[Complications after rectal prolapse surgery]. / Komplikationen nach Rektumprolapsoperationen.

Major complications only rarely occur after rectal prolapse surgery. Generally, the spectrum of possible complications should always be considered depending on the selected surgical procedure. Minor complications in all techniques have been described in up to 36 %. The commonest complication is bleeding with 2-5 %, urinary tract infections and wound infections. Finally, the risk of recurrence must be considered, which shows substantial differences (4-40 %); therefore, no operation technique can be given preference based solely on the risk of recurrence. Therapy decisions are always more individualized and must take the personal environment of the patient as well as the experience of the surgeon into consideration.

Clinical value of sentinel node mapping in carcinoma of the colon.

AIM: Sentinel lymph node mapping has been used in colon cancer to improve prognosis. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of in vivo SLNM in patients with colon carcinoma undergoing surgery with curative intent. METHOD: Thirty-one patients operated for colon carcinoma underwent in vivo sentinel lymph node mapping using patent blue dye. Each sentinel lymph node (SLN) was marked intraoperatively, and histological examination was performed after en bloc resection. If no metastasis was found, step sectioning with immunohistochemistry was performed. RESULTS: The SLN was successfully identified in 28 (90%) of 31 patients. The false-negative rate to identify stage III disease was 66% (eight of 12), the negative predictive value was 46% (19 of 27) and the accuracy was 14% (four of 28). One patient negative on routine histopathology had micrometastasis on step sectioning of the SLN. CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node mapping in colon carcinoma cannot accurately predict nodal status.

[Diagnosis and therapy of stool incontinence]. / Diagnostik und Therapie der Stuhlinkontinenz.

Incontinence may have different causes. First it is necessary to diagnose any underlying muscular defects. Neurologic lesions and coordinative disturbances should also be excluded. A great variety of methods are available for treatment. In fact conservative therapy alone will very often be successful. In all traumatic lesions of the sphincter muscle, surgical reconstruction is the method of choice if the defect is not too large. In cases of extensive sphincter destruction, an artificial anorectal sphincter implant or dynamic graciloplasty may be options. In all cases with no or only small muscular defects, sacral nerve stimulation should be offered to the patient. Plicating techniques such as pre- or postanal repair have lost their therapeutic attractiveness at present. Therefore in any case of incontinence, the correctly structured stoma still has a place. To date it is not possible to confirm how much new methods such as bulking agents may contribute to the treatment of incontinence.

Laparoscopic TME: better vision, better results?

One of the most controversial discussions on laparoscopic surgery deals with the question of whether to apply this technique to malignant disease and specifically to rectal cancer. The four major issues are the adequacy of oncologic resection, recurrence rates and patterns, long-term survival and quality of life. There is evidence, from nonrandomized studies, suggesting that margins of excision and lymph node harvest achieved laparoscopically reached comparable results to those known from conventional open resection. Our own experience of laparoscopic surgery on rectal cancer is based on 52 patients treated with curative intent. Focusing on the postoperative long-term run, we gained the following results: The median age of patients was 66.7 years and ranged from 42-88. Anastomotic leakage was seen in 6.1% of cases. In a median follow-up of 48 months (36-136), we reached an overall 3-year survival rate of 93% and a 5-year survival rate of 62%. Local recurrence was 1.9%, distant metastasis occurred in 11.5% of cases. We saw no port-site metastasis. To evaluate functional results following laparoscopic surgery a matched pair analysis was carried out. Matching of patients after laparoscopic and conventional open surgery was performed according to sex, age, type of resection, time period of surgery, and stage of disease classified by UICC. Regarding bladder and sexual dysfunction, using the EORTC QLQ CR38 score we found no statistical significant difference between the examined groups. As far as can be seen, laparoscopic surgery in rectal carcinoma may achieve the same or, in selected patients, even better results than open surgery. However, at present no published study has shown much evidence. Many more studies are necessary to define the place of laparoscopic technique in rectal cancer surgery, regarding appropriate selection of patients and evaluating adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment in combination with the laparoscopic approach.

Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate?

Numerous surgical procedures have been suggested to treat rectal prolapse. In elderly and high-risk patients, perineal approaches such as Delorme's procedure and perineal rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier's procedure) have been preferred, although the incidence of recurrence and the rate of persistent incontinence seem to be high when compared with transabdominal procedures. Functional results of transabdominal procedures, including mesh or suture rectopexy and resection-rectopexy, are thought to be associated with low recurrence rates and improved continence. Transabdominal procedures, however, usually imply rectal mobilization and fixation, colonic resection, or both, and some concern is voiced that morbidity, in terms of infection or leakage, and mortality could be increased. If we focus on surgical outcome, our own experience of laparoscopic resection-rectopexy for rectal prolapse shows that the laparoscopic approach is safe and effective, and functional results with respect to recurrence are favorable. However, the controversy "which operation is appropriate?" cannot be answered definitely, as a clear definition of rectal prolapse, the extent of a standardized diagnostic assessment, and the type of surgical procedure have not been identified in published series. Randomized trials are needed to improve the evidence with which the optimal surgical treatment of rectal prolapse can be defined.

[Obstructed defecation]. / Defäkationsobstruktion.

Adequate therapy of obstructed defecation (pelvic outlet obstruction) is often challenging, as the etiology and clinical symptoms include a wide range of disorders. Standardized diagnostic assessment has to differentiate between obstructed defecation caused by either pelvic outlet obstruction or slow transit constipation. Additionally, morphologic changes of colon, rectum, or the pelvic floor have to be separated from functional disorders. Providing defecography or dynamic MR of the pelvic floor, common causes of outlet obstruction such as sigmoidoceles, in which surgery is indicated, and rectal prolapse can be diagnosed with high accuracy. However, the diagnosis and therapeutic options in symptomatic rectocele and intussusception are controversial. Patients with functional disorders such as rectoanal dyssynergia are candidates for conservative treatment (biofeedback). To identify patients who will benefit from surgery for obstructed defecation, careful patient selection remains the crucial issue in diagnostic assessment.

Laparoscopic colectomy for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis: a prospective study of 396 patients.

BACKGROUND: It was the aim of this prospective study to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease. METHODS: All patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticular disease within a 10-year period were prospectively entered into a PC database registry. Indications for laparoscopic surgery were acute complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey stages I and IIa), chronically recurrent diverticulitis, sigmoid stenosis or outlet obstruction caused by chronic diverticulitis. Surgical procedures (sigmoid and anterior resection, left colectomy and resection rectopexy) included intracorporeal dissection and colorectal anastomosis. Parameters studied included age, gender, stage of disease, procedure, duration of surgery, intraoperative technical variables, transfusion requirements, conversion rate, total complication rate including major (requiring re-operation), minor (conservative treatment) and late-onset (post-discharge) complication rates, stay on ICU, hospitalisation, mortality, and recurrence. For objective evaluation, only laparoscopically completed procedures were analysed. Comparative outcome analysis was performed with respect to stage of disease and experience. RESULTS: A total of 396 patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy. Conversion rate was 6.8% ( n=27), so that laparoscopic completion rate was 93.2% ( n=369). Most common reasons for conversion were directly related to the inflammatory process, abscess or fistulas. The most common procedure was sigmoid resection ( n=279), followed by anterior resection ( n=36) and left colectomy ( n=29). Total complication rate was 18.4% ( n=68). Major complication rate was 7.6% ( n=28), whereas the most common complication requiring re-operation was haemorrhage in 3.3% ( n=12). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 1.6% ( n=6). Minor complications were noted in 10.7% ( n=40), late-onset complications occurred in 2.7% ( n=10). Mortality was 0.5% ( n=2). Mean duration of surgery was 193 (range 75-400) min, return to normal diet was completed after 6.8 (range 3-19) days. Mean hospital stay was 11.8 (range 4-71) days. No recurrence of diverticulitis occurred. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is safe, feasible and effective. Therefore, laparoscopic colectomy has replaced open resection as standard surgery for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis at our institution.

Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study analyzed the results of a standardized approach in anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection for rectal cancer without performance of a protective ileostomy during the primary operation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included all 306 patients with rectal cancer electively undergoing low anterior resection with retroperitonealization of the anastomosis over 9 years. The diagnostic procedure for anastomotic leakage included serum laboratory investigations and abdominal CT together with contrast enema. Minor leakages, i.e., small leakages and pelvic abscess, were treated with rectoscopic lavage and/or CT-guided drainage of the abscess, respectively. Major leakage was defined as broad insufficiency with or without septicemia. Nonseptic patients were treated by ileostomy and rectoscopic treatment. In septic patients a revision of the anastomosis with loop ileostomy was performed. RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage was diagnosed in 30 patients (overall 9.8%; 12 major, 18 minor leakages). Common clinical signs were pelvic pain and fever. No patient developed a peritonitis. The most accurate diagnostic instrument was CT (96.7%). CONCLUSION: Retroperitonealization appears to prevent peritonitis in patients with anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection. A differential treatment leads to good results in terms of mortality and anorectal function.

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: do differences in body mass indices lead to different outcomes?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients. METHODS: All patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for both benign and malignant disease within the past 5 years were entered into the prospective database registry. Body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)) was used as the objective measure to indicate morbid obesity. Patients with a BMI >30 were defined as obese, and patients with a BMI <30 were defined as nonobese. The parameters analyzed included age, gender, comorbid conditions, diagnosis, procedure, duration of surgery, transfusion requirements, conversion rate, overall morbidity rate including major complications (requiring reoperation), minor complications (conservative treatment) and late-onset complications (postdischarge), stay on intensive case unit, hospitalization, and mortality. For objective evaluation, only laparoscopically completed procedures were analyzed. Statistics included Student's t test and chi-square analysis. Statistical significance was assessed at the 5% level (p < 0. 05 statistically significant). RESULTS: A total of 589 patients were evaluated, including 95 patients in the obese group and 494 patients in the nonobese group. There was no significant difference in conversion rate (7.3% in the obese group vs 9.5% in the nonobese group, p > 0.05) so that the laparoscopic completion rate was 90.5% (n = 86) in the obese and 92.7% (n = 458) in the nonobese group. The rate of females was significantly lower among obese patients (55.8% in the obese group vs 74.2% in the nonobese group, p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed with respect to age, diagnosis, procedure, duration of surgery, and transfusion requirements (p > 0.05). In terms of morbidity, there were no significant differences related to overall complication rates with respect to BMI (23.3% in the obese group vs 24.5% in the nonobese group, p > 0.05). Major complications were more common in the obese group without showing statistical significance (12.8% in the obese group vs 6.6% in the nonobese group, p = 0.078). Conversely, minor complications were more frequently documented in the nonobese group (8.1% in the obese group vs 15.5% in the nonobese group, p = 0.080). In the postoperative course, no differences were documented in terms of return of bowel function, duration of analgesics required, oral feeding, and length of hospitalization (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that laparoscopic colorectal surgery is feasible and effective in both obese and nonobese patients. Obese patients who are thought to be at increased risk of postoperative morbidity have the similar benefit of laparoscopic surgery as nonobese patients with colorectal disease.

Uretero-iliac artery fistula--a rare cause of massive hematuria.

Uretero-arterial fistulae are rare. Immediate diagnosis and treatment are crucial in this life-threatening disorder and thus a uretero-arterial fistula in a patient with persistent hematuria should be taken into consideration. The authors report a case of a fistula between the right ureter and right common iliac artery.

[Surgical therapy of rectal carcinoma]. / Chirurgische Therapie des Rektumkarzinoms.

Total mesorectal excision (TME) has gained a revolutionary impact on the surgical therapy of rectal cancer within the last 2 decades, providing superior local tumor control in comparison to conventional resection. Consequently, 85% of rectal carcinomas can be resected by sphincter-preserving surgery without compromising either oncologic radicality or continence. With the introduction of TME, local recurrence rates have been reliably decreased below 10% after curative resection. Surgical dissection along the connective tissue space between rectal and parietal pelvic fascia with complete mesorectal excision results in reliable excision of all relevant lymphatic pathways with preservation of continence and sexual function. Complete removal of a TME specimen is mandatory in carcinomas of the middle and lower third of the rectum. Both removal of the complete TME specimen and careful pathologic examination of the circumferential resection margin have decisive significance. An additional pelvic lymphadenectomy with the potential risk of increased morbidity does not improve prognosis. As a spread of tumor distally along the bowel wall rarely exceeds a few centimeters, a distal resection margin of 1-2 cm is oncologically sufficient in sphincter-saving procedures without compromising prognosis. Taken together, the convincing results of TME provide a rationale for using TME as the dissection policy of choice to resect rectal cancers in the distal two-thirds of the rectum, despite the absence of direct evidence from prospective randomized trials. The question whether laparoscopic curative resection for rectal cancer is oncologically adequate cannot be definitely answered to date, as results of randomized studies are currently missing. However, the preliminary results of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer provided by centers are promising.

[Quality of life assessment after surgery for diverticulitis - a follow-up study]. / Lebensqualität nach chirurgischer Therapie einer Divertikulitis - Ergebnisse im Follow-up -

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sigmoid resection is a well established procedure for surgical treatment of benign colorectal diseases. The aim of the present study was to assess the longterm quality of life of patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoid resection for sigmoid diverticulitis. Differences in health related life quality to the open-conventional approach were evaluated in a matched pair analysis (age, gender, Hinchey-Stage, Type of Surgery) using a validated quality of life instrument. METHODS: A total of 45 matched pairs (laparoscopic/open) operated for diverticulitis at stage I-IIa (Hinchey classification) were included in this study. The quality of life was measured with the Short-Form-36-Health Survey (SF-36), a standardized questionnaire with 8 scales and 36 items. The follow-up period was at least 2 years (mean 62.2 months). RESULTS: Pair members (n = 45) operated via laparoscopic or open approach for Hinchey I-IIa diverticulitis were of the same sex (21 female/24 male pairs) and age at time of surgery (range: lap.: 53.5-66 years; open: 53.5-67 years). Mean follow-up periods for patients operated laparoscopically and with open procedure were 2 (range: 1-3) and 7 (range: 5-9) years, respectively. The SF-36 scale scores for both groups appeared high and only slightly below a validated norm population. This represents a high quality of life after open as well as laparoscopic surgery for sigmadiverticulitis. No significant differences were apparent between the 45 matched-pairs. Pairs 65 years old or older presented no significantly different score values compared to those younger than 65 years. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term follow-up data in this age and sex matched pair analysis showed favorable results after open as well as laparoscopic surgery for sigmadiverticulitis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two surgical techniques. Self-reports by the patient concerning his or her health condition, recovery and quality of life following any surgical procedure are needed to assess valid outcome data of new surgical treatments including a critical evaluation of all its benefits and burdens.

Oligoneuronal hypoganglionosis in patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation.

PURPOSE: Several alterations of the enteric nervous system have been described as an underlying neuropathologic correlate in patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation. To obtain comprehensive data on the structural components of the intramural nerve plexus, the colonic enteric nervous system was investigated in patients with slow-transit constipation and compared with controls by means of a quantitative morphometric analysis. METHODS: Resected specimens were obtained from ten patients with slow-transit constipation and ten controls (nonobstructive neoplasias) and processed for immunohistochemistry with the neuronal marker Protein Gene Product 9.5. The morphometric analysis was performed separately for the myenteric plexus and submucous plexus compartments and included the quantification of ganglia, neurons, glial cells, and nerve fibers. RESULTS: In patients with slow-transit constipation, the total ganglionic area and neuronal number per intestinal length as well as the mean neuron count per ganglion were significantly decreased within the myenteric plexus and external submucous plexus. The ratio of glial cells to neurons was significantly increased in myenteric ganglia but not in submucous ganglia. On statistical analysis, the histopathologic criteria (submucous giant ganglia and hypertrophic nerve fibers) of intestinal neuronal dysplasia previously described in patients with slow-transit constipation were not completely fulfilled. CONCLUSION: The colonic motor dysfunction in slow-transit constipation is associated with quantitative alterations of the enteric nervous system. The underlying defect is characterized morphologically by oligoneuronal hypoganglionosis. Because the neuropathologic alterations primarily affect the myenteric plexus and external submucous plexus, superficial submucous biopsies are not suitable to detect these innervational disorders.