Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 39(2): 216-224, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32819017

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: SBAR (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) is a structured format for the effective communication of critically relevant information. This tool was developed as a generic template to provide structure to the communication of clinical information between health care providers. Neonatal transport often presents clinically stressful circumstances where concise and accurate information is required to be shared clearly between multidisciplinary health care providers. A modified SBAR communication tool was designed to facilitate structured communication between nonphysician bedside care providers operating from remote sites and physicians providing decision-making support at receiving care facilities. Prospective interventional study was designed to evaluate the reliability of a "SBAR report to physician tool" in sharing clinically relevant information between multidisciplinary care providers on neonatal transport. STUDY DESIGN: The study was conducted between 2011 and 2014 by a dedicated neonatal transport service based at McMaster Children's Hospital which provides care for approximately 500 infants in Southern Ontario annually. In the preintervention phase, 50 calls were randomly selected for the evaluation and 115 consecutively recorded transport calls following adoption of the reporting tool. The quality of calls prior to and after the intervention was assessed by reviewers independently. Inter-rater agreement was also assessed for both periods. RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement between raters was moderate to perfect in most components of the SBAR "report to the physician tool" except for the assessment component, which showed fair agreement during both preintervention and postintervention periods. There was an improvement in global score (primary outcome) with a mean difference of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-1.14; p < 0.001) and in cumulative score with a mean difference of 8.55 (95% CI: 7.26-9.84; p < 0.001) in postintervention period. CONCLUSION: The use of the SBAR report to physician tool improved the quality of clinical information shared between nonphysician members of the neonatal transport team and neonatal transport physicians. KEY POINTS: · Long-Accurate and concise information sharing is crucial for decision-making in neonatal transport.. · Information sharing between multidisciplinary teams can be enhanced by using a commonly understood information sharing template.. · The SBAR report to physician tool improves the quality of information shared between multidisciplinary team members in neonatal transport..


Subject(s)
Documentation/methods , Hospitals, Pediatric/organization & administration , Interdisciplinary Communication , Patient Handoff/organization & administration , Documentation/standards , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Medical Staff, Hospital , Ontario , Patient Handoff/standards , Physicians , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 17(1): 61, 2017 01 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28109276

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Growth of neonatal intensive care units in number and size has raised questions towards ability to maintain continuity and quality of care. Structural organization of intensive care units is known as a key element for maintaining the quality of care of these fragile patients. The reconstruction of megaunits of intensive care to smaller care units within a single operational service might help with provision of safe and effective care. METHODS/DESIGN: The clinical team and patient distribution lay out, admission and discharge criteria and interdisciplinary round model was reorganized to follow the microstructure philosophy. A working group met weekly to formulate the implementation planning, to review the adaptation and adjustment process and to ascertain the quality of implementation following the initiation of the microsystem model. DISCUSSION: In depth examination of microsystem model of care in this study, provides systematic evaluation of this model on variable aspects of health care. The individual projects of this trial can be source of solid evidence for guidance of future decisions on optimized model of care for the critically ill newborns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02912780 . Retrospectively registered on 22 September 2016.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Critical Illness/therapy , Decision Support Systems, Clinical/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Quality of Health Care/standards , Canada/epidemiology , Continuity of Patient Care/standards , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/standards , Interdisciplinary Communication , Patient Discharge , Program Evaluation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...