Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Anim Sci ; 93(1): 46-52, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25568356

ABSTRACT

Heterosis, assumed proportional to expected breed heterozygosity, was calculated for 6834 individuals with birth, weaning and yearling weight records from Cycle VII and advanced generations of the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) Germplasm Evaluation (GPE) project. Breeds represented in these data included: Angus, Hereford, Red Angus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Simmental, Limousin and Composite MARC III. Heterosis was further estimated by proportions of British × British (B × B), British × Continental (B × C) and Continental × Continental (C × C) crosses and by breed-specific combinations. Model 1 fitted fixed covariates for heterosis within biological types while Model 2 fitted random breed-specific combinations nested within the fixed biological type covariates. Direct heritability estimates (SE) for birth, weaning ,and yearling weight for Model 1 were 0.42 (0.04), 0.22 (0.03), and 0.39 (0.05), respectively. The direct heritability estimates (SE) of birth, weaning, and yearling weight for Model 2 were the same as Model 1, except yearling weight heritability was 0.38 (0.05). The B × B, B × C, and C × C heterosis estimates for birth weight were 0.47 (0.37), 0.75 (0.32), and 0.73 (0.54) kg, respectively. The B × B, B × C, and C × C heterosis estimates for weaning weight were 6.43 (1.80), 8.65 (1.54), and 5.86 (2.57) kg, respectively. Yearling weight estimates for B × B, B × C, and C × C heterosis were 17.59(3.06), 13.88 (2.63), and 9.12 (4.34) kg, respectively. Differences did exist among estimates of breed-specific heterosis for weaning and yearling weight, although the variance component associated with breed-specific heterosis was not significant. These results illustrate that there are differences in breed-specific heterosis and exploiting these differences can lead to varying levels of heterosis among mating plans.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Birth Weight/genetics , Body Weight/genetics , Cattle/growth & development , Cattle/genetics , Animals , Female , Heterozygote , Hybrid Vigor , Models, Genetic , Regression Analysis , Reproduction/genetics , Weaning
2.
Meat Sci ; 98(4): 804-14, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25170816

ABSTRACT

The objectives were to determine the variation explained by the BovineSNP50v2 BeadChip for cholesterol (CH), polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), protein, and minerals in beef cattle, and to identify chromosomal regions that harbor major allelic variants underlying the variation of these traits. Crossbred steers and heifers (n=236) segregating at the inactive myostatin allele on BTA2 were harvested and steaks were sampled from the M. semitendinosus and the M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum for nutrient analysis. A Bayes C algorithm was employed in genome-wide association analysis. The resulting posterior heritability (SD) estimates ranged from 0.43 (0.10) to 0.71 (0.08) for lipid traits and 0.05 (0.08) to 0.75 (0.06) for mineral traits. Across cuts, correlations between genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were similar for CH, MUFA and PUFA. The top 0.5% 1-Mb windows for all traits explained up to 9.93% of the SNP variance. Slight differences did exist between cuts and between different measurement scales of fatty acids.


Subject(s)
Cholesterol/analysis , Dietary Proteins/analysis , Fatty Acids, Unsaturated/analysis , Genome-Wide Association Study/methods , Meat/analysis , Minerals/analysis , Animals , Cattle , Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated/analysis , Female , Male , Muscle, Skeletal
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...