Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Acad Audiol ; 18(10): 846-62, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18496994

ABSTRACT

Three hundred twenty zinc-air batteries representing four manufacturers (Energizer, Power One, Duracell, and Ray-O-Vac) and four cell sizes (10, 312, 13, and 675) were exposed in a salt spray fog apparatus for 2.5, 5.5, 24, 48, and 72 hours. At the conclusion of each exposure, the batteries were rated blindly for the presence of rust by four experienced audiologists using a four point rating scale. Results revealed significant differences in the rating of rust across the four manufacturers and duration of exposure. No statistically significant difference was found across cell size. Also, the correlation between raters was exceptionally high indicating that each audiologist rated the presence of rust for each battery in a very similar manner. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) techniques were applied and provided answers for the observed differences in rust between the four manufacturers.


Subject(s)
Electric Power Supplies , Hearing Aids , Corrosion , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Equipment Failure Analysis , Humans , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Salts/chemistry , Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission , Surface Properties , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...