[Technique and Study Results of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer]. / Technik und Studienlage der laparoskopischen Gastrektomie bei Magenkarzinom.

The aim of this paper was to describe the technique of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma and to present a review of current international studies on this topic.The first part describes and documents a standard laparoscopic gastrectomy for carcinoma. In the second part, after an EMBASE and PubMed search, a total of 123 quality-relevant randomised (RCT) and non-randomised (non-RCT) studies on laparoscopic gastrectomy are identified from a primary total of 3,042 hits by systematic narrowing. The study results are then summarised conclusively for the target criteria of feasibility, outcome, oncological quality, morbidity and mortality.Both, laparoscopic subtotal resection for distal gastric carcinomas and laparoscopic gastrectomy can now be performed safely and with few complications. In a recent literature review of a total of 15 RCTs with 5,576 patients (laparoscopic 2,793 vs. open 2,756), there were no significant differences in terms of feasibility, intraoperative outcome and oncological quality (R0 and lymph node harvest). Surgical morbidity and mortality were comparable. Patients after laparoscopic surgery showed a significantly faster early postoperative recovery with a lower overall morbidity. In contrast, the operating time was significantly longer - by a mean of 45 min - compared to the open technique. The advantages of the laparoscopic technique were equally evident in studies on early gastric carcinoma and advanced carcinomas (>T2).Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma is safe to perform and shows better early postoperative recovery. Complication rates, morbidity and mortality as well as long-term oncological results are comparable with open surgery.

[Evidence in minimally invasive oncological gastric surgery]. / Evidenz in der minimal-invasiven onkologischen Chirurgie des Magens.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to systematically review the current evidence on laparoscopic and robotic distal and total gastrectomy in comparison to open surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search of EMBASE and PubMed was conducted and 197 randomized (RCT) and non-randomized (non-RCT) studies were identified. An evaluation of early gastric cancer (EGC) and advanced (AGC) gastric cancer was carried out. RESULTS: For EGC and laparoscopic distal resection (LDG) and total gastrectomy (LTG) a total of 10 RCT and 6 non-RCT, including 4329 patients (laparoscopic 2010 vs. open 2319) were identified. At a high evidence level (1+, 1++) there was no significant difference in terms of feasibility, intraoperative outcome and oncological quality, mortality and long-term oncological outcome compared to open gastrectomy (OG). After LDG and LTG patients showed a significantly faster early postoperative recovery and lower total morbidity. In contrast, the operation times were significant longer compared to ODG and OTG. For distal AGC and LDG in 6 RCT, including 2806 patients (LDG 1410 vs. ODG 1369) comparable results could be found also with a high evidence level (1++). The evidence for LTG in cases of AGC was lower (2-, 2+). Currently ,only 6 non-RCT with a total of 1090 patients (LTG 539 vs. OTG 551) are available, which showed comparable results to LDG but further high-quality RCTs are necessary. Robotic gastrectomy (RG) is currently being evaluated. According to the first studies RG for EGC seems to be equivalent to LDG; however, the evidence is currently low (3 to 2-).

Totally Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Matched Pair Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastrectomy has been established for treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) especially in Eastern Asian countries. Currently, it still needs evaluation for advanced gastric cancer (AGC, T ≥ 2). Difficulty is how far Asian study data are valid for western conditions. METHODS: Out of 502 patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery between 2003 and 2016 at Klinikum Suedstadt Rostock 90 patients were selected for a retrospective study to compare totally laparoscopic D2-gastrectomy (LG, n = 45) with open D2-gastrectomy (OG, n = 45). The groups were matched by age, gender and tumour stage (TNM). RESULTS: Average age was 62.9 years (33 - 83), 42.2% were female. There were no differences between both study groups concerning BMI, ECOG and comorbidities. Amounts of EGC and AGC were 35.5% and 64.4% in LG, 28.9% and 71.0% in OG (p = 0.931). In LG-group 53.3% of the patients and in OG-group 51.1% of the patients were nodal negative (p = 0.802). 31.1% of patients in LG and in 33.3% in OG (p = 0.821) undergone perioperative chemotherapy. Total gastrectomy was performed in 73.3% in LG and 82.2% in OG, subtotal resections were done in 26.7% in LG and 17.8% in OG (p = 0.310). Resection free margins (R0) were recognized in 97.8% of the patients in both groups, and for EGC in all cases (p = 0.928). Total numbers of retrieved lymph nodes were significant higher in LG (33.1, 17 - 72) than in OG (28.2, 14 - 57). A significant longer operation time was noticed for laparoscopic gastrectomy in contrast to open surgery (+ 43.0 ± 27.2 min, p = 0.0054). Overall morbidity in OG (44.4%) was twice as high as in LG (22.2%, p < 0.05) due to lower rate of minor complications (Clavien I - II) in LG (LG vs. OG: 13.3% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.0078). For major complications (Clavien ≥ III) no difference between both groups was detected (LG vs. OG: 8.8% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.69). LG showed a significant faster postoperative recovery with earlier oral fluid intake (LG vs. OG: 25.9 h vs. 46.2 h) and shorter time to first flatus (LG vs. OG: 81.6 vs. 102.6 h). Patients after LG were earlier out of bed (LG vs. OG: 69.7 h vs. 108.7 h) and also hospital stay was significantly shorter (11.9 days in LG vs. 16.3 days in OG, p = 0.037). 30- and 90-days mortality was equal for LG and OG (0 and 2.2% per group). After a median follow up of 51.9 month (1 - 117) there were similar results for 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS for LG: 75.6% and 64.6% vs. OG: 68.9% and 64.6%, p = 0.446). Also no differences for 3- and 5-year OS were detected concerning patients without lymph node metastases (LG: 91.7% and 83.4% vs. OG: 91.3% and 78.3%, p = 0.658) or lymph node positive patients (LG: 47.6% and 38.1% vs. OG: 40.9% and 31.8%, p = 0.665). CONCLUSION: Despite western conditions laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy is certainly a save and feasibly approach for surgical therapy of EGC and AGC with low morbidity and mortality, and faster postoperative recovery. The oncologic outcome seems to be equivalent to open surgery.

Vascular clips versus ligatures in thyroid surgery--results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (CLIVIT Trial).

BACKGROUND: New techniques using vascular clips or ultrasonically activated shears have been suggested to shorten operation time without compromising safety. The objective of the CLIVIT Trial was to compare ligatures with vascular clips for hemostasis in elective benign thyroid surgery. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, controlled, parallel group superiority trial was conducted in 13 German surgical centers. Patients scheduled for at least subtotal resection bilaterally were intraoperatively randomized. The primary endpoint was resection time. Secondary endpoints were the amount of postoperative bleeding, reoperation due to bleeding, wound infection, temporary (reversal within 12 months) and permanent (over 1 year) recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis, length of hospital stay, and safety. REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 96901396. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty patients were treated with ligatures and 241 with vascular clips. No differences in patients' baseline and surgical characteristics were observed. No difference was detected for mean resection time (clip 63.5 min ± 29.6, ligature 66.1 min ± 29.3, P = 0.258). Postoperative bleeding (mean 86 ml ± 93), reoperation due to bleeding (clips 4, ligature 2), wound infections (clips 4, ligature 4), postoperative hospital stay (mean 3.0 ± 1.9), and safety data also did not vary significantly. The rates of temporary and permanent RLN paralysis were 6.9 % (34/491) and 2.9 % (14/491), respectively. Not using a surgical drain (123 patients) was not associated with a higher rate of complications. CONCLUSION: Vascular clips did not reduce the resection time. However, a 2.9 % rate of permanent RLN paralysis is of concern. Drains in elective surgery may be of no benefit.

[Nutritional recommendations, supplementation, and physical activity program following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity]. / Ernährungsumstellung, Supplementation und Bewegungsprogramm nach Roux-Y-Magenbypass.

The number of gastric bypass operations (RYGB) needed worldwide is increasing annually due to the obesity epidemic.Yet the success of this treatment is only guaranteed if an appropriate exercise therapy, a corresponding change of diet, and an adequate supplementation take hold in the aftercare program.Subject to pre-existing musculoskeletal diseases, exercise therapy should start about 4 weeks after the operation and comprise alternating cardiovascular and connective tissue-restitution training. The required change of diet focuses on small portions of calorie-reduced as well as protein- and vitamin enriched food. The standard daily intake should be between 800 and 1,200 kcal. However, after RYGB, nutritive deficiencies have been registered for proteins in 1-3%, for iron in 45-52%,vitamin B12 in 33-37%, folic acid in about 35%, calcium in 10-12%, and vitamins in 10-45% of the patients. For this reason,laboratory analysis at regular intervals is necessary in the follow-up and an appropriate supplementation of minerals, vitamins,and trace elements must be implemented.