Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 21(12): 3411-9, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23942596

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Integration of palliative care into oncology practice remains suboptimal. Misperceptions about the meaning of palliative care may negatively impact utilization. PURPOSE: We assessed whether the term and/or description of palliative care services affected patient views. METHODS: 2x2 between-subject randomized factorial telephone survey of 169 patients with advanced cancer. Patients were randomized into one of four groups that differed by name (supportive care vs. palliative care) and description (patient-centered vs. traditional). Main outcomes (0-10 Likert scale) were patient understanding, impressions, perceived need, and intended use of services. RESULTS: When compared to palliative care, the term supportive care was associated with better understanding (7.7 vs. 6.8; p = 0.021), more favorable impressions (8.4 vs. 7.3; p = 0.002), and higher future perceived need (8.6 vs. 7.7; p = 0.017). There was no difference in outcomes between traditional and patient-centered descriptions. In adjusted linear regression models, the term supportive care remained associated with more favorable impressions (p = 0.003) and higher future perceived need (p = 0.022) when compared to palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced cancer view the name supportive care more favorably than palliative care. Future efforts to integrate principles of palliative medicine into oncology may require changing impressions of palliative care or substituting the term supportive care.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care/methods , Palliative Care/psychology , Patient-Centered Care/methods , Terminology as Topic , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Palliative Care/standards , Patient-Centered Care/standards
2.
Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol ; 11(3): 82-8, 1986 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2944402

ABSTRACT

The responses of peripheral blood human T lymphocytes supported by decidual antigen-presenting cells (DAPCs) to a variety of immunogenic stimuli were studied and compared to those of T cells supported by peripheral blood antigen-presenting cells (PAPCs). Antigen-presenting cells were isolated from early normal decidual tissue or peripheral blood by elution with ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid of cells that after Ficoll-Paque separation bear receptors for all have bound to fibronectin. DAPCs pulsed with soluble or particulate antigens induced proliferation of T cells with an efficiency equivalent to PAPCs. Decidual tissue APCs also showed the ability to stimulate auto- and alloreactivity. Treatment with anti-human lymphocyte antigen (HLA) class II antibody and ultraviolet radiation resulted in substantial inhibition of the accessory cell function of DAPCs as well as of PAPCs. Bromodeoxyuridine and light treatment of alloreactive T cells generated in vitro was used to demonstrate that DAPCs primed with a synthetic polypeptide antigen (T,G)-A-L can stimulate only HLA class II-compatible T lymphocytes.


Subject(s)
Antigen-Presenting Cells/cytology , Decidua/cytology , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibody-Dependent Cell Cytotoxicity/drug effects , Bromodeoxyuridine/pharmacology , Decidua/immunology , Female , Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/immunology , Humans , Lymphocyte Activation/drug effects , Lymphocyte Cooperation/radiation effects , Lymphocyte Culture Test, Mixed/methods , Major Histocompatibility Complex , Pregnancy , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Ultraviolet Rays
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...