Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Orthopadie (Heidelb) ; 53(6): 404-414, 2024 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739271

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Muscle injuries are common in football. Imaging diagnostics have a major role in establishing a diagnosis. The main diagnostic procedures are MRI and ultrasound. Both diagnostics have advantages and disadvantages, which should be balanced against each other. NEW ULTRASONIC TECHNIQUES: The role of MRI as the gold standard is increasingly being replaced by high-resolution ultrasound techniques, and MRI imaging is not always useful. To detect complications in the early stages it is advised to perform regular ultrasound-imaging check-ups. The healing process can be monitored, and it offers additional options for ultrasound-guided interventions such as hematoma punctures and targeted infiltrations. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES: However, ultrasound imaging is highly user dependent. Experienced operators can eliminate this disadvantage, which makes ultrasound a superior imaging system in many areas, especially for dynamic examinations. Nevertheless, MRI imaging remains a necessary imaging method in certain areas.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Muscle, Skeletal , Ultrasonography , Humans , Athletic Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Image Enhancement/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Muscle, Skeletal/injuries , Muscle, Skeletal/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...