Phase II trial of topotecan as a 21-day continuous infusion in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of topotecan administered as a 21-day continuous intravenous infusion in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. 26 previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma received topotecan at a dose of 0.5 mg/m2/day or 0.6 mg/m2/day as a continuous intravenous infusion for 21 days. Courses were repeated every 28 days. 26 patients were assessable for response and toxicity on an intent-to-treat basis. The initial 8 patients at a starting dose of 0.6 mg/m2/day experienced unacceptable myelosuppression and dose delays. The subsequent 18 patients, therefore began therapy at a dose of 0.5 mg/m2/day. The major toxicity of topotecan at this dose and schedule was myelosuppression, which was reversible and non-cumulative. There were no complete responses and two partial responses for a total response rate of 8% (95% confidence interval, 1-25%). Response durations were 17 and 45 weeks. Stable disease was seen in 3 patients. The median time to progression for all patients was 8 weeks and the median survival was 20 weeks. Topotecan given as a 21-day continuous intravenous infusion has a similar response rate and median survival to our previously reported study of the 5-day short infusion regimen in pancreatic carcinoma.

Phase I dose escalating trial of hyperfractionated pre-operative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the acute toxicity, post-operative complications, pathologic response and extent of downstaging to high dose pre-operative radiation using a hyperfractionated radiation boost and concurrent chemotherapy in a prospective Phase I trial. MATERIALS & METHODS: To be eligible for this study, patients had to have adenocarcinoma of the rectum less than 12 cm from the anal verge with either Stage T4 or T3 but greater than 4 cm or greater than 40% of the bowel circumference. All patients received 45 Gy pelvic radiation (1.8 Gy per fraction). Subsequent radiation was given to the region of the gross tumor with a 2 cm margin. This "boost" treatment was given at 1.2 Gy twice daily to a total dose of 54.6 Gy for Level I, 57 Gy for Level II, and 61.8 Gy for Level III. 5-FU was given at 1g/m2 over 24 hours for a four day infusion during the first and sixth weeks of radiation, with the second course concurrent with the hyperfractionated radiation. Surgical resection was carried out 4-6 weeks following completion of chemoradiation (in curative cases) and additional adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 5-FU and Leucovorin was given for an additional 4 monthly cycles Days 1 through 5 beginning four weeks post surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients, age 40-82 (median 61), completed the initial course of chemoradiation and are included in the analysis of toxicity. The median follow-up is 27 months (range 8-68). Eleven patients were treated to a dose of 54.6 Gy, nine patients to 57 Gy, and seven patients to 61.8 Gy. Twenty-one patients had T3 tumors, and six patients T4 tumors. Grade III acute toxicity from chemoradiation included proctitis (5 patients), dermatitis (9), diarrhea (five), leukopenia (1), cardiac (1). Grade IV toxicities included one patient with diarrhea (on dose Level I) and one patient (on dose Level III) with cardiac toxicity (unrelated to radiation). Surgical resection consisted of abdominal perineal resection in 16 and low anterior resection in 7. Four patients did not undergo a curative resection; three initially presented with metastases and one developed metastasis during the pre-operative regimen. Post-operative complications included pelvic or perineal abscess in two (on dose Levels I & II), and delayed wound healing in two (one of whom, on dose Level III, developed perineal wound dehiscence requiring surgical reconstruction). Of the 23 patients who had a curative resection, four manifested pathologic complete responses (17.4%). Thirteen of 23 patients (57%) had evidence of pathologic downstaging and only 1/23 patients (on dose Level I) had a positive resection margin. Of these 23 patients (with a minimum follow-up of 8 months), the patient with positive margins was the only one who developed a local failure (Fisher's Exact p=.04). The 3-year actuarial OS, DFS and LC rates are 82%, 72% and 96%, respectively. Twelve of 13 patients (92% at 3 years) > or = 61 years vs. 5/10 patients (45% at 3 years) < 61 years remained disease-free (log-rank p=0.017). CONCLUSION: This regimen of high dose pre-operative chemoradiation employing a hyperfractionated radiation boost is feasible and tolerable and results in significant downstaging in locally advanced rectal cancer. The vast majority of patients (96%) achieved negative margins, which appears to be a prerequisite for local control (p= 0.04). Older age (> or =61 years) was a significant predictor for improved DFS. This regimen (at dose Level III, 61.8 Gy) is currently being tested in a Phase II setting.

Phase II trial of topotecan in advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of topotecan, an inhibitor of topoisomerase I, was conducted in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas to determine the activity and toxicity of topotecan. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: 35 patients, previously untreated with chemotherapy, received topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/d for five days intravenously and repeated every 21 days. Patients were assessed for response after 3 cycles. Those with either clinical response or stable disease received additional cycles of the drug until toxicity developed or disease progression occurred. RESULTS: Among 30 patients evaluable for response there were no complete responses and 3 partial responses (10%) for a total response rate of 10% (95% confidence interval = 0-20.6%). Stable disease for at least eight weeks was seen in 11 patients (36%). Median survival was 19 weeks (95% confidence interval 11 to 26 weeks). Therapy was generally well tolerated, with reversible granulocytopenia being the most common toxicity. CONCLUSION: Topotecan given on a 5 day, short infusion schedule, demonstrated limited activity in pancreatic carcinoma with minimal toxicity. Further exploration of topotecan in pancreatic carcinoma using different dosing schedules is warranted.

Gynecologic malignancies.

No new publication appeared in the past year on early stage ovarian cancer. The current GOG study will help determine the relative benefits and toxicities of intraperitoneal P32 versus cyclophosphamide and cisplatin in this group of patients. Recent studies in advanced ovarian carcinoma suggest a modest additional benefit for multidrug regimens, but cisplatin and cyclophosphamide remains an acceptable first line treatment for stage III and IV disease. Additional information on the use of carboplatin in advanced disease has been published, and this agent is now accepted as part of standard first line treatment programs. Platinum-based chemotherapy continues to be the mainstay of treatment for recurrent disease. With the commercial availability of taxol, a new salvage treatment is now available. Taxol will be increasingly studied as a part of front-line therapy as well as its role in the salvage setting. Altretamine and ifosfamide appear to have activity even in some patients with platinum-resistant disease, but these drugs will not likely have a major impact on ovarian cancer treatment. The use of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow or peripheral stem cell support offers an exciting and potentially beneficial approach for patients with poor prognosis disease. The use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and biologic agents continues to be problematic, and additional improvements are needed before they are considered useful outside of a research setting. With the exception of P32 for early stage disease, radiation therapy is likely to continue to play a minor role in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Few studies involving non-epithelial ovarian carcinomas were published during the past year. A definitive report was published demonstrating the activity of cisplatin-based chemotherapy (BEP) in patients with advanced dysgerminoma. Chemotherapy which preserves fertility provides an effective alternative to irradiation. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was active in mixed mullerian tumors of the ovary although the prognosis of these patients was worse than patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Concurrent chemotherapy added to irradiation has not improved survival over radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the uterine cervix. Patients still failed locally and distantly. Extended field irradiation to involved paraaortic lymph nodes with weekly cisplatin generated promising pilot data. Randomized trials evaluating the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to pelvic radiotherapy showed no benefit and increased toxicity. Ifosfamide alone or in combination regimens is an active drug but with serious side effects which require careful monitoring.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Medical management of early-stage breast cancer.

With improved screening and education, a greater proportion of breast cancer is detected at an early stage. Although the prognosis for many of these patients is excellent following definitive local therapy alone, some subsets of node-negative patients have a 30% chance of eventually developing metastatic disease that will be incurable with current therapy. Thus, an increasing proportion of early-stage patients are being offered some form of adjuvant therapy, with the expectation of improved relapse-free survival, and possibly improved overall survival. Efforts have been made to base the selection of patients for adjuvant therapy on specific prognostic factors. Meanwhile, the scope and complexity of putative prognostic factors continues to widen, and now includes such items as the presence of occult microscopic metastases, DNA ploidy and proliferative fraction, cytogenetic abnormalities, oncogene expression, growth factor receptors, and expression of hormonally regulated proteins. In addition, there is now a considerable range of options with regard to the composition, dose intensity, and sequence of multimodality therapy. Data regarding the classification, significance, and interpretation of prognostic factors is reviewed together with the development, current status, and recommendations regarding adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer. For 1991, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has estimated that 175,000 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in American women. It is also estimated that 44,500 women will die of breast cancer. Unfortunately, the age-adjusted death rate from breast cancer has shown no overall change from 1930 through 1987. However, effective screening techniques continue to identify an increasing percentage of early-stage tumors, which should exceed 50% of all new tumors in 1991. Ultimately, our understanding of environmental and genetic risk factors may identify new ways to reduce the impact of this disease. In the interim, development and application of effective systemic adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy has become increasingly important. There is no question that a greater proportion of patients with less extensive disease are now being offered some form of adjuvant therapy. Meanwhile, selection of patients for adjuvant therapy, and choice among specific adjuvant regimens, has remained controversial. Analysis of multiple prognostic factors is performed not only in the context of cooperative investigational trials, but more often in the offices of individual physicians caring for individual patients. Tumor biopsies can now be routinely sent to specialized laboratories for performance of complex assays with potential prognostic information, although interpretation of these results with reference to a specific patient is often uncertain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Cutaneous malakoplakia simulating relapsing malignant lymphoma.

This report describes the case of a 42-year-old man with malignant lymphoma, diffuse large non-cleaved cell type, who developed cutaneous malakoplakia in the left groin. The patient had widespread lymph node involvement, including a left inguinal mass which was clinically thought to represent recurrent lymphoma. The inguinal mass failed to regress after chemotherapy and irradiation, although lymphoma in other sites responded to chemotherapy. A skin biopsy of the area showed an ulcer and an abscess involving the dermis and subcutaneous tissue. Microscopically, a diffuse infiltrate of foamy histiocytes was seen with numerous intracellular and extracellular, round and laminated bodies. Some of these bodies had a "targetoid" appearance, stained strongly with von-Kossa's calcium stain and showed the typical appearance of Michaelis-Gutmann bodies by electron microscopy. Cultured monocytes from the peripheral blood of the patient showed ultrastructural features similar to their tissue counterparts, suggesting a systemic involvement of the monocyte macrophage lineage. This case represents an unusual presentation of malakoplakia of the skin associated with relapsing malignant lymphoma in a patient on immunosuppressive drugs.