Standards for the care of people with cystic fibrosis (CF); Planning for a longer life.

This is the final of four papers updating standards for the care of people with CF. That this paper "Planning a longer life" was considered necessary, highlights how much CF care has progressed over the past decade. Several factors underpin this progress, notably increased numbers of people with CF with access to CFTR modulator therapy. As the landscape for CF changes, so do the hopes and aspirations of people with CF and their families. This paper reflects the need to consider people with CF not as a "problem" to be solved, but as a success, a potential and a voice to be heard. People with CF and the wider CF community have driven this approach, reflecting many of the topics in this paper. This exercise involved wide stakeholder engagement. People with CF are keen to contribute to research priorities and be involved in all stages of research. People with CF want healthcare professionals to respect them as individuals and consider the impact of our actions on the world around us. Navigating life presents challenges to all, but for people with CF these challenges are heightened and complex. In this paper we highlight the concerns and life moments that impact people with CF, and events that the CF team should aim to support, including the challenges around having a family. People with CF and their care teams must embrace the updated standards outlined in these four papers to enjoy the full potential for a healthier life.

The impact of switching to race-neutral reference equations on FEV1 percent predicted among people with cystic fibrosis.

RATIONALE: The American Thoracic Society recommended switching to race-neutral spirometry reference equations, as race is a social construct and to avoid normalizing disparities in lung function due to structural racism. Understanding the impact of the race-neutral equations on percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV1) in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) will help prepare patients and providers to interpret pulmonary function test results. OBJECTIVE(S): To quantify the impact of switching from Global Lung Initiative (GLI) 2012 race-specific to GLI 2022 Global race-neutral reference equations on the distribution of ppFEV1 among PwCF of different races. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of FEV1 among PwCF ages ≥6 years in the 2021 U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. We describe the absolute difference in ppFEV1 between the two reference equations by reported race and the effect of age and height on this difference. RESULTS: With the switch to GLI Global, ppFEV1 will increase for White (median increase 4.7, (IQR: 3.1; 6.4)) and Asian (2.6 (IQR: 1.6; 3.7)) individuals and decrease for Black individuals (-7.7, (IQR: -10.9; -5.2)). Other race categories will see minimal changes in median ppFEV1. Individuals with higher baseline ppFEV1 and younger age will see a greater change in ppFEV1 (i.e., a greater improvement among White and Asian individuals and a greater decline among Black individuals). CONCLUSIONS: Switching from GLI 2012 race-specific reference equations to GLI 2022 Global race-neutral equations will result in larger reductions in ppFEV1 among Black individuals with CF than increases among White and Asian people with CF.

An emotional journey: caregiver experiences with gastrostomy tube decision-making for children with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional challenges are common in early CF care and stressful for caregivers of children with CF (cwCF) to navigate. Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement can improve weight gain, however the decision to proceed with placement is personalized and preference-sensitive. Little is known about the experiences of caregivers of cwCF and the G-tube decision-making process. OBJECTIVES: The present study used a qualitative approach to explore the perceptions and experiences of caregivers of cwCF with G-tube introductions and recommendations, as well as factors influencing G-tube decision-making. METHODS: Caregivers of cwCF aged ≤ 10 years completed audio-taped, semi-structured interviews describing their experiences with G-tube placement discussions. Interviews were transcribed and two independent researchers coded the transcripts and conducted content and thematic analysis using an inductive approach. RESULTS: Participants included 43 caregivers, 84 % were mothers (36/43). CwCF had a mean age of 4 years (SD=2.6), 84 % were White (36/43), and 60 % reported weights below <50th percentile (26/43). All caregivers knew about G-tubes, 44 % (19/43) were recommended a G-tube and 35 % (15/43) had a G-tube placed. Major findings included descriptions of the stages of G-tube decision-making from a heads up, to the game plan, to making a first difficult decision and finally living with the decision to pursue G-tube placement. CONCLUSION: G-tube decision-making is an emotional and personalized journey for caregivers of cwCF. Efforts to explore the values and priorities of caregivers is imperative to supporting families making difficult decisions in CF care.

Impact of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor on Healthcare Resource Utilization and Associated Costs Among People With Cystic Fibrosis in the US: A Retrospective Claims Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-limiting genetic disease caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) is a CFTR modulator (CFTRm) that targets the underlying cause of CF. Based on safety and efficacy demonstrated in clinical trials, ELX/TEZ/IVA is approved in the US for the treatment of CF in people aged ≥ 2 years who have ≥ 1 F508del-CFTR mutation or a CFTR mutation that is responsive to ELX/TEZ/IVA based on in vitro data. While ELX/TEZ/IVA demonstrated unprecedented improvements in lung function and dramatic reductions in pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) and associated hospitalizations in clinical trials, a limited number of studies have examined the impact of ELX/TEZ/IVA on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs in a real-world setting. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate changes in PEx, HCRU, and associated non-CFTRm healthcare costs following initiation of ELX/TEZ/IVA among people with CF aged ≥ 12 years in the US. METHODS: We evaluated the rates of PEx, HCRU, and associated costs before and after initiation of ELX/TEZ/IVA in people with CF aged ≥ 12 years using data from the Merative MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database and the Merative Multi-State Medicaid Database from April 21, 2019 to December 31, 2020. Because the study period included time following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, we limited our primary analysis to the period prior to the pandemic (October 21, 2019 to March 12, 2020). Outcomes following the onset of the pandemic (March 13 to December 31, 2020) were examined in an exploratory analysis. RESULTS: In both commercially insured and Medicaid-insured people with CF, ELX/TEZ/IVA was associated with reductions in PEx, hospitalizations, and associated costs prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and these reductions were maintained following the onset of the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ELX/TEZ/IVA reduces the burden and costs associated with PEx and hospitalizations in people with CF.

Food insecurity screening and local food access: Contributions to nutritional outcomes among children and adults with cystic fibrosis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: As the nutritional status of people with CF (PwCF) is associated with their socioeconomic status, it is important to understand factors related to food security and food access that play a role in the nutritional outcomes of this population. We assessed the contributions of CF program-level food insecurity screening practices and area-level food access for nutritional outcomes among PwCF. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 2019 data from the U.S. CF Patient Registry (CFFPR), linked to survey data on CF program-level food insecurity screening and 2019 patient zip code-level food access. Pediatric and adult populations were analyzed separately. Nutritional outcomes were assessed with annualized BMI percentiles (CDC charts) for children and BMI (kg/m2) for adults, with underweight status defined as BMIp <10% for children and BMI <18.5 kg/m2 for adults, and overweight or obese status defined as BMIp >85% for children and BMI >25 kg/m2 for adults. Analyses were adjusted for patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The study population included 11,971 pediatric and 14,817 adult PwCF. A total of 137 CF programs responded to the survey, representing 71% of the pediatric sample and 45% of the CFFPR adult sample. The joint models of nutritional status as a function of both program-level food insecurity screening and area-level food access produced the following findings. Among children with CF, screening at every visit vs less frequently was associated with 39% lower odds of being underweight (OR 0.61, p = 0.019), and the effect remained the same and statistically significant after adjusting for all covariates (aOR 0.61, p = 0.047). Residence in a food desert was associated both with higher odds of being underweight (OR 1.66, p = 0.036; aOR 1.58, p = 0.008) and with lower BMIp (-4.81%, p = 0.004; adjusted -3.73%, p = 0.014). Among adults with CF, screening in writing vs verbally was associated with higher odds of being overweight (OR 1.22, p = 0.028; aOR 1.36, p = 0.002) and higher BMI (adjusted 0.43 kg/m2, p = 0.032). Residence in a food desert was associated with higher odds of being underweight (OR 1.48, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Food insecurity screening and local food access are independent predictors of nutritional status among PwCF. More frequent screening is associated with less underweight among children with CF, whereas screening in writing (vs verbally) is associated with higher BMI among adults. Limited food access is associated with higher odds of being underweight in both children and adults with CF, and additionally with lower BMI among children with CF. Study results highlight the need for standardized, evidence-based food insecurity screening across CF care programs and for equitable food access to optimize the nutritional outcomes of PwCF.

Aiming to Improve Equity in Pulmonary Health: Cystic Fibrosis.

This review summarizes the evidence of health disparities in cystic fibrosis (CF), an autosomal recessive genetic disorder with substantial variation in disease progression and outcomes. We review disparities by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographic location, gender identity, or sexual orientation documented in the literature. We outline the mechanisms that generate and perpetuate such disparities across levels and domains of influence and assess the implications of this evidence. We then recommend strategies for improving equity in CF outcomes, drawing on recommendations for the general population and considering approaches specific to people living with CF.

Nocturnal High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy and Sinonasal Symptoms During Cystic Fibrosis Exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: Both nasal obstruction and sleep disturbance are common in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). In patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), studies suggest that these conditions are related and that nasal congestion improves with CPAP therapy. We hypothesized that subjects admitted to hospital for therapy of an exacerbation of CF would have both nasal symptoms and sleep disturbance and that these would improve with the initiation of nocturnal high-flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC). METHODS: Twenty-five subjects with an exacerbation of CF were enrolled to randomly receive either 5 d of nocturnal HFNC at 20 L/min in the treatment group or 5 L/min of nocturnal nasal cannula air at ambient temperature and humidity in the low-flow group. On the first and last day of the study, the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) was administered to evaluate nasal symptoms, and sleep quality was measured using the Actiwatch 2. RESULTS: Fifteen subjects completed the study (6 HFNC, 9 low flow). We confirmed that subjects had significant sleep disturbance that did not improve over the 5 d of the study. Subjects also had disturbing nasal symptoms that significantly improved only in those receiving HFNC (pre 14 [20] vs post 6 [13], P = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to what has been reported in older subjects with OSA, nocturnal HFNC improves sinonasal symptoms in subjects with an exacerbation of CF. There was no measurable effect on sleep quality, which may be due to the short duration of the study, or to subjects being evaluated while being treated in a hospital setting.

National integration of mental health screening and treatment into specialized care for cystic fibrosis: What predicts success?

OBJECTIVES: The CF Foundation sponsored competitive awards for Mental Health Coordinators (MHCs) from 2016 to 2018 to implement the international guidelines for mental health screening and treatment in US CF centers. Longitudinal surveys evaluated success in implementing these guidelines using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). METHODS: MHCs completed annual surveys assessing implementation from preparation/basic implementation (e.g., using recommended screeners) to full implementation/sustainability (e.g., providing evidence-based treatments). Points were assigned to questions through consensus, with higher scores assigned to more complex tasks. Linear regression and mixed effects models were used to: (1) examine differences in centers and MHC characteristics, (2) identify predictors of success, (3) model the longitudinal trajectory of implementation scores. RESULTS: A total of 122 MHCs (88.4% responded): Cohort 1, N = 80; Cohort 2, N = 30; and Cohort 3, N = 12. No differences in center characteristics were found. Significant improvements in implementation were observed across centers over time. Years of experience on a CF team was the only significant predictor of success; those with 1-5 years or longer reported the highest implementation scores. Change over time was predicted by >5 years of experience. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the mental health guidelines was highly successful over time. Funding for MHCs with dedicated time was critical. Longitudinal modeling indicated that CF centers with diverse characteristics could implement them, supported by evidence from the CF Patient Registry showing nearly universal uptake of mental health screening in the United States. Years of experience predicted better implementation, suggesting that education and training of MHCs and retention of experienced providers are critical to success.

Lung Function Decline in Cystic Fibrosis: Impact of Data Availability and Modeling Strategies on Clinical Interpretations.

Rationale: Studies estimating the rate of lung function decline in cystic fibrosis have been inconsistent regarding the methods used. How the methodology used impacts the validity of the results and comparability between studies is unknown. Objectives: The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation established a work group whose tasks were to examine the impact of differing approaches to estimating the rate of decline in lung function and to provide analysis guidelines. Methods: We used a natural history cohort of 35,252 individuals with cystic fibrosis aged ⩾6 years in the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR), 2003-2016. Modeling strategies using linear and nonlinear forms of marginal and mixed-effects models, which have previously quantified the rate of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) decline (percent predicted per year), were evaluated under clinically relevant scenarios of available lung function data. Scenarios varied by sample size (overall CFFPR, medium-sized cohort of 3,000 subjects, and small-sized cohort of 150), data collection/reporting frequency (encounter, quarterly, and annual), inclusion of FEV1 during pulmonary exacerbation, and follow-up length (<2 yr, 2-5 yr, entire duration). Results: Rate of FEV1 decline estimates (percent predicted per year) differed between linear marginal and mixed-effects models; overall cohort estimates (95% confidence interval) were 1.26 (1.24-1.29) and 1.40 (1.38-1.42), respectively. Marginal models consistently estimated less rapid lung function decline than mixed-effects models across scenarios, except for short-term follow-up (both were ∼1.4). Rate of decline estimates from nonlinear models diverged by age 30. Among mixed-effects models, nonlinear and stochastic terms fit best, except for short-term follow-up (<2 yr). Overall CFFPR analysis from a joint longitudinal-survival model implied that an increase in rate of decline of 1% predicted per year in FEV1 was associated with a 1.52-fold (52%) increase in the hazard of death/lung transplant, but the results exhibited immortal cohort bias. Conclusions: Differences were as high as 0.5% predicted per year between rate of decline estimates, but we found estimates were robust to lung function data availability scenarios, except short-term follow-up and older age ranges. Inconsistencies among previous study results may be attributable to inherent differences in study design, inclusion criteria, or covariate adjustment. Results-based decision points reported herein will support researchers in selecting a strategy to model lung function decline most reflective of nuanced, study-specific goals.

Bronchiolitis therapies and misadventures.

Viral bronchiolitis, which is most commonly caused by an infection with the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), can lead to respiratory difficulties in young children which may require hospitalization. Despite years of research and medical trials, the mainstay of bronchiolitis treatment remains supportive only. This review provides an overview of the history of different treatments for bronchiolitis, including those that failed, as well as new therapies that are under study. Future studies for the treatment of bronchiolitis should consider different age-groups, important subgroups (i.e., those with a prior history of wheezing, those with a family history of asthma and those with non-RSV viral etiologies) whose response to treatment may differ from that of the composite group.

Real-world Associations of US Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Programs With Nutritional and Pulmonary Outcomes.

Importance: Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) has been universal in the US since 2010, but its association with clinical outcomes is unclear. Objective: To describe the real-world effectiveness of NBS programs for CF in the US on outcomes up to age 10 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study using CF Foundation Patient Registry data from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2018. The staggered implementation of NBS programs by state was used to compare longitudinal outcomes among children in the same birth cohort born before vs after the implementation of NBS for CF in their state of birth. Participants included children with an established diagnosis of CF born between January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2018, in any of the 44 states that implemented NBS for CF between 2003 and 2010. Data were analyzed from October 5, 2020, to April 22, 2022. Exposures: Birth before vs after the implementation of NBS for CF in the state of birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: Longitudinal trajectory of height and weight percentiles from diagnosis, lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, [FEV1] percent predicted) from age 6 years, and age at initial and chronic infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa using linear mixed-effects and time-to-event models adjusting for birth cohort and potential confounders. Results: A total of 9571 participants (4713 female participants [49.2%]) were eligible for inclusion, with 4510 (47.1%) in the pre-NBS cohort. NBS was associated with higher weight and height percentiles in the first year of life (weight, 6.0; 95% CI, 3.1-8.4; height, 6.6; 95% CI, 3.8-9.3), but these differences decreased with age. There was no association between NBS and FEV1 at age 6 years, but the percent-predicted FEV1 did increase more rapidly with age in the post-NBS cohort. NBS was associated with older age at chronic P aeruginosa infection (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.89) but not initial P aeruginosa infection (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.01). Conclusions and Relevance: NBS for CF in the US was associated with improved nutritional status up to age 10 years, a more rapid increase in lung function, and delayed chronic P aeruginosa infection. In the future, as highly effective modulator therapies become available for infants with CF, NBS will allow for presymptomatic initiation of these disease-modifying therapies before irreversible organ damage.

Socioeconomic determinants of respiratory health in patients with cystic fibrosis: implications for treatment strategies.

INTRODUCTION: Great variation exists in the progression and outcomes of cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease, due to both genetic and environmental influences. Social determinants mediate environmental exposures and treatment success; people with CF from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds have worse health and die younger than those in more advantaged positions. AREAS COVERED: This paper reviews the literature on the mechanisms that are responsible for generating and sustaining disparities in CF health, and the ways by which social determinants translate into health advantages or disadvantages in people with CF. The authors make recommendations for addressing social risk factors in CF clinical practice. EXPERT OPINION: Socioeconomic factors are not dichotomous and their impact is felt at every step of the social ladder. CF care programs need to adopt a systematic protocol to screen for health-related social risk factors, and then connect patients to available resources to meet individual needs. Considerations such as daycare, schooling options, living and working conditions, and opportunities for physical exercise and recreation as well as promotion of self-efficacy are often overlooked. In addition, advocacy for changes in public policies on health insurance, environmental regulations, social welfare, and education would all help address the root causes of CF health inequities.

Obesity in Cystic fibrosis: prevalence, trends and associated factors data from the US cystic fibrosis foundation patient registry.

Strong emphasis has been placed historically on increasing weight and improving nutritional status in cystic fibrosis patients. Due to correlation between nutritional indices (e.g. BMI) and lung function, CF Nutrition Guidelines have recommended BMI percentile goals at the 50th percentile or higher. Trends in increasing BMI across CF programs suggest significantly increasing proportions of overweight and obese status in recent years. We identify that between 2000 and 2019 there has been a relative decrease in underweight status by ∼40%, simultaneously with a > 300% increase in overweight status, and >400% increase in obesity. Patient specific factors associated with higher prevalence of obesity included age ≥46, living in a zip code where the median income was < $20,000, having at least one allele with a class IV or V mutation, a ppFEV1 >90 prescribed ivacaftor, and not prescribed pancreatic enzymes. Program specific factors were not identified.

Left behind: The potential impact of CFTR modulators on racial and ethnic disparities in cystic fibrosis.

The advent of CFTR modulators, a genomic specific medication, revolutionized the treatment of CF for many patients. However, given that these therapeutics were only developed for specific CFTR mutations, not all people with CF have access to such disease-modifying drugs. Racial and ethnic minority groups are less likely to have CFTR mutations that are approved for CFTR modulators. This exclusion has the potential to widen existing health disparities.

Bone mineral density screening by DXA for people with cystic fibrosis: A registry analysis of patient and program factors influencing rates of screening.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend screening for Cystic Fibrosis (CF) related bone disease (CFBD) using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for all people ≥ 18 years of age and select people ≥ 8 years of age. However, adherence to these guidelines is variable. This study aims to evaluate screening practices among adult programs in the US and identify patient and program-based characteristics which may influence screening. METHODS: The CF Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) was used to identify all people over the age of 18 who were seen at adult CF programs and received screening for CFBD using DXA at least once between 2014 and 2018. Associations with patient and program level characteristics were assessed using the Chi Square test. Patient level variables were also examined using standardized difference to assess for meaningful clinical differences in rates of screening. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2018, a total of 15,134 people over the age of 18 were identified in the CFFPR. Of these people, 9,023 (60%) received a DXA during the time period. The median rate of screening by program was 66% and programs in the highest quartile of screening obtained DXAs on >76% of their population. At the program level, larger size and increased adherence to other guideline practices such as OGTT screening and 4 visits, 4 cultures in a year correlated with higher rates of screening for CFBD. At the patient-level, people with lower lung function (FEV1 <90%) and those with CF related diabetes were more likely to be screened. People without health insurance were less likely to receive recommended screening. CONCLUSION: Screening practices for CFBD vary widely across adult programs in the US despite recommendations to screen all people over the age of 18. Factors identified in this analysis may be used to identify those people at highest risk of missing appropriate screening. CFBD has significant implications for our patients and therefore routine screening should be emphasized as part of standard care moving forward.

Telehealth use in cystic fibrosis during COVID-19: Association with race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors.

BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an uptake of telehealth in cystic fibrosis care. Previous studies show disparities in telehealth use based on socioeconomic status (SES). We aimed to: (1) understand telehealth use and perceptions and (2) identify the facilitators and barriers to telehealth use among people with CF and their families (PwCF) from diverse racial/ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of the 2020 Cystic Fibrosis State of Care surveys completed by PwCF (PFSoC), CF Care Programs (SoC1) and the CF Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR). RESULTS: A total of 424 PwCF and 286 programs responded to the PFSoC and SoC1. Among PwCF, 90% self-identified as White, 6% as Hispanic/Latino, and 2% as Black. Racial/ethnic minorities were less likely to have had a telehealth visit (p=.015). This difference was pronounced among the Hispanic/Latino population (p<.01). Telehealth use did not differ by health insurance and was similarly offered independent of financial status. Compared to PwCF who denied financial constraints, those who reported financial difficulties found telehealth more difficult to use (p=.018) and were less likely to think that their concerns (p=.010) or issues that mattered most to them (p=.020) were addressed during telehealth. Programs perceived lack of technology, language barriers, and home conditions as barriers to telehealth in vulnerable populations. CONCLUSION: PFSoC and SoC1 identified differences in telehealth use and care perceptions by ethnicity, race, and socioeconomic characteristics. Further studies are needed to understand how telehealth can change access to CF care in diverse subpopulations.

Adaptations to the RVA Breathes clinical trial due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

RVA Breathes, a community program to improve asthma management and care coordination among children living in a low-income, urban area, is being evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. In March 2020, RVA Breathes was converted to a remote program due to the COVID-19 pandemic; this report provides an update on the modifications made to the RVA Breathes trial. Additionally, given that families in the program have been disproportionally impacted by both COVID-19 and significant social unrest at both the local and national level, strategies used to enroll and engage families in the trial who bore disproportionately high burdens during this time period are outlined. Remote sessions (telephone or video) for families enrolled in the program prior to the onset of COVID-19 began in April 2020; enrollment of new families began remotely in July 2020 using adapted consent procedures. Baseline, intervention, and follow-up sessions were delivered either via the telephone or video depending upon family preference. Strategies were implemented to engage caregivers and children in completing measures over the telephone or video versus in person. Tangible intervention materials and participant payments were dropped off at family homes using contactless procedures. Our team was able to adapt and safely continue a large, community-based clinical trial, despite the increased health risks and social isolation mandates from the pandemic, by transitioning to a remote format. Challenges remain in determining whether RVA Breathes as a remote program has had the same impact on child asthma as the face-to-face interventions that comprised its original format.