Psychological disorders in patients with chronic postoperative inguinal pain.

PURPOSE: Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP), a complication of inguinal hernia repair, may negatively affect mental health. The rates of psychological disorders in patients with CPIP are unknown. We aimed to describe the prevalence of psychological disorders coinciding with CPIP. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients seen at the Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health's inter-disciplinary Chronic Groin Pain Clinic. This clinic is unique in that all patients are evaluated by a surgeon, a sonographer and radiologist, and a behavioral medicine psychologist. Patient psychological history and treatment, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) scores, pain catastrophizing, and trauma or abuse history were captured. RESULTS: From January 2018 to January 2022, 61 patients were evaluated and included in the study. Psychological treatment had been provided to 37 (61%) patients (present: 16 (27%), past: 21 (35%)). The most common psychological disorders represented were depression (N = 13, 22%), anxiety (N = 10, 17%), and post-traumatic stress disorder (N = 5, 8%). DASS scores indicated that 20 (33%) patients were reporting symptoms of depression and 16 (27%) patients were reporting symptoms of anxiety. Of the 40 patients assessed for pain catastrophizing, 28 (70%) reported rumination, 9 (23%) reported magnification, and 23 (58%) reported feelings of helplessness. A childhood history of emotional or physical abuse was reported by 11 (18%) patients. CONCLUSION: An inter-disciplinary groin pain clinic has revealed that patients with CPIP frequently have pre-existing complex psychosocial issues. A multi-specialty approach to CPIP may improve preoperative assessments and identify patients who may benefit from further psychological evaluation and treatment.

Improved quality of life following total pancreatectomy and auto-islet transplantation for chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Total pancreatectomy (TP) with auto-islet transplant (AIT) is an extreme treatment for chronic pancreatitis, and we reviewed our experience to assess the impact on quality of life (QOL). METHODS: A prospective cohort study from 2007 through 2010 with pre- and postoperative assessments of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, Pain Disability Index, and visual analogue pain scale was performed. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent TP-AIT with a median follow-up of 12 months (6.75-24 months). All patients reported moderate (45 %) to severe (55 %) pain prior to surgery. TP-AIT resulted in significant decreases in abdominal pain (p < 0.001), 80 % reporting no or mild pain. Despite pain improvement, only 30 % discontinued narcotics. Improvements in all PDI QOL domains improved from 79 to 90 % (p = 0.002), with greatest improvements seen in those without prior pancreatic surgery, younger patients, and in those with higher levels of preoperative pain. Patients were less affected by depression and anxiety prior to surgery, but 60 and 70 % did show improvement in depression and anxiety, respectively (p = 0.033). Sixteen patients (80 %) required exogenous insulin at last follow-up (mean total dose of insulin 11.6 U/day). CONCLUSIONS: TP-AIT significantly improves pain and QOL measures in appropriately selected patients with CP.

Role of differential neuroaxial blockade in the evaluation and management of pain in chronic pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic pancreatic pain is difficult to treat. Surgical and medical therapies directed at reducing pain have met with little long-term success. In addition, there are no reliable predictors of response including pancreatic duct diameter. A differential neuroaxial blockade allows characterization of chronic abdominal pain into visceral and nonvisceral pain origins and may be useful as a guide to the treatment. Pain from an inflamed, and scarred pancreas should be visceral in origin. The purpose of our study was to determine the frequency with which patients with chronic pancreatitis have visceral pain and whether our modified differential neuroaxial blockade technique using thoracic epidural analgesia can accurately predict which patients will respond to medical or surgical therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with a firmly established diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis (Cambridge classification, calcifications) who had undergone a differential neuroaxial block for their chronic abdominal pain evaluation. Patient demographics and medical or surgical treatment for pancreatic pain was recorded. Response to therapy was defined by a 50% reduction in pain by verbal response score. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were identified. Alcohol was the most common etiology for chronic pancreatitis (15 of 23, 55%). Surprisingly, the majority of chronic pancreatitis patients had nonvisceral pain (18 of 23, 78%) and only 22% (5 of 23) had visceral pain by differential neuroaxial block. Four of five patients (80%) with visceral pain responded to therapy, whereas only 5 of 17 (29%) of patients with nonvisceral pain responded. CONCLUSIONS: Surprisingly, patients with chronic pancreatitis commonly have nonvisceral pain. Differential neuroaxial blockade can predict which patients will respond to therapy.

Effects of instructions on physical capacities outcome in a workers' compensation setting.

UNLABELLED: Physical Capacity Evaluations (PCE) are often used in Pain Management Programs (PMP) to help determine patients' return-to-work status, continued rehabilitation and compensation. STUDY DESIGN: Groups of patients participating in a 4-week PMP were given the PCE upon entry to the program and again near discharge. Change in performance between the first and second testing was examined. OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to examine the effects of instructions on patients' performance on the PCE. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: An extensive literature suggests that, although commonly used, the PCE is of questionable validity in measuring actual physical capacity. METHODS: Patients were assigned to one of 2 physical therapists and given a PCE (in this setting, a dynamic vs static strength test) on admission and near the time of discharge. The assessment by the 2 therapists differed in the instructions they gave their patients for the PCE. Both therapists told their groups, "Do the best you can," but only one therapist added, "This test will be used to determine your job classification." In the second half of the study both therapists gave identical instructions, "Do the best you can," and did not add the explanation. RESULTS: Patients who were informed that the test would be used to determine their job classifications performed considerably worse than those not so informed. When both therapists gave the same instructions, groups performed comparably, suggesting that therapist variables did not explain the differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Instructions on the PCE have an effect on performance.

Flashback and nightmares after surgery under neuraxial anesthesia: a report of two cases.

Recall, awareness, flashback, and nightmares are reported complications of general anesthesia, but flashback and nightmares after regional anesthesia have not been described. Two patients underwent vascular and orthopedic surgery under spinal and epidural anesthesia, respectively. Local anesthetic consisted of bupivacaine, and sedation was achieved with the combination of fentanyl, midazolam, and diphenhydramine. In both patients the anesthetic course was uneventful, but the recovery process was complicated by flashbacks and nightmares leading to depression, physical complaints, and lengthy convalescence. Flashback and nightmares after neuraxial anesthesia are unreported and, therefore, their incidence is unknown.