Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
BMC Med Educ ; 22(1): 25, 2022 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35012542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As part of an elective course, the Interdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine at Duesseldorf University Hospital offers medical students the opportunity to personally meet and talk to a seriously ill patient on one or more occasions. The future physicians are provided with an opportunity to broaden their professional competence, i.e. their knowledge and skills in patient-centred communication at the end of life, and enhance their personal competence, for example in how to professionally handle their own emotions. A topical e-learning module helps the students to prepare for the meetings, and writing a reflection paper forms the basis for the concluding reflection seminar. OBJECTIVES: The study's objective is a global and outcome-based evaluation of the elective blended-learning course that provides real-world patient interaction. The outcome-based evaluation or outcome assessment aims to objectively evaluate changes identified in knowledge, skills and attitude among the participants of the elective-course. Furthermore, the evaluation aims to answer the question of whether changes especially in attitude (social skills and self-competence) should be expected after the students have met with severely ill or dying patients. METHOD: On two questionnaires specifically developed for this survey the students were able to provide a global rating of the elective course and describe their learning gains in palliative care. The students' learning gains were measured by means of 14 items reflecting the specific educational objectives of the offered elective course. Using the German school grading system as a rating scale, the students assessed their learning progress by retrospectively evaluating their skills before and after completion of the elective course (Comparative Self-Assessment, CSA). RESULTS: In the time from April 2018 till March 2020, 62 students participated in the evaluation. Overall, learning progress among students could be observed across all areas of competence, and in 50% of all retrospective self-assessment items the learning gains were ≥ 50%. The highest learning gain (63.6%) was observed in the students' ability to meet a severely ill patient without fear. The lowest learning gain was observed when students had to confront and accept their own mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The offered elective course supports students in achieving social and self-competence development goals. According to the obtained results, contact with real-world patients helps mould the students' attitude.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , Clinical Competence , Communication , Curriculum , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies
2.
Schmerz ; 35(4): 227-228, 2021 08.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34297183
3.
Schmerz ; 35(4): 242-250, 2021 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33970339

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This article describes a first use of an electronic case-based assessment tool in undergraduate palliative care education. It describes the development of the tool presenting strengths and shortcomings in order to contribute to an innovative design of assessment tools in medical education. DESIGN AND METHOD: An electronic (virtual) case-based assessment tool (the virtual palliative patient, vPp) was developed. Palliative care levels of knowledge, skills and attitude of students were tested at a computer workplace as a voluntary and non-performance-relevant pilot project at four faculties. RESULTS: On average the students achieved 80% of the points using the vPp tool, which is below the average score of 91% achieved in the regular examination. In particular, the free text task on reflection of dealing with the patient's death wish caused uncertainty, while multiple choice questions and an interactive conversation sequence were perceived as relatively easy. Technical problems were also identified in the evaluation but overall the concept was evaluated positively and establishment as a regular examination or e­learning tool was desired. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an innovative assessment tool in medical education is technically challenging. A coordination with contents of the individual faculties is necessary in order that students do not have a feeling of a lack of preparation. The development of the vPp describes an innovative assessment format. In the long term, all interested faculties could receive a form of toolbox containing the technical framework of the assessment tool, which can then be fed with new contents.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , Cognition , Curriculum , Electronics , Humans , Pain , Palliative Care , Pilot Projects
4.
Schmerz ; 27(3): 275-88, 2013 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23736747

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2013 palliative medicine (PM) will be integrated into the undergraduate curriculum as part of the mandatory education in German medical universities. The aim of this study is to determine the current state of implementation at German medical faculties (MF). METHODS: All German MFs were contacted using a written postal survey in June 2012. RESULTS: A total of 32 out of 36 MFs participated. Teaching staff consists of 15 or more lecturers in 8 MFs (30 %) and includes psychologists in 24 MFs (75 %) and also nurses in 18 MFs (56 %). Participating physicians are specialized in anesthesiology, internal medicine and general medicine. Teaching staff include palliative outpatient (20 MFs, 63 %) and consultation services (22 MFs, 69 %). Bedside teaching is provided in 15 MFs (47 %). Multiple choice tests are the major form of assessment (29 MFs, 84 %). The total number of teaching units in PM is between 12 and 43 and is usually provided at the end of medical school education. Nurses are employed in the education significantly more in MFs with a chair in PM. General practitioners were engaged only by faculties without a chair in PM. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the mandatory training in PM at MFs in Germany is inhomogeneous. Further steps include in particular the development of a competence-based curriculum and assessment.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate/legislation & jurisprudence , Faculty, Medical , National Health Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , Palliative Care , Clinical Competence/legislation & jurisprudence , Cooperative Behavior , Curriculum , Educational Measurement , Faculty, Nursing , Germany , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Medicine , Patient Care Team , Schools, Medical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...