Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Injury ; 55(5): 111304, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38171970

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Even when using the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines and other diagnostic protocols for the initial assessment of trauma patients, not all injuries will be diagnosed in this early stage of care. The aim of this study was to quantify how many, and assess which type of injuries were diagnosed with delay during the initial assessment of trauma patients including a total-body computed tomography (TBCT) scan in a Level 1 Trauma Center in the Netherlands. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 697 trauma patients who were assessed in the trauma bay of the Amsterdam University Medical Center (AUMC), using a TBCT. A delayed diagnosed injury was defined as an injury sustained during the initial trauma and not discovered nor suspected upon admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or surgical ward following the initial assessment, diagnostic studies, or during immediate surgery. A clinically significant delayed diagnosis of injury was defined as an injury requiring follow-up or further medical treatment. We aimed to identify variables associated with delayed diagnosed injuries. RESULTS: In total, 697 trauma patients with a median age of 46 years (IQR 30-61) and a median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 16 (IQR 9-25) were included. Delayed diagnosed injuries were found in 97 patients (13.9 %), of whom 79 injuries were clinically significant (81.4 %). Forty-eight of the delayed diagnosed injuries (49.5 %) were within the TBCT field. Ten delayed diagnosed injuries had an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of ≥3. Most injuries were diagnosed before or during the tertiary survey (60.8 %). The median time of delay was 34.5 h (IQR 17.5-157.3). Variables associated with delayed diagnosed injuries were primary ICU admission (OR 1.8, p = 0.014), an ISS ≥ 16 (OR 1.6, p = 0.042), and prolonged hospitalization (40+ days) (OR 8.5, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: With the inclusion of the TBCT during the primary assessment of trauma patients, delayed diagnosed injuries still occurs in a significant number of patients (13.9 %). Factors associated with delayed diagnosed injuries were direct admission to ICU and an ISS ≥ 16.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Trauma Centers , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Injury Severity Score , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
Ann Surg ; 276(6): e758-e763, 2022 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33351483

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incremental yield of standardized addition of chest CT to abdominal CT to detect COVID-19 in patients presenting with primarily acute gastrointestinal symptoms requiring abdominal imaging. Summary Background Data: Around 20% of patients with COVID-19 present with gastrointestinal symptoms. COVID-19 might be neglected in these patients, as the focus could be on finding abdominal pathology. During the COVID-19 pandemic, several centers have routinely added chest CT to abdominal CT to detect possible COVID-19 in patients presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms. However, the incremental yield of this strategy is unknown. METHODS: This multicenter study in 6 Dutch centers included consecutive adult patients presenting with acute nontraumatic gastrointestinal symptoms, who underwent standardized combined abdominal and chest CT between March 15, 2020 and April 30, 2020. All CT scans were read for signs of COVID-19 related pulmonary sequelae using the СО-RADS score. The primary outcome was the yield of high COVID-19 suspicion (СО-RADS 4-5) based on chest CT. RESULTS: A total of 392 patients were included. Radiologic suspicion for COVID-19 (СО-RADS 4-5) was present in 17 (4.3%) patients, eleven of which were diagnosed with COVID-19. Only 5 patients with СО-RADS 4-5 presented without any respiratory symptoms and were diagnosed with COVID-19. No relation with community prevalence could be detected. CONCLUSION: The yield of adding chest CT to abdominal CT to detect COVID-19 in patients presenting with acute gastrointestinal symptoms is extremely low with an additional detection rate of around 1%.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Pandemics , Thorax/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging
4.
Injury ; 45(1): 146-50, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23000055

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The most widely used grading system for blunt splenic injury is the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) organ injury scale. In 2007 a new grading system was developed. This 'Baltimore CT grading system' is superior to the AAST classification system in predicting the need for angiography and embolization or surgery. The objective of this study was to assess inter- and intraobserver reliability between radiologists in classifying splenic injury according to both grading systems. METHODS: CT scans of 83 patients with blunt splenic injury admitted between 1998 and 2008 to an academic Level 1 trauma centre were retrospectively reviewed. Inter and intrarater reliability were expressed in Cohen's or weighted Kappa values. RESULTS: Overall weighted interobserver Kappa coefficients for the AAST and 'Baltimore CT grading system' were respectively substantial (kappa=0.80) and almost perfect (kappa=0.85). Average weighted intraobserver Kappa's values were in the 'almost perfect' range (AAST: kappa=0.91, 'Baltimore CT grading system': kappa=0.81). CONCLUSION: The present study shows that overall the inter- and intraobserver reliability for grading splenic injury according to the AAST grading system and 'Baltimore CT grading system' are equally high. Because of the integration of vascular injury, the 'Baltimore CT grading system' supports clinical decision making. We therefore recommend use of this system in the classification of splenic injury.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/pathology , Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Embolization, Therapeutic/statistics & numerical data , Multidetector Computed Tomography , Spleen/injuries , Spleen/pathology , Vascular System Injuries/pathology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/pathology , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Spleen/diagnostic imaging , Vascular System Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging
5.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 150(27): 1518-22, 2006 Jul 08.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16892616

ABSTRACT

A 26-year-old male amateur cyclist, with no risk factors for vascular disease or previous trauma, presented with left-calf claudication. Physical and additional examination revealed an occlusion of the external iliac artery. During the operation, the cause was found to be an endofibrotic lesion of the external iliac artery, probably due to mechanical trauma as a result of the non-physiological aerodynamic position held on the bicycle during many hours of training. An endarterectomy was performed and the tendon of the psoas-minor muscle was cut because of its strong impression on the psoas-major muscle, which resulted in kinking of the external iliac artery. There followed two episodes of re-occlusion which were treated with a venous interposition graft and a dacron interposition graft, respectively. Thereafter the patient was able to train without pain. Intermittent claudication of the legs in young athletes should not be underestimated; occlusive vascular disease caused by arterial endofibrosis should be considered.


Subject(s)
Bicycling , Iliac Artery/pathology , Iliac Artery/surgery , Intermittent Claudication/diagnosis , Adult , Endarterectomy , Fibrosis , Humans , Intermittent Claudication/pathology , Intermittent Claudication/surgery , Male , Psoas Muscles , Recurrence , Tendons/surgery , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...