ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It has previously been shown that a combination of erythromycin and benzoyl peroxide is superior to either ingredient when used alone in the treatment of acne. A clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide combination gel might have an advantage over erythromycin/benzoyl peroxide gel because the former does not require refrigeration after it is dispensed. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the efficacy and safety of a combination clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel when compared with benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin, or vehicle gels. METHODS: In two double-blind, randomized, parallel, vehicle-controlled trials, patients were treated for 11 weeks with once-nightly application of one of the above preparations. Evaluations were performed at 2, 5, 8, and 11 weeks and included lesion counts and assessment of global responses and irritant effects. RESULTS: A total of 334 patients completed the study. All three active preparations were significantly superior to the vehicle in global improvement and in reducing inflammatory lesions and noninflammatory lesions. The combination gel was significantly superior to the two individual agents in global improvement and reduction of inflammatory lesions and also to the clindamycin gel in reducing noninflammatory lesions. There was no significant difference in tolerance to the active gels versus the vehicle gel. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of acne, topical clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide combination gel is well tolerated and superior to either individual ingredient.
Subject(s)
Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Benzoyl Peroxide/therapeutic use , Clindamycin/therapeutic use , Keratolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Administration, Cutaneous , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Benzoyl Peroxide/administration & dosage , Benzoyl Peroxide/adverse effects , Clindamycin/administration & dosage , Clindamycin/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Erythromycin/administration & dosage , Erythromycin/therapeutic use , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gels , Humans , Irritants/adverse effects , Keratolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Keratolytic Agents/adverse effects , Logistic Models , Male , Pharmaceutical Vehicles , Placebos , Remission Induction , SafetyABSTRACT
The multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of amifloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent, were evaluated in healthy male volunteers. Amifloxacin was administered orally at 200, 400, or 600 mg every 12 h (q12h) and 400, 600, or 800 mg every 8 h (q8h) for 10 days. An additional dose was administered on day 11. Concentrations of amifloxacin in plasma and urine were measured on days 1, 5, and 11 by high-performance liquid chromatography. Steady-state amifloxacin concentrations were reached by day 5. Mean +/- standard deviation maximum observed amifloxacin concentrations in plasma were 2.52 +/- 1.12, 4.98 +/- 1.44, 5.40 +/- 2.02, 4.59 +/- 2.17, 6.53 +/- 2.44, and 8.01 +/- 3.00 micrograms/ml after the initial dose and 2.30 +/- 0.98, 5.41 +/- 0.74, 8.05 +/- 1.68, 6.87 +/- 2.81, 9.53 +/- 0.50, and 11.9 +/- 1.92 micrograms/ml on day 11 of the study for the 200-, 400-, and 600-mg q12h and 400-, 600-, and 800-mg q8h regimens, respectively. Amifloxacin was rapidly absorbed, as evidenced by the mean time to the maximum observed amifloxacin concentration of 0.98 h. Mean values for the terminal amifloxacin half-life in plasma ranged from 3.58 to 5.78 h. Mean amifloxacin concentrations in urine on day 11 in samples collected 0 to 2 h after dosing were 105, 417, 376, 336, 518, and 464 micrograms/ml for the 200-, 400-, and 600-mg q12h and 400-, 600-, and 800-mg q8h regimens, respectively. The mean amount of the dose excreted in the urine as amifloxacin was 53.9%. Amifloxacin was generally well tolerated, although there was a tendency for the subjects who received amifloxacin to experience more gastrointestinal, central nervous system, and cutaneous complaints than did those who received placebo. Clinically significant adverse reactions, including pruritus and transaminase elevations, occurred only at doses of 1,200 mg/day or above. Clinical and pharmacokinetic data suggest that orally administered amifloxacin may have utility in the treatment of urinary tract infections.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacokinetics , Ciprofloxacin/analogs & derivatives , Fluoroquinolones , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents/toxicity , Ciprofloxacin/administration & dosage , Ciprofloxacin/pharmacokinetics , Ciprofloxacin/toxicity , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Evaluation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reference ValuesABSTRACT
We conducted a randomized controlled trial of orally administered amifloxacin versus trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) as treatments of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women. Amifloxacin at a dosage of 200 mg twice a day appeared as safe and effective as TMP-SMX, but amifloxacin at 400 mg twice a day tended to cause adverse events more frequently than did TMP-SMX.
