Is early DNR a self-fulfilling prophecy for patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage?

BACKGROUND: To investigate differences in outcome of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) based on institution of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order within first 24 h of admission. METHODS: A prospective registry of patients presenting with ICH from Jan 2006 to Dec 2008 was created. Patients with and without DNR orders instituted within 24 h of admission were classified as cases and controls respectively and were matched based on age and stroke severity. Demographics, intracerebral volume of hematoma, intraventricular extension of hemorrhage (IVH), invasive treatments, and outcomes at discharge were collected. All patients were followed up at least for 1 year, to determine mortality outcomes. RESULTS: Of a total of 245 subjects, 18 % had DNR order instituted within 24 h of admission. After matching, a total of 69 controls were available for 44 cases. There was no difference in demographics, IVH extension, volume of hemorrhage, and length of stay among cases and controls. Higher proportions of controls had surgical evacuation of the hematoma (p = 0.0125) and mechanical ventilation (p = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in functional outcome and survival rates among cases and controls at the end of 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: DNR institution and restriction of resuscitation was not associated with poor outcome or difference in survival within 1 year after ICH. This indicates an early DNR probably does not lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy in this population, and might be explained by our practice, were DNR orders do not impact the level of supportive medical care we provide.

Low-dose nesiritide in human anterior myocardial infarction suppresses aldosterone and preserves ventricular function and structure: a proof of concept study.

BACKGROUND: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP, nesiritide) has anti-fibrotic, anti-hypertrophic, anti-inflammatory, vasodilating, lusitropic and aldosterone-inhibiting properties but conventional doses of BNP cause hypotension, limiting its use in heart failure. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether infusion of low-dose BNP within 24 h of successful reperfusion for anterior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) would prevent adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling and suppress aldosterone. METHODS: A translational proof-of-concept study was carried out to determine tolerability and biological activity of intravenous BNP at 0.003 and 0.006 microg/kg/min, without bolus started within 24 h of successful reperfusion for anterior AMI. 24 patients with first anterior wall ST elevation AMI and successful revascularisation were randomly assigned to receive 0.003 (n = 12) or 0.006 (n = 12) microg/kg/min of IV BNP for 72 h in addition to standard care during hospitalisation for anterior AMI. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, drugs and peak cardiac biomarkers for myocardial damage were similar between both groups. Infusion of BNP at 0.006 microg/kg/min resulted in greater biological activity than infusion at 0.003 microg/kg/min as measured by higher mean (SEM) plasma cGMP levels (8.6 (1) vs 5.5 (1) pmol/ml, p<0.05) and suppression of plasma aldosterone (8.0 (2) to 4.6 (1) ng/dl, p<0.05), which was not seen in the 0.003 microg/kg/min group. LV ejection fraction (LVEF) improved significantly from baseline to 1 month (40 (4)% to 54 (5)%, p<0.05) in the 0.006 group but not in the 0.003 group. Infusion of BNP at 0.006 microg/kg/min was associated with a decrease of LV end-systolic volume index (61 (9) to 43 (8) ml/m(2), p<0.05) at 1 month, which was not seen in the 0.003 group. No drug-related serious adverse events occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: 72 h infusion of low BNP at the time of anterior AMI is well tolerated and biologically active. Patients treated with low-dose BNP had improved LVEF and smaller LV end-systolic volume at 1 month.

The effect of written informed consent on detection of violence in the home.

UNLABELLED: Studies of programmatic interventions for victims of violence in the home may require the use of informed consent. The use of informed consent may result in ascertainment bias, with victims of violence being less likely to participate. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of written informed consent on the detection of violence in the home during emergency department (ED) screening. METHODS: The authors performed a nonrandomized, controlled trial of 3,466 patients at an urban university ED. On odd days, patients (n = 1,857) were read a brief scripted statement and screened using standardized questions. On even days, patients (n = 1,609) received standard written informed consent prior to the same screening questions (writ-IC). The main outcome was the number of cases of violence in the home detected using each screening protocol. RESULTS: Fewer writ-IC patients participated in screening (82% vs 92%; p < 0.001). Despite a higher refusal rate in the writ-IC group, there was no difference in the number of victims detected by each screening method: choked/kicked/bit/punched? (writ-IC, 7.3 vs routine screen, 6.5%; p = 0.3); slapped/grabbed/shoved? (7.3 vs 6.7%; p = 0.4); threatened/actually used knife/gun to scare/hurt you? (8.3 vs 9.4%; p = 0.3); thrown object to harm you? (5.2 vs 4.6%; p = 0.4); forced sex? (5.8 vs 4.7%; p = 0.15); or afraid current/former intimate partner would hurt you physically? (13.9 vs 11.9%; p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: A written informed consent process in screening for violence in the home is associated with a higher refusal rate than routine screening, but use of written informed consent does not result in a lower rate of detection for multiple forms of violence. The authors did not find any support for the hypothesis that the use of written informed consent would decrease detection of violence in the home.

Emergency physicians' role in end-of-life care.

End-of-life care, as it merges with emergency medicine, raises as many ethical issues as it does clinical judgments. The role of the ED physician as it pertains to end-of-life treatment options encompasses a vast array of variables that should nevertheless center on patient welfare. The choice between ethical responses and trained reactions is an ever-present reality in emergency medicine, and the instinct to perform aggressive procedures may overshadow the professional purpose to inform, comfort, counsel, and treat. The exercise of clinical judgment should be balanced by previously reasoned ethical conduct codes when it comes to end-of-life emergent care.