Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 94(6 Suppl): 1785S-1793S, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21918213

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early introduction of solid food has been suspected to induce excessive infant energy intake and weight gain. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test whether introduction of solid foods influences energy intake or growth. DESIGN: Healthy, formula-fed infants who were recruited in 5 European countries were eligible for study participation. Anthropometric measurements were taken at recruitment and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 mo. Time of introduction of solid foods and energy intake were determined by questionnaires and 3-d weighed food records at monthly intervals. Age at introduction of solid food was categorized into 4 groups: ≤ 13 wk, 14-17 wk, 18-21 wk, and ≥ 22 wk. RESULTS: Of 1090 recruited infants, 830 (76%) had data available for age at first introduction of solid food, and 671 (61%) completed the study until 24 mo of age. The median age at introduction of solid food was 19 wk. The time of introduction of solid foods was associated with country, sex, birth weight, parental education and marital status, and maternal smoking. Energy intake was higher in the first 8 mo of life in children with solid-food intake. Solid-food introduction did not predict anthropometric measures at 24 mo. Growth trajectories differed significantly: children with solid-food introduction in the first 12 wk experienced early catch-up growth, whereas those introduced to solid food at >22 wk of age grew more slowly and stayed on lower trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: Solid foods do not simply replace infant formula but increase energy intake. Time of introduction of solid food has little influence on infant growth. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00338689.


Subject(s)
Child Development , Infant Formula/administration & dosage , Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Energy Intake , Europe , Female , Humans , Infant , Linear Models , Male , Milk , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Weaning , Weight Gain , White People
2.
Ann Nutr Metab ; 58(2): 109-17, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21487215

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little information is available on infants' age at first introduction of potentially allergenic foods as part of complementary feeding. We aimed to analyze age at the introduction of potentially allergenic foods in healthy term infants relative to recommendations in 5 European countries. METHOD: Recruitment was conducted from October 2002 to June 2004. A total of 1,678 infants [588 breastfed (BF) and 1,090 formula-fed (FF) infants] were studied. In 1,368 infants, at least one 3-day weighed food diary at the age of 1-9 and 12 completed months was available. RESULTS: Six percent of BF infants and 13% of FF infants consumed some potentially allergenic food already prior to the recommended minimum age of 4 months, and 4% of BF infants and 11% of FF infants had already received gluten. There were significant differences in the timing of the introduction of potentially allergenic foods between the countries at the age of 4-6 months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The time of first introduction of potentially allergenic foods in infants differed significantly between countries, and they were introduced much earlier than recommended in some countries. FF infants received potentially allergenic foods earlier than BF infants. Better information and counseling of parents is desirable.


Subject(s)
Allergens/administration & dosage , Food Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Infant Food , Allergens/immunology , Bottle Feeding , Breast Feeding , Cohort Studies , Diet Records , Double-Blind Method , Europe , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Behavior , Mothers/education , Patient Compliance , Patient Education as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Clin Nutr ; 29(6): 726-32, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20599300

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intake of energy providing liquids (EPL) other than breast milk or formula to infants is discouraged because it may displace milk intake. Data on actual practice is lacking. AIM: To describe the current practice of EPL supply to infants in five European countries. METHOD: Breastfed (BF) infants and infants fed using two formulae (FF) with different protein content were recruited from October 2002 to June 2004. Three-day weighed food protocols of 1368 infants were obtained monthly at the ages of 1 to 9 and again at 12 completed months. RESULTS: At the age of 4 months, 13% of BF and 43% of FF infants received EPL. FF infants started EPL earlier (median 17 weeks) than BF infants (median 30 weeks). EPL intake was associated with a lower intake of formula milk and solids (kcal/d) in the first year of life. Multiple regression analysis showed significant differences in EPL introduction between the individual countries. CONCLUSION: In contrast to recommendations, EPL is frequently given during the first months of life to breastfed and particularly to formula fed infants. Infants given EPL showed lower intakes of infant formula and solids. Caregivers should receive better counselling on appropriate infant feeding.


Subject(s)
Beverages , Energy Intake , Infant Formula , Milk, Human , Bottle Feeding , Breast Feeding , Drinking , Europe , Fruit/metabolism , Humans , Infant , Infant Food , Logistic Models , Vegetables/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...