Safety and Tolerability of Fremanezumab for the Prevention of Migraine: A Pooled Analysis of Phases 2b and 3 Clinical Trials.

OBJECTIVE: Presentation of pooled analysis of safety data for fremanezumab in patients with chronic (CM) or episodic migraine (EM) from 4 placebo-controlled phase 2b and phase 3 studies. BACKGROUND: There is a need for an effective, safe, and well-tolerated preventive therapy that specifically targets the pathophysiology of migraine to reduce the frequency and severity of migraine attacks in patients with CM or EM who experience 4 or more migraine days per month. Fremanezumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide, a neuropeptide involved in the pathophysiology of migraine. DESIGN/METHODS: The 4 placebo-controlled phases 2b and 3 studies included in this analysis were 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and parallel-group studies consisting of a screening visit, a 28-day pretreatment baseline period, and a 12-week treatment period with a final evaluation 4 weeks after the final dose of the study drug. Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and immunogenicity. RESULTS: A total of 2566 patients were randomized across all studies (fremanezumab, n = 1704; placebo, n = 862), and 2563 patients were treated. Common reasons for study discontinuation were withdrawal by patient (n = 78), patient lost to follow-up (n = 60), and AE (n = 50). The mean (standard deviation) duration of exposure was 83.8 (13.6) days for the patients who received fremanezumab, with a total exposure of 390.4 patient years and maximum exposure of 181 days. AEs were mostly mild to moderate in severity and were reported among 48-69% of patients in all treatment groups, and most were injection site reactions (pain, induration, and erythema). Two deaths occurred (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and intentional overdose of diphenhydramine), both of which were deemed unrelated to study drug by the investigators and sponsor. Cardiovascular adverse events, abnormal liver function tests, and hypersensitivity were uncommon and occurred at similar rates between the placebo and fremanezumab groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fremanezumab is a generally safe and well-tolerated preventive therapy for migraine in adults.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam with concomitant lamotrigine or concomitant topiramate in pooled Phase III randomized, double-blind trials: A post-hoc analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) with concomitant use of lamotrigine (LTG) or topiramate (TPM) in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures. METHODS: Data were pooled from three randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III studies (NCT00490035/N01252, NCT00464269/N01253, NCT01261325/N01358) of adults with focal (partial-onset) seizures. Patients taking concomitant levetiracetam were excluded from the efficacy populations, but included in the safety populations. This post-hoc analysis reports data from patients taking BRV in the approved therapeutic range (50-200mg/day) concomitantly with LTG or TPM. RESULTS: The number of patients in each of the three BRV dosage groups was small, particularly for the TPM subgroup. Mean percent reduction over placebo in baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency/28days for BRV 50, 100, and 200mg/day was 8.7, 5.3, and 8.9 in the LTG subgroup (n=220), and 8.4, 21.3, and -4.2 in the TPM subgroup (n=122). The ≥50% responder rate with concomitant LTG or TPM with BRV 50, 100, and 200mg/day or placebo was LTG: 28.1%, 36.1%, 34.1%, and 29.1%; and TPM: 14.3%, 44.4%, 25.0%, and 17.5%. There were numerically ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% responder rates for patients taking BRV ≥50mg/day compared with placebo in both subgroups. In the LTG and TPM safety populations (n=245 versus n=125), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported with LTG 68.7% versus 68.4%, and TPM 65.6% versus 57.8% (BRV ≥50mg/day versus placebo). Discontinuations due to TEAEs versus placebo were LTG 7.3% versus 6.3% and TPM 8.2% versus 4.7%. The three most frequently reported TEAEs for both subgroups were somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue. Of these, the incidence of fatigue in the LTG population appeared to increase with dose. SIGNIFICANCE: In this post-hoc pooled analysis, BRV administered with concomitant LTG or TPM reduced seizure frequency and was generally well tolerated for BRV doses of 50-200mg/day.

Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in patients with prior antiepileptic drug exposure: A post-hoc study.

Brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) for adjunctive treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures in adults with epilepsy. This post-hoc analysis was conducted to explore the efficacy of adjunctive BRV in patients with prior levetiracetam (LEV) exposure and whether changes in efficacy were related to the similar mechanism of action of these two drugs. Data were pooled from three Phase III studies (NCT00490035; NCT00464269; NCT01261325) of adults with focal seizures taking 1-2 AEDs who received placebo or BRV 50-200mg/day without titration over a 12-week treatment period. Patients taking concomitant LEV at enrollment were excluded from this analysis. Patients were categorized by their status of prior exposure to LEV, carbamazepine (CBZ), topiramate (TPM), or lamotrigine (LTG), to investigate any consistent trend towards reduced response in AED-exposed subgroups compared to AED-naïve subgroups, regardless of the mechanism of action. Study completion rates, percent reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency over placebo, ≥50% responder rates, and tolerability were evaluated for each subgroup. A total of 1160 patients were investigated. Study completion rates were similar in the AED-exposed subgroups and AED-naïve subgroups. In subgroups with (531 patients) or without (629 patients) prior LEV exposure, ≥50% responder rates for each dose of BRV compared with placebo were generally higher among the LEV-naïve subgroups than the previously LEV-exposed subgroups. LEV-exposed subgroups receiving BRV doses ≥50mg/day showed greater ≥50% responder rates than those receiving placebo. Similar results were observed for CBZ, TPM, and LTG. Previous treatment failure with commonly prescribed AEDs (LEV, CBZ, TPM, or LTG) is associated with a reduced response to BRV irrespective of the mechanism of action. Hence, this post-hoc analysis indicates that previous treatment failure with LEV does not preclude the use of BRV in patients with epilepsy.

Time to onset of sustained ≥50% responder status in patients with focal (partial-onset) seizures in three phase III studies of adjunctive brivaracetam treatment.

Time to onset of sustained ≥50% responder status (SRS) was assessed for the pooled patient population receiving brivaracetam (BRV) 50, 100, or 200 mg/day or placebo in three randomized phase III studies (NCT00464269, NCT00490035, and NCT01261325). Patients were aged ≥16 years with well-characterized focal (partial-onset) seizures (FS) uncontrolled by 1-2 concomitant antiepileptic drugs. After an 8-week baseline period, patients received study drug without up-titration for a 12-week (84-day) treatment period. A patient was a sustained ≥50% responder on a particular day if they completed the entire treatment period through day 84 and was a ≥50% responder (based on percent reduction in FS frequency from baseline) both on that day and every successive day until day 84 (end of treatment period). In the pooled efficacy population (N = 1,160), 15.5%, 18.1%, and 19.4% of patients taking BRV 50, 100, or 200 mg/day, respectively, achieved SRS on day 1 versus 6.7% for placebo (p < 0.001). Statistically significant SRS was also achieved for most of the BRV-treated groups in the three separate studies. This suggests that BRV has an early, sustained onset of action in a subset of responders. The incidence of adverse events during the first week was similar to that in the overall treatment period.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam for secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures: Pooled results from three Phase III studies.

PURPOSE: Secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (SGTCS) are among the most devastating types of seizures, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. Brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle 2A (SV2A), has been shown to be useful for the adjunctive treatment of focal seizures. We sought to determine its specific efficacy in treating SGTCS. METHODS: Data were pooled from three Phase III studies (NCT00490035; NCT00464269; NCT01261325) of adults with focal seizures taking 1-2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) who received placebo or BRV 50-200mg/day without titration over a 12-week treatment period. We report efficacy and safety/tolerability data for the BRV therapeutic dose range (50-200 mg/day) in patients with focal seizures including baseline SGTCS. RESULTS: Patients (efficacy population, N=409) had been diagnosed with epilepsy for a mean±standard deviation duration of 22.2±13.1years. Baseline median SGTCS frequency was 3.0 per 28days. The majority (293, 71.6%) had failed ≥2 AEDs prior to study enrollment. The median percent reduction from baseline in SGTCS frequency/28days was: placebo, 33.3%; BRV 50mg/day, 66.6% (p<0.001); BRV 100mg/day, 61.2% (p=0.002); and BRV 200mg/day, 82.1% (p<0.001). The ≥50% responder rate for SGTCS was: placebo, 33.0%; BRV 50mg/day, 61.3% (p=0.003); BRV 100mg/day, 55.0% (p<0.001); and BRV 200mg/day, 64.0% (p<0.001). Freedom from SGTCS was achieved by: placebo, 14.8%; BRV 50mg/day, 22.6%; BRV 100mg/day, 31.0%; and BRV 200mg/day, 36.0% of patients. Time to first SGTCS during the treatment period was longer in patients receiving BRV than placebo (26days vs 8days, hazard ratio 0.55, p<0.001). In the SGTCS safety population (N=487), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 60.6% of patients receiving placebo vs 65.0% of patients receiving BRV ≥50mg/day. Serious TEAEs were reported by 3.1% placebo vs 3.9% BRV ≥50mg/day. Discontinuations due to TEAEs were 3.9% placebo vs 6.3% BRV ≥50mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with drug-resistant focal seizures, adjunctive BRV is effective in reducing the frequency of SGTCS. Almost one-third (30.4%) of patients were rendered completely free of SGTCS during the 12-week treatment period when taking BRV ≥50mg/day. BRV was well tolerated, with a TEAE profile consistent with that of the overall study population.

Tolerability, safety, and efficacy of adjunctive brivaracetam for focal seizures in older patients: A pooled analysis from three phase III studies.

INTRODUCTION: This analysis was conducted to assess the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of brivaracetam (BRV) for adjunctive treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures in patients aged ≥65 years. METHODS: Safety/tolerability and efficacy data for patients aged ≥65 years were pooled from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose Phase III studies (NCT00490035, NCT00464269, and NCT01261325). Data were pooled by treatment group: placebo or the proposed therapeutic dose range of 50-200 mg/day: BRV 50, 100, 200mg/day. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients aged ≥65 years were randomized to placebo or BRV 50-200 mg/day. Of these, 30 patients (93.8%) completed their respective study. In the safety population (n=32), 87.5% placebo- vs 73.3% BRV-treated patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the treatment period; most commonly, headache (25.0% vs 12.5%), paresthesia (0% vs 12.5%), and somnolence (50.0% vs 12.5%) for placebo- vs BRV-treated patients, respectively. During the treatment period, drug-related TEAEs were reported by 62.5% of placebo- vs 53.3% of BRV-treated patients, and serious TEAEs (SAEs) were reported by 0% of placebo- and 4.2% of BRV-treated patients; there were no drug-related SAEs and no deaths. Three SAEs (placebo 1/8; BRV 2/24) and two deaths (placebo 1/8; BRV 1/24) occurred in the post-treatment period. In the efficacy population (n=31), median percent reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency/28days was 14.0% for placebo vs 25.5%, 49.6%, and 74.9% for BRV 50, 100, and 200 mg/day, respectively. The ≥50% responder rate was 14.3% for placebo vs 25.0%, 50.0%, and 66.7% for BRV 50, 100, and 200 mg/day, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Safety/tolerability and efficacy findings in this small subgroup of older patients treated with adjunctive BRV are consistent with those observed in the much larger overall pooled population. BRV may be a suitable adjunctive treatment for older patients with uncontrolled focal seizures. Further larger studies in this population are warranted.

Safety, tolerability, and seizure control during long-term treatment with adjunctive brivaracetam for partial-onset seizures.

OBJECTIVES: To report pooled safety/tolerability and seizure outcome data from adults with uncontrolled partial-onset (focal) seizures (POS) receiving adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) during phase IIb/III and long-term follow-up (LTFU) studies. METHODS: Seizure outcome data were pooled from phase IIb (NCT00175929 and NCT00175825), III/IIIb (NCT00490035, NCT00464269, NCT00504881, and NCT01261325) and associated LTFU studies (NCT00175916, NCT00150800, and NCT01339559). Safety/tolerability data were pooled from these studies plus NCT01405508, NCT01653262, and NCT01728077 (LTFU). Patients received placebo (during core studies) or BRV 5-200 mg/day. Safety/tolerability and seizure outcomes (BRV modal doses 50-200 mg/day) were assessed until January 17, 2014. RESULTS: Of 2,186 patients (97.3% with POS and 2.7% with other seizure types) who received BRV 50-200 mg/day, 2,051 (93.8%) completed core studies and continued in LTFU studies. Total BRV exposure: 5,339.4 patient-years (≥8.0 years in 41 patients); 6-, 12-, 24-, and 60-month retention: 91.0%, 79.8%, 68.1%, and 54.4%, respectively. Safety/tolerability data pooled from 2,186 patients: ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) reported by 1,848 (84.5%) patients; 1,184 (54.2%) reported ≥1 TEAE considered treatment-related. Most frequent TEAEs (≥10%): headache (20.9%), dizziness (17.5%), somnolence (15.2%), nasopharyngitis (13.2%), fatigue (11.3%), and convulsion (10.6%). Serious TEAEs (SAEs) and treatment-related SAEs: 401 (18.3%) and 95 (4.3%) patients, respectively. Of 28 (1.3%) deaths, four (14.3%) were considered possibly treatment related by the investigator. Pooled seizure outcome data (1,836 patients): median POS frequency/28 days at baseline was 8.9; on treatment, median percentage reduction from baseline in POS/28 days was 48.8%, and ≥50% responder rate was 48.7%. Complete seizure freedom: 4.9%, 4.2%, 3.0%, and 3.3% for ≥6, 12, 24, and 60 months, respectively. Improvements were seen in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from baseline, assessed by Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31. SIGNIFICANCE: Adjunctive BRV treatment in adults with POS was effective and generally well tolerated when administered long-term (≥8.0 years). Retention was high and HRQoL improvements were observed.

Efficacy and safety of brivaracetam for partial-onset seizures in 3 pooled clinical studies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for SV2A, for treatment of partial-onset (focal) seizures (POS) in adults. METHODS: Data were pooled from patients (aged 16-80 years) with POS uncontrolled by 1 to 2 antiepileptic drugs receiving BRV 50, 100, or 200 mg/d or placebo, without titration, in 3 phase III studies of BRV (NCT00490035, NCT00464269, and NCT01261325, ClinicalTrials.gov, funded by UCB Pharma). The studies had an 8-week baseline and a 12-week treatment period. Patients receiving concomitant levetiracetam were excluded from the efficacy pool. RESULTS: In the efficacy population (n = 1,160), reduction over placebo (95% confidence interval) in baseline-adjusted POS frequency/28 days was 19.5% (8.0%-29.6%) for 50 mg/d (p = 0.0015), 24.4% (16.8%-31.2%) for 100 mg/d (p < 0.00001), and 24.0% (15.3%-31.8%) for 200 mg/d (p < 0.00001). The ≥50% responder rate was 34.2% (50 mg/d, p = 0.0015), 39.5% (100 mg/d, p < 0.00001), and 37.8% (200 mg/d, p = 0.00003) vs 20.3% for placebo (p < 0.01). Across the safety population groups (n = 1,262), 90.0% to 93.9% completed the studies. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 68.0% BRV overall (n = 803) and 62.1% placebo (n = 459). Serious TEAEs were reported by 3.0% (BRV) and 2.8% (placebo); 3 patients receiving BRV and one patient receiving placebo died. TEAEs in ≥5% patients taking BRV (vs placebo) were somnolence (15.2% vs 8.5%), dizziness (11.2% vs 7.2%), headache (9.6% vs 10.2%), and fatigue (8.7% vs 3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive BRV was effective and generally well tolerated in adults with POS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This analysis provides Class I evidence that adjunctive BRV is effective in reducing POS frequency in adults with epilepsy and uncontrolled seizures.

Safety and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam as intravenous infusion or bolus in patients with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES: An intravenous (IV) formulation of brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, has been developed. We investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of adjunctive IV BRV administered as a bolus or infusion to adults with epilepsy. METHODS: A phase III, multicenter, randomized, four-arm, parallel-group study (NCT01405508) of patients aged 16-70 years with focal or generalized epilepsy uncontrolled by 1-2 antiepileptic drugs was undertaken. The study comprised a 7-day baseline period, a 7-day double-blind run-in period (oral BRV 200 mg/day or placebo [PBO] twice daily [BID]), and 4.5-day open-label evaluation period (IV BRV 200 mg/day BID; 2-min bolus or 15-min infusion, total nine doses). Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 PBO/BRV bolus; PBO/BRV infusion; BRV/BRV bolus; BRV/BRV infusion. Safety and tolerability were assessed using adverse events, electrocardiography, vital signs, and laboratory assessments. BRV plasma concentrations were measured before and 15 min after the first and last IV doses. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients randomized (53.3% women; 77.1% white; mean [standard deviation; SD] age 41.6 [12.2] years), 103 (98.1%) completed the study. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) incidence during IV BRV was similar whether IV BRV was initiated first (70.6%) or followed oral BRV (66.0%), and whether it was administered as a bolus (71.2%) or infusion (65.4%). Injection-related TEAEs were reported by 9.6% of patients following bolus and 11.5% following infusion. No serious TEAEs were reported. IV BRV plasma concentrations were higher after the first dose in the conversion groups than initiation groups, and slightly higher in the bolus arm than the infusion arm; concentrations were similar in all patients after the last IV dose. SIGNIFICANCE: IV BRV was generally well tolerated, with similar tolerability as a bolus or infusion and independent of de novo administration or as conversion from oral BRV tablets. IV BRV may be an option for patients who are unable to receive oral BRV.

Levetiracetam extended release for the treatment of patients with partial-onset seizures: A long-term, open-label follow-up study.

This was an open-label study (N01281 [NCT00419393]) assessing the long-term safety of extended-release levetiracetam (LEV XR) in patients with partial-onset seizures (POS); the study was a follow-up to a double-blind, randomized, historical controlled, multicenter, conversion to monotherapy study (N01280 [NCT00419094]). Eligible patients initially received LEV XR 2000 mg/day; dose adjustments and the addition of other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were permitted. Overall, 190 patients were enrolled, 189 (99.5%) received LEV XR (safety and efficacy populations) and 166 patients (87.4%) completed the study. The study duration in completed patients was 5.5-24.6 months. Mean daily dose of LEV XR was 2131 mg/day. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 126 patients (66.7%); most were of mild or moderate severity. Five patients (2.6%) had a TEAE that led to treatment discontinuation. Treatment-emergent serious adverse events occurred in 22 patients (11.6%). Twenty-six patients (13.8%) experienced a psychiatric TEAE. The median 7-day normalized POS frequency was: 1.38 at N01280 study baseline; 0.50 at the first visit of N01281 (last visit of N01280); and 0.00-0.36 between all subsequent visits. Overall, 171 patients (90.5%) entered the N01281 study on LEV XR monotherapy; 65.3% (32/49) of patients remained on monotherapy for 12 months and 47.1% (8/17) for 18 months. While remaining on LEV XR monotherapy, 27/139 patients (19.4%) were seizure-free at 6 months and 8/49 (16.3%) at 12 months. In conclusion, LEV XR was well tolerated when administered as long-term monotherapy or in combination with other AEDs in patients with inadequately controlled POS.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive brivaracetam in adult patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures.

OBJECTIVE: Brivaracetam (BRV), a selective and high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand, is in development as adjunctive treatment for partial-onset (focal) seizures (POS). This phase 3 study (N01358; NCT01261325) aimed to confirm the efficacy and safety/tolerability of BRV in adults (≥ 16-80 years) with POS. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study enrolled patients with uncontrolled POS despite ongoing treatment with 1-2 antiepileptic drugs. Patients exposed to levetiracetam ≤ 90 days before visit 1 were excluded. Patients entered an 8-week prospective baseline period, followed by a 12-week treatment period when they were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo (PBO), BRV 100 mg/day, or BRV 200 mg/day, started without up-titration. The co-primary efficacy outcomes were percent reduction over placebo in 28-day adjusted POS frequency, and ≥ 50% responder rate based on percent reduction in POS frequency from baseline to the treatment period. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-eight patients were randomized; 760 were included in the efficacy analysis: 259, 252, and 249 in PBO, BRV 100 mg/day, and BRV 200 mg/day groups, respectively. Percent reduction over PBO in 28-day adjusted seizure frequency (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 22.8% for BRV 100 mg/day (13.3-31.2%; p < 0.001) and 23.2% for BRV 200 mg/day (13.8-31.6%; p < 0.001). The ≥ 50% responder rate (odds ratio vs. PBO; 95% CI) was 21.6% for PBO, 38.9% for BRV 100 mg/day (2.39; 1.6-3.6; p < 0.001), and 37.8% for BRV 200 mg/day (2.19; 1.5-3.3; p < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 155 (59.4%) of 261 PBO patients versus 340 (67.6%) of 503 BRV-treated patients (safety population). Discontinuation rates due to TEAEs were 3.8%, 8.3%, and 6.8% for PBO, BRV 100 mg/day, and BRV 200 mg/day, respectively. Most frequent TEAEs (PBO versus BRV) were somnolence (7.7% vs. 18.1%), dizziness (5.0% vs. 12.3%), and fatigue (3.8% vs. 9.5%). SIGNIFICANCE: Adjunctive BRV 100 and 200 mg/day was efficacious in reducing POS in adults without concomitant levetiracetam use and was well tolerated.

Levetiracetam extended release conversion to monotherapy for the treatment of patients with partial-onset seizures: a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, historical control study.

This double-blind, randomised, multicentre, conversion to monotherapy, historical control study (N01280; NCT00419094) evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of levetiracetam extended release (LEV XR) 2000mg/day once daily for the treatment of patients with partial-onset seizures compared with a historical control. Patients aged 12-75 years with 2-40 partial-onset seizures per 4 weeks, taking 1-2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and receiving a stable dosage for ≥4 weeks prior to screening were randomised in a 3:1 ratio to LEV XR 2000 or 1000 mg/day. The study comprised baseline (8 weeks), LEV XR up-titration (2 weeks), baseline AED tapering (6 weeks), LEV XR monotherapy (10 weeks), and entry into open-label follow-up study or down-titration (1 week). The primary efficacy variable was the cumulative exit rate at Day 112 due to predefined exit criteria compared with the historical control. Of the 171 patients randomised to LEV XR 2000 mg/day and 57 randomised to 1000 mg/day, 141 (82.5%) and 50 (87.7%) completed the study. The cumulative exit rate for patients on LEV XR 2000 mg/day (0.375 [95% CI 0.297, 0.453]) was significantly lower than historical control (0.653). Both LEV doses were well tolerated. The most common adverse events during the treatment period were somnolence (21.9%), headache (19.7%) and convulsion (14.9%).

Assessment of behavioral and emotional functioning using standardized instruments in children and adolescents with partial-onset seizures treated with adjunctive levetiracetam in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (N01103, NCT00105040) evaluated behavioral and emotional effects of adjunctive levetiracetam (LEV) treatment in children and adolescents (4-16years old) with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Patients received adjunctive LEV 20-60mg/kg/day (n=64) or placebo (n=34) for 12weeks. The Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and portions of the Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) were used to assess behavioral and emotional functioning at baseline and end of the treatment period. Worsening of the mean CBCL Aggressive Behavior score occurred for LEV but not placebo, leading to similar results for Externalizing Syndromes and Total Problems (all P<0.05 vs placebo). The change in the CBCL Activities Competence score favored LEV (P<0.05). These results are in line with the known safety profile of LEV.

Epilepsia Reflexógena / Reflex Epilepsy

El reconocimiento del factor desencadenante de las crisis convulsivas es muy valioso y esencial en la interpretación de la naturaleza del ataque epiléptico en un pequeño grupo de pacientes. Se hace una descripción de las principales formas clínicas de crisis convulsivas desencadenadas por estímulos exógenos definidos. En el tratamiento se utilizan las drogas anticonvulsivantes de acuerdo al criterio médico y la identificación, prevención, atenuación o eliminación del factor desencadenante utilizando terapias comportamentales