Can Patient-centered Education and Pain Management Delivered by Coaches Improve Pain Outcomes After Orthopaedic Trauma? A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Pain after orthopaedic trauma is complex, and many patients who have experienced orthopaedic trauma are at increased risk for prolonged opioid utilization after the injury. Patient-centered interventions capable of delivering enhanced education and opioid-sparing pain management approaches must be implemented and evaluated in trauma care settings to improve pain outcomes and minimize opioid-related risks. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Does personalized pain education and management delivered by coaches (1) improve pain-related outcomes, (2) reduce opioid consumption, and (3) improve patient-reported outcome measures (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] scores) compared to written discharge instructions on pain management and opioid safety? METHODS: This clinical trial aimed to examine the effect of a personalized pain education and management intervention, delivered by paraprofessional coaches, on pain-related outcomes and opioid consumption compared with usual care (written discharge instructions on pain management and opioid safety). Between February 2021 and September 2022, 212 patients were randomized to the intervention (49% [104]) or control group (51% [108]). A total of 31% (32 of 104) and 47% (51 of 108) in those groups, respectively, were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 12 weeks or had incomplete datasets, leaving 69% (72 of 104) and 53% (57 of 108) for analysis in the intervention and control group, respectively. Patients randomized to the intervention worked with the paraprofessional coaches throughout hospitalization after their orthopaedic injury and at their 2-, 6-, and 12-week visits with the surgical team after discharge to implement mindfulness-based practices and nonpharmacological interventions. Most participants in the final sample of 129 identified as Black (73% [94 of 129]) and women (56% [72 of 129]), the mean Injury Severity score was 8 ± 4, and one-third of participants were at medium to high risk for an opioid-use disorder based on the Opioid Risk Tool. Participants completed surveys during hospitalization and at the 2-, 6-, and 12-week follow-up visits. Surveys included average pain intensity scores over the past 24 hours measured on the pain numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 and PROMIS measures (physical functioning, pain interference, sleep disturbance). Opioid utilization, measured as daily morphine milligram equivalents, was collected from the electronic health record, and demographic and clinical characteristics were collected from self-report surveys. Groups were compared in terms of mean pain scores at at the 12-week follow-up, daily morphine milligram equivalents both during inpatient and at discharge, and mean PROMIS scores at 12 weeks of follow-up. Additionally, differences in the proportion of participants in each group achieving minimum clinically important differences (MCID) on pain and PROMIS scores were examined. For pain scores, an MCID of 2 points on the pain numeric rating scale assessing past 24-hour pain intensity was utilized. RESULTS: We found no difference between the intervention and control in terms of mean pain score at 12 weeks nor in the proportions of patients who achieved the MCID of 2 points for 24-hour average pain scores (85% [61 of 72] versus 72% [41 of 57], respectively, OR 2.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9 to 5.3]; p = 0.08). No differences were noted in daily morphine milligram equivalents utilized between the intervention and control groups during hospitalization, at discharge, or in prescription refills. Similarly, we observed no differences in the proportions of patients in the intervention and control groups who achieved the MCID on PROMIS Physical Function (81% [58 of 72] versus 63% [36 of 57], respectively, OR 2.2 [95% CI 0.9 to 5.2]; p = 0.06). We saw no differences in the proportions of patients who achieved the MCID on PROMIS Sleep Disturbance between the intervention and control groups (58% [42 of 72] versus 47% [27 of 57], respectively, OR 1.4 [95% CI 0.7 to 3.0]; p = 0.31). The proportion of patients who achieved the MCID on PROMIS Pain Interference scores did not differ between the intervention and the control groups (39% [28 of 72] versus 37% [21 of 57], respectively, OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.5 to 2.1]; p = 0.95). CONCLUSION: In this trial, we observed no differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of pain outcomes, opioid medication utilization, or patient-reported outcomes after orthopaedic trauma. However, future targeted research with diverse samples of patients at increased risk for poor postoperative outcomes is warranted to ascertain a potentially meaningful patient perceived effect on pain outcomes after working with coaches. Other investigators interested in this interventional approach may consider the coach program as a framework at their institutions to increase access to evidence-based nonpharmacological interventions among patients who are at increased risk for poor postoperative pain outcomes. Smaller, more focused programs connecting patients to coaches to learn about nonpharmacological pain management interventions may deliver a larger impact on patient's recovery and outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Patient-reported barriers for adherence to prophylactic enoxaparin after orthopedic trauma surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism following orthopedic trauma surgery remains prevalent despite prophylaxis being a standard of care. Enoxaparin injection is a commonly utilized prophylaxis regimen among high-risk patients. Patient-reported rates of nonadherence and barriers to enoxaparin use are not described in the literature. A better understanding of these barriers and their impact on adherence to post-discharge prophylaxis regimens may shed light on persistent outcomes gaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were administered to adult patients prescribed prophylactic enoxaparin and presenting to orthopedic surgery outpatient clinic at an urban level 1 trauma center for a post-operative appointment following traumatic injury from April to July 2023. Patients self-reported their age, gender, race, and mobility. Inductive thematic analysis with three-reviewer consensus identified common barriers among responses. Adherence rates were calculated by dividing patients' estimated number of missed doses over total prescribed doses at the point of inquiry. RESULTS: We identified 154 eligible patients through chart review, and 50 enrolled and interviewed. Participants had a mean age of 37 years. Of 50 participants, 20 identified as female; 25 identified as Black or African American, 16 as White, 5 as Hispanic, 2 as Asian, and 2 as multiracial. Twenty-one participants were non-ambulatory at time of interview. Mean and median patient-reported adherence were 64.5 % (SD 35.5) and 70.5 % (IQR 33-100) respectively. Five patients reported complete nonadherence, while 17 patients reported perfect adherence. Every participant reporting complete nonadherence identified as Black or African American, as compared to 8 out of 17 reporting perfect adherence. Despite acknowledging a twice-daily prescription, 17 patients reported once-daily rather than twice-daily use. Inductive thematic analysis revealed the following six barriers to prophylaxis adherence (number of participants reporting): Inconvenience (18 patients), Pain (16), Fear (12), Acquisition (7), Bruising (7), and Mechanism (7). Altogether, 40 patients endorsed at least one barrier to adherence. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS: Most patients face barriers to adherence with post-discharge prophylactic enoxaparin, and the resultant rates of adherence are low. This may contribute to persistent outcomes gaps in the orthopedic trauma population despite prophylaxis standards. Changes in prescribing patterns and patient engagement techniques may improve post-operative thromboembolic outcomes.

Opioid utilization after orthopaedic trauma hospitalization among Medicaid-insured adults.

Opioids are vital to pain management and sedation after trauma-related hospitalization. However, there are many confounding clinical, social, and environmental factors that exacerbate pain, post-injury care needs, and receipt of opioid prescriptions following orthopaedic trauma. This retrospective study sought to characterize differences in opioid prescribing and dosing in a national Medicaid eligible sample from 2010-2018. The study population included adults, discharged after orthopaedic trauma hospitalization, and receiving an opioid prescription within 30 days of discharge. Patients were identified using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9; ICD-10) codes for inpatient diagnosis and procedure. Filled opioid prescriptions were identified from National Drug Codes and converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Opioid receipt and dosage (e.g., morphine milligram equivalents [MME]) were examined as the main outcomes using regressions and analyzed by year, sex, race/ethnicity, residence rurality-urbanicity, and geographic region. The study population consisted of 86,091 injured Medicaid-enrolled adults; 35.3% received an opioid prescription within 30 days of discharge. Male patients (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07-1.18) and those between 31-50 years of age (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.08-1.22) were found to have increased odds ratio of receiving an opioid within 30 days of discharge, compared to female and younger patients, respectively. Patients with disabilities (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.71-0.80), prolonged hospitalizations, and both Black (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83-0.92) and Hispanic patients (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.66-0.77), relative to white patients, had lower odds ratio of receiving an opioid prescription following trauma. Additionally, Black and Hispanic patients received lower prescription doses compared to white patients. Individuals hospitalized in the Southeastern United States and those between the ages of 51-65 age group were found to be prescribed lower average daily MME. There were significant variations in opioid prescribing practices by race, sex, and region. National guidelines for use of opioids and other pain management interventions in adults after trauma hospitalization may help limit practice variation and reduce implicit bias and potential harms in outpatient opioid usage.

A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery continues to be one of the least diverse medical specialties. Recently, increasing emphasis has been placed on improving diversity in the medical field, which includes the need to better understand existing biases. Despite this, only about 6% of orthopaedic surgeons are women and 0.3% are Black. Addressing diversity, in part, requires a better understanding of existing biases. Most universities and residency programs have statements and policies against discrimination that seek to eliminate explicit biases. However, unconscious biases might negatively impact the selection, training, and career advancement of women and minorities who are underrepresented in orthopaedic surgery. Although this is difficult to measure, the Implicit Association Test (IAT) by Project Implicit might be useful to identify and measure levels of unconscious bias among orthopaedic surgeons, providing opportunities for additional interventions to improve diversity in this field. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do orthopaedic surgeons demonstrate implicit biases related to race and gender roles? (2) Are certain demographic characteristics (age, gender, race or ethnicity, or geographic location) or program characteristics (geographic location or size of program) associated with the presence of implicit biases? (3) Do the implicit biases of orthopaedic surgeons differ from those of other healthcare providers or the general population? METHODS: A cross-sectional study of implicit bias among orthopaedic surgeons was performed using the IAT from Project Implicit. The IAT is a computerized test that measures the time required to associate words or pictures with attributes, with faster or slower response times suggesting the ease or difficulty of associating the items. Although concerns have been raised recently about the validity and utility of the IAT, we believed it was the right study instrument to help identify the slight hesitation that can imply differences between inclusion and exclusion of a person. We used two IATs, one for Black and White race and one for gender, career, and family roles. We invited a consortium of researchers from United States and Canadian orthopaedic residency programs. Researchers at 34 programs agreed to distribute the invitation via email to their faculty, residents, and fellows for a total of 1484 invitees. Twenty-eight percent (419) of orthopaedic surgeons and trainees completed the survey. The respondents were 45% (186) residents, 55% (228) faculty, and one fellow. To evaluate response biases, the respondent population was compared with that of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons census. Responses were reported as D-scores based on response times for associations. D-scores were categorized as showing strong (≥ 0.65), moderate (≥ 0.35 to < 0.65), or slight (≥ 0.15 to < 0.35) associations. For a frame of reference, orthopaedic surgeons' mean IAT scores were compared with historical scores of other self-identified healthcare providers and that of the general population. Mean D-scores were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test to determine whether demographic characteristics were associated with differences in D-scores. Bonferroni correction was applied, and p values less than 0.0056 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Overall, the mean IAT D-scores of orthopaedic surgeons indicated a slight preference for White people (0.29 ± 0.4) and a slight association of men with career (0.24 ± 0.3), with a normal distribution. Hence, most respondents' scores indicated slight preferences, but strong preferences for White race were noted in 27% (112 of 419) of respondents. There was a strong association of women with family and home and an association of men with work or career in 14% (60 of 419). These preferences generally did not correlate with the demographic, geographic, and program variables that were analyzed, except for a stronger association of women with family and home among women respondents. There were no differences in race IAT D-scores between orthopaedic surgeons and other healthcare providers and the general population. Gender-career IAT D-scores associating women with family and home were slightly lower among orthopaedic surgeons (0.24 ± 0.3) than among the general population (0.32 ± 0.4; p < 0.001) and other healthcare professionals (0.34 ± 0.4; p < 0.001). All of these values are in the slight preference range. CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic surgeons demonstrated slight preferences for White people, and there was a tendency to associate women with career and family on IATs, regardless of demographic and program characteristics, similar to others in healthcare and the general population. Given the similarity of scores with those in other, more diverse areas of medicine, unconscious biases alone do not explain the relative lack of diversity in orthopaedic surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Implicit biases only explain a small portion of the lack of progress in improving diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging in our workforce and resolving healthcare disparities. Other causes including explicit biases, an unwelcoming culture, and perceptions of our specialty should be examined. Remedies including engagement of students and mentorship throughout training and early career should be sought.

Evaluation and treatment of postoperative periprosthetic humeral fragility fractures.

Postoperative periprosthetic humeral shaft fractures represent a growing and difficult complication to treat given the aging patient population and associated bone loss. Determining the best treatment option is multifactorial, including patient characteristics, fracture pattern, remaining bone stock, and implant stability. Possible treatment options include nonoperative management with bracing or surgical intervention. Nonoperative treatment has been shown to have higher nonunion rates, thus should only be selected for a specific patient population with minimally displaced fractures or those that are unfit for surgery. Surgical management is recommended with prosthetic loosening, fracture nonunion, or failure of nonoperative treatment. Surgical options include open reduction and internal fixation, revision arthroplasty, or hybrid fixation. Careful evaluation, decision making, and planning is required in the treatment of these fractures.

A systematic review of patient-centered interventions for improving pain outcomes and reducing opioid-related risks in acute care settings.

Objectives: This systematic review evaluates the literature for patient-oriented opioid and pain educational interventions that aim to optimize pain management using opioid-sparing approaches in the orthopaedic trauma population. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021234006). Data Sources: A review of English-language publications in CINAHL (EBSCO), MEDLINE through PubMed, Embase.com, PsycInfo (EBSCO), and Web of Science Core Collection literature databases published between 1980 and February 2021 was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Study Selection: Only studies implementing patient-oriented opioid and/or pain education in adult patients receiving acute orthopaedic care were eligible. Outcomes were required to include postinterventional opioid utilization, postoperative analgesia and amount, or patient-reported pain outcomes. Data Extraction: A total of 480 abstracts were reviewed, and 8 publications were included in the final analysis. Two reviewers independently extracted data from selected studies using a standardized data collection form. Disagreements were addressed by a third reviewer. Quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Data Synthesis: Descriptive statistics characterized study findings, and content analysis was used to discern themes across studies. Conclusion: Our findings indicate the merit for patient-centered educational interventions including verbal/written/audio-visual trainings paired with multimodal approaches to target opioid-sparing pain management and reduce short-term pain scores in urgent and acute care settings after acute orthopaedic injuries. The scarcity of published literature warrants further rigorously designed studies to substantiate the benefit of patient-centric education in reducing prolonged opioid utilization and associated risks after orthopaedic trauma. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic level III.

Opioid Prescribing Behavior in the Emergency Department During Routine Orthopedic Manipulations.

BACKGROUND: The emergency department (ED) often represents the first exposure orthopedic trauma patients have to prescription opioids and thus a critical opportunity for prevention of potential long-term opioid use. This study will analyze the impact of opioid prescribing patterns among both ED providers and orthopedic surgery residents on the utilization of opioids during routine orthopedic trauma manipulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed opioid utilization among patients with an ankle or distal radius fracture at a large, urban, level 1 trauma center. Data on clinical providers, patient demographics, and injury severity score (ISS) were collected. Total opioid use was reported in oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Regression analyses were performed to determine how provider opioid prescribing intensity affected administered MME. RESULTS: Five-hundred and ninety-five patients were included. The mean MME administered was 40.84 (SD 30.0) and was inversely associated with ISS (R = -.05; P = .40). Patients treated by a high-intensity ED prescriber had approximately three times higher odds of receiving over 40.84 MME (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.33-5.90 P = .07). For those with an ISS score less than 15, the presence of a low-intensity orthopedic resident decreased the odds of receiving over 40.84 MME from 2.25 to 1.78 in the presence of a high-intensity ED prescriber. CONCLUSION: For isolated orthopedic manipulations in the ED, involvement of a low-intensity prescribing orthopedic resident significantly decreased the quantity of opioids administered for those with lower ISS injuries, thus effectively mitigating the effect of high-intensity prescribing behavior prescriber.

Racial Disparities in the Operative Management of Orthopedic Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate if race is associated with the likelihood of operative management of acute fractures. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify studies associated with social disparities and acute orthopedic trauma. Peer-reviewed studies commenting on social disparities and the decision to pursue operative or non-operative management of acute fractures were identified for detailed review. Study characteristics and odds ratios were extracted from each article. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. A quality analysis of the data was also performed. RESULTS: In total, 13 studies were identified and 8 were included in the meta-analysis totaling 743,846 fractures. Hip, distal radius, pelvic, tibial plateau, clavicle, femoral neck, and femoral shaft fractures were represented in this patient population. The meta-analysis demonstrated that White race is associated with a higher likelihood of operative intervention compared to all other races pooled together (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.47; p < .0001) as well as Black race (odds ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.72; p = .0025). CONCLUSIONS: Non-White race and Black race are associated with a lower likelihood of receiving surgical management of acute orthopedic trauma. Surgeons and health systems should be aware of these inequities and consider strategies to mitigate bias and ensure all patients receive appropriate and timely care regardless of race.

Early Identification of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Trauma Patients: Development of a Multivariable Risk Prediction Model.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to build a risk prediction model to identify trauma patients at the time of injury who are at high risk for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) 1 year later. METHODS: Patients 18+ with operative orthopedic trauma injuries were enrolled in prospective social determinants of health cohort. Data were collected through initial surveys, medical records at time of injury, and 1-year follow-up phone screenings. Univariate analysis examined associations between factors and PTSD at 1 year. The best fit multivariable logistic regression model led to a novel PTSD risk prediction tool based on weights assigned similar to the Charlson index methods. RESULTS: Of 329 enrolled patients, 87 (26%) completed follow-up surveys; 58% screened positive for chronic PTSD. The best fit model predicting PTSD included age, insurance, violent mechanism, and 2 acute stress screening questions (AUC .89). Using these parameters, the maximum possible TIPPS index was 19. Those with PTSD at 1 year had a mean TIPPS index of 12.9 ± 4.0, compared to 5.9 ± 4.2 for those who did not (P < .001). DISCUSSION: Traumatic injury often leads to PTSD, which can be predicted by a novel risk score incorporating age, insurance status, violent injury mechanism, and acute stress reaction symptoms. Stability in life and relationships with primary care physicians may be protective of PTSD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic level II.

Outpatient clinic attendance and outcomes among patients hospitalized with diabetic foot ulcers.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on post-hospital discharge clinic attendance rates and outcomes among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). METHODS: Retrospective study of patients hospitalized with a DFU from 2016 to 2019 in a large public hospital. We measured rates and predictors of clinic attendance with providers involved with DFU care within 30 days of hospital discharge ("30-day post-discharge clinic attendance"). Log-binomial regression was used to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 888 patients, 60.0 % were between 45 and 64 years old, 80.5 % were Black, and 24.1 % were uninsured. Overall, 478 (53.8 %) attended ≥1 30-day post-discharge clinic appointment. Initial hospital outcomes were associated with clinic attendance. For example, the RR of 30-day post-discharge clinic attendance was 1.39 (95%CI 1.19-1.61) among patients who underwent a major amputation compared to patients with DFUs without osteomyelitis and did not undergo an amputation during the initial hospitalization. Among 390 patients with known 12-month outcome, 71 (18.2 %) had a major amputation or died ≤12 months of hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: We found a low post-discharge clinic attendance and high post-discharge amputation and death rates among patients hospitalized with DFUs. Interventions to increase access to outpatient DFU care are needed and could prevent amputations.

High Altitude as a Risk Factor for Venous Thromboembolism in Tibial Plateau Fractures.

Background: Tibial plateau fractures are often significant injuries that can require complex surgical interventions with prolonged perioperative immobilization, thereby increasing the risk of developing venous thromboembolic (VTE) events, specifically, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Risk stratification is paramount for guiding VTE prophylaxis. Although high altitude has been suggested to create a prothrombotic state, virtually no studies have explored its clinical effects in lower extremity trauma. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical fixation of tibial plateau fractures at high and low altitudes and its effects on post-operative VTE development. Methods: The Truven MarketScan claims database was used to retrospectively identify patients who underwent surgical fixation of isolated and closed tibial plateau fractures using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes over a 10-year period. Extraneous injuries were excluded using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10), and CPT codes. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and DVT chemoprophylaxis prescriptions were obtained. Patients were partitioned into high altitude (>4000 feet) or low altitude (<100 feet) cohorts based on the zip codes of their surgery locations. One-to-one matching and univariate analysis were used to assess and control any baseline discrepancies between cohorts; multivariate regression was then performed between cohorts to determine the odds ratios (OR) for developing VTEs post-operatively. Results: There were 7,832 patients included for analysis. There was no statistical difference between high and low altitude cohorts in developing VTEs within 30 days post-operatively. Higher altitudes were associated with increased odds of developing DVT (OR 1.21, p = 0.043) and PE (OR 1.27, p = 0.037) within 90 days post-operatively. Conclusions: Surgical fixation of tibial plateau fractures is associated with an increased risk of developing VTEs at high altitudes within 90 days post-operatively. Understanding such risk factors in specific orthopaedic patient populations is essential for optimizing DVT prophylaxis protocols. Further studies should investigate this relationship and the role of DVT prophylaxis regimens in this population.

Prevalence of Housing Insecurity in Survivors of Traumatic Injury.

BACKGROUND: Almost 20% of the US population are housing insecure (HI) due to inadequate living conditions, imbalanced costs to income, nonsustainable shelter, or overcrowding. Housing insecure and physical trauma share similar risk factors, but their direct association is not well elucidated. The objective of our study was to determine the prevalence of HI in survivors of traumatic injury. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study at an urban, level 1 trauma center. A survey on social determinants of health was administered to adult patients, and demographic, injury specifics, and clinical outcomes data were collected. HI was defined by affirmative answers to questions related to history of homelessness or concern about sustainable shelter. The cohort was stratified by HI; groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher exact tests, as appropriate. RESULTS: Of 116 study participants, four were excluded due to missing data. Of the 112, 42 (37.8%) reported HI and most were black (69%) males (73.8%). There were no demographic differences between groups. Conversely, HI patients had a higher rate of penetrating traumatic injury (34.1% vs 14.5%, P-value = .03) and were significantly less educated compared to secure participants (P-value = .03) [no degree (26.2% vs 10.3%), high school degrees (21.4% vs 41.2%)] with concomitant illicit drug use (63.4% vs 27.9%, P < .001), and history of addiction (52.4% vs 7.2%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: HI far exceeds national averages in our cohort. Although difficult to ascertain a cause-effect relationship, HI may be a modifiable risk factor for trauma that negatively influences outcomes.

The Potential Impact of Food Insecurity in an Urban Trauma Population.

BACKGROUND: Food insecurity (FI) has been defined as a lack of consistent access to enough food for a healthy active lifestyle. As of 12.7% of the United States are suffering from FI, which has been correlated with increased hospital costs and poorer health outcomes. Currently, limited data exists examining the relationship between trauma populations and FI despite both having similar root causes. We sought to determine this and validate a screening tool for FI in this population. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study of trauma patients was conducted at a level 1 trauma center in Atlanta, Georgia. Survey questions included the first two items of the Core Food Security Module. Zip codes were used to determine FI, defined by the USDA Food Access Research and compared to individual participant survey responses. Binary classification test metrics were calculated to validate the two items as a screening tool in this population. RESULTS: The cohort included 136 patients, of which the majority were black (60.3%) and male (60.3%). Thirty-one respondents affirmed food security (22.8%) despite over half (51.5%) living in a food insecure community. The sensitivity and specificity for this screening to predict FI were 25 and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the specificity is high, this screening tool has a low sensitivity, accuracy, NPV, and PPV to determine food insecurity in this population. Community-level statistics suggests that food insecurity is a significant public problem amongst trauma patients. Prevention efforts should, therefore, aim to address both issues simultaneously.

Integration of Life Care Specialists Into Orthopaedic Trauma Care to Improve Postoperative Outcomes: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: AIM: This pilot study assessed the feasibility and impact of integrating a Life Care Specialist (LCS) into orthopaedic trauma care. DESIGN: This was a prospective feasibility single group pilot study at a level 1 trauma center. METHOD: The LCS is a paraprofessional behavior-based "pain coach" and delivered patient-centered opioid safety education, trained participants on nonpharmacologic pain management approaches, conducted opioid risk assessments, and coordinated care. Numeric Rating Scale pain scores were assessed on admission, at discharge, and at 2-week follow-up. Daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) during hospitalization, opioid medication use at 2-weeks, and patient satisfaction were recorded. T test compared mean morphine milligram equivalents (MME) to historical orthopaedic trauma patient population's mean dosage at discharge from the study site. Generalized linear models assessed pain scores over time. RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of 121 total participants met criteria for moderate to severe risk of opioid misuse at initial hospitalization. On average, 2.8 LCS pain management interventions were utilized, most frequently progressive muscle relaxation (80%) and sound therapy (48%). Mean inpatient MME/day was 40.5, which was significantly lower than mean historical MME/day of 49.7 (p < .001). Pain scores improved over time from admission to 2-weeks postoperatively (p < .001). Nearly all participants agreed that the LCS was helpful in managing pain (99%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate feasibility to integrate LCS into orthopaedic trauma care, evident by participant engagement and satisfaction, and that LCS serve as valuable resources to assist with pain management and opioid education.

From Self-efficacy to Imposter Syndrome: The Intrapersonal Traits of Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Demographic differences among surgical trainees regarding intrapersonal traits, such as imposter syndrome and assertiveness, have become widely acknowledged. However, many of these characteristics have not been examined in tandem, nor among both trainees and surgeons in practice. This study aimed to address these knowledge gaps. METHODS: This was an anonymous, voluntary survey study comprised of validated measures of (1) self-efficacy, (2) imposter syndrome, (3) assertiveness, (4) perfectionism, and (5) self-rated likeability. A multimodal recruitment strategy was used and surgeons across all subspecialties were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 296 participants were included, with 54% identifying as female (n = 161) and 72% between the ages of 25 and 40 years of age (n = 212). Imposter syndrome, assertiveness, and perfectionism scales were normally distributed; self-efficacy and self-rated likeability scales demonstrated slight negative skew. Self-identified male sex was associated with less imposter syndrome (P < 0.001) and perfectionism (P = 0.035) and higher assertiveness (P < 0.001). Imposter syndrome was less common among older age groups (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons are a self-efficacious group of perfectionists with widespread variability in imposter syndrome and assertiveness. Female sex and younger age were associated with more imposter syndrome and less assertiveness, highlighting an opportunity for early career coaching.

The Metabolic Syndrome Paradox: Increased Morbidity and Decreased Mortality in Operative Orthopedic Trauma.

We examined the impact of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on operative outcomes with orthopedic trauma, particularly among patients with pelvic, acetabular, and lower extremity fractures. This retrospective cohort study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients who had operative pelvic, acetabular, and lower extremity trauma from 2006 through 2014. We defined MetS as type 2 diabetes, a history of hypertension requiring medication, and body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or greater. Patients with MetS were compared with unaffected patients and assessed for association with in-hospital complications and mortality. The study population included 37,495 patients; 5.7% (n=2154) had MetS. On multivariable logistic regression, MetS was associated with increased odds of any hospital complication (odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.13-1.51; P<.001), Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.23-1.87; P<.001), readmission (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.18-1.63; P<.001), and reoperation (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.11-1.76; P=.004). Conversely, MetS significantly decreased the odds of mortality (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.92; P=.01). Although MetS is a risk factor for postoperative complications, longer length of stay, and increased readmission after surgical intervention for orthopedic lower extremity trauma, MetS appears to decrease the odds of mortality in this specific patient population, which merits further investigation. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(2):103-108.].

The effect of a Life Care Specialist on pain management and opioid-related outcomes among patients with orthopedic trauma: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic trauma patients face complex pain management needs and are frequently prescribed opioids, leaving them at-risk for prolonged opioid use. To date, post-trauma pain management research has placed little emphasis on individualized risk assessments for misuse and systematically implementing non-pharmacologic pain management strategies. Therefore, a community-academic partnership was formed to design a novel position in the healthcare field (Life Care Specialist (LCS)), who will educate patients on the risks of opioids, tapering usage, safe disposal practices, and harm reduction strategies. In addition, the LCS teaches patients behavior-based strategies for pain management, utilizing well-described techniques for coping and resilience. This study aims to determine the effects of LCS intervention on opioid utilization, pain control, and patient satisfaction in the aftermath of orthopedic trauma. METHODS: In total, 200 orthopedic trauma patients will be randomized to receive an intervention (LCS) or a standard-of-care control at an urban level 1 trauma center. All patients will be assessed with comprehensive social determinants of health and substance use surveys immediately after surgery (baseline). Follow-up assessments will be performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively, and will include pain medication utilization (morphine milligram equivalents), pain scores, and other substance use. In addition, overall patient wellness will be evaluated with objective actigraphy measures and patient-reported outcomes. Finally, a survey of patient understanding of risks of opioid use and misuse will be collected, to assess the influence of LCS opioid education. DISCUSSION: There is limited data on the role of individualized, multimodal, non-pharmacologic, behavioral-based pain management intervention in opioid-related risk-mitigation in high-risk populations, including the orthopedic trauma patients. The findings from this randomized controlled trial will provide scientific and clinical evidence on the efficacy and feasibility of the LCS intervention. Moreover, the final aim will provide early evidence into which patients benefit most from LCS intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04154384 . Registered on 11/6/2019 (last updated on 6/10/2021).

Impact of Intraoperative Hypothermia on Transfusion Requirements in Patients With Pelvic and Acetabular Trauma.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between intraoperative hypothermia and perioperative blood loss and blood transfusion requirements in patients with operative pelvic and acetabular fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Single, Level 1 trauma center in Atlanta, Georgia. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seventy-four patients who underwent surgical fixation of an acetabular fracture and/or pelvic ring injury at a single Level 1 trauma center during the years 2013-2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimated blood loss during surgery (EBL, mL), drain output (mL) on postoperative day 1 (POD1), and rate of postoperative packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion (%). RESULTS: A significant association was found between intraoperative hypothermia and postoperative transfusion requirement (P = 0.016). The rate of postoperative blood transfusion was 42% for patients with intraoperative hypothermia compared with 28% for controls. In a subgroup analysis of patients presenting with an admission acidosis, the rate of postoperative transfusion was significantly increased to more than 4 times as likely when intraoperative hypothermia was present, even after controlling for admission hemoglobin, Injury Severity Score, and rate of preoperative transfusion (OR 4.4; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with pelvic trauma who present with an admission acidosis, intraoperative hypothermia is an independent risk factor for postoperative blood transfusion. This information is clinically important given the modifiable nature of intraoperative patient temperature and the known complications and sequelae associated with increased transfusion rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Infection After Open Long Bone Fractures: Can We Improve on Prophylaxis?

INTRODUCTION: Current standards recommend antibiotic prophylaxis administered after open fracture injury. The purpose of this study was to assess culture results in patients with open fracture-associated infections, hypothesizing that cultures obtained do not vary by Gustilo-Anderson (GA) classification. METHODS: We examined cultured bacterial species from patients with open long bone fractures that underwent irrigation and debridement at a Level 1 trauma center (2008-2016), evaluating our current and two hypothetical antibiotic protocols to assess whether they provided appropriate coverage. The antibiotic protocols included protocols 1 (cefazolin, with gentamicin added for type III fractures), 2 (vancomycin and cefepime) and 3 (ceftriaxone). RESULTS: GA classification was not associated with bacterial gram stain (P = 0.161), nor was it predictive of mono- versus polymicrobial infection (P = 0.094). Of 42 culture-positive infections, 31 were type III and 11 were type I or II fractures. 27% of the infections for type I or II fractures were caused by organisms targeted by protocol 1 (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.82; P = 0.027). There was no difference in coverage by fracture type among protocol 2 (P = 0.771) or protocol 3 (P = 0.891). For type III fractures, protocol 2 provided 94% appropriate coverage compared to 68% and 61% coverage by protocols 1 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: For open fractures complicated by infection, isolated bacterial organisms do not correlate with GA open fracture classification, suggesting that hypothetical protocol 2 should be used for all fracture types. Protocol 2's broad coverage, across all GA fracture types, may prevent infection by organisms not covered by current antibiotic prophylaxis.