Frequency domain optical coherence tomography to assess non-ostial left main coronary artery.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of unprotected non-ostial left main (LM) imaging by frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of OCT studies performed to image lesions located in the non-ostial LM. OCT studies were analysed off-line to detect the number of artefact frames in the different LM/bifurcation segments. OCT cross-sectional images were used to assess area measures. OCT longitudinal reconstructions were used to obtain the LM length. Standard quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was used as the reference methodology. A total of 54 patients with non-ostial LM disease entered the study. The mean number of LM artefact frames was 8±10, corresponding to 19% of the total number of LM frames analysed. The percentages of artefact frames differed significantly according to the segment analysed: 43.3% proximal LM, 11.4% mid LM and 2.1% distal LM, 2.0% ostial left anterior descending artery and 0% ostial left circumflex artery (p<0.0001). All LM OCT measurements were significantly correlated with QCA measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study show that FD-OCT assessment of non-ostial LM disease is feasible and may provide high-quality imaging. OCT assessment of distal LM is more efficient than that of the proximal LM segment.

Impact of operator experience and wiring technique on procedural efficacy of trans-radial percutaneous chronic total occlusion recanalization performed by dedicated radialists.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of trans-radial approach (TRA) in chronic total occlusions (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is not well established. Thus, we sought to review the feasibility and long-term results of TRA for CTO PCI performed by dedicated TRA operatorsof our center. METHODS: CTO PCI performed by dedicated radialists were considered. Primary end-points were "PCI success" (stent implantation with residual stenosis < 20% and TIMI 3) and "patient success" (PCI success in a first or second attempt). Vascular complications and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were also assessed. Procedures were divided into: Period 1 - no systematic adoption of TRA nor systematic wire selection, and Period 2 - systematic TRA with stepwise wire selection. The starting guidewire was initially an intermediate wire (Period 2a), and, thereafter, a tapered soft polymeric guidewire (Period 2b). RESULTS: Two operators performed 167 TRA PCI on CTO in 158 patients. PCI success rate was 74.3% and patient success rate was 78.5%. Drug-eluting stents were implanted in 95.1% of successful procedures. One (0.6%) patient had a (minor) vascular complication. After a mean follow-up of 580 days, 93.7% of patients were free from MACE. PCI success (57.1% in Period 1 vs. 76.5% in Period 2a vs. 80.5% in Period 2b, p = 0.029) and patient success (62.5% in Period 1 vs. 77.8% in Period 2a vs. 86.1% in Period 2b, p = 0.025) significantly improved during the study. CONCLUSIONS: CTO PCI by TRA is safe and feasible. Its efficacy seems to be strongly dependenton operator experience with CTO techniques and may be influenced by the strategy of guidewire selection.

Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent to treat bifurcated lesions according to the provisional technique: a procedural performance comparison with sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents.

OBJECTIVES: Different drug-eluting stents (DES) may have different performance in bifurcation PCI. Thus, we compared the performance of a novel zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZRS) with that obtained using two other DES in bifurcation PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with bifurcated lesions undergoing DES implantation were treated by a provisional approach with sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) or everolimus-eluting stent (EES) during a former period, and then by ZRS in a second period. The PCI procedural details were prospectively recorded and angiographic results were evaluated by a 3-dimensional quantitative coronary analysis software. Primary procedural end-point was "side-branch (SB) trouble" (occurrence, after MV stenting, of: SB TIMI flow<3 or need of specific wires for SB rewiring, or failure to re-wire/dilate the SB). Primary angiographic end-point was post-PCI minimal-lumen-diameter at SB-ostium. During the study, 225 patients were enrolled and treated by ZRS (n=75), by SES (n=75) or by EES (n=75). Among procedural characteristics, "SB trouble" occurred in 4% of patients treated by ZRS, a figure significantly lower compared to SES (16%, P=0.014) and non-significantly lower compared to EES (11%, P=0.12). At multivariable analysis, DES type, pre-PCI SB flow <3 and bifurcation complexity were the only predictors of "SB trouble". After the procedure, minimal-lumen-diameter at SB ostium was significantly larger with ZRS compared to SES (1.94 vs. 1.64 mm, P=0.008) and similar to that of EES. CONCLUSIONS: ZRS is associated to improved performance and SB angiographic results compared to SES. These results support the hypothesis that DES selection may influence the procedural course and the acute angiographic result of bifurcation PCI.

One-year outcomes of consecutive patients treated by Endeavor zotarolimus and Resolute zotarolimus stents: the impact of polymer coating in drug-eluting stent technology.

BACKGROUND: Polymer-coating represents a key component of drug-eluting stent (DES) technology and its possible impact on vessel-wall healing is a matter of debate. The clinical impact of different polymer-coating may be assessed by comparing the outcome of patients treated by DES having the same stent platform and drug, and differing in the polymer. Thus, we compared the clinical outcome of patients treated by Endeavor Zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) and Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) as they differ in the polymer-coating only. METHODS: At our Institution, E-ZES was available during a first period and then it was substituted by the R-ZES during a second period. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural data were prospectively collected. Clinical follow-up was prospectively obtained up to 1-year. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12-month. RESULTS: A total of 467 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled: 233 patients treated with E-ZES and 234 with R-ZES. Patients treated by R-ZES had similar clinical characteristics and worse angiographic characteristics compared with those treated by E-ZES. At 12-month follow-up, MACE rate was significantly lower in the R-ZES group compared with E-ZES group (4.2% vs. 14.6%; P < 0.01). This difference was due to nonsignificantly lower rates of death and myocardial infarction and to significant lower rate of target-lesion-revascularization (R-ZES 3.4% vs. E-ZES 10.3%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the clinical outcome of patients treated by DES differing for the polymer coating only may be different. Polymer coating is a pivotal, probably underrated, component of DES technology which may influence the clinical performance of DES.

Management and timing of access-site vascular complications occurring after trans-radial percutaneous coronary procedures.

BACKGROUND: Access-site vascular complications (ASVC) in patients undergoing trans-radial coronary procedures are rare but may have relevant clinical consequences. Data regarding the optimal management of radial-access-related ASVC are lacking. METHODS: During a period of 6 years we prospectively collected ASVC. ASVC were defined as any complication requiring ultrasound examination or upper limb angiography. ASVC were categorized according to the timing of diagnosis: "very early" (in the cath lab), "early" (after cath lab discharge, but during the hospital stay) and "late" (after hospital discharge). The need of surgery (primary end-point) and the development of neurological hand deficit (secondary end-point) were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven radial-artery related ASVC were collected. ASVC diagnosis was obtained by upper limb angiography in 25 patients (44%) and by Doppler in 32 patients (56%). Surgery was required in 6 cases (11%), the remaining patients receiving successful conservative management (which included prolonged local compression). Three patients (who received surgery) exhibited a mild neurological hand deficit in the follow-up. Need for surgery differed significantly according to timing of diagnosis as it occurred in 1 of 26 patients (3.8%) with "very early" diagnosis, in 1 of 21 patients (4.8%) with "early" diagnosis, and in 4 of 10 patients (40%) with "late" diagnosis (p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: ASVC are diagnosed with different timing after trans-radial procedures. Conservative management including local compression allows successful management in the majority of ASVC. Prompt recognition is pivotal as late diagnosis is associated to the need for surgery.

Baseline inflammatory status and long-term changes in renal function after percutaneous renal artery stenting: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate a possible independent predictive role of systemic inflammation markers on renal function after renal artery stenting. BACKGROUND: An elevated baseline serum creatinine has previously been shown to be the strongest predictor of improved renal function after percutaneous renal artery stenting. The inflammatory system is implicated in every stage of chronic kidney disease, and we hypothesized an additional value of markers of systemic inflammation in predicting response after renal artery stenting. METHODS: This single center, prospective study includes 62 consecutive patients with chronic kidney disease at stage ≥ 3 or resistant hypertension who underwent stent placement for 74 angiographically significant atherosclerotic renal lesions. Inflammatory markers, including serum C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and white blood cell count were determined prior to renal angioplasty and related to changes in renal function at follow-up. RESULTS: Six-month clinical follow up was completed in 57 patients. Overall, median serum creatinine concentration exhibited a non significant reduction from 1.40 mg/dl (quartiles: 1.20, 1.75 mg/dl) at baseline to 1.30 mg/dl (quartiles: 1.1, 1.55 mg/dl) at 6 months (p=0.17). Significant multivariate independent predictors of decreased creatinine included higher baseline serum creatinine levels (adjusted OR per quartile increment, 2.5 [1.3 to 4.7], p=0.004) and lower C-reactive protein levels (adjusted OR per quartile increment 0.39 [0.19 to 0.82], p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with higher serum creatinine and lower CRP derive the most benefit from renal artery stenting.

EuroSCORE predicts long-term mortality of unselected patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

BACKGROUND: The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) is a simple risk model able to predict early and late mortality after cardiac surgery. Recent data suggest that this score may also predict early clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data regarding EuroSCORE usefulness to predict late outcome after PCI in unselected patients are lacking. METHODS: EuroSCORE was prospectively assessed in consecutive patients undergoing PCI during 18 months. The primary end-point was cardiac mortality during the follow-up after PCI. Total mortality was the secondary end-point. Kaplan-Meyer analyses were performed dividing the study population in three subgroups according to the additive EuroSCORE algorithm (low risk group: EuroSCORE 0-2; medium risk group: EuroSCORE 3-5; high-risk group: EuroSCORE ≥ 6). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and landmark analysis on cardiac mortality after 30 days were performed. RESULTS: The study population comprised 1170 patients undergoing PCI. Mean follow-up duration was 633 days (range: 365-1000 days). Cardiac mortality was 2%; 2.4%; 13.2% in patients with low, medium and high EuroSCORE respectively. Kaplan-Meyer survival curves for cardiac death differed significantly between EuroSCORE groups (p<0.0001). The area under the ROC curve for the prediction of cardiac death was 0.77. Similar results were obtained for total mortality. At landmark analysis starting 30 days after PCI, EuroSCORE groups were significantly associated with different survival in the long term (P=0.014). CONCLUSION: EuroSCORE risk model can be efficiently utilized to predict late mortality in consecutive, unselected, patients undergoing PCI.

Management of the access site after transradial percutaneous procedures: literature overview.

The transradial approach (TRA) is emerging as a promising strategy to improve the safety of percutaneous coronary diagnostic or interventional procedures. Nevertheless, a series of specific complications related to the radial access have been described so that their prevention and optimal management is clinically relevant. In this article, the types of access-related vascular complications potentially occurring after TRA and their possible management are described. In particular, the vascular complications have been classified in three groups according to the main pathogenetic mechanism: thrombotic, hemorrhagic and nonthrombotic nonhemorrhagic. Moreover, a practical operative protocol for prompt diagnosis and treatment has been proposed.

Angiographic and clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis of bifurcated lesions.

AIMS: Restenosis and bifurcated lesions represent technically challenging lesions for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Data regarding procedural and clinical outcome of re-PCI for restenosis of stented bifurcated lesions are lacking. Our aims were to evaluate angiographic and procedural results and one-year clinical outcome of PCI for restenosis of stented bifurcated lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing PCI for restenosis of one bifurcated lesion previously treated by stent implantation at our centre entered the study. The primary endpoint was angiographic and procedural success, defined as final residual stenosis ≤30% in the main vessel with TIMI 3 flow in both MV and side branch, and stenosis ≤50% in the SB without death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularisation during hospitalisation. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events at one-year clinical follow-up. The study population included 64 patients treated by PCI on a single restenotic bifurcated lesion. Angiographic and procedural success was achieved in 61 cases (95.3%) whereas the three cases of failure were due to SB residual stenosis >50%. At one year, MACE rate was 18.7% (12/64) with rates of cardiac death, MI and TVR of 1.6% (1/64), 6.2% (4/64) and 18.7% (12/64), respectively. No cases of stent thrombosis occurred. Patients treated by a single drug-eluting stent (DES) on main vessel (MV) had a significant lower rate of MACE at one year as compared to patients treated with balloon only PCI or by double-stenting technique or with a BMS, irrespective of the strategy adopted: 4/37 (10.8%) vs. 8/27 (29.6%); p=0.04. CONCLUSIONS: PCI in restenotic bifurcated lesions can be a good treatment option with high rates of angiographic and procedural success and an acceptable rate of long-term MACE. The use of a single DES implantation may be a promising strategy as it is associated with lower rates of MACE in the long term.

INtimal hyPerplasia evAluated by oCT in de novo COROnary lesions treated by drug-eluting balloon and bare-metal stent (IN-PACT CORO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Neointimal hyperplasia plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Drug-eluting balloons are a promising tool to prevent restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Moreover, an increased knowledge of the pathophysiology of restenosis my help improve therapeutic strategies. METHODS/DESIGN: We present the design of an open-label, randomized three-arm clinical trial aimed to assess whether a strategy of bare-metal stent implantation with additional use of drug-eluting balloons, either before (pre-dilation) or after stenting (post-dilation), reduces the primary endpoint of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia area as compared with a strategy of bare-metal stent implantation alone. This primary endpoint will be assessed by optical coherence tomography at follow-up. Secondary endpoints will be the percentage of uncovered struts, and the percentage of struts with incomplete apposition. An ancillary study investigating the relation between systemic levels of endothelial progenitors cells and neointimal hyperplasia, and the interaction between endothelial progenitors cell levels and drug-eluting balloons has been planned. Thirty consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention will be randomized with a 1:1:1 design to bare-metal stent implantation alone (n = 10); bare-metal stent implantation after pre-dilation with a drug-eluting balloon (n = 10); or bare-metal stent implantation followed by post-dilation with a drug-eluting balloon (n = 10). Six-month follow-up coronary angiography with optical coherence tomography imaging of the stented segment will be performed in all patients. Blood samples for the assessment of endothelial progenitors cell levels will be collected on admission and at 6 months. DISCUSSION: Experimental and early clinical data showed that inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia may be obtained by local administration of antiproliferative drugs loaded on the surface of angioplasty balloons. The INtimal hyPerplasia evAluated by oCT in de novo COROnary lesions treated by drug-eluting balloon and bare-metal stent (IN-PACT CORO) trial was conceived to test the superiority of a strategy of bare-metal stent implantation with additional drug-eluting balloon use (either before or after stenting) versus a strategy of bare-metal stent implantation alone for the reduction of neointimal hyperplasia. We also planned an ancillary study to assess the role of endothelial progenitors cells in the pathophysiology of neointimal hyperplasia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01057563.

Vascular complications and access crossover in 10,676 transradial percutaneous coronary procedures.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have shown that transradial approach, compared with transfemoral, reduces vascular complications (VCs) of coronary procedures in selected patients. Yet, radial approach is associated to a variety of access-site VC as well as to a higher failure rate compared with femoral access. METHODS: At our institution, from May 2005 to May 2010, we prospectively assessed the occurrence and outcome of VC in consecutive patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary procedures performed by trained radial operators. The need of access crossover to complete the procedure was also prospectively investigated. Vascular complications were classified as "radial related" or "nonradial related" (in the case of access crossover). Vascular complications were also classified "major" if requiring surgery and/or blood transfusions or causing hemoglobin drop >3 g/dL. RESULTS: Ten thousand six hundred seventy-six procedures were performed using a right radial (87.5%), left radial (12.4%), or ulnar (0.1%) artery as primary access. A total of 53 VCs (0.5%) were observed: 44 (83%) radial related and 9 (17%) nonradial related. Major VCs occurred in 16 patients only (0.2%) and were radial related in 10 (62.5%) and nonradial related in 6 (37.5%) patients. Vascular complications rate was stable during the study and independent of operator's experience. Access crossover rate was 4.9%, differed according to the operator radial experience and significantly decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: The present study, conducted in a center with high volume of radial procedures, shows that transradial approach is associated with a very low rate of VC, which is stable over time. On the contrary, access crossover rate decreased over time and differed according to operator (radial) experience.

Feasibility of complex coronary and peripheral interventions by trans-radial approach using large sheaths.

BACKGROUND: Trans-radial approach (TRA) reduces vascular access-site complications but has some technical limitations. Usually, TRA procedures are performed using 5 Fr or 6 Fr sheaths, whereas complex interventions requiring larger sheaths are approached by trans-femoral access. METHODS: During 4 years, at two Institutions with high TRA use, we have attempted to perform selected complex coronary or peripheral interventions by TRA using sheaths larger than 6 Fr. Clinical and procedural data were prospectively collected. Attempt to place a 7 Fr or 8 Fr sheath (according to the planned strategy of the procedure) was performed after 5-6 Fr sheath insertion, administration of intra-arterial nitrates and radial artery angiography. Late (>3 months) patency of the radial artery was checked (by angiography in the case of repeated procedures or by palpation + reverse Allen test). RESULTS: We collected 60 patients in which TRA large sheath insertion was attempted. The large sheath (87% 7 Fr, 13% 8 Fr) was successfully placed in all cases. Most of the procedures were complex coronary interventions (bifurcated or highly thrombotic or calcific chronic total occlusive lesions), whereas 8.3% were carotid interventions. Procedural success rate was 98.3% (1 failure to reopen a chronic total occlusion). No access-site related complication occurred. In 57 (95%) patients, late radial artery patency was assessed and showed patency in 90% of the cases, the remaining patients having asymptomatic collateralized occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, complex percutaneous interventions requiring 7-8 Fr sheaths can be successfully performed by RA approach without access-site clinical consequences.

Prospective randomized comparison of sirolimus- or everolimus-eluting stent to treat bifurcated lesions by provisional approach.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the procedural performance and the acute angiographic result on side-branch ostium obtained using 2 different drug-eluting stents (DES) to treat patients with bifurcated coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents are routinely used in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of bifurcated coronary lesions. Different DES types have major technical differences that may influence the procedural and clinical performance in bifurcation PCI. METHODS: Consecutive patients with bifurcated lesions undergoing DES implantation using a systematic provisional-stenting strategy were randomized to sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) or everolimus-eluting stent (EES) before intervention. The procedural details for PCI were prospectively recorded to assess the occurrence of any trouble in the side-branch (SB) management (primary end point). Post-PCI angiographic result (primary end point: minimal lumen diameter at SB ostium) was evaluated offline by 3-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative coronary analysis. Clinical outcome was prospectively recorded up to 18 months to assess the occurrence of target bifurcation failure. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were enrolled in the study (29% diabetics, 17% unprotected left main). The stent was successfully implanted according to randomization in all cases. Procedural performance was not significantly different between the 2 kinds of DES. Three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative coronary analysis showed similar post-PCI results in the main vessel and better results in the SB with EES than with SES (minimal lumen diameter at SB ostium: 1.94 ± 0.72 mm vs. 1.64 ± 0.62 mm; p = 0.013). At 18 months, target bifurcation failure occurred in 7 (9.0%) of SES-treated patients versus 8 (10.7%) of EES patients (p = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with bifurcated lesions treated by provisional stenting technique, EES compared with SES is associated with similar procedural performance and better 3-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative coronary analysis result in the SB. Both DES are associated with low rates of major adverse events and angiographic failure. (Sirolimus Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent Randomized Assessment in Bifurcated Lesions and Clinical Significance of Residual Side-Branch Stenosis [SEA-SIDE]; NCT00697372).

Procedural and clinical evaluation of the novel zotarolimus-eluting resolute stent in patients with unselected bifurcated coronary stenosis treated by provisional approach: a multicenter registry.

AIMS: As data on the use of the latest-generation drugeluting stents (DES) in bifurcation interventions are lacking, we realized a multicenter registry to assess the procedural and clinical results obtained in patients with unselected bifurcated lesions treated with the novel zotarolimus-eluting Resolute stent (ZRS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Three Italian centers participated in the study. Consecutive patients with significant stenosis of bifurcated lesions undergoing DES implantation were treated with ZRS. The recommended technique was the "provisional TAP approach" [main-vessel (MV) stent implantation eventually followed by kissing balloon and sidebranch (SB) stenting according to TAP technique]. Clinical characteristics, procedural details and clinical follow-up data were prospectively recorded. Procedural success was defined as post-percutaneous coronary intervention visual stenosis > 20% on MV and TIMI 3 flow on both MV and SB. Primary endpoint was major adverse coronary events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization) at 9-month follow up. A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The target lesion was located in the distal left main in 16% and in the left anterior descending artery in 52%. All but 3 cases were treated according to the provisional TAP approach (kissing balloon rate, 69%; overall SB stenting rate, 10.6%). Procedural success was obtained in 98.3% (3 failures due to final SB TIMI flow < 3). At 9-month follow up, the survival free from MACE was 97.8% (1 cardiac death and 3 repeat revascularizations). CONCLUSION: The use of the latest-generation ZRS in unselected bifurcated lesions treated by a provisional approach is associated with excellent procedural results and with promising clinical outcomes.

Outcome of non-cardiac surgery after stent implantation in the DES era: results of the Surgery After Stent (SAS) registry.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of patients needing non-cardiac surgery after coronary stenting has not been established. Objective. To assess the perioperative outcome of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery after coronary bare-metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (up to 2008) after coronary stenting in a single-center registry, prospectively registering clinical and procedural data about revascularization and retrospectively recording surgical details, perioperative therapy and in-hospital outcome after surgery. At our institution, we implant BMS for planned surgery at time of revascularization, and use antiplatelet therapy for surgery required within 1 month of BMS or within 12 months of DES implantation. The primary endpoint was defined as perioperative occurrence of major adverse events, both cardiovascular (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and repeated revascularization) and hemorrhagic (bleeding requiring transfusions or surgical hemostasis). RESULTS: We enrolled 101 patients: 70 treated with BMS (group 1) and 31 with DES (group 2). The mean interval between stenting and surgery was 288 days. The average number of antiplatelet drugs used during the operative period was higher in group 2 than group 1 (p = 0.02). Fifteen patients (15%) experienced major adverse events (5.9% had non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, 12% received blood transfusions), without a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.72). At multivariate analysis, the predictor of primary endpoint was time interval between stenting and surgery (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: We found similar outcomes for non-cardiac surgery after coronary stenting when BMS were selected for planned surgery and dual antiplatelet therapy was used, if indicated, during the operative period.

Comparative assessment of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the CASTOR-Bifurcation registry.

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have revolutionized the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. Among different DES types, sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) showed better outcomes than paclitaxel-eluting stents. Because novel sirolimus analogues have been implemented in DES, a prospective observational comparison was undertaken to compare major mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-eluting stents in the treatment of bifurcation lesions according to the provisional T-stenting and small protrusion (TAP) technique. Overall, 187 patients (165 men, 65 ± 10 years) were enrolled in the study: 80 patients received a SES, whereas zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) were implanted in 53 patients and everolimus-eluting stents (EvES) in 62 patients. Primary end-point of the study was the 12-month incidence of target bifurcation failure (TBF) defined as occurrence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) or angiographic documentation of > 50% restenosis on the main vessel or TIMI flow < 3 on the side branch. Groups were homogeneous according to main clinical and angiographic characteristics. Overall, 17 (9.1%) patients had TBF: 4 (2.1%) patients had nonfatal non-ST-segment elevation MI, 9 (4.8%) patients underwent TVR, and 6 (3.2%) patients had an angiographic restenosis. The rate of TBF was statistically different among the three groups (7.9% in SES group, 18% in ZES group, and 3.3% in EvES group, P = 0.024). Previous MI was associated with a worse outcome (P = 0.025), whereas final kissing balloon was associated with a better outcome (P = 0.045). In conclusion, in this prospective registry, significant differences between DES were found in the outcome of patients treated for coronary bifurcation lesions according to provisional TAP technique. Thus, prospective randomized trials in this field are needed.

Thrombus aspiration without additional ballooning or stenting to treat selected patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The use of thrombus aspiration during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is recommended in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing mechanical revascularization. When thrombus aspiration is adopted, the standard technique includes, after mechanical thrombus extraction, angioplasty and/or stent implantation to eliminate residual stenosis. To date, no data are available concerning the use of thrombectomy alone without additional ballooning or stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report the angiographic and clinical outcome of a series of selected STEMI patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion by thrombus aspiration without additional ballooning or stenting. Four patients out of 316 consecutive STEMI patients were managed by thrombus aspiration alone (1.3%). All patients had angiographic documentation of an occlusive large intracoronary thrombus in the infarct-related artery before intervention and complete restoration of coronary flow in the absence of critical coronary stenosis after thrombus aspiration. Three of these patients had a clinical contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy, thus suggesting that to avoid stent implantation would be advisable. Angiographic reevaluation was performed before discharge in 3 patients confirming persistent patency of the infarct-related artery (in 1 case the residual stenosis was judged to require intravascular ultrasound evaluation and subsequent elective PCI with stent implantation). The thirty-day clinical course was uneventful in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with STEMI undergoing mechanical reperfusion, thrombus aspiration without additional ballooning or stenting may be successfully performed. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical relevance of this novel approach.

Renal artery stenting in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of renal stenting in selected patients with chronic ischemic heart disease and renal artery stenosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients, with chronic ischemic heart disease and severe hypertension and/or impaired renal function undergoing renal stenting, were prospectively enrolled. Mid-term (at least 2 years) follow-up was performed to assess both changes in renal function [serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtrate rate (eGFR)] and blood pressure (BP) control (number of required drugs) and to record the incidence of clinical major adverse events. Moreover, in the first consecutive 24 patients, out-of-range pressure values at 24-hr BP monitoring and GFR at renal scintigraphy were measured at baseline and 1 month after stenting. RESULTS: Seventy patients treated by stenting on 86 renal arteries entered the study. Procedural success rate was 99% and no major complication occurred. At 2-year follow-up, both mean serum creatinine (-0.1 +/- 0.7 mg/dl at follow-up compared to baseline, P = 0.6) and eGFR (+3.7 +/- 23.5 ml/min/1.73m(2) at follow-up compared to baseline, P = 0.2) did not significantly change while the number of drugs required to control BP significantly decreased (2.7 +/- 0.8 to 2.2 +/- 0.7, P < 0.0001). In the subset of 24 patients evaluated at 1 month, GFR significantly increased (62 +/- 20 ml/min to 67 +/- 21 ml/min; P = 0.008) and the rate of the out-of-range systolic pressure values at 24-hr monitoring significantly decreased (51-33%, P = 0.005). Elevated baseline creatinine values and the presence of global renal ischemia were identified as predictors of poor outcome at the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with chronic ischemic heart disease and hypertension and/or renal insufficiency, renal stenting may be performed with very low periprocedural complications and results in unchanged renal function and improved BP control.