Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol ; 50(4): 457-460, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33663894

ABSTRACT

Similar to the experiences of other radiology practices, our radiology staff members felt that scored peer review identified few errors/learning opportunities while undermining team collegiality. They desired a more effective way to promote team collegiality and foster lifelong learning. We describe the steps our department took to transition from a peer review system to a peer learning program.


Subject(s)
Radiology , Humans , Peer Review , Radiography
2.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 16(5S): S104-S115, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31054737

ABSTRACT

This review summarizes the relevant literature for the initial imaging of patients with symptoms of dysphagia. For patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia who have an underlying attributable cause, a modified barium swallow is usually appropriate for initial imaging but for those who have unexplained dysphagia a fluoroscopic biphasic esophagram is usually appropriate. Fluoroscopic biphasic esophagram is usually appropriate for initial imaging in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients who have retrosternal dysphagia. For postoperative patients with dysphagia, fluoroscopic single-contrast esophagram and CT neck and chest with intravenous (IV) contrast are usually appropriate for oropharyngeal or retrosternal dysphagia occurring in the early postoperative period where water-soluble contrast is usually preferred rather than barium sulfate. In the later postoperative period (greater than 1 month), CT neck and chest with IV contrast and fluoroscopic single-contrast esophagram are usually appropriate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Contrast Media , Diagnosis, Differential , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Societies, Medical , United States
3.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 15(11S): S217-S231, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30392591

ABSTRACT

The range of pathology in adults that can produce abdominal pain is broad and necessitates an imaging approach to evaluate many different organ systems. Although localizing pain prompts directed imaging/management, clinical presentations may vary and result in nonlocalized symptoms. This review focuses on imaging the adult population with nonlocalized abdominal pain, including patients with fever, recent abdominal surgery, or neutropenia. Imaging of the entire abdomen and pelvis to evaluate for infectious or inflammatory processes of the abdominal viscera and solid organs, abdominal and pelvic neoplasms, and screen for ischemic or vascular etiologies is essential for prompt diagnosis and treatment. Often the first-line modality, CT quickly evaluates the abdomen/pelvis, providing for accurate diagnoses and management of patients with abdominal pain. Ultrasound and tailored MRI protocols may be useful as first-line imaging studies, especially in pregnant patients. In the postoperative abdomen, fluoroscopy may help detect anastomotic leaks/abscesses. While often performed, abdominal radiographs may not alter management. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Subject(s)
Abdomen, Acute/diagnostic imaging , Contrast Media , Diagnosis, Differential , Evidence-Based Medicine , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Societies, Medical , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Ultrasonography/methods
4.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 15(11S): S373-S387, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30392606

ABSTRACT

Appendicitis remains the most common surgical pathology responsible for right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain presenting to emergency departments in the United States, where the incidence continues to increase. Appropriate imaging in the diagnosis of appendicitis has resulted in decreased negative appendectomy rate from as high as 25% to approximately 1% to 3%. Contrast-enhanced CT remains the primary and most appropriate imaging modality to evaluate this patient population. MRI is approaching CT in sensitivity and specificity as this technology becomes more widely available and utilization increases. Unenhanced MRI and ultrasound remain the diagnostic procedures of choice in the pregnant patient. MRI and ultrasound continue to perform best in the hands of experts. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/diagnostic imaging , Appendicitis/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Contrast Media , Diagnosis, Differential , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Societies, Medical , United States
5.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 15(5S): S56-S68, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29724427

ABSTRACT

This review summarizes the relevant literature regarding colorectal screening with imaging. For individuals at average or moderate risk for colorectal cancer, CT colonography is usually appropriate for colorectal cancer screening. After positive results on a fecal occult blood test or immunohistochemical test, CT colonography is usually appropriate for colorectal cancer detection. For individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer (eg, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, ulcerative colitis, or Crohn colitis), optical colonoscopy is preferred because of its ability to obtain biopsies to detect dysplasia. After incomplete colonoscopy, CT colonography is usually appropriate for colorectal cancer screening for individuals at average, moderate, or high risk. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Subject(s)
Colonography, Computed Tomographic , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Early Detection of Cancer , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Societies, Medical , United States
6.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 14(5S): S234-S244, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28473079

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancers are common tumors in the United States and appropriate imaging is essential to direct appropriate care. Staging and treatment differs between tumors arising in the colon versus the rectum. Local staging for colon cancer is less integral to directing therapy given radical resection is often standard. Surgical options for rectal carcinoma are more varied and rely on accurate assessment of the sphincter, circumferential resection margins, and peritoneal reflection. These important anatomic landmarks are best appreciated on high-resolution imaging with transrectal ultrasound or MRI. When metastatic disease is suspected, imaging modalities that provide a global view of the body, such as CT with contrast or PET/CT may be indicated. Rectal cancer often metastasizes to the liver and so MRI of the liver with and without contrast provides accurate staging for liver metastases. This article focuses on local and distant staging and reviews the appropriateness of different imaging for both variants. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Radiology , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Societies, Medical , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography/methods , United States
7.
Radiol Clin North Am ; 51(1): 45-68, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23182507

ABSTRACT

This article reviews the computed tomography (CT) findings of miscellaneous regional and diffuse small bowel disorders. CT technique and potential pitfalls are discussed. Several categories of regional and diffuse small bowel conditions are reviewed, with representative CT images. These disorders often have relatively nonspecific CT appearances, and correlation with the history, clinical, and laboratory findings in each specific case is critical. In selected conditions, the CT findings are highly specific. The imaging literature of some of the common as well as some of the less common entities is reviewed, and clues to narrowing the differential diagnosis are provided.


Subject(s)
Intestinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Intestine, Small , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans
8.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 197(2): 393-8, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21785085

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to retrospectively review the radiologic and clinical findings in patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)-induced small-bowel angioedema, with an emphasis on CT findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Imaging findings, with an emphasis on CT, and clinical characteristics of 20 patients (23 presentations) presenting to two institutions' emergency departments from 1996 through 2010 with ACEI-induced small-bowel angioedema were retrospectively reviewed by two abdominal radiologists who were aware of the diagnosis. Examinations were reviewed in consensus to determine common radiographic findings. RESULTS: Patient age range was 23-83 years (mean, 56 years). Sixteen of the 20 patients were women, and 15 of 20 were obese. All had acute onset of severe abdominal pain. The date of the initial episode prompting CT evaluation ranged from 2 days to 10 years after the start of ACEI therapy (average, 3.3 years). All patients underwent abdominal CT examinations while symptomatic; five patients also underwent a small-bowel series. Three patients underwent urgent surgery for presumed small-bowel ischemia. All patients had resolution of symptoms within 4 days of hospitalization. CT findings included ascites in all patients, small-bowel wall thickening (mean, 1.3 cm), mild dilatation (mean, 2.9 cm), and straightening. There was no small-bowel obstruction. CONCLUSION: ACEI-induced small-bowel angioedema should be included in the differential diagnosis when patients receiving ACEI therapy present with abdominal complaints and the following combination of findings on CT examination: ascites, small-bowel wall thickening, dilatation without obstruction, and straightening.


Subject(s)
Angioedema/chemically induced , Angioedema/diagnostic imaging , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Intestine, Small , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioedema/surgery , Contrast Media , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
9.
Abdom Imaging ; 33(2): 196-9, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17435982

ABSTRACT

Degos disease is a rare idiopathic vasculopathy with multisystem involvement. We present a previously healthy 40-year-old woman who developed spontaneous small bowel infarctions and perforations 17 months after presentation with characteristic skin lesions. The abdominal CT findings of Degos disease, which have not been previously depicted in the radiology literature, are discussed.


Subject(s)
Intestinal Perforation/diagnosis , Intestine, Small/diagnostic imaging , Malignant Atrophic Papulosis/diagnosis , Adult , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Diagnosis, Differential , Fatal Outcome , Female , Hemothorax/etiology , Humans , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/therapy , Malignant Atrophic Papulosis/complications , Malignant Atrophic Papulosis/therapy , Omentum/diagnostic imaging , Peritonitis/etiology , Pneumoperitoneum/etiology , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiography, Abdominal/methods , Rare Diseases , Skin Diseases/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
10.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 189(4): 786-90, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17885046

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to describe and illustrate intramural fat in the duodenum and jejunum, to our knowledge a previously undescribed finding in celiac disease. CONCLUSION: Celiac disease is known to produce inflammation of the duodenum and jejunum. We propose that postinflammatory intramural fat deposition occurs in a distribution likely unique for celiac disease. CT scans of the chest and abdomen obtained for many indications include these portions of the bowel. Celiac disease is now recognized as a common disease, and the recognition of intramural fat in the duodenum and jejunum on CT may allow earlier diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/diagnostic imaging , Celiac Disease/diagnostic imaging , Duodenum/diagnostic imaging , Intestine, Small/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
11.
Radiographics ; 26(5): 1355-71, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16973769

ABSTRACT

Obesity is an epidemic in the United States. The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure is an effective surgical intervention that can produce dramatic weight loss in morbidly obese patients. Despite the inherent risks, the surgery is increasing in popularity. Radiology plays a crucial role in postoperative evaluation. Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series and abdominal computed tomography (CT) are the primary radiologic tools used in assessment of possible complications. With knowledge of the normal postoperative appearance, performance of UGI studies and interpretation of the results should be easy. The 24-hour postoperative examination allows reliable detection of anastomotic leaks. Although strictures of the gastrojejunal anastomosis are a common complication, they are often diagnosed and treated with endoscopy. In a thorough examination, one also evaluates for degraded pouch restriction, including a patulous gastrojejunal anastomosis or gastrogastric fistula, as a late cause of weight gain. Knowledge of the postoperative anatomy also assists in detection of internal hernias. CT is invaluable in detection and characterization of small bowel obstructions and internal hernias. CT may allow diagnosis of anastomotic leaks, abscesses, gastrogastric fistulas, and intra-abdominal hematomas. CT-guided percutaneous procedures, such as placement of gastrostomy tubes or drainage of fluid collections, can obviate emergency exploration and may be the only procedural intervention necessary for a cure.


Subject(s)
Gastric Bypass/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Obesity/diagnostic imaging , Obesity/surgery , Postoperative Care/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prognosis , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Treatment Outcome
12.
Surg Clin North Am ; 86(4): 819-47, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16905412

ABSTRACT

Screening of asymptomatic average-risk patients for presence of colon cancer and early detection in precursor stages is of great interest to general population. Comprehensive evaluation of symptomatic or high-risk patients represents another important clinical focus. Available techniques for total colon imaging, rectal cancer staging and the role of positron emission tomography are discussed.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colon/diagnostic imaging , Colon/pathology , Colonography, Computed Tomographic , Colonoscopy , Contrast Media , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neoplasm Staging , Positron-Emission Tomography , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...