cannabidiol strains of cannabis like 'skunk' and encouraged to use strains containing higher levels of cannabidiol.


Subject(s)
Cannabidiol/pharmacology , Cannabinoids/pharmacology , Dronabinol/pharmacology , Marijuana Smoking/adverse effects , Memory Disorders/chemically induced , Adolescent , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Analysis of Variance , Cannabidiol/analysis , Cannabinoids/adverse effects , Cannabinoids/analysis , Dronabinol/adverse effects , Dronabinol/analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Memory/drug effects , Mental Recall/drug effects , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1/drug effects , Saliva/chemistry , United Kingdom , Verbal Learning/drug effects , Young Adult
9.
Neuropsychopharmacology ; 35(9): 1879-85, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20428110

ABSTRACT

Worldwide cannabis dependence is increasing, as is the concentration of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in street cannabis. At the same time, the concentration of the second most abundant cannabinoid in street cannabis, cannabidiol (CBD), is decreasing. These two cannabinoids have opposing effects both pharmacologically and behaviorally when administered in the laboratory. No research has yet examined how the ratio of these constituents impacts on the appetitive/reinforcing effects of cannabis in humans. A total of 94 cannabis users were tested 7 days apart, once while non-intoxicated and once while acutely under the influence of their own chosen smoked cannabis on dependence-related measures. Using an unprecedented methodology, a sample of cannabis (as well as saliva) was collected from each user and analyzed for levels of cannabinoids. On the basis of CBD : THC ratios in the cannabis, individuals from the top and bottom tertiles were directly compared on indices of the reinforcing effects of drugs, explicit liking, and implicit attentional bias to drug stimuli. When intoxicated, smokers of high CBD : THC strains showed reduced attentional bias to drug and food stimuli compared with smokers of low CBD : THC. Those smoking higher CBD : THC strains also showed lower self-rated liking of cannabis stimuli on both test days. Our findings suggest that CBD has potential as a treatment for cannabis dependence. The acute modulation of the incentive salience of drug cues by CBD may possibly generalize to a treatment for other addictive disorders.


Subject(s)
Appetitive Behavior/drug effects , Cannabidiol/therapeutic use , Dronabinol/administration & dosage , Hallucinogens/administration & dosage , Marijuana Smoking/drug therapy , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Adolescent , Analysis of Variance , Cannabidiol/administration & dosage , Cannabidiol/urine , Choice Behavior/drug effects , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Dronabinol/urine , Female , Hallucinogens/urine , Humans , Male , Marijuana Abuse , Marijuana Smoking/urine , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Neuropsychological Tests , Reaction Time/drug effects , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...