Poor evidence for poor R wave progression in coronary disease: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Poor R wave progression (PRWP) and reversed R wave progression (RRWP) have long been noted in electrocardiograms as potential indicators of anterior wall fibrosis or chronic coronary artery disease; however, the quantity and quality of evidence supporting these associations warrants closer examination. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this scoping review is to assess the breadth of evidence regarding the diagnostic significance of PRWP and RRWP, explore the extent of research, study populations and methodologies, and the presence of gaps in knowledge regarding these electrocardiographic phenomena and their association with coronary diseases. DESIGN: We conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, covering literature on PRWP or RRWP in the context of myocardial infarction, ischemia, or fibrosis from any time period and in any language. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were included in this review, highlighting the severe paucity of data. No high-quality accuracy studies have been identified, and existing research suffers from methodological issues, in particular selection bias. Prevalence and prognostic studies showed significant heterogeneity in terms of definitions and outcomes, which contributes to an alarming risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of solid evidence for PRWP and RRWP as diagnostic markers for acute and chronic coronary artery disease necessitates caution in clinical interpretation. Future research should focus on well-designed case-control studies to clarify the diagnostic accuracy of these markers. Until robust evidence is available, the reliance on PRWP/RRWP for diagnosing anterior infarction should be discouraged, reflecting a gap between clinical practice and evidence-based medicine.

ST segment and T wave abnormalities: A narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a valuable tool for interpreting ventricular repolarization. This article aims to broaden the diagnostic scope beyond the conventional ischemia-centric approach, integrating an understanding of pathophisiological influences on ST-T wave changes. METHODS: A review was conducted on the physiological underpinnings of ventricular repolarization and the pathophisiological processes that can change ECG patterns. The research encompassed primary repolarization abnormalities due to uniform variations in ventricular action potential, secondary changes from electrical or mechanical alterations, and non-ischemic conditions influencing ST-T segments. RESULTS: Primary T waves are characterized by symmetrical waves with broad bases and variable QT intervals, indicative of direct myocardial action potential modifications due to ischemia, electrolyte imbalances, and channelopathies. Secondary T waves are asymmetric and often unassociated with significant QT interval changes, suggesting depolarization alterations or changes in cardiac geometry and contractility. CONCLUSION: We advocate for a unified ECG analysis, recognizing primary and secondary ST-T changes, and their clinical implications. Our proposed analytical framework enhances the clinician's ability to discern a wide array of cardiac conditions, extending diagnostic accuracy beyond myocardial ischemia.

Poor evidence for poor R wave progression in coronary disease: a scoping review

BACKGROUND Poor R wave progression (PRWP) and reversed R wave progression (RRWP) have long been noted in electrocardiograms as potential indicators of anterior wall fibrosis or chronic coronary artery disease; however, the quantity and quality of evidence supporting these associations warrants closer examination. OBJECTIVE The aim of this scoping review is to assess the breadth of evidence regarding the diagnostic significance of PRWP and RRWP, explore the extent of research, study populations and methodologies, and the presence of gaps in knowledge regarding these electrocardiographic phenomena and their association with coronary diseases. DESIGN We conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, covering literature on PRWP or RRWP in the context of myocardial infarction, ischemia, or fibrosis from any time period and in any language. RESULTS A total of 20 studies were included in this review, highlighting the severe paucity of data. No high-quality accuracy studies have been identified, and existing research suffers from methodological issues, in particular selection bias. Prevalence and prognostic studies showed significant heterogeneity in terms of definitions and outcomes, which contributes to an alarming risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS The lack of solid evidence for PRWP and RRWP as diagnostic markers for acute and chronic coronary artery disease necessitates caution in clinical interpretation. Future research should focus on well-designed case-control studies to clarify the diagnostic accuracy of these markers. Until robust evidence is available, the reliance on PRWP/RRWP for diagnosing anterior infarction should be discouraged, reflecting a gap between clinical practice and evidence-based medicine.

ST segment and T wave abnormalities: A narrative review

INTRODUCTION: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a valuable tool for interpreting ventricular repolarization. This article aims to broaden the diagnostic scope beyond the conventional ischemia-centric approach, integrating an understanding of pathophisiological influences on ST-T wave changes. METHODS: A review was conducted on the physiological underpinnings of ventricular repolarization and the pathophisiological processes that can change ECG patterns. The research encompassed primary repolarization abnormalities due to uniform variations in ventricular action potential, secondary changes from electrical or mechanical alterations, and non-ischemic conditions influencing ST-T segments. RESULTS: Primary T waves are characterized by symmetrical waves with broad bases and variable QT intervals, indicative of direct myocardial action potential modifications due to ischemia, electrolyte imbalances, and channelopathies. Secondary T waves are asymmetric and often unassociated with significant QT interval changes, suggesting depolarization alterations or changes in cardiac geometry and contractility. CONCLUSION: We advocate for a unified ECG analysis, recognizing primary and secondary ST-T changes, and their clinical implications. Our proposed analytical framework enhances the clinician's ability to discern a wide array of cardiac conditions, extending diagnostic accuracy beyond myocardial ischemia.

EPM algorithm: A stepwise approach to accessory pathway localization in ventricular pre-excitation.

BACKGROUND: Accurate estimation of accessory pathway (AP) localization in patients with ventricular pre-excitation or Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome remains a diagnostic challenge. Existing algorithms have contributed significantly to this area, but alternative algorithms can offer additional perspectives and approaches to AP localization. OBJECTIVE: This study introduces and evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of the EPM algorithm in AP localization, comparing it with established algorithms Arruda and EASY. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 138 patients from Hospital São Paulo who underwent catheter ablation. Three blinded examiners assessed the EPM algorithm's diagnostic accuracy against the Arruda and EASY algorithms. The gold standard for comparison was the radioscopic position of the AP where radiofrequency ablation led to pre-excitation disappearance on the ECG. RESULTS: EPM showed a diagnostic accuracy of 51.45%, closely aligning with Arruda (53.29%) and EASY (44.69%). Adjacency accuracy for EPM was 70.67%, with Arruda at 66.18% and EASY at 72.22%. Sensitivity for EPM in distinguishing left vs. right APs was 95.73%, with a specificity of 74.33%. For identifying septal vs. lateral right APs, EPM sensitivity was 82.79% with a specificity of 46.15%. These measures were comparable to those of Arruda and EASY. Inter-observer variability was excellent for EPM, with Kappa statistics over 0.9. CONCLUSION: The EPM algorithm emerges as a reliable tool for AP localization, offering a systematic approach beneficial for therapeutic decision-making in electrophysiology. Its comparable diagnostic accuracy and excellent inter-observer variability underscore its potential clinical applicability. Future research may further validate its efficacy in a broader clinical setting.

EPM algorithm: a stepwise approach to accessory pathway localization in ventricular pre-excitation

BACKGROUND: Accurate estimation of accessory pathway (AP) localization in patients with ventricular pre-excitation or Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome remains a diagnostic challenge. Existing algorithms have contributed significantly to this area, but alternative algorithms can offer additional perspectives and approaches to AP localization. OBJECTIVE: This study introduces and evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of the EPM algorithm in AP localization, comparing it with established algorithms Arruda and EASY. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 138 patients from Hospital São Paulo who underwent catheter ablation. Three blinded examiners assessed the EPM algorithm's diagnostic accuracy against the Arruda and EASY algorithms. The gold standard for comparison was the radioscopic position of the AP where radiofrequency ablation led to pre-excitation disappearance on the ECG. RESULTS: EPM showed a diagnostic accuracy of 51.45%, closely aligning with Arruda (53.29%) and EASY (44.69%). Adjacency accuracy for EPM was 70.67%, with Arruda at 66.18% and EASY at 72.22%. Sensitivity for EPM in distinguishing left vs. right APs was 95.73%, with a specificity of 74.33%. For identifying septal vs. lateral right APs, EPM sensitivity was 82.79% with a specificity of 46.15%. These measures were comparable to those of Arruda and EASY. Inter-observer variability was excellent for EPM, with Kappa statistics over 0.9. CONCLUSION: The EPM algorithm emerges as a reliable tool for AP localization, offering a systematic approach beneficial for therapeutic decision-making in electrophysiology. Its comparable diagnostic accuracy and excellent inter-observer variability underscore its potential clinical applicability. Future research may further validate its efficacy in a broader clinical setting.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of ST-segment elevation for acute coronary occlusion

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ST-segment elevation on a 12­lead ECG in detecting ACO across any coronary artery, challenging the current STEMI-NSTEMI paradigm. METHODS: Studies from MEDLINE and Scopus (2012-2023) comparing ECG findings with coronary angiograms were systematically reviewed and analyzed following PRISMA-DTA guidelines. QUADAS-2 assessed the risk of bias. STUDY SELECTION: Studies included focused on AMI patients and provided data enabling the construction of contingency tables for sensitivity and specificity calculation, excluding those with non-ACS conditions, outdated STEMI criteria, or a specific focus on bundle branch blocks or other complex diagnoses. Data were extracted systematically and pooled test accuracy estimates were computed using MetaDTA software, employing bivariate analyses for within- and between-study variation. The primary outcomes measured were the sensitivity and specificity of ST-segment elevation in detecting ACO. RESULTS: Three studies with 23,704 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity of ST-segment elevation for detecting ACO was 43.6% (95% CI: 34.7%-52.9%), indicating that over half of ACO cases may not exhibit ST-segment elevation criteria. The specificity was 96.5% (95% CI: 91.2%-98.7%). Additional analysis using the OMI-NOMI strategy showed improved sensitivity (78.1%, 95% CI: 62.7%-88.3%) while maintaining similar specificity (94.4%, 95% CI: 88.6%-97.3%). CONCLUSION: The findings reveal a significant diagnostic gap in the current STEMI-NSTEMI paradigm, with over half of ACO cases potentially lacking ST-segment elevation. The OMI-NOMI strategy could offer an improved diagnostic approach. The high heterogeneity and limited number of studies necessitate cautious interpretation and further research in diverse settings.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of ST-segment elevation for acute coronary occlusion.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ST-segment elevation on a 12­lead ECG in detecting ACO across any coronary artery, challenging the current STEMI-NSTEMI paradigm. METHODS: Studies from MEDLINE and Scopus (2012-2023) comparing ECG findings with coronary angiograms were systematically reviewed and analyzed following PRISMA-DTA guidelines. QUADAS-2 assessed the risk of bias. STUDY SELECTION: Studies included focused on AMI patients and provided data enabling the construction of contingency tables for sensitivity and specificity calculation, excluding those with non-ACS conditions, outdated STEMI criteria, or a specific focus on bundle branch blocks or other complex diagnoses. Data were extracted systematically and pooled test accuracy estimates were computed using MetaDTA software, employing bivariate analyses for within- and between-study variation. The primary outcomes measured were the sensitivity and specificity of ST-segment elevation in detecting ACO. RESULTS: Three studies with 23,704 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity of ST-segment elevation for detecting ACO was 43.6% (95% CI: 34.7%-52.9%), indicating that over half of ACO cases may not exhibit ST-segment elevation. The specificity was 96.5% (95% CI: 91.2%-98.7%). Additional analysis using the OMI-NOMI strategy showed improved sensitivity (78.1%, 95% CI: 62.7%-88.3%) while maintaining similar specificity (94.4%, 95% CI: 88.6%-97.3%). CONCLUSION: The findings reveal a significant diagnostic gap in the current STEMI-NSTEMI paradigm, with over half of ACO cases potentially lacking ST-segment elevation. The OMI-NOMI strategy could offer an improved diagnostic approach. The high heterogeneity and limited number of studies necessitate cautious interpretation and further research in diverse settings.

Amplitude das Ondas F como Preditor de Tromboembolismo e de Sucesso da Cardioversão Elétrica em Pacientes com Fibrilação Atrial Persistente / F Wave Amplitude as a Predictor of Thromboembolism and Success of Electrical Cardioversion in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Resumo Fundamento A fibrilação atrial (FA) é classificada, de acordo com a amplitude das ondas fibrilatórias (f), em ondas finas (FAf) e ondas grossas (FAg). Objetivos Correlacionar a amplitude das ondas f com variáveis clínicas, laboratoriais, eletrocardiográficas e ecocardiográficas que indiquem alto risco de tromboembolismo e avaliar o seu impacto no sucesso da cardioversão elétrica (CVE). Métodos Estudo retrospectivo, observacional, que incluiu 57 pacientes com FA não valvar persistente submetidos a CVE. A amplitude máxima das ondas f foi aferida na derivação V1. FAg foi definida quando f≥1,0 mm e FAf quando f<1,0mm. Os achados foram correlacionados com as variáveis indicadas. Valores de p<0,05 foram considerados estatisticamente significativos. Resultados FAg (n=35) associou-se a maior sucesso na CVE (94,3% vs. 72,7%, p=0,036) mesmo após ajuste para variáveis como idade e IMC (p=0,026, OR=11,8). Pacientes com FAf (n=22) necessitaram mais choques e maior energia para reversão ao ritmo sinusal (p=0,019 e p=0,027, respectivamente). Não houve associação significativa entre a amplitude das ondas f e parâmetros clínicos, ecocardiográficos e laboratoriais. Conclusões A amplitude de f não se associou a parâmetros ecocardiográficos, clínicos e laboratoriais que indicam alto risco de tromboembolismo. FAg associou-se a maior chance de sucesso na reversão ao ritmo sinusal por meio da CVE. Maior número de choques e energia foram necessários para reversão ao ritmo sinusal em pacientes com FAf.

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is classified according to the amplitude of fibrillatory waves (f) into fine waves (fAF) and coarse waves (cAF). Objectives To correlate the amplitude of f waves with clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic variables that indicate a high risk of thromboembolism and to assess their impact on the success of electrical cardioversion (ECV). Methods Retrospective, observational study that included 57 patients with persistent non-valvular AF who underwent ECV. The maximum amplitude of f waves was measured in lead V1. cAF was defined when f ≥ 1.0mm and fAF when f < 1.0mm. The findings were correlated with the indicated variables. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results cAF (n = 35) was associated with greater success in ECV (94.3% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.036) even after adjusting for variables such as age and BMI (p = 0.026, OR = 11.8). Patients with fAF (n = 22) required more shocks and more energy to revert to sinus rhythm (p = 0.019 and p = 0.027, respectively). There was no significant association between f-wave amplitude and clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters. Conclusions The amplitude of f wave was not associated with echocardiographic, clinical and laboratory parameters that indicate a high risk of thromboembolism. cAF was associated with a higher chance of success reverting to sinus rhythm employing ECV. A greater number of shocks and energy were required for reversion to sinus rhythm in patients with fAF.

Right Bundle-Branch Block Pattern in Precordial Leads and Left Bundle-Branch Block Pattern With Left Axis Deviation in Frontal Plane Leads-What Does This Mean?

This case report describes a patient in their 70s who presented to the emergency department with a history of syncope that occurred 7 days before admission.

F Wave Amplitude as a Predictor of Thromboembolism and Success of Electrical Cardioversion in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. / Amplitude das Ondas F como Preditor de Tromboembolismo e de Sucesso da Cardioversão Elétrica em Pacientes com Fibrilação Atrial Persistente.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is classified according to the amplitude of fibrillatory waves (f) into fine waves (fAF) and coarse waves (cAF). OBJECTIVES: To correlate the amplitude of f waves with clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic variables that indicate a high risk of thromboembolism and to assess their impact on the success of electrical cardioversion (ECV). METHODS: Retrospective, observational study that included 57 patients with persistent non-valvular AF who underwent ECV. The maximum amplitude of f waves was measured in lead V1. cAF was defined when f ≥ 1.0mm and fAF when f < 1.0mm. The findings were correlated with the indicated variables. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: cAF (n = 35) was associated with greater success in ECV (94.3% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.036) even after adjusting for variables such as age and BMI (p = 0.026, OR = 11.8). Patients with fAF (n = 22) required more shocks and more energy to revert to sinus rhythm (p = 0.019 and p = 0.027, respectively). There was no significant association between f-wave amplitude and clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The amplitude of f wave was not associated with echocardiographic, clinical and laboratory parameters that indicate a high risk of thromboembolism. cAF was associated with a higher chance of success reverting to sinus rhythm employing ECV. A greater number of shocks and energy were required for reversion to sinus rhythm in patients with fAF.

FUNDAMENTO: A fibrilação atrial (FA) é classificada, de acordo com a amplitude das ondas fibrilatórias (f), em ondas finas (FAf) e ondas grossas (FAg). OBJETIVOS: Correlacionar a amplitude das ondas f com variáveis clínicas, laboratoriais, eletrocardiográficas e ecocardiográficas que indiquem alto risco de tromboembolismo e avaliar o seu impacto no sucesso da cardioversão elétrica (CVE). MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo, observacional, que incluiu 57 pacientes com FA não valvar persistente submetidos a CVE. A amplitude máxima das ondas f foi aferida na derivação V1. FAg foi definida quando f≥1,0 mm e FAf quando f<1,0mm. Os achados foram correlacionados com as variáveis indicadas. Valores de p<0,05 foram considerados estatisticamente significativos. RESULTADOS: FAg (n=35) associou-se a maior sucesso na CVE (94,3% vs. 72,7%, p=0,036) mesmo após ajuste para variáveis como idade e IMC (p=0,026, OR=11,8). Pacientes com FAf (n=22) necessitaram mais choques e maior energia para reversão ao ritmo sinusal (p=0,019 e p=0,027, respectivamente). Não houve associação significativa entre a amplitude das ondas f e parâmetros clínicos, ecocardiográficos e laboratoriais. CONCLUSÕES: A amplitude de f não se associou a parâmetros ecocardiográficos, clínicos e laboratoriais que indicam alto risco de tromboembolismo. FAg associou-se a maior chance de sucesso na reversão ao ritmo sinusal por meio da CVE. Maior número de choques e energia foram necessários para reversão ao ritmo sinusal em pacientes com FAf.

Amplitude das ondas F como preditor de tromboembolismo e de sucesso da cardioversão elétrica em pacientes com fibrilação atrial persistente / F-wave amplitude as a predictor of thromboembolism and success of electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUÇÃO: A fibrilação atrial (FA) é classificada em dois tipos de acordo com a amplitude das ondas fibrilatórias (f) em: FA de ondas finas (FAf) e FA de ondas grossas (FAg). OBJETIVOS: Correlacionar a amplitude das ondas f com variáveis clínicas, laboratoriais, eletrocardiográficas e ecocardiográficas que indicam alto risco de tromboembolismo e avaliar o seu impacto no sucesso da cardioversão elétrica (CVE). MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo, observacional, no qual 57 pacientes com FA não valvar persistente submetidos a CVE foram avaliados. Aferiu-se a amplitude máxima das ondas f na derivação V1, promovendo classificação em FAg quando f ≥ 1,0 mm e FAf para f ˂ 1,0 mm. Os achados foram correlacionados com as variáveis indicadas. RESULTADOS: FAg (n = 35) associou-se a maior sucesso na CVE (94,3% vs 72,7%, p = 0,045; sensibilidade 71,4% e especificidade 62,5%, AUC = 0,74, p = 0,03) mesmo após ajuste para variáveis como idade e IMC (p = 0,026, Exp(B) = 11,8). Pacientes com FAf (n = 22) necessitaram mais choques e maior energia para reversão ao ritmo sinusal (2,6±1,1 vs 1,87±0,9, p = 0,019; 178±55,2 vs 140±40,2J, p = 0,027). Não houve associação significativa entre a amplitude das ondas f e parâmetros clínicos, ecocardiográficos e laboratoriais. CONCLUSÕES: A amplitude de f não se associa a parâmetros ecocardiográficos, clínicos e laboratoriais que indicam alto risco de tromboembolismo. FAg associa-se a maior chance de sucesso na reversão ao ritmo sinusal de por meio da CVE. Maior número de choques e energia são necessários para reversão ao ritmo sinusal em pacientes com FAf. Gráfico 1 - Curva ROC da máxima amplitude de f em V1 como preditora de sucesso da CVE. Gráfico 2 ­ Número máximo de choques aplicados em cada grupo e energia cumulativa necessária para reversão ao ritmo sinusal.

Síndrome de Reel recorrente após implante de cardiodesfibrilador à esquerda e à direita / Recurrent Reel Syndrome after left and right implantation of cardioverter defibrillator

A síndrome de Reel é uma complicação rara que ocorre após o implante de dispositivos intracardíacos, sendo definida como retração e deslocamento dos cabos-eletrodos em decorrência de rotação do gerador em seu eixo sagital. Recorrências após medidas preventivas durante o reposicionamento não são comuns. Relata-se o caso de uma paciente com deslocamento recorrente de cabos-eletrodos após implante de cardiodesfibrilador a despeito de diversas medidas adotadas para prevenir novos deslocamentos e implante do dispositivo pela veia subclávia tanto esquerda como direita, com fixação do gerador à fáscia subpeitoral.

The Reel Syndrome is a rare complication that occurs after implantation of intracardiac devices, defined as lead retraction and displacement due to generator rotation on its sagittal axis. Recurrences after preventive measures during repositioning are not common. We report the case of a patient with recurrent lead displacement after defibrillator implantation in spite of several measures taken to prevent further device displacement and implantation both by left and right subclavian vein with attachment of the generator to the subpectoral fascia.