History, background, concepts and current use of comedication and polypharmacy in psychiatry.

Based on a careful literature search a review is presented of the history, background, concepts and current use of comedication and polypharmacy in psychiatry. The pros and cons of comedication and polypharmacy are presented, as well as their apparent increase in recent times. Possible reasons for the increase of comedication/polypharmacy are described. Both the potential advantages as well as the potential risks are discussed. The one sided view that all comedication/polypharmacy is nothing but problematic is questioned. Comedication/polypharmacy seems to be, among others, the current answer to the well-known limited efficacy and effectiveness of current monotherapy treatment strategies.

The validity of self-rated psychotic symptoms in depressed inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Self-ratings of psychotic experiences might be biased by depressive symptoms. METHOD: Data from a large naturalistic multicentre trial on depressed inpatients (n=488) who were assessed on a biweekly basis until discharge were analyzed. Self-rated psychotic symptoms as assessed with the 90-Item Symptom Checklist (SCL-90) were correlated with the SCL-90 total score, the SCL-90 depression score, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 21 item (HAMD-21) total score, the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score and the clinician-rated paranoid-hallucinatory score of the Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry (AMDP) scale. RESULTS: At discharge the SCL-90 psychosis score correlated highest with the SCL-90 depression score (0.78, P<0.001) and with the BDI total score (0.64, P<0.001). Moderate correlations were found for the MADRS (0.34, P<0.001), HAMD (0.37, P<0.001) and AMDP depression score (0.33, P<0.001). Only a weak correlation was found between the SCL-90 psychosis score and the AMDP paranoid-hallucinatory syndrome score (0.15, P<0.001). Linear regression showed that change in self-rated psychotic symptoms over the treatment course was best explained by a change in the SCL-90 depression score (P<0.001). The change in clinician-rated AMDP paranoid-hallucinatory score had lesser influence (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In depressed patients self-rated psychotic symptoms correlate poorly with clinician-rated psychotic symptoms. Caution is warranted when interpreting results from epidemiological surveys using self-rated psychotic symptom questionnaires as indicators of psychotic symptoms. Depressive symptoms which are highly prevalent in the general population might influence such self-ratings.

The RSM-scale: a pilot study on a new specific scale for self- and observer-rated quality of life in patients with schizophrenia.

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a self- and observer-rating scale on quality of life in patients suffering from schizophrenia with regard to the efficacy of atypical antipsychotics based on different dimensions and to apply within a pilot study. METHODS: Following review of existing scales and a prevalidation phase, the Riedel-Spellmann-Musil (RSM) scale was developed comprising 36 items assigned to different subscales. As reference scales, the Quality of Life Scale (QLS) and the Subjective Well-being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale-short version (SWN-K) were performed, psychopathology and adverse events were measured at all visits. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to assess construct validity, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were used for test-retest reliability. T tests were performed in normal distributed samples; otherwise Wilcoxon tests were used. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six patients were included in the study. Cronbach`s α was 0.917 for the self-rating and 0.915 for the interviewer-rating part. ICCs were >0.70 for all subscales. The self-rating part correlated strongly with the SWN-K and the observer part with the QLS. Changes in psychopathology over the study period and different levels of functioning were detected. CONCLUSION: The RSM-scale is a new scale to assess the quality of life in different dimensions of patients with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics and shows good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct and discriminant validity.

Response and remission of subjective well-being in patients suffering from schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

BACKGROUND: Purpose of this study was to assess subjective well-being in schizophrenia inpatients and to find variables predictive for response and remission of subjective well-being. METHOD: The subjective well-being under neuroleptic treatment scale (SWN-K) was used in 232 schizophrenia patients within a naturalistic multicenter trial. Early response was defined as a SWN-K total score improvement of 20% and by at least 10 points within the first 2 treatment weeks, response as an improvement in SWN-K total score of at least 20% and by at least 10 points from admission to discharge and remission in subjective well-being as a total score of more or equal to 80 points at discharge. Logistic regression and CART analyses were used to determine valid predictors of subjective well-being outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of the patients were detected to be SWN-K early responders, 40% fulfilled criteria for response in subjective well-being and 66% fulfilled criteria for remission concerning subjective well-being. Among the investigated predictors, SWN-K early improvement and the educational status were significantly associated with SWN-K response. The SWN-K total score at baseline showed a significant negative predictive value for response. Baseline SWN-K total score, PANSS global subscore, and side effects as well as the educational status were found to be significantly predictive for remission. CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms should be radically treated and side effects closely monitored to improve the patient's subjective well-being. The important influence of subjective well-being on overall treatment outcome could be underlined.

Evaluating depressive symptoms and their impact on outcome in schizophrenia applying the Calgary Depression Scale.

OBJECTIVE: To examine depressive symptoms, their course during treatment, and influence on outcome. METHOD: Weekly Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia ratings were performed in 249 inpatients with schizophrenia. Early response was defined as a 20% reduction in the total score of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia from admission to week 2, response as a 50% reduction in the total score of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) from admission to discharge and remission according to the consensus criteria. RESULTS: Thirty six per cent of the patients were depressed at admission, with 23% of them still being depressed at discharge. Depressed patients scored significantly higher on the PANSS negative and general psychopathology subscore, featured more impairments in subjective well-being (P < 0.0001) and functioning (P < 0.0001). They suffered from more suicidality (P = 0.0021), and had greater insight into their illness (P = 0.0105). No significant differences were found regarding early response, response, and remission. CONCLUSION: Patients with depressive symptoms should be monitored closely, given the burden of negative symptoms, their impairments in well-being and functioning and the threat of suicidality.

A critical analysis and discussion of the appropriateness of the schizophrenia consensus remission criteria in clinical pharmaceutical trials.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to apply the proposed consensus remission criteria to an acutely ill inpatient sample at admission and evaluate their adaptability in this patient population and pharmaceutical trials. METHODS: The Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group's consensus criteria were applied to 272 acutely ill schizophrenia patients. Patients were examined using the PANSS, HAMD, UKU and SWN-K total scales at admission as well as the GAF, SOFAS and the Strauss-Carpenter Prognostic Scale. Sociodemographic and clinical baseline variables were assessed using a standardized documentation system. RESULTS: 33 patients (12%) fulfilled the symptom severity component of the proposed remission criteria already at baseline. Almost no significant differences were found when comparing patients with achieved and failed symptom severity component that would explain the hospitalization of the patients with achieved criteria despite their apparently mild psychopathological symptoms. The only explainable difference was that patients with an achieved symptom severity component had received significantly more antipsychotics and had suffered from significantly more life events before admission. CONCLUSION: The present results raise the question whether the symptom severity threshold is adequate to identify patients in remission when applied in clinical trials.

[Bipolar depression. Spectrum of clinical pictures and differentiation from unipolar depression]. / Bipolare Depression. Spektrum klinischer Erscheinungsbilder und Abgrenzbarkeit von der unipolaren Depression.

Patients with bipolar disorder often present initially with a major depressive episode. The correct diagnosis at the first presentation could help to find an effective medication regimen, to prevent antidepressant-induced rapid cycling and to reduce antidepressant-induced manic episodes, e.g. though combination therapy with a mood stabilizer. Consistent predictors for an underlying bipolar illness are an early age of onset, a highly recurrent illness course with more than five episodes, the presentation of atypical features, psychotic symptoms, the presence of psychiatric comorbidities like anxiety disorders, history of suicide attempts (especially at an early age), positive family anamnesis for bipolar disorder, and a rapid evolvement of the depressive episode. So far there are no pathognomonic markers for bipolar disorder. Therefore we propose to assess the risk of each patient for having bipolar disorder individually. Patients who are at a high risk should at least be informed and should be closely monitored for the development of manic episodes.

Neurocognition and its influencing factors in the treatment of schizophrenia-effects of aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone.

BACKGROUND: To examine influencing variables of neurocognition in patients with schizophrenia and to predict cognition during antipsychotic treatment. METHODS: Data were obtained from patients with an acute episode of schizophrenia participating in two double-blind and one open label trial comparing the effects of different atypical antipsychotics on cognition. In total, 129 patients were enrolled in this analysis. Cognitive function was assessed at admission, week 4 and 8. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed weekly using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Simpson Angus Sale (SAS). Patients were treated with aripirazole, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone. Regression analysis including mixed effect models was performed. RESULTS: A significant improvement in all cognitive domains was observed from baseline to week 8. Regarding the antipsychotic treatment applied quetiapine seemed to achieve the most favourable cognitive improvement. Negative and depressive symptoms, the patient's age and the concomitant and antipsychotic treatment applied were observed to significantly influence and predict neurocognition. CONCLUSION: The results may indicate that schizophrenia is a static disorder with trait and state dependent cognitive components especially in the memory domains. The influence of negative and depressive symptoms should be considered in daily clinical routine.

Effect of aripiprazole on cognition in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the cognitive effects of aripiprazole in inpatients with schizophrenia. METHODS: This was an investigator-initiated, open label eight-week trial evaluating 56 inpatients with the DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia. Efficacy was assessed weekly using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and tolerability was assessed each week using the Udvalg for Klinske Undersogelser side effect rating scale (UKU). Cognitive function was assessed at baseline, week 4 and week 8. RESULTS: Aripiprazole showed significant improvement in PANSS total score and all subscores between baseline and endpoint visit. The substance was very well tolerated. Patients improved significantly in verbal memory, reaction time and reaction quality/attention from baseline to week eight. Furthermore, mean z-values of individual cognitive domains summarized in a global cognitive index improved significantly from baseline to week eight. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that aripiprazole provides a valuable treatment option for patients with schizophrenia.

Time course of antipsychotic treatment response in schizophrenia: results from a naturalistic study in 280 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the course of positive and negative symptoms during inpatient treatment and examine remission and response rates under routine clinical care conditions. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty inpatients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV criteria) were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at admission and at biweekly intervals until discharge from hospital. Remission was defined according to the symptom-severity component of the consensus criteria (Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group) as a rating of three or less in the relevant PANSS items at discharge, and response as a reduction of at least 20% in the PANSS total score from admission to discharge. RESULTS: The mean duration of inpatient treatment was 54.8 days. Of the total sample, 78.5% achieved the criteria for response and 44.6% those for remission. Mean PANSS total scores decreased from 72.4 at admission to 52.5 at discharge (p<0.001). A reduction in PANSS total scores was found from visit to visit, up to week 8. The most pronounced decline was observed within the first two weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Response rates were comparable to those found in efficacy studies, and remission rates were slightly higher. This may be explained by differences in the selection and the treatment of patients. Nevertheless, the findings might indicate that a complex naturalistic treatment approach is beneficial in terms of effectiveness.

Outcome of suicidal patients with schizophrenia: results from a naturalistic study.

OBJECTIVE: Purpose was to assess suicidality before and at the time of admission in patients with schizophrenia and compare outcome differences. METHOD: Biweekly PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale), HAMD (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) and UKU (Udvalg for Klinske Undersogelser Side Effect Rating Scale) ratings were evaluated in 339 in-patients with schizophrenic spectrum disorders. Response was defined as an initial 20% PANSS total score reduction at discharge, remission was defined according to the proposed consensus criteria by the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group. RESULTS: Suicidal patients (22%) scored significantly higher on the PANSS negative subscore, PANSS insight item and HAMD total score at admission and at discharge. They developed significantly more side effects. No differences were found concerning response and remission between the two patient subgroups. CONCLUSION: Despite receiving significantly more antidepressants the suicidal patients suffered from significantly more depressive symptoms up to discharge, yet without differing regarding response and remission.