Can auditory cues improve visuo-spatial neglect? Results of two pilot studies.

Although neglect is known to be a multimodal deficit, current interventions often address the visual modality only. Experimental studies, however, found that neglect patients can partially overcome their spatial inattention temporarily when being exposed to auditory cues that move towards the neglected side of space. Two pilot studies investigated the impact of dynamic auditory cueing on egocentric neglect severity in a clinical-therapeutic setting. In both studies, the patient groups received 15 sessions of intervention. Study 1, designed as double-blinded trial with a historical control group, targeted severely impaired early-acute patients who listened to music or audio books which were presented as moving dynamically from right to left. Results showed a reduction in egocentric neglect severity that persisted after therapy termination in the intervention but not in the historical control group. In study 2, based on the comparison with reported effect sizes of previous studies, dynamic meaningful auditory cues and optokinetic stimulation were combined in a computer-based training. Both studies found a significant reduction of neglect severity. Results provide evidence for the reduction of egocentric neglect severity after repetitive auditory cueing therapy in both severely and moderately impaired patients. Our promising findings should be verified thoroughly in randomized-controlled trials.

[Development of a claim form for the initiation of post-treatment rehabilitation for nationwide use by all reimbursement agencies: a report and plea for reducing administrative barriers]. / Entwicklung eines bundeseinheitlichen und kostenträger- übergreifenden Antragsformulars für die Einleitung der Anschlussrehabilitation: Projektbericht und Plädoyer zum Abbau administrativer Hürden.

We describe the results of a survey of claim forms that are used when starting rehabilitation following inpatient treatment and of an evaluation of a claim form developed on the basis of the results. The survey of different existing forms shows a high overlapping in content, suggesting the possibility of unification to one claim form that can be accepted by all insurers. In analogy to the Delphi method criteria for evaluation were consented and applied by the author group to assess the relevance of the claim forms content items for the process of initiating rehabilitation. A group of further experts added their evaluations. We prioritised the results and extracted the essential contents to conceive a unified claim form eligible for all types of rehabilitation. The claim form was discussed in 3 focus groups, revised accordingly and tested in the Hannover Medical School. Test results show that all relevant information is asked for and that the form is well manageable. The users' request for an IT-based solution and further ideas for improvement were integrated into the revised and validated version of the claim form. It is now available for all stake holders, in particular for insurers, as a means to improve quality of care and efficiency by standardisation of rehabilitation claim forms.