Effects of nasal dilator strips on subjective measures of sleep in subjects with chronic nocturnal nasal congestion: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This exploratory study investigated effects of a new asymmetric butterfly-shaped prototype nasal dilator strip and the currently marketed clear Breathe Right Nasal Strip (BRNS) on subjective measures of nasal congestion and sleep quality. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, subjects with chronic nasal congestion and sleep difficulties were assigned a BRNS clear strip, an asymmetric butterfly prototype, or an asymmetric butterfly placebo strip without springs, to use nightly for 2 weeks. The main outcomes included change from baseline to days 7 and 14 on the Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale (PIRS), Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (NRQLQ), and Congestion Quantifier Seven-Item Test (CQ7). RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population included 59 subjects. The butterfly and BRNS strips showed significant (P < 0.05) improvement versus placebo on PIRS satisfaction with sleep at day 7 [least square (LS) mean changes: - 0.7, - 0.6, and - 0.2, respectively], and the butterfly strip also showed significant improvement from baseline on this outcome versus placebo at day 14 (- 1.0 vs - 0.5). On the NRQLQ, both the butterfly prototype and BRNS clear were more effective than placebo in improving symptoms on waking at day 7 (LS mean changes: - 7.9, - 7.2, and - 4.1, respectively); the BRNS clear was significantly more effective than placebo in improving sleep problems at day 7 (- 7.4 vs - 4.2). There were no between-treatment differences on the CQ7. All strips were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The asymmetric butterfly prototype and BRNS clear strip significantly improved some subjective measures of nasal congestion and sleep compared with placebo in subjects with nasal congestion and sleep difficulties.Trial registration This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01122849).

Impact of sodium chloride on the expansion of a liquid-liquid miscibility gap in an API/water system. Case study of Brivaracetam.

Brivaracetam, or (2S)-2-[(4R)-2-oxo-4-propyl-pyrrolidin-1-yl] butanamide, is an active pharmaceutical ingredient designed for the treatment of epilepsy. During the development of the IV administration mode, a liquid-liquid miscibility gap has been observed with pure water, isotonic and hypertonic solutions (vehicle at 0.9% w/w and 5%w/w NaCl respectively). The study reveals that the NaCl concentration has a direct impact on the extent of the demixing domain; from a sub-micronic demixing in pure water towards a macroscopic miscibility gap in hypertonic aqueous solutions. The thorough exploration of these heterogeneous equilibria led to define experimental parameters for safe IV injections without risk of liquid - liquid miscibility gap at 37°C.

Development and validation of a method for the analysis of hydroxyzine hydrochloride in extracellular solution used in in vitro preclinical safety studies.

In the process of drug development, preclinical safety studies are to be performed that require the analysis of the compound at very low concentrations with high demands on the performance of the analytical methods. In the current study, a UPLC-MS/MS method was developed and validated to quantify hydroxyzine hydrochloride in an extracellular solution used in a hERG assay in concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 10µM (4.5ng/ml-4.5µg/ml). Chromatographic separation was achieved isocratically on an Acquity BEH C18 analytical column. The assay was validated at concentrations of 0.11-1.1ng/ml in end solution for hydroxyzine hydrochloride. Linearity was demonstrated over the range of concentrations of 0.06-0.17ng/ml and over the range of concentrations of 0.6-1.7ng/ml in end solution with the coefficient of correlation r>0.99. Accuracy of the achieved concentration, intra-run, and inter-run precision of the method were well within the acceptance criteria (being mean recovery of 80-120% and relative standard deviation ≤10.0%). The limit of quantification in extracellular solution was 0.09ng/ml. Hydroxyzine hydrochloride in extracellular solution proved to be stable when stored in the fridge at 4-8°C for at least 37 days, at room temperature for at least 16 days and at +35°C for at least 16 days. The analytical method was successfully applied in hERG assay.

Therapeutic equivalence of triamcinolone acetonide hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon nasal inhalers in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) has been reformulated as an hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) aerosol for intranasal use in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). This study compared the TAA HFA formulation with the previously available chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) nasal inhaler in a dose-ranging study. METHODS: This was a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study in 780 adults with SAR. Patients had a history of fall seasonal rhinitis and positive skin tests to ragweed. After meeting minimum symptom requirements during the run-in phase, patients were randomized to one of eight groups: TAA CFC or HFA at 14, 110, or 440 micrograms once daily or matching placebo. Treatment was continued for two weeks and patient completed a daily diary for reflective and instantaneous rating of nasal and ocular allergy symptoms. RESULTS: All active treatment groups were statistically superior to placebo with respect to the primary outcome variable, total nasal symptoms. Furthermore, the TAA HFA and TAA CFC formulations were statistically comparable over the dose range. Within each formulation, there was a significant mean reduction from baseline in the symptoms of rhinitis that increased with increasing dose. Ocular symptoms were also reduced with both formulations. Both preparations were well tolerated without any safety concerns. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, a new formulation of TAA with a HFA propellant was found to be effective in the treatment of SAR and comparable with the previously available TAA CFC formulation. There was a dose response to TAA, with doses as low as 7 micrograms per nostril once daily producing statistically significant improvement in rhinitis symptoms.

Intranasal mometasone furoate alleviates the ocular symptoms associated with seasonal allergic rhinitis: results of a post hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND: Burdensome symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR) include nasal and ocular symptoms such as itching, tearing and redness. Intranasal corticosteroids are efficacious in the treatment of nasal symptoms of AR. OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to determine the efficacy of the intranasal corticosteroid mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in relieving ocular symptoms associated with seasonal AR (SAR). METHODS: Ocular symptom data were analyzed for subjects >or=12 years of age, randomized to MFNS 200 mug q.d. (n = 176) or placebo (n = 177) in a placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Post hoc efficacy analysis assessed the mean change from baseline in subject-reported total ocular symptom scores (TOSS) averaged over the treatment period. RESULTS: Mean baseline TOSS was 4.91 for the MFNS group and comparable (5.05) for the placebo group - combined average for individual symptoms such as itching, tearing and redness ranged from 0 (no symptoms) to 9 (all symptoms, severe). Mean change from baseline in TOSS averaged over days 1-15 was -1.42 for the MFNS group and -0.94 for the placebo group (p = 0.02), for an observed treatment difference of 0.49 (statistical data rounded to 2 decimal positions). Improvement in individual symptoms (eye itching, tearing and redness) contributed to this treatment effect; the greatest improvement occurred with tearing, which decreased -0.52 from the baseline score 1.59 in the MFNS group and -0.31 from 1.67 in those receiving placebo (p < 0.01), for an observed treatment difference of 0.21. Treatment with MFNS was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: MFNS is effective in reducing ocular symptoms of SAR, in addition to its established efficacy in reducing nasal symptoms of SAR.

Effect of desloratadine on the control of morning symptoms in patients with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis.

The symptoms of allergic rhinitis vary in severity over the course of the day and often are worse in the morning. This review focuses on data from clinical studies of the antihistamine desloratadine to establish whether it effectively controls the morning symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Studies of desloratadine in patients with allergic rhinitis that used instantaneous scoring to assess the severity of morning symptoms were selected for inclusion from published literature (peer-reviewed articles and abstracts presented at professional meetings). When administered once daily, desloratadine is effective in alleviating the morning symptoms of allergic rhinitis, including nasal congestion. Its action is sustained over the 24-hour dosing interval. A comparison of morning and evening dosing of desloratadine revealed equivalent relief of morning symptoms, illustrating that the effect of desloratadine is independent of the time of dosing. Clinical studies indicate that desloratadine is nonsedating and well tolerated, with no evidence of adverse cardiac effects. For many patients with allergic rhinitis, symptoms are most severe in the morning. To maximize the benefits for patients, pharmacologic agents used in the management of allergic rhinitis should be effective in controlling these peak morning symptoms. The sustained 24-hour action of desloratadine and its effective control of morning symptoms make it a valuable tool for improving the quality of life of patients with allergic rhinitis.

Validation of the nighttime symptoms score as a clinically relevant measure of allergic rhinitis.

The aim of this study was to validate the nighttime symptoms score (NSS), which incorporates individual scores for difficulty going to sleep and nighttime awakening caused by nasal symptoms and nasal congestion on awakening, as a clinically relevant measure of allergic rhinitis (AR). Fifty-five general season AR (SAR) symptom items were generated by interviews with 14 patients with symptomatic SAR without concomitant asthma for use in an Importance Rating Questionnaire (IRQ). A second group of patients (n = 83) with symptomatic AR without asthma rated the importance of each item on the IRQ. Correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the relationships between the six sleep quality questions on the IRQ and the other AR symptoms and between the symptom questions of the NSS, the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score (DNSS), and the individual domains of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ). The majority (94%) of patients with active AR reported some degree of symptoms relating to sleep quality. The six sleep quality items on the IRQ were selected by 71-84% of patients. The sleep quality items were more highly correlated with each other (r = 0.48-0.85) than with the four items of the DNSS (r = 0.01-0.42). There was a moderate-to-strong correlation of the RQLQ sleep domain with the two sleep questions of the NSS (r = 0.44-0.57). The individual symptom questions of the NSS and the DNSS were only moderately correlated with each other. Sleep quality questions measure aspects of SAR that are not captured by daytime SAR symptoms. The results show that the NSS is a valid and relevant clinical measure of the impact of nighttime sleep disturbance on AR patients.

Allergic rhinitis: treatment based on patient profiles.

Allergic rhinitis is a common medical condition characterized by nasal, throat, and ocular itching; rhinorrhea; sneezing; nasal congestion; and, less frequently, cough. The treatment of allergic rhinitis should control these symptoms without adversely affecting daily activities or cognitive performance and should prevent sequelae such as asthma exacerbation or sinusitis. This review describes a stepwise approach to treatment of allergic rhinitis derived from a synthesis of clinical trial results, patient preferences, and real-world tolerability data. Key clinical considerations include frequency and intensity of symptoms, patient age, comorbidities, compliance with treatment regimens (influenced by formulation, route and frequency of administration), and effects on quality of life. Oral second-generation antihistamines, versus first-generation agents and inhaled corticosteroids, should be considered first-line treatment because they provide rapid relief of most allergic rhinitis symptoms without safety and tolerability issues. Additional therapeutic agents can then be added or substituted based on individual symptom response.

Combining desloratadine and pseudoephedrine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Nonsedating antihistamines are a first-line therapy in the management of allergic rhinitis. They relieve the majority of the histamine-mediated symptoms of the condition, including rhinorrhea, sneezing, and pruritus. The nonsedating antihistamine desloratadine is effective in alleviating the symptoms of both seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis. It may also have some decongestant properties, and thus help to alleviate nasal congestion. Administering desloratadine in combination with the decongestant pseudoephedrine may offer allergic rhinitis patients with moderate-to-severe nasal congestion the benefits of desloratadine's effectiveness for alleviating histamine-mediated symptoms plus pseudoephedrine's relief from nasal congestion. This drug profile reviews a combination therapy containing desloratadine and pseudoephedrine, approved in the USA for the relief of the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis, including nasal congestion.

Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in nasal polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that topical corticosteroids are effective in the treatment of nasal polyps; however, this has yet to be confirmed in a large, robust clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) for nasal polyposis. METHODS: A total of 354 subjects with bilateral nasal polyps and clinically significant congestion/obstruction participated in this multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Subjects received MFNS 200 microg once or twice daily or placebo for 4 months. Coprimary endpoints were (1) change from baseline to last assessment in physician-evaluated bilateral polyp grade score and (2) change from baseline averaged over month 1 in subject-assessed nasal congestion/obstruction. ANOVA was used for all efficacy endpoints, except for change in bilateral polyp grade score, for which baseline polyp grade was added as a covariate. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, MFNS 200 microg administered once or twice daily produced significantly greater reductions in bilateral polyp grade score (P < .001, P = .010, respectively) and congestion/obstruction (P = .001, P < .001), as well as improvement in loss of smell (P < .001, P = .036), anterior rhinorrhea (P < .001 for both), and postnasal drip (P < .001, P = .001) over month 1. MFNS 200 microg twice daily was superior to MFNS 200 microg once daily in reducing congestion/obstruction (P = .039), and there were more improvers in the MFNS 200 microg twice daily group (P = .035). MFNS was well tolerated in both groups. CONCLUSION: MFNS 200 mug, once or twice daily, was safe and significantly superior to placebo in reducing polyp grade (size and extent) and improving congestion/obstruction and return of sense of smell. MFNS is an effective medical treatment for nasal polyposis and may reduce or delay the need for surgery.

Features of mometasone furoate nasal spray and its utility in the management of allergic rhinitis.

Mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray (NS; Nasonex, Schering Corporation), is a synthetic corticosteroid approved for the prophylaxis and treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) in patients >or= 12 years of age, and for the treatment of SAR and PAR in children as young as 2 years of age. Studies demonstrate that mometasone furoate NS is a potent, clinically effective and well-tolerated intranasal corticosteroid with negligible systemic activity and which offers the convenience of once-daily dosing.

Efficacy of once-daily desloratadine/pseudoephedrine for relief of nasal congestion.

The majority of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) suffer from nasal congestion. Desloratadine, a nonsedating H1-receptor antagonist, has given decongestant relief to patients with mild-to-moderate nasal congestion associated with SAR. The following study was undertaken to show that a once-daily formulation of desloratadine/pseudoephedrine would provide greater decongestant relief to patients experiencing moderate-to-severe nasal congestion compared with component monotherapy. A total of 1018 patients were assigned randomly to receive desloratadine/pseudoephedrine (5 mg/240 mg), desloratdine (5 mg), or pseudoephedrine (240 mg) daily for 15 days. Over the 15-day study period, patients receiving desloratadine/pseudoephedrine combination tablets had a significant reduction in mean A.M./P.M. reflective nasal congestion scores compared with patients receiving desloratadine or pseudoephedrine (p < 0.01); this reduction reached significance by day 2. Desloratadine/pseudoephedrine combination tablets also produced a greater reduction in A.M. instantaneous nasal congestion scores compared with component monotherapy (p < 0.01), indicating not only superior efficacy but also a full 24-hour effect. Desloratadine monotherapy reduced all mean nasal congestion scores to a similar degree as compared with pseudoephedrine monotherapy (p = NS). No unusual or unexpected adverse events were reported in any group. It was concluded that desloratadine/pseudoephedrine offers additional benefit to patients with moderate-to-severe SAR-associated nasal congestion compared with pseudoephedrine therapy alone.

Safety and efficacy of desloratadine 5 mg in asthma patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and nasal congestion.

BACKGROUND: Antihistamines relieve most seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) symptoms, with the exception of nasal congestion, which is often the most troublesome symptom for patients. A nonsedating antihistamine that significantly decreases nasal congestion and improves symptoms of seasonal allergic asthma would be a significant advance in therapy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of desloratadine 5 mg in patients experiencing moderate SAR, nasal congestion, and symptoms of seasonal allergic asthma. METHODS: This 4-week, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind study evaluated desloratadine treatment (5 mg once daily) versus placebo in 331 subjects with SAR and mild seasonal allergic asthma. Subjects evaluated SAR and asthma symptoms twice daily, recording 12-hour reflective and instantaneous severity evaluation scores. The primary efficacy parameter was the difference from baseline in AM/PM reflective total symptom scores. Changes in individual SAR and asthma symptoms were also analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, desloratadine significantly reduced mean AM/PM reflective total symptom scores for SAR, beginning with the first dose (P < 0.001) and continuing throughout days 1 to 15 (-4.90 vs -2.98; P < 0.001) and days 1 to 29 (-5.47 vs -3.73; P < 0.001). Desloratadine significantly decreased AM/PM reflective total asthma symptom scores for days 1 to 15 (P = 0.023) and AM/PM reflective nasal congestion scores over days 1 to 15 and days 1 to 29 (P = 0.006 and P = 0.014, respectively). Desloratadine was safe and well tolerated; adverse events were similar to placebo overall. CONCLUSIONS: Desloratadine provided significant relief from the signs and symptoms of SAR, including nasal congestion. In this patient population, symptoms of seasonal allergic asthma also improved.

One-year trial on safety and normal linear growth with flunisolide HFA in children with asthma.

Flunisolide hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) has efficacy equivalent to that of flunisolide chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) at one third the dose of the CFC formulation, a reduction from 250 microg/puff for flunisolide CFC to 85 microg/puff for flunisolide HFA. Flunisolide HFA delivers a smaller particle size (1.2 microm) in solution, resulting in improved lung deposition as compared with flunisolide CFC (3.8 microm), which is delivered in suspension. An added built-in spacer has reduced oropharyngeal deposition that may result in fewer adverse events and make it easier to use. The objective of this study was to compare the year-long safety of flunisolide HFA (daily dosage 340 microg) with that of CFC beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) (daily dosage 336 microg) and cromolyn sodium (daily dosage 6,400 microg) in children 4-11 years old with mild-to-moderate asthma. The effects of these drugs on linear growth and growth velocity were also compared. The study was a 1-year open-label, parallel-group trial. Changes in physical examinations (including growth), adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms, cosyntropin stimulation tests, mouth and throat cultures for Candida albicans, and laboratory findings were analyzed. Patients 4-5 years old received flunisolide HFA only. In total, 235 children were evaluated (152 receiving flunisolide HFA, 39 BDP, and 44 cromolyn). The incidence of adverse events was comparable among treatment groups; most were mild or moderate and considered unrelated to treatment. Among patients 6-11 years old, mean changes from baseline height at week 52 were 6.2 cm for the flunisolide HFA and cromolyn groups and 5.1 cm for the BDP group. Thus growth in children receiving flunisolide HFA was unaffected by 1 year of treatment. Changes from baseline in other parameters, including response to cosyntropin stimulation, were insignificant and similar among the 3 treatment groups. At the dosages studied, and following 1 year of treatment, flunisolide HFA with its small particle size and built-in spacer is safe and well tolerated in children 4-11 years old. There are no adverse effects associated with hypothalamic pituitary axis (HPA) function of flunisolide HFA, including linear growth in children 6-11 years old when compared with BDP and cromolyn sodium.