ABSTRACT
Hintergrund: Bei der Behandlung parodontaler Entzündungen werden in der Versorgungspraxis auch homöopathische Mittel eingesetzt. Noch ist weniger über deren grundlegende Wirkprinzipien bekannt. Ziel dieser Arbeit war es daher, die Auswirkungen potenzierter Substanzen bei parodonta-ler Entzündung mittels Durchflusszytometrie zu untersuchen. Material und Methoden: Lymphozyten aus Blutproben von drei Parodontitis-Patienten und drei gematchten gesunden Probanden wurden extrahiert und mit stark verdünnten wässrigen Extrakten (D12 und C200) aus Mercurius solubilis, Silicea, Sulphur, Tuberculinum oder Placebo inkubiert. Um die Lymphozytenexpression zu untersuchen, wurde die Durchflusszytometrie für CD45R0- und CD25-Antikörper angewandt. Die statistische Analyse wurde unter Verwendung von Histogramm- und bivariaten Dot-Plot-Analysen durchgeführt. Ergebnisse: Veränderungen der Expression von CD25 und CD45R0 wurden bei Mercurius C200, Mercurius D12, Silicea D12 und Sulphur D12 beobachtet. Mit 36,47% zeigte Sulphur D12 die höchsten Veränderungen in der CD45R0-Expression zwischen Verum und Placebo bei den Parodontitis-Patienten. Die CD25-Expression war in Mercurius D12 mit 18,68% am höchsten. Aufgrund der hohen Variabilität konnten die Ergebnisse jedoch nicht durch statistische Analysen untermauert werden. Diskussion: Diese Studie konnte zeigen, wie Effekte hoch verdünnter Substanzen mit modernen immunologischen Methoden analysiert werden können. Obwohl die Schlussfolgerungen aufgrund der hohen Variabilität der Lymphozytenexpression begrenzt sind, könnten die Ergebnisse dieser Pilotstu-die weitere Untersuchungen anregen. BACKGROUND: Several homeopathic remedies are applied in the treatment of periodontal inflammation. Still, little is known about their basic working principles. We therefore aimed at investigating the effects of homeopathic drugs in periodontal inflammation by flow cytometry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lymphocytes from blood samples of three periodontitis patients and three matched healthy volunteers were extracted and incubated with highly diluted (D12 and C200) aqueous extracts from Mercurius solubilis, Silicea, Sulphur, Tuberculinum, or placebo. To investigate lymphocyte expression, flow cytometry was applied for CD45R0 and CD25 antibodies. Statistical analysis was performed using histogram and bivariate dot-plot analysis. RESULTS: Changes in CD25 and CD45R0 expression were observed in Mercurius C200, Mercurius D12, Silicea D12, and Sulfur D12. With 36.47%, Sulfur D12 showed the highest differences in CD45R0 expression in periodontitis patients between verum and placebo. CD25 expression was highest in Mercurius D12 with 18.68%. Due to high variability, the results could, however, not be underpinned by statistical analyses. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated how effects of highly diluted substances can be analyzed using modern immunological methods. Although conclusions are limited due to high variability in lymphocyte expression, results from our pilot study might encourage further investigations.
Subject(s)
Flow Cytometry , Homeopathy/methods , Periodontitis/immunology , Periodontitis/therapy , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Several homeopathic remedies are applied in the treatment of periodontal inflammation. However, little is known about their basic active principles. Therefore, we aimed at investigating the effects of homeopathic drugs in periodontal inflammation by observing lymphocyte migration activity in vitro. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lymphocytes from blood samples of 3 periodontitis patients and 3 matched healthy volunteers were extracted and embedded in collagen matrix migration assays together with highly diluted (D12 and C200) aqueous extracts from Mercurius solubilis, Silicea, Sulphur, Tuberculinum, or placebo. Lymphocyte migration and lymphocyte speed were observed in a 60-min time frame. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate statistics and SiZer time series analysis. RESULTS: While C-dilutions did not reveal clear differences between placebo and substances, strong effects were observed in D-dilutions compared to placebo. The strongest effects were achieved in lymphocytes exposed to Sulfur D12. While most specific effects were observed in Sulphur D12 showing an activating effect on periodontitis patient lymphocytes (mean activity: 11,1% (placebo) vs. 23,8% (verum)), there was no effect in healthy volunteers (25,8% (placebo) vs. 25,6% (verum)). SiZer analysis confirmed this effect to be significant. CONCLUSION: The basic active principles of highly diluted substances are still a matter of controversial debate. Although conclusions are limited due to low sample size, results from our pilot study might encourage further investigations on the role of highly diluted Sulphur in the treatment of periodontitis. Apart from a reproduction study with Sulphur, other immunological experiments, i.e. the investigation of cell limes via flow cytometry, should be performed to underpin these results.
