Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Abnorm Child Psychol ; 44(2): 257-68, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25795013

ABSTRACT

Depression symptoms are associated with impairments in functioning and have substantial health and economic consequences. Universal substance misuse prevention programs have shown effects on non-targeted mental health-related symptoms, but long-term effects are understudied. This cluster randomized controlled trial examined effects of both the LifeSkills Training (LST) and Strengthening Families Program: For Parents and Youth 10-14 (SFP 10-14) interventions, delivered during seventh grade, on age 22 young adult depression symptoms. The study was conducted in US rural Midwestern communities with a randomly-selected sample from a larger study (N = 670). Experimental conditions were LST+SFP 10-14, LST-only, and a control condition. Effects on age 22 depression symptoms were hypothesized as mediated through effects on age 21 relationship problems and illicit use of substances. Structural equation modeling with manifest and latent variables was conducted to test hypotheses; the intervention conditions were combined and compared with the control condition because analyses indicated a comparable pattern of effects between intervention conditions. Significant indirect intervention effects were found on age 22 depression symptoms via effects on the mediating variables (indirect effect: ß = -0.06, 95 % CI [-0.10, -0.01], p = 0.011). Effect sizes for the young adult variables were between d = 0.17 and 0.29, which can be considered small, but nontrivial, especially in the context of public health benefits. Results support scaled-up implementation of school-based and family-focused universal substance misuse preventive interventions.


Subject(s)
Depression/prevention & control , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Psychotherapy/methods , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Family Therapy/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Midwestern United States , Models, Psychological , Rural Population , Young Adult
2.
Am J Community Psychol ; 55(3-4): 253-65, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25791916

ABSTRACT

An emerging literature highlights the potential for broader dissemination of evidence-based prevention programs in communities through existing state systems, such as the land grant university Extension outreach system and departments of public education and health (DOE-DPH). This exploratory study entailed surveying representatives of the national Extension system and DOE-DPH, to evaluate dissemination readiness factors, as part of a larger project on an evidence-based program delivery model called PROSPER. In addition to assessing systems' readiness factors, differences among US regions and comparative levels of readiness between state systems were evaluated. The Extension web-based survey sample N was 958 and the DOE-DPH telephone survey N was 338, with response rates of 23 and 79 %, respectively. Extension survey results suggested only a moderate level of overall readiness nationally, with relatively higher perceived need for collaborative efforts and relatively lower perceived resource availability. There were significant regional differences on all factors, generally favoring the Northeast. Results from DOE-DPH surveys showed significantly higher levels for all readiness factors, compared with Extension systems. Overall, the findings present a mixed picture. Although there were clear challenges related to measuring readiness in complex systems, addressing currently limited dissemination resources, and devising strategies for optimizing readiness, all systems showed some readiness-related strengths.


Subject(s)
Community Health Services/organization & administration , Evidence-Based Practice/organization & administration , Preventive Health Services/organization & administration , State Government , Community Health Services/standards , Evidence-Based Practice/standards , Humans , Preventive Health Services/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
3.
Prev Med ; 56(3-4): 190-6, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23276777

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a delivery system for evidence-based preventive interventions through 12th grade, 6.5 years past baseline. METHOD: A cohort sequential design included 28 public school districts randomly assigned to the partnership delivery system or usual-programming conditions. At baseline, 11,960 students participated. Partnerships supported community teams that implemented a family-focused intervention in 6th grade and a school-based intervention in 7th grade. Outcome measures included lifetime, current misuse, and frequencies of misuse, for a range of substances. Intent-to-treat, multilevel analyses of covariance of point-in-time misuse and analyses of growth in misuse were conducted. RESULTS: Results showed significantly lower substance misuse in the intervention group at one or both time points for most outcomes, with relative reduction rates of up to 31.4%. There was significantly slower growth in misuse in the intervention group for 8 of the 10 outcomes. In addition, risk moderation results indicated that there were significantly greater intervention benefits for higher- versus lower-risk youth, for the misuse of 6 of the 10 substances at 11th grade, illicit substances at 12th grade, and growth in the misuse of illicit substances. CONCLUSION: Partnership-based delivery systems for brief universal interventions have potential for public health impact by reducing substance misuse among youth, particularly higher-risk youth.


Subject(s)
Community-Institutional Relations , School Health Services/organization & administration , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Adolescent , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Iowa/epidemiology , Male , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Risk Reduction Behavior , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology
4.
Alcohol Res Health ; 34(2): 188-203, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22330218

ABSTRACT

Underage drinking is a pervasive problem in the United States, with serious consequences for youth, families, communities, and society as a whole. Family-focused preventive interventions for children and adolescents have shown potential for reducing underage drinking and other problem behaviors. Research findings indicate that clear advances have been made, in terms of both the number of evidence-based interventions available, and in the quality of the methods used to evaluate them. To fully reap the benefits of such preventive interventions and achieve public health impact, the findings of family-focused preventive intervention science must be translated into real-world, community practices. This type of translation can be enhanced through four sets of translational impact factors-effectiveness of interventions, extensiveness of their population coverage, efficiency of interventions, and engagement of eligible populations, with sustained quality intervention implementation. Findings from studies conducted by researchers at the Partnerships in Prevention Science Institute and other empirical work highlight the importance of these factors. A model for community- university partnerships has been developed that potentially can facilitate the dissemination and public health impact of universal interventions to prevent underage drinking and other problem behaviors. This model fits well within a comprehensive strategic framework for promoting effective prevention.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/prevention & control , Family Therapy/methods , Public Health/methods , Residence Characteristics , Adolescent , Adolescent Behavior/psychology , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Child , Child Behavior/psychology , Family Therapy/trends , Humans , Public Health/trends , Public-Private Sector Partnerships/trends
5.
J Prim Prev ; 30(5): 513-30, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19669885

ABSTRACT

It is becoming increasingly common for community teams or coalitions to implement programming for children and families designed to promote positive youth development and prevent adolescent problem behaviors. However, there has been only limited rigorous study of the effectiveness of community teams' programming efforts to produce positive outcomes. This study employed a community-level randomized control design to examine protective parent and youth skills outcomes of evidence-based preventive interventions selected from a menu and delivered by community teams supported by a community-university partnership model called PROSPER. Twenty-eight rural communities in two states were randomized across intervention and control conditions. Data were collected through written questionnaires that were completed by approximately 12,000 middle school students in the fall of the 6th grade, prior to intervention delivery, and again in the spring of the 7th, 8th, and 9th grades. Positive intervention effects were found for youth, parent, and family outcomes (e.g., association with antisocial peers, child management, parent-child affective quality) at each post-intervention assessment point. Improvements in these family and youth skill outcomes are expected to support long-term reductions of adolescent problem behaviors, such as substance abuse. EDITORS' STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS: In this important and well controlled trial, the authors demonstrate that university partnership-supported community teams, especially when supported with ongoing technical assistance, can continue to produce positive outcomes even after much of the control over delivery of programs is turned over to representatives of the communities in which they are implemented.


Subject(s)
Community Networks , Community-Institutional Relations , Evidence-Based Practice , Health Promotion , Universities , Adolescent , Adolescent Behavior , Cooperative Behavior , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Humans , Iowa , Pennsylvania , Rural Population , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Dev Psychopathol ; 20(1): 291-318, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18211739

ABSTRACT

Data from a community-based sample of 1,126 10th- and 11th-grade adolescents were analyzed using a model-based cluster analysis approach to empirically identify heterogeneous adolescent subpopulations from the person-oriented and pattern-oriented perspectives. The model-based cluster analysis is a new clustering procedure to investigate population heterogeneity utilizing finite mixture multivariate normal densities and accordingly to classify subpopulations using more rigorous statistical procedures for the comparison of alternative models. Four cluster groups were identified and labeled multiproblem high-risk, smoking high-risk, normative, and low-risk groups. The multiproblem high risk exhibited a constellation of high levels of problem behaviors, including delinquent and sexual behaviors, multiple illicit substance use, and depressive symptoms at age 16. They had risky temperamental attributes and lower academic functioning and educational expectations at age 15.5 and, subsequently, at age 24 completed fewer years of education, and reported lower levels of physical health and higher levels of continued involvement in substance use and abuse. The smoking high-risk group was also found to be at risk for poorer functioning in young adulthood, compared to the low-risk group. The normative and the low risk groups were, by and large, similar in their adolescent and young adult functioning. The continuity and comorbidity path from middle adolescence to young adulthood may be aided and abetted by chronic as well as episodic substance use by adolescents.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/epidemiology , Conduct Disorder/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Illicit Drugs , Juvenile Delinquency/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Behavior , Smoking/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Alcoholism/psychology , Cluster Analysis , Comorbidity , Conduct Disorder/diagnosis , Conduct Disorder/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Female , Health Status , Health Surveys , Humans , Juvenile Delinquency/psychology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Multivariate Analysis , New York , Risk Factors , Smoking/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Temperament , Underachievement
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...