Implementation of whole-exome sequencing for pharmacogenomics profiling and exploring its potential clinical utilities.

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is widely used in clinical settings; however, the exploration of its use in pharmacogenomic analysis remains limited. Our study compared the variant callings for 28 core absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination genes by WES and array-based technology using clinical trials samples. The results revealed that WES had a positive predictive value of 0.71-0.92 and a sensitivity of single-nucleotide variants between 0.68 and 0.95, compared with array-based technology, for the variants in the commonly targeted regions of the WES and PhamacoScan™ assay. Besides the common variants detected by both assays, WES identified 200-300 exclusive variants per sample, totalling 55 annotated exclusive variants, including important modulators of metabolism such as rs2032582 (ABCB1) and rs72547527 (SULT1A1). This study highlights the potential clinical advantages of using WES to identify a wider range of genetic variations and enabling precision medicine.

Relationship among DDR gene mutations, TMB and PD-L1 in solid tumour genomes identified using clinically actionable biomarker assays.

The DNA damage response (DDR) pathway regulates DNA repair and cell survival, and inactivating mutations in DDR genes can increase tumour mutational burden (TMB), a predictive biomarker of treatment benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies. However, a better understanding of the relationship among specific DDR mutations, TMB and PD-L1 expression is needed to improve translational strategies. Here, we determined genomic alteration frequencies in selected DDR genes that are clinically actionable biomarkers and investigated their association with TMB and PD-L1 in bladder, colorectal, non-small cell lung, ovarian and prostate cancers using the FoundationInsights® web portal. Our results not only confirm known associations, such as mismatch repair and POLE gene mutations with high TMB, but also identify significant associations between mutations in the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling genes ARID1A and SMARCA4 and high TMB in multiple tumour types. Mutations in the ATR gene were associated with high TMB in colorectal and prostate cancers; however, associations between individual DDR mutations and high PD-L1 expression were uncommon and tumour-type specific. Finally, we found that high TMB and high PD-L1 expression were poorly associated, emphasising their independence as predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor use.

Comparison of Two Illumina Whole Transcriptome RNA Sequencing Library Preparation Methods Using Human Cancer FFPE Specimens.

Objective: RNA extraction and library preparation from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples are crucial pre-analytical steps towards achieving optimal downstream RNA sequencing (RNASeq) results. In this study, we assessed 2 Illumina library preparation methods for RNA-Seq analysis using archived FFPE samples from human cancer indications at 2 independent vendors. Methods: Twenty-five FFPE samples from 5 indications (non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, renal carcinoma, breast cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma) were included, covering a wide range of sample storage durations (3-25 years-old), sample qualities, and specimen types (resection vs core needle biopsy). Each sample was processed independently by both vendors. Total RNA was isolated using the Qiagen miRNeasy FFPE kit followed by library construction using either TruSeq Stranded Total RNA library preparation kit with Ribo-Zero Gold, or TruSeq RNA Access library preparation kit. Libraries were normalized to 20 pM and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 using V3 chemistry in paired-end mode with a read length of 2 × 50 bp. The data were processed through a standard RNASeq pipeline to produce counts and transcripts per millions for each gene in each sample to compare 2 library kits at 2 different vendors. Results: Our data showed that TruSeq RNA Access libraries yield over 80% exonic reads across different quality samples, indicating higher selectivity of the exome pull down by the capture approach compared to the random priming of the TruSeq Stranded Total kit. The overall QC data for FFPE RNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing generated by the 2 vendors are comparable, and downstream gene expression quantification results show high concordance as well. With the TruSeq Stranded Total kit, the mean Spearman correlation between vendors was 0.87 and the mean Pearson correlation was 0.76. With the TruSeq RNA Access kit, the mean Spearman correlation between vendors was 0.89 and the mean Pearson correlation was 0.73. Interestingly, examination of the cross-vendor correlations compared to various common QC statistics suggested that library concentration is better correlated with consistency between vendors than is the RNA quantity. Conclusions: Our analyses provide evidence to guide selection of sequencing methods for FFPE samples in which the sample quality may be severely compromised.

Landscape and Clonal Dominance of Co-occurring Genomic Alterations in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping.

MET exon 14 skipping alterations (METex14) comprise a diverse set of actionable oncogene drivers in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent studies have established the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for this patient population. The landscape of co-occurring genetic alterations in METex14 NSCLC and their potential impact to therapeutic sensitivities has not yet been fully described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: METex14 NSCLC cases were collected from three cohorts: the VISION trial, and data sets from Guardant360 and GenePlus. Clinicopathologic characteristics and METex14 mutation sites were analyzed and compared across data sets. Co-occurring genetic alterations and the clonality relationships to METex14 were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 40,824 NSCLCs, 692 METex14 cases (1.7%) were identified, including 332 in Guardant360, 188 in VISION, and 172 in GenePlus. The demographics and mutation type and/or sites were similar in the Asian versus Western cohorts. MET amplification, which were found to be associated with sensitivity to MET kinase inhibitors, co-occurs in 7.6%-13.8% of cases, whereas kinase domain secondary mutation of MET co-occurs in 5%-6%. When co-occurring with METex14, EGFR mutations were often identified as the dominant clone (78%, 7 of 9), whereas when co-occurring, METex14 (39%, 7 of 18) and KRAS (44%, 8 of 18) had similar rates of clonal dominance. PIK3CA and PTEN mutations were almost always subclones (89%, 16 of 18) to METex14. Moreover, RET-CCDC6 fusion and EGFR mutation were detected following crizotinib treatment in two patients, suggesting novel mechanisms of resistance. CONCLUSION: METex14 mutations frequently co-occur with other potential driver oncogenes with differing patterns of clonal dominance observed among the drivers. This cellular context can provide insights into whether METex14 is acting as a primary oncogenic driver or resistance mechanism and help guide treatment choices.

Avelumab internalization by human circulating immune cells is mediated by both Fc gamma receptor and PD-L1 binding.

Avelumab is an IgG1 anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) monoclonal antibody that has been approved as a monotherapy for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma and advanced urothelial carcinoma, and in combination with axitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Avelumab is cleared faster and has a shorter half-life than other anti-PD-L1 antibodies, such as atezolizumab and durvalumab, but the mechanisms underlying these differences are unknown. IgG antibodies can be cleared through receptor-mediated endocytosis after binding of the antibody Fab region to target proteins, or via Fcγ receptor (FcγR)-mediated endocytosis. Unlike other approved anti-PD-L1 antibodies, avelumab has a native Fc region that retains FcγR binding capability. We hypothesized that the rapid clearance of avelumab might be due to the synergistic effect of both FcγR-mediated and PD-L1 target-mediated internalization. To investigate this, we performed in vitro and in vivo studies that compared engineered variants of avelumab and atezolizumab to determine mechanisms of cellular internalization. We found that both FcγR and PD-L1 binding contribute to avelumab internalization. While FcγR binding was the dominant mechanism of avelumab internalization in vitro, with CD64 acting as the most important FcγR, studies in mice and cynomolgus monkeys showed that both FcγR and PD-L1 contribute to avelumab elimination, with PD-L1 binding playing a greater role. These studies suggest that the rapid internalization of avelumab might be due to simultaneous binding of both PD-L1 and FcγR in trans. Our findings also provide a basis to alter the clearance and half-life of monoclonal antibodies in therapeutic development.

Development of a liquid biopsy based purely quantitative digital droplet PCR assay for detection of MLH1 promoter methylation in colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: MutL Homolog 1 (MLH1) promotor methylation is associated with microsatellite instability high colorectal cancer (CRC). The strong correlation between methylation status and cancer development and progression has led to a growing interest in the use of methylation markers in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for early cancer detection and longitudinal monitoring. As cancer-specific DNA methylation changes in body fluids are limited, it is particularly challenging to develop clinically applicable liquid biopsy methodologies with high sensitivity and specificity. The purpose of this study was to develop a fit-for-purpose methylation sensitive restriction enzyme (MSRE) based digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) assay to examine MLH1 promoter methylation in ctDNA in advanced CRC. METHODS: Primers and probes were designed to amplify CpG sites of the MLH1 promoter. Methylated and unmethylated control genomic DNA were sheared to mimic ctDNA and subjected to MSRE HpaII digestion. Plasma samples from 20 healthy donors and 28 CRC patients were analyzed with the optimized MSRE procedure using ddPCR. RESULTS: Using methylated and unmethylated controls, we optimized the conditions for HpaII enzyme digestion to ensure complete digestion and avoid false positives. Based on the results from the ddPCR assay using 1 ng circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) input from healthy donors or CRC samples, ROC curves were generated with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.965 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.99). The statistically optimal assay sensitivity and specificity was achieved when 8 positive droplets were used as acceptance criteria (78% sensitivity and 100% specificity, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.95). A tiered-based cutoff (20, 50, 80% percentile based) was applied to distinguish CRC samples with different methylation level. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that the liquid biopsy assay for MLH1 promoter methylation detection using purely quantitative ddPCR is a simple and highly sensitive procedure that provides reliable methylation detection in ctDNA. The MSRE ddPCR approach can also be applied to other genes of interest where methylation patterns could reveal clinically relevant information for future clinical biomarker and/or companion diagnostic development.

Fit-for-purpose quantitative liquid biopsy based droplet digital PCR assay development for detection of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) RNA expression in PAXgene blood samples.

Development of a clinically applicable liquid biopsy-based test for PD-L1 mRNA expression would be beneficial in providing complementary evidence to current immunohistochemistry assays. Hence, we report the development of a fit-for-purpose assay for detection of blood PD-L1 mRNA expression using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). TaqMan® assays were selected based on coverage of the PD-L1 gene and were tested for linearity and efficiency using real-time quantitative PCR. Four reference genes were analyzed in positive control cell line (A549 treated with interferon gamma, [IFN γ]) genomic DNA. The PD-L1 primer/probe sets were also evaluated in ddPCR for limit of blank, limit of detection, and precision. Finally, thirty-five healthy volunteer samples were evaluated to establish a baseline level of PD-L1 expression. In ddPCR, the limit of blank was determined to be 0 copies and the limit of detection was determined to be less than or equal to 19 copies of PD-L1. The average intra-run coefficient of variation in the ddPCR assay was 7.44% and average inter-run CV was 7.70%. Treatment of A549 cells with IFN γ resulted in a 6.7-fold increase in PD-L1 expression (21,580 copies in untreated cDNA versus 145,000 copies in treated cDNA). Analysis of healthy human samples yielded a median value of 1659 PD-L1 copies/µL with a range of 768-7510 copies/µL. The assay was transferred to an external service provider and results from our in-house experiments and those conducted externally shows a correlation of 0.994. In conclusion, a fit-for-purpose liquid biopsy-based, purely quantitative ddPCR assay for the detection of PD-L1 mRNA expression was developed and validated using PAXgene RNA blood samples. Linearity, reproducibility, limit of blank and limit of detection were measured and deemed suitable for clinical application. This ultra-sensitive liquid biopsy ddPCR assay has promising clinical potential in screening, longitudinal monitoring and disease progression detection.

Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry Assay Comparison Studies in NSCLC: Characterization of the 73-10 Assay.

INTRODUCTION: Several programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays have been developed independently within clinical programs for therapeutic anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) or PD-L1 antibodies, necessitating assessment of assay comparability. We characterized the Dako PD-L1 IHC 73-10 assay used in clinical trials of avelumab (anti-PD-L1) or bintrafusp alfa (M7824; bifunctional immunotherapy) and compared it with the Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay, an approved companion diagnostic for pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded NSCLC tumor samples from a commercial source and from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor phase 1 trial of avelumab (NCT01772004) were stained using the 73-10 and 22C3 IHC assays with a standard protocol. RESULTS: Both assays displayed expected PD-L1 staining patterns. In 148 commercial NSCLC samples, the 73-10 assay stained greater than or equal to 1%, greater than or equal to 50%, and greater than or equal to 80% of tumor cells as PD-L1+ in 64.2%, 36.5%, and 23.6% of the samples, respectively, whereas the 22C3 assay stained 20.3% of the samples as greater than or equal to 50% PD-L1+. In 83 NSCLC clinical trial samples, the 73-10 assay stained 79.5% and 31.3% of the samples as greater than or equal to 1% and greater than or equal to 80% PD-L1+, respectively, whereas the 22C3 assay stained 59.0% and 21.7% as greater than or equal to 1% and greater than or equal to 50% PD-L1+, respectively. Efficacy of avelumab was similar in the subgroups classified with the 73-10 and 22C3 assays using greater than or equal to 80% and greater than or equal to 50% PD-L1+ cutoffs, with objective response rates of 26.9% and 33.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 73-10 assay demonstrated high sensitivity for PD-L1 staining, and staining was comparable between the greater than or equal to 80% cutoff of the 73-10 assay and greater than or equal to 50% cutoff of the 22C3 assay.