Functional Outcomes of Isolated Infrasyndesmotic Fibula Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Ankle fractures are among the most common injuries encountered by orthopedic surgeons, with an incidence ranging from 71 to 187 per 100 000 people. Few studies have reliably investigated injuries involving isolated fractures of the distal fibula below the level of the ankle syndesmosis. Therefore, this study details on the patient-reported outcomes of nonoperatively managed isolated infrasyndesmotic fibula (ISF) fractures with a minimum 3-year follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort study was undertaken across all emergency departments serving a major urban population. Among 159 consecutive patients meeting inclusion criteria, 108 agreed to participate. Clinical information, functional outcomes, and radiographic measurements were collected from electronic medical records and 3 validated outcome measures: the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Foot & Ankle Scale (FAS), the AAOS Shoe-Comfort Scale (SCS), and a general questionnaire. RESULTS: An incidence of 22 ISF fractures per 100 000 people/year was found with FAS (91.2 ± 12.9) and SCS scores (76.8 ± 27.7), similar to reported population norms. Approximately 40% of patients (n = 43) reported continuing symptoms including pain (81.8%), stiffness (68.1%), and/or instability (39.0%). Less than 13% (n = 14) reported "severe" disabilities, and no patients required operative intervention within the follow-up period. Less-favorable outcomes were reported among work-related injuries, female patients, and "avulsion-type" fractures less than 10 mm in height (P < .01). No relationships were identified between age, degree of articular-incongruity, fracture-displacement, and self-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with nonoperatively managed ISF fractures reported good-to-excellent early functional outcomes. Less-favorable outcomes were reported among work-related injuries, female patients, and "avulsion-type" fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative series.

Primary Wound Closure After Open Fracture: A Prospective Cohort Study Examining Nonunion and Deep Infection.

OBJECTIVES: Determine the proportion of subjects developing deep infection or nonunion after primary wound closure of open fractures (humerus, radius/ulna, femur, and tibia/fibula). Secondarily, a matched-series analysis compared outcomes with subjects who underwent delayed wound closure. DESIGN: Prospective cohort between 2009 and 2013 of subjects undergoing primary closure. SETTING: Trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-three (84 fractures) subjects were enrolled. Eighty-two (99%) subjects (83 fractures) provided follow-up data. Matching (age, sec, fracture location, and grade) was performed using study data of delayed wound closure undertaken at the same center between 2001 and 2009 (n = 68 matched subjects). INTERVENTION: Primary wound closure occurred when the fracture grade was Gustilo grade 3A or lower and the wound deemed clean at initial surgery. Standardized evaluations occurred until the fracture(s) healed; phone interviews and chart reviews were also undertaken at 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Deep infection is defined as infection requiring unplanned surgical debridement and/or sustained antibiotic therapy after wound closure; nonunion is defined as unplanned surgical intervention after definitive wound closure or incomplete radiographic healing 1-year after fracture. RESULTS: Three (4%) subjects had deep infections, whereas 10 (12%) subjects developed nonunion in the primary closure cohort. In the matched analyses [n = 68 pairs; (136 subjects)], the primary closure cohort had fewer deep infections [n = 3 (4%) vs. n = 6 (9%)] and nonunions [n = 9 (13%) vs. n = 19 (29%)] than the delayed closure cohort (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Primary wound closure after an open fracture appears acceptable in appropriately selected patients and may reduce the risk of deep infection and nonunion compared with delayed closure; a definitive randomized trial is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Treatment of large segmental bone defects with reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft: technique and case series.

Treatment of large segmental defects using conventional autogenous iliac crest bone graft can be limited by volume of cancellous bone and donor site morbidity. The reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) technique allows access to a large volume of cancellous bone graft containing growth factors with potency equal to or greater than autograft material from the iliac crest. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of RIA-harvested autogenous bone graft for treating large segmental defects of long bones.

Weightbearing CT scan of severe flexible pes planus deformities.

BACKGROUND: The three-dimensional relationships of the bones in the foot in a flatfoot deformity are difficult to assess with standard radiographs. CT scans demonstrate these relationships but are typically made in a nonweightbearing mode. Our objective was to assess the use of a weightbearing CT apparatus to image the feet in patients with severe flexible pes planus deformities and to better define the anatomical changes that occur. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A specialized device was designed and constructed to simulate weightbearing to the feet during CT examination. Eighteen normal feet and 30 painful severe and flexible pes planus feet were imaged in both the non weightbearing and weightbearing states, set at 50% of body weight. Several measurements of intertarsal relationships were made of the pes planus and normal feet. Navicular floor to skin distance, forefoot arch angle, and subtalar joint subluxation were measured in the coronal plane in both the weightbearing and nonweightbearing states. T-tests were used to analyze measurements of navicular floor to skin distance and forefoot arch angle. RESULTS: The weightbearing device had a significant effect on foot configuration for both normal and pes planus feet (p = 0.0008) and (p < 0.0001) respectively for both floor to skin distance and forefoot arch angle. There was a significant difference between normal feet and pes planus feet with regard to the forefoot arch angle in the nonweightbearing (p = 0.02) and weightbearing states (p = 0.01). Four of the pes planus patients had evidence of subtalar joint subluxation which was more pronounced in the weightbearing state. There was no significant difference between the navicular floor to skin distance in the normal versus pes planus feet in either the non weightbearing (p = 0.05) or the weightbearing states (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: A device was designed and constructed to apply a weightbearing load equal to that of 50% body weight with minimal to no patient discomfort. The resultant effects on foot configuration were significant, and are useful for assessment of degree of flexible flat foot deformity, thus guiding clinical management. The measure which most significantly differed between pes planus patients and normal volunteers was the forefoot arch angle. Forefoot arch angle may therefore be the most useful measure for the imaging diagnosis of flexible pes planus, and the degree of planus deformity.

Does functional recovery in elderly hip fracture patients differ between patients admitted from long-term care and the community?

BACKGROUND: It is largely unknown whether functional recovery following hip fracture differs between long-term care (LTC) and community-dwelling residents. Our primary purpose was to compare recovery between these patients 6 months following hip fracture, controlling for known prognostic factors. Secondarily, we examined the contribution of residential status, in addition to patient characteristics, to functional recovery. METHODS: We studied a population-based inception cohort of 451 hip fracture patients >/= 65 years old admitted to one Canadian health region hospital between July 1999 and September 2000. Participants completed the Modified Barthel Functional Index (MBI) in hospital and again via telephone interviews 6 months postoperatively. Data were also collected on surgery and rehabilitation timing, length of hospital stay (LOS). and discharge destination. Relative change from prefracture function adjusting for known prognostic factors, and the proportion of participants returning to prefracture function were compared between the LTC and community-dwelling residents. RESULTS: LTC residents (n = 115) were older, with lower function prefracture, more comorbidities, and increased dementia than community-dwelling residents (n = 336). Six months postfracture, 17 (22%) LTC and 180 (71%) community-dwelling residents had regained prefracture function (p <.001). LTC residents had 33% lower (-40.6, -27.2) and community-dwelling residents 11.6% lower (-14.8, -8.4) 6-month MBI scores relative to prefracture scores after risk adjustment. Residential status was significantly associated with risk-adjusted functional recovery (p <.001). Median LOS was 4 days less for LTC than for community-dwelling residents (p <.001). Twelve (10%) LTC and 266 (79%) community-dwelling residents were discharged to inpatient rehabilitation (p <.001). CONCLUSION: Following hip fracture, most LTC residents do not regain prefracture function irrespective of known prognostic factors. Further investigation is needed as to the extent to which personal and environmental characteristics contribute to outcome after hip fracture.