Simplified lipid guidelines: Prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To develop clinical practice guidelines for a simplified approach to primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), concentrating on CVD risk estimation and lipid management for primary care clinicians and their teams; we sought increased contribution from primary care professionals with little or no conflict of interest and focused on the highest level of evidence available. METHODS: Nine health professionals (4 family physicians, 2 internal medicine specialists, 1 nurse practitioner, 1 registered nurse, and 1 pharmacist) and 1 nonvoting member (pharmacist project manager) comprised the overarching Lipid Pathway Committee (LPC). Member selection was based on profession, practice setting, and location, and members disclosed any actual or potential conflicts of interest. The guideline process was iterative through online posting, detailed evidence review, and telephone and online meetings. The LPC identified 12 priority questions to be addressed. The Evidence Review Group answered these questions. After review of the answers, key recommendations were derived through consensus of the LPC. The guidelines were drafted, refined, and distributed to a group of clinicians (family physicians, other specialists, pharmacists, nurses, and nurse practitioners) and patients for feedback, then refined again and finalized by the LPC. RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommendations are provided on screening and testing, risk assessments, interventions, follow-up, and the role of acetylsalicylic acid in primary prevention. CONCLUSION: These simplified lipid guidelines provide practical recommendations for prevention and treatment of CVD for primary care practitioners. All recommendations are intended to assist with, not dictate, decision making in conjunction with patients.

Evaluation of a telehealth clinic as a means to facilitate dermatologic consultation: pilot project to assess the efficiency and experience of teledermatology used in a primary care network.

BACKGROUND: Primary care offices spend considerable time coordinating the specialist referral process. Patients experience long wait times for consultation and intervention. OBJECTIVE: To determine if telehealth combined with interdisciplinary team-based care can reduce wait times for dermatologic consultation while making the consultation process easier for physicians. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews as well as patient, referring physician, nonreferring physician, clinic physician, nurse, and teledermatologist interviews were used to evaluate the clinic. A comparative immersion approach generated themes from field notes. Wait times, appointment times, and encounter durations were measured. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were seen (23 had previous specialist referral experience) within 1 week of referral compared to a wait period of 104 days for conventional referral. Patients requiring intervention were treated within 1 week of their initial appointment. Referring practitioners were concerned that they would lose control of patients' care. An easier referral process and faster intakes met physician expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Teledermatology improves the timeliness of appointments. Patients forgo face-to-face appointments if alternatives are available sooner. Physicians are concerned about their own liability if dermatologists do not assess the patient in person but will refer through teledermatology when patients are seen faster and they remain in control of the care process.