The development and flux of the University of Minnesota Survivorship Program: progress, challenges, and opportunities.

For the past 30 years, the University of Minnesota's Cancer Survivorship Program has been dedicated to providing exceptional care to patients who have lived the cancer experience. Our model is consultative, risk-stratified, and oncologist-led but executed predominately by advanced practice providers. Care is personalized and serves three survivor populations: children, adults, and patients who received BMT with over 500 new patients evaluated annually. As guidelines and survivorship standards have changed, our clinical programs have evolved from a focus on survivorship care plans to supportive care. The program offers a wide range of supportive services from acupuncture to nutritional services as well as several educational programs for patients. The program has a strong research legacy, notably as the birthplace of research that led to the Children's Oncology Group Guidelines as well as advancements in cardio-oncology and frailty after bone marrow transplantation. In 2021, we hosted the first annual Survivorship Research Forum, providing the opportunity and space for experts across disciplines to exchange ideas on a broad range of survivorship topics not possible at other national cancer-related conferences. With successes and challenges, we have identified opportunities for growth as our program continues to evolve and grow in our goal to improve cancer outcomes along a wide spectrum of physical, emotional, functional, and social dimensions. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The University of Minnesota Cancer Survivorship Program provides care, education, and research opportunities for patients across the cancer continuum.

Iron Overload in Survivors of Childhood Cancer.

Iron overload is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for patients who require frequent transfusions. We completed a prospective, cross-sectional study to evaluate the prevalence of iron overload in previously transfused childhood cancer survivors. Survivors recruited from the University of Minnesota Long-Term Follow-Up Clinic were stratified into 3 groups: oncology patients not treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (n=27), patients treated with allogeneic HSCT (n=27), and patients treated with autologous HSCT (n=9). Serum ferritin was collected and hepatic magnetic resonance imaging (FerriScan) was obtained for those with iron overload (defined as ferritin ≥1000 ng/mL). The prevalence of iron overload in subjects with a history of allogeneic HSCT was 25.9% (95% CI, 9.4%-42.5%) compared with only 3.7% (95% CI, 0%-10.8%) in subjects treated without HSCT and 0% in subjects treated with autologous HSCT. No association was found between serum ferritin levels and the presence of cardiac, liver, or endocrine dysfunction. The prevalence of iron overload in subjects who received no HSCT or autologous HSCT is low in our study. A higher prevalence was found in patients receiving allogeneic HSCT, reiterating the importance of screening these patients for iron overload in accordance with the current Children's Oncology Group Long Term Follow-Up Guidelines.